[CentOS] Monitoring services

2011-11-27 Thread Kenneth Porter
What's available to remotely monitor services? What I'd like is something 
that can run scripts for each service to connect to a port and verify that 
it's up, and then send me an SMS message (phone text) to let me know which, 
if any, are down.

Also, does a script exist that checks all the services listed by chkconfig 
and reports those that should be up but are down?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Monitoring services

2011-11-27 Thread Corey Henderson
On 11/27/2011 4:01 PM, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> What's available to remotely monitor services? What I'd like is something
> that can run scripts for each service to connect to a port and verify that
> it's up, and then send me an SMS message (phone text) to let me know which,
> if any, are down.
>

Nagios ( http://www.nagios.org/ ) is one of the many pieces of software 
that can do this.

> Also, does a script exist that checks all the services listed by chkconfig
> and reports those that should be up but are down?

None that I'm aware of. If you're going to write one, keep in mind that 
some init scripts list as "on" in chkconfig and run on boot but don't 
actually launch a process.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Monitoring services

2011-11-27 Thread Kenneth Porter
--On Sunday, November 27, 2011 4:22 PM -0700 Corey Henderson 
 wrote:

> None that I'm aware of. If you're going to write one, keep in mind that
> some init scripts list as "on" in chkconfig and run on boot but don't
> actually launch a process.

True. I was thinking that a script could run "chkconfig --list" to first 
find the processes that should be running, then run "service $servicename 
status" on each to look for ones that were down. Alas, I don't think 
there's a standard for the output, but the oddballs that don't match RHEL's 
conventions should be few.


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Monitoring services

2011-11-27 Thread John Broome
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 18:01, Kenneth Porter  wrote:

> What's available to remotely monitor services? What I'd like is something
> that can run scripts for each service to connect to a port and verify that
> it's up, and then send me an SMS message (phone text) to let me know which,
> if any, are down.
>
> Also, does a script exist that checks all the services listed by chkconfig
> and reports those that should be up but are down?
>
>
Not sure about the second one, but we used siteuptime.com at my last job
for external checks, and I'm using the free version of pingdom to keep an
eye on my VPS.

Both can be configured to check a port every X amount of time and report
back.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Monitoring services

2011-11-27 Thread Alan McKay
Nagios is probably the most popular, and is pretty powerful and
relatively easy to write your own plugins for.

I have to look at this in my new job in the next month or so.  I'm
going to have a look at Zenoss and if that does not pan out and
nothing else turns up I'll fall back to Nagios.

Really there is not anything bad you can say about Nagios for this
specific purpose other than that the web monitoring GUI is kind of
ugly (or was in the last version I used about 2 years ago).  But
Zenoss advertises that it does this plus a number of other things I
need so I could kill a few birds with one stone there.



-- 
“Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV”
         - Michael Pollan, author of "In Defense of Food"
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Monitoring services

2011-11-27 Thread Craig White
On Sun, 2011-11-27 at 20:56 -0500, Alan McKay wrote:
> Nagios is probably the most popular, and is pretty powerful and
> relatively easy to write your own plugins for.
> 
> I have to look at this in my new job in the next month or so.  I'm
> going to have a look at Zenoss and if that does not pan out and
> nothing else turns up I'll fall back to Nagios.
> 
> Really there is not anything bad you can say about Nagios for this
> specific purpose other than that the web monitoring GUI is kind of
> ugly (or was in the last version I used about 2 years ago).  But
> Zenoss advertises that it does this plus a number of other things I
> need so I could kill a few birds with one stone there.

I like Zenoss

Craig


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Monitoring services

2011-11-27 Thread Yu Watanabe
>Nagios is probably the most popular, and is pretty powerful and
>relatively easy to write your own plugins for.
>
>I have to look at this in my new job in the next month or so.  I'm
>going to have a look at Zenoss and if that does not pan out and
>nothing else turns up I'll fall back to Nagios.
>
>Really there is not anything bad you can say about Nagios for this
>specific purpose other than that the web monitoring GUI is kind of
>ugly (or was in the last version I used about 2 years ago).  But
>Zenoss advertises that it does this plus a number of other things I
>need so I could kill a few birds with one stone there.

  We use nagios. I like the basic priciple of this software. Very simple theory.
  But you would need a software that can manage the configuration data.

Thanks,
Yu

>
>
>
>-- 
>泥on't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV・
>\xA0 \xA0 \xA0 \xA0\xA0 - Michael Pollan, author of "In Defense of Food"
>___
>CentOS mailing list
>CentOS@centos.org
>http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos