Re: [CentOS] VLC Equivalent for CentOS 6.3
Am 10.09.2012 um 00:51 schrieb John R Pierce: > On 09/09/12 1:21 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote: >> Is there anything available in the CentOS 6.3 software catalog that can >> play a DVD? I am loath to install software from external repositories. >> That only leads to headaches. > > probably not because any legal DVD player software has to be licensed by > the DVD Forum to understand the decryption keys. any use of 'cracked' > keys is illegal, and Red Hat can't condone that. > > you can just download the RPM from here > http://pkgs.repoforge.org/vlc/vlc-1.1.13-1.el6.rf.x86_64.rpm or > http://pkgs.repoforge.org/vlc/vlc-1.1.13-1.el6.rf.i686.rpm > > if you don't want to configure the repo. there's also a mozilla plugin > that enables playing videos embedded in firefox in that same folder. i suggest to configure the corresponding repository - the player have a lot of (rpm pkgs) dependencies ... -- LF ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [Solved] C6 VM text install not recognizing LV
Hello James, On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 14:30 -0400, James B. Byrne wrote: > WAG? Is there a partition on the lv that the installer can find? I > run into this all the time when using an lv storage pool and an lv > based virtio drive. I first have to fdisk the newly allocated drive > and do a partprobe before the vm guest will recognize that it has the > space. The volume actually did contain a partition table, but I added it after accidentally formatting it as ext4. This confused the installer. Zeroing out the first 5k bytes and recreating the partition table with fdisk fixes the issue. I can reproduce this. When adding a partition table with fdisk after having formatted the volume (as ext4) the installer does not pick up the volume. Zeroing out of a few sectors (5k works, less might work too) and recreating the partition table and the installer sees the volume. Thank you for pointing me in the right direction. Regards, Leonard. -- mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] postfix mail server
On Sun, 2012-09-09 at 22:23 -0700, John R Pierce wrote: > On 09/09/12 9:57 PM, jiten jha wrote: > > I have postfix mail server it is running fine . In my mail server all users > > are virtual. Can I merge all users with his/her mails in mysql or > > postgresql database. > what exactly do you mean by 'merge all users' ? I assume he means create one map that knows about all users - the answer is yes. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] VLC Equivalent for CentOS 6.3 (SOLVED)
On Sunday, September 09, 2012 09:55:56 PM Mark LaPierre wrote: > I just installed the Fluendo DVD player. Cost me $20. Its playing > Shrek right now. Swaps to full screen and back without a hitch. > http://www.fluendo.com/shop/product/fluendo-dvd-player/ While there have been a few legal DVD players for Linux over the years, to the best of my knowledge the Fluendo product is the only 'legal licensed fully paid up' one that still is fully supported by the developer. Fluendo also has a legal MP3 decoder that is a no-cost download, and a full codec pack that has a small cost for fully legal gstreamer decode plugins. The harder software packages to find for Linux in fully licensed and legal form are the encoders.. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 91, Issue 6
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. CEBA-2012:1247 CentOS 6 libdvdread FASTTRACK Update
(Johnny Hughes)
--
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 15:15:39 +
From: Johnny Hughes
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:1247 CentOS 6 libdvdread
FASTTRACK Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: <20120910151539.ga20...@chakra.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:1247
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1247.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
cc0abd3827fc4a7b9be2c4d51eab07dbe8e45cc704f7614d5ba24500c54ecfaf
libdvdread-4.1.4-0.3.svn1183.el6.i686.rpm
7980ee5a7ba4fa480fb94be15c5772bf02292ed0dcd759fdd38826949fdf52a2
libdvdread-devel-4.1.4-0.3.svn1183.el6.i686.rpm
x86_64:
cc0abd3827fc4a7b9be2c4d51eab07dbe8e45cc704f7614d5ba24500c54ecfaf
libdvdread-4.1.4-0.3.svn1183.el6.i686.rpm
4dfd44b3d382d9b9870a45370b11cb499abb0ab0c8ff47a704c8380fe3dcdf49
libdvdread-4.1.4-0.3.svn1183.el6.x86_64.rpm
7980ee5a7ba4fa480fb94be15c5772bf02292ed0dcd759fdd38826949fdf52a2
libdvdread-devel-4.1.4-0.3.svn1183.el6.i686.rpm
853a1c33722a417489460d4d4a3135cd491f108b24bc7f207be2a8099e4a4a8e
libdvdread-devel-4.1.4-0.3.svn1183.el6.x86_64.rpm
Source:
12315446d73198c35d8cc58284dc3c7ff982fb2ae3f891f38413eab897395c9e
libdvdread-4.1.4-0.3.svn1183.el6.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
centos-annou...@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 91, Issue 6
**
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Basic KVM networking question
A CentOS 6.3 box ("host") runs several KVM virtual machines, each of which
has two interfaces attached to the two bridges br1 and br2 (and each thus
has two IP's; one on 192.168.0.0/22 and one on 192.168.4.0/22);
net.ipv4.ip_forward on the host is 1. Simplified diagram:
host
+---+
| |
net1 = 192.168.0.0/22 | | net2 = 192.168.4.0/22
---+ br1 br2 +-
| | ||
| | ||
Client A +---+Client B
(hosts KVM1, KVM2, etc)
Each client uses the bridge's IP address on the same side as default
gateway. Client A can successfully ping or ssh (for example) to a KVM
machine by IP address by using the KVM machine's net1 IP address. Client B
can likewise communicate using the KVM machine's net2 IP address. However,
neither client can communicate by using the address on the opposing
segment (eg, Client A using KVM1_net2_IP); I can see from tcpdump that the
packets are received by the virtual machine but no reply is ever made. Any
clue?
Steve
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] ldap 2.4 for centos 5/rhel 5
Hi, Is there any good source for openldap-server 2.4 version for centos 5 / rhel 5 ? -- Eero ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Basic KVM networking question
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Steve Thompson wrote:
>
> A CentOS 6.3 box ("host") runs several KVM virtual machines, each of which
> has two interfaces attached to the two bridges br1 and br2 (and each thus
> has two IP's; one on 192.168.0.0/22 and one on 192.168.4.0/22);
> net.ipv4.ip_forward on the host is 1. Simplified diagram:
>
> host
> +---+
> | |
>net1 = 192.168.0.0/22 | | net2 = 192.168.4.0/22
>---+ br1 br2 +-
>| | ||
>| | ||
>Client A +---+Client B
> (hosts KVM1, KVM2, etc)
>
> Each client uses the bridge's IP address on the same side as default
> gateway. Client A can successfully ping or ssh (for example) to a KVM
> machine by IP address by using the KVM machine's net1 IP address. Client B
> can likewise communicate using the KVM machine's net2 IP address. However,
> neither client can communicate by using the address on the opposing
> segment (eg, Client A using KVM1_net2_IP); I can see from tcpdump that the
> packets are received by the virtual machine but no reply is ever made. Any
> clue?
Routing problem? What are the response to each of the commands below on
all five systems: host, Client A and B, KVM1 and 2:
# ip addr show
# ip route show
--
Dale Dellutri
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Basic KVM networking question
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, Dale Dellutri wrote: > Routing problem? Not that I can see, but here is the info (omitting interfaces that are not up). I included on one KVM since the problem is common to the others, and they are all set up the same way. On the host: 3: em2: mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP qlen 1000 link/ether 84:2b:2b:47:e8:7d brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet6 fe80::862b:2bff:fe47:e87d/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 4: p1p1: mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP qlen 1000 link/ether 00:1b:21:6f:2b:4c brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet6 fe80::21b:21ff:fe6f:2b4c/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 7: br1: mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN link/ether 84:2b:2b:47:e8:7d brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.4.2/22 brd 192.168.7.255 scope global br1 inet6 fe80::862b:2bff:fe47:e87d/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 8: br2: mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN link/ether 00:1b:21:6f:2b:4c brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.0.2/22 brd 192.168.3.255 scope global br2 inet6 fe80::21b:21ff:fe6f:2b4c/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 10: virbr0: mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN link/ether 52:54:00:9d:ad:f7 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.122.1/24 brd 192.168.122.255 scope global virbr0 11: virbr0-nic: mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN qlen 500 link/ether 52:54:00:9d:ad:f7 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 12: vnet0: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UNKNOWN qlen 500 link/ether fe:54:00:13:73:28 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet6 fe80::fc54:ff:fe13:7328/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 13: vnet1: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UNKNOWN qlen 500 link/ether fe:54:00:12:99:dd brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet6 fe80::fc54:ff:fe12:99dd/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 14: vnet2: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UNKNOWN qlen 500 link/ether fe:54:00:72:f5:33 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet6 fe80::fc54:ff:fe72:f533/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 192.168.122.0/24 dev virbr0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.122.1 192.168.4.0/22 dev br1 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.4.2 192.168.0.0/22 dev br2 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.2 default via 192.168.0.1 dev br2 On KVM1: 2: eth0: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP qlen 1000 link/ether 52:54:00:13:73:28 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.3.253/22 brd 192.168.3.255 scope global eth0 inet6 fe80::5054:ff:fe13:7328/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 3: eth1: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP qlen 1000 link/ether 52:54:00:12:99:dd brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.7.253/22 brd 192.168.7.255 scope global eth1 inet6 fe80::5054:ff:fe12:99dd/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 192.168.4.0/22 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.7.253 192.168.0.0/22 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.3.253 default via 192.168.0.1 dev eth0 On client A: 2: eth0: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP qlen 1000 link/ether 00:14:22:27:9b:51 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.0.172/22 brd 192.168.3.255 scope global eth0 inet6 fe80::214:22ff:fe27:9b51/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 192.168.0.0/22 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.172 default via 192.168.0.2 dev eth0 On client B: 2: eth0: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000 link/ether 00:19:b9:c7:23:ad brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.5.241/22 brd 192.168.7.255 scope global eth0 inet6 fe80::219:b9ff:fec7:23ad/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 192.168.4.0/22 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.5.241 default via 192.168.4.1 dev eth0 -Steve ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Basic KVM networking question
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Steve Thompson wrote: > On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, Dale Dellutri wrote: > >> Routing problem? > > Not that I can see, but here is the info (omitting interfaces that are not > up). I included on one KVM since the problem is common to the others, and > they are all set up the same way. > > On the host: > > 3: em2: mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP qlen 1000 > link/ether 84:2b:2b:47:e8:7d brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > inet6 fe80::862b:2bff:fe47:e87d/64 scope link > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > 4: p1p1: mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP qlen > 1000 > link/ether 00:1b:21:6f:2b:4c brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > inet6 fe80::21b:21ff:fe6f:2b4c/64 scope link > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > 7: br1: mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN > link/ether 84:2b:2b:47:e8:7d brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > inet 192.168.4.2/22 brd 192.168.7.255 scope global br1 > inet6 fe80::862b:2bff:fe47:e87d/64 scope link > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > 8: br2: mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN > link/ether 00:1b:21:6f:2b:4c brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > inet 192.168.0.2/22 brd 192.168.3.255 scope global br2 > inet6 fe80::21b:21ff:fe6f:2b4c/64 scope link > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > 10: virbr0: mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state > UNKNOWN > link/ether 52:54:00:9d:ad:f7 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > inet 192.168.122.1/24 brd 192.168.122.255 scope global virbr0 > 11: virbr0-nic: mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN qlen 500 > link/ether 52:54:00:9d:ad:f7 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > 12: vnet0: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state > UNKNOWN qlen 500 > link/ether fe:54:00:13:73:28 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > inet6 fe80::fc54:ff:fe13:7328/64 scope link > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > 13: vnet1: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state > UNKNOWN qlen 500 > link/ether fe:54:00:12:99:dd brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > inet6 fe80::fc54:ff:fe12:99dd/64 scope link > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > 14: vnet2: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state > UNKNOWN qlen 500 > link/ether fe:54:00:72:f5:33 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > inet6 fe80::fc54:ff:fe72:f533/64 scope link > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > > 192.168.122.0/24 dev virbr0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.122.1 > 192.168.4.0/22 dev br1 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.4.2 > 192.168.0.0/22 dev br2 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.2 > default via 192.168.0.1 dev br2 > > On KVM1: > > 2: eth0: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP > qlen 1000 > link/ether 52:54:00:13:73:28 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > inet 192.168.3.253/22 brd 192.168.3.255 scope global eth0 > inet6 fe80::5054:ff:fe13:7328/64 scope link > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > 3: eth1: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP > qlen 1000 > link/ether 52:54:00:12:99:dd brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > inet 192.168.7.253/22 brd 192.168.7.255 scope global eth1 > inet6 fe80::5054:ff:fe12:99dd/64 scope link > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > > 192.168.4.0/22 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.7.253 > 192.168.0.0/22 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.3.253 > default via 192.168.0.1 dev eth0 > > On client A: > > 2: eth0: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP > qlen 1000 > link/ether 00:14:22:27:9b:51 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > inet 192.168.0.172/22 brd 192.168.3.255 scope global eth0 > inet6 fe80::214:22ff:fe27:9b51/64 scope link > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > > 192.168.0.0/22 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.172 > default via 192.168.0.2 dev eth0 > > On client B: > > 2: eth0: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000 > link/ether 00:19:b9:c7:23:ad brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > inet 192.168.5.241/22 brd 192.168.7.255 scope global eth0 > inet6 fe80::219:b9ff:fec7:23ad/64 scope link > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > > 192.168.4.0/22 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.5.241 > default via 192.168.4.1 dev eth0 This looks like it should work for Client A, but maybe not for Client B (see below). So maybe it's a firewall problem (iptables chain FORWARD) on the host? Client B's default route is 192.168.4.1. This address is not on the host. Did you mean to use .2? If not, is .1 aware of the routing to the 192.168.0.0/22 network? -- Dale Dellutri ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Basic KVM networking question
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, Dale Dellutri wrote: > This looks like it should work for Client A, but maybe not for Client B (see > below). So maybe it's a firewall problem (iptables chain FORWARD) on the > host? > > Client B's default route is 192.168.4.1. This address is not on the host. > Did you mean to use .2? If not, is .1 aware of the routing to the > 192.168.0.0/22 network? Actually I have two similar setups, one with .1 and one with .2, so I mixed up the examples here. But in reality it is setup up correctly. And it doesn't work for either client :-( Steve ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Basic KVM networking question
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, Steve Thompson wrote: > On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, Dale Dellutri wrote: > >> This looks like it should work for Client A, but maybe not for Client B (see >> below). So maybe it's a firewall problem (iptables chain FORWARD) on the >> host? >> >> Client B's default route is 192.168.4.1. This address is not on the host. >> Did you mean to use .2? If not, is .1 aware of the routing to the >> 192.168.0.0/22 network? > > Actually I have two similar setups, one with .1 and one with .2, so I > mixed up the examples here. But in reality it is setup up correctly. > And it doesn't work for either client :-( Let me expand on this. There is no issue with a client on net1 communicating with a client on net2; the host passes packets from one subnet to the other as it should. The only issue is when the client is a virtual machine on the host. Steve ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Basic KVM networking question
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Steve Thompson wrote: > > > Each client uses the bridge's IP address on the same side as default > gateway. What does that mean? A bridge shouldn't have an address and a gateway needs to be the IP of something capable of routing. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Need versions of automake and autoconf not in repository
I have the latest updates to CentOS 5.6. However, I need different versions of autoconf and automake. How can this be handled? What will happen on later updates? Currently I have autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.59 automake (GNU automake) 1.9.6 I need autoconf 2.69-1 and automake 1.11.6. Thanks, John -- John J. Boyer; President, Chief Software Developer Abilitiessoft, Inc. http://www.abilitiessoft.com Madison, Wisconsin USA Developing software for people with disabilities For a description of the software, to download it and links to project pages go to http://www.abilitiessoft.com - End forwarded message - -- John J. Boyer; President, Chief Software Developer Abilitiessoft, Inc. http://www.abilitiessoft.com Madison, Wisconsin USA Developing software for people with disabilities ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Need versions of automake and autoconf not in repository
Am 10.09.2012 um 22:39 schrieb John J. Boyer: > I have the latest updates to CentOS 5.6. However, I need different > versions of autoconf and automake. How can this be handled? What will > happen on later updates? Currently I have > > autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.59 > automake (GNU automake) 1.9.6 > > I need > > autoconf 2.69-1 and automake 1.11.6. Hi John, i think you have to build them manually and install them separately (e. g. /usr/local/bin). The configure script of your code should find them (via PATH). Regards LF ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Need versions of automake and autoconf not in repository
I use the environmental modules to provide software that isn't provided by the base OS. http://modules.sf.net will be a good start. You can also look at building your own versions regardless if you choose to implement modules to wrap on top - Original Message - | I have the latest updates to CentOS 5.6. However, I need different | versions of autoconf and automake. How can this be handled? What will | happen on later updates? Currently I have | | autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.59 | | automake (GNU automake) 1.9.6 | | I need | | autoconf 2.69-1 and automake 1.11.6. | | Thanks, | John | -- | John J. Boyer; President, Chief Software Developer | Abilitiessoft, Inc. | http://www.abilitiessoft.com | Madison, Wisconsin USA | Developing software for people with disabilities | | For a description of the software, to download it and links to | project pages go to http://www.abilitiessoft.com | | - End forwarded message - | | -- | John J. Boyer; President, Chief Software Developer | Abilitiessoft, Inc. | http://www.abilitiessoft.com | Madison, Wisconsin USA | Developing software for people with disabilities | | ___ | CentOS mailing list | CentOS@centos.org | http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos | -- James A. Peltier Manager, IT Services - Research Computing Group Simon Fraser University - Burnaby Campus Phone : 778-782-6573 Fax : 778-782-3045 E-Mail : jpelt...@sfu.ca Website : http://www.sfu.ca/itservices http://blogs.sfu.ca/people/jpeltier Success is to be measured not so much by the position that one has reached in life but as by the obstacles they have overcome. - Booker T. Washington ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Basic KVM networking question
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, Les Mikesell wrote: > What does that mean? A bridge shouldn't have an address and a > gateway needs to be the IP of something capable of routing. Sure it has an address: # ip addr show br1 7: br1: mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN ... inet 192.168.4.2/22 brd 192.168.7.255 scope global br1 inet6 fe80::862b:2bff:fe47:e87d/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever -s ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Basic KVM networking question
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Steve Thompson wrote: > >> What does that mean? A bridge shouldn't have an address and a >> gateway needs to be the IP of something capable of routing. > > Sure it has an address: > > # ip addr show br1 > 7: br1: mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN > ... > inet 192.168.4.2/22 brd 192.168.7.255 scope global br1 > inet6 fe80::862b:2bff:fe47:e87d/64 scope link > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > > -s Do the things you are trying to reach have a route back through the KVM host? -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Basic KVM networking question
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, Les Mikesell wrote: > Do the things you are trying to reach have a route back through the KVM host? Yep. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Are the CentOS forums available as RSS feeds?
Newcomer to CentOS, have signed up for the mailing lists and tried unsuccessfully to find newsfeeds for the forums. Hoping someone here might know better? Thanks. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] VLC Equivalent for CentOS 6.3 (SOLVED)
On 09/10/2012 09:35 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: > On Sunday, September 09, 2012 09:55:56 PM Mark LaPierre wrote: >> I just installed the Fluendo DVD player. Cost me $20. Its playing >> Shrek right now. Swaps to full screen and back without a hitch. > >> http://www.fluendo.com/shop/product/fluendo-dvd-player/ > > While there have been a few legal DVD players for Linux over the years, to > the best of my knowledge the Fluendo product is the only 'legal licensed > fully paid up' one that still is fully supported by the developer. Fluendo > also has a legal MP3 decoder that is a no-cost download, and a full codec > pack that has a small cost for fully legal gstreamer decode plugins. > > The harder software packages to find for Linux in fully licensed and legal > form are the encoders.. > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > Linux users too often flaunt the law by using patented software illegally. By doing so we refuse to support those who invest their funds and blood to produce compatible software. Then we complain about companies not supporting Linux. I wonder who is at fault for that. ;-) No, I don't support the concept of software patents, but let's not go there right now. I, for one, have no problem with supporting companies who support Linux. I buy software and hardware from vendors who support Linux, and I take the time to write to those who don't to complain. Maybe if more of us would support companies who support Linux there would be more companies willing to make the investment required to support Linux. Now don't think that I'm not an open source supporter. I use it when I can get it because open source leads to innovation and improved data security. Where are all those people who use proprietary software that uses proprietary file formats going to go when the company they have been depending on decides to abandon their customers. -- _ °v° /(_)\ ^ ^ Mark LaPierre Registerd Linux user No #267004 www.counter.li.org ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] ntop for centos 5.8
Hi, Are there rpm binaries for ntop for CentOS Linux version 5.8? Regards, Kaushal ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] VLC Equivalent for CentOS 6.3 (SOLVED)
On 09/10/12 4:39 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote: > Where are all those people who use proprietary software that > uses proprietary file formats going to go when the company they have > been depending on decides to abandon their customers. when that happens, the proprietary formats should die with the company that created them. anyways, we're dealing with a very specific situation here, the DVD Forum, which was created by the electronics companies that make the players, and the media companies that sell the DVDs, has refused to allow an open source player even after DeCSS proved out futile the media copy protection is. If you buy a movie on DVD, you can't even make an m4v copy to watch on your iphone many linux users are quite adamant about only running open source code on their systems. -- john r pierceN 37, W 122 santa cruz ca mid-left coast ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ntop for centos 5.8
Le 2012-09-11 03:04, Kaushal Shriyan a écrit : > Hi, > > Are there rpm binaries for ntop for CentOS Linux version 5.8? > > Regards, > > Kaushal Old packages (3.3.8) available here: http://pkgs.repoforge.org/ntop/ ...and how to setup the repository: http://repoforge.org/use/ -- Laurent. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] postfix mail server
my answer is not. I mean I have 400 user with his/her mails. So can I shift or move all mails and users in MYSQL (database) . On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > On Sun, 2012-09-09 at 22:23 -0700, John R Pierce wrote: > > On 09/09/12 9:57 PM, jiten jha wrote: > > > I have postfix mail server it is running fine . In my mail server all > users > > > are virtual. Can I merge all users with his/her mails in mysql or > > > postgresql database. > > what exactly do you mean by 'merge all users' ? > > I assume he means create one map that knows about all users - the answer > is yes. > > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > -- Thanks & Regards Jitendra Jha +91-7498370550 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] postfix mail server
On 09/10/12 9:13 PM, jiten jha wrote: > my answer is not. I mean I have 400 user with his/her mails. So can I shift > or move all mails and users in MYSQL (database) . shift or move all mail and users from where to where ? do you mean between two servers, or ?? -- john r pierceN 37, W 122 santa cruz ca mid-left coast ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] postfix mail server
I mean I have postfix server i want to merge all mail and users in mysql. On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:04 AM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 09/10/12 9:13 PM, jiten jha wrote: > > my answer is not. I mean I have 400 user with his/her mails. So can I > shift > > or move all mails and users in MYSQL (database) . > > > shift or move all mail and users from where to where ? do you mean > between two servers, or ?? > > > > -- > john r pierceN 37, W 122 > santa cruz ca mid-left coast > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -- Thanks & Regards Jitendra Jha +91-7498370550 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
