[CentOS] DSL battling rojter - help!
My internet connection is through a Siemens Speedstream 4100 DSL modem connected to AT&T (sbcglobal.net), and a Dlink WBR-2310 router. Late last night, I changed the administrative password on the router, and for some reason it didn't take right, so I had to reset the router to get the password cleared. Unfortunately, this also lost all my connection settings to the DSL, and I lost the internet for a while. After some effort and a couple of phone calls to AT&T technical support, I determined the following: 1. If I connect my CentOS (main) box to the DSL modem, I can log into the modem and check all the settings, and I can ping sites on the web from there, but I can't actually get any web pages to load. This is using Firefox 3.6.4 (the L&G). 2. If I connect a WinXP box to the modem, it gets to the web without any trouble. 3. If I connect the router to the modem and run the machines through the router, no one gets to the web. I managed to get it to a point where I could acquire an IP address, but nothing on the web was visible. I'll figure out the router problem one way or another, but it really concerns me that I couldn't get to the web from my CentOS box at all. Before the router password fiasco, everything was working absolutely perfectly, and I did not change ANY settings on my machines. Now, I do have a line in /etc/hosts that sets my machine id, and its IP address to 192.168.0.100, which is what it normally should be for access through the router as it is the primary machine on it. (I need that because my VMWare SMB is set up to use that for connections between my virtual XP machine and my CentOS host.) Could that be the problem with internet access directly through the DSL modem? If so, how do I change this to ensure that the hostname is set properly but the IP address matches whatever the DSL modem gives back? How do I then also ensure that the hostname and address are set right so my host-VMWare samba connection still work? Otherwise, what? Thanks. Mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] 2X app server alternatives
Does anyone know any oss alternatives to 2x aplication server ? Regards, Silviu Hutanu ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] DSL battling rojter - help!
On Sun, 2010-07-18 at 01:26 -0700, Mark wrote: > 1. If I connect my CentOS (main) box to the DSL modem, I can log into > the modem and check all the settings, and I can ping sites on the web > from there, but I can't actually get any web pages to load. This is > using Firefox 3.6.4 (the L&G). No proper default gateway or dns server aettings. Of which some dsl modems under linux you have to hard code those settings on the machine. If your using dhcp and then go to make changes make sure to use "dhclient" from the cmd line. > 2. If I connect a WinXP box to the modem, it gets to the web without > any trouble. Yea winblows does a great job at this. > 3. If I connect the router to the modem and run the machines through > the router, no one gets to the web. I managed to get it to a point > where I could acquire an IP address, but nothing on the web was > visible. Right, because the DSL Router is not in Bridged Mode. Enable Bridged mode on the Siemens Modem. > I'll figure out the router problem one way or another, but it really > concerns me that I couldn't get to the web from my CentOS box at all. See above. > Before the router password fiasco, everything was working absolutely > perfectly, and I did not change ANY settings on my machines. > > Now, I do have a line in /etc/hosts that sets my machine id, and its > IP address to 192.168.0.100, which is what it normally should be for > access through the router as it is the primary machine on it. (I need > that because my VMWare SMB is set up to use that for connections > between my virtual XP machine and my CentOS host.) Could that be the > problem with internet access directly through the DSL modem? If so, > how do I change this to ensure that the hostname is set properly but > the IP address matches whatever the DSL modem gives back? How do I > then also ensure that the hostname and address are set right so my > host-VMWare samba connection still work? Your confusing here either you want to configure the machine for dhcp or static addys. Get the first part working then decide what you need. "hostname foobar" from the command line. 127.0.0.1 foobar localhost.localdomain localhost # example John ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] DSL battling rojter - help!
Sorry about the "j" - dvorak artifact Okay, let me try again. First, here's my (new) /etc/hosts file: # Do not remove the following line, or various programs # that require network functionality will fail. 127.0.0.1 mhrichter localhost localhost.localdomain #192.168.0.100 mhrichter mhrichter.adsl.irvine.sbcglobal.net ::1 localhost6.localdomain6 localhost6 If I run ifup eth0, here's what I get: eth0Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1E:90:F3:D2:8D inet addr:192.168.0.100 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::21e:90ff:fef3:d28d/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:5557646 errors:4 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:4 TX packets:3497153 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:7118384647 (6.6 GiB) TX bytes:413380509 (394.2 MiB) Interrupt:153 Base address:0xc000 With this setup, I can login to the DSL modem, which shows the following configuration: DSL UP Connection UP User ID ...@sbcglobal.net Connected at1536 Kbps (downstream) 384 Kbps (upstream) IP Address 69.234.16.38 IP Gateway 69.234.31.254 DNS Servers 68.94.156.1 dnsr1.sbcglobal.net 68.94.157.1 dnsr2.sbcglobal.net ModePPP on the modem (Public IP for LAN device) Timeout Never Modem Information Modem Name SpeedStream Model 4100 Serial Number 20013A3E0A514 Software Version1.0.0.53 MAC Address 00:13:A3:E0:A5:14 First Use Date 2006/10/31 00:38:02 GMT Local Network Modem IP Address192.168.0.1 Ethernet Status Connected In this shape, I can ping, say, google.com from the modem and get a response. But, when I run dhclient, I get this: # dhclient Internet Systems Consortium DHCP Client V3.0.5-RedHat Copyright 2004-2006 Internet Systems Consortium. All rights reserved. For info, please visit http://www.isc.org/sw/dhcp/ /sbin/dhclient-script: configuration for vmnet8 not found. Continuing with defaults. /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/network-functions: line 78: vmnet8: No such file or directory Listening on LPF/vmnet8/00:50:56:c0:00:08 Sending on LPF/vmnet8/00:50:56:c0:00:08 Listening on LPF/eth0/00:1e:90:f3:d2:8d Sending on LPF/eth0/00:1e:90:f3:d2:8d Sending on Socket/fallback DHCPREQUEST on vmnet8 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 DHCPREQUEST on eth0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 DHCPACK from 192.168.0.1 bound to 69.234.16.38 -- renewal in 291 seconds. And after that I can't reach the modem or the internet. If I run ifdown eth0 and then ifup eth0, I get the 192.168.0.100 IP address back, and I can reach the modem, but not the internet. (So I'm back on the Windows machine to send this.) This probably seems pretty basic to many of you, but I'm still a neophyte at the details of IP under Linux. IOW, I'm lost. None of this was any kind of problem before I reset/mangled the router. One other question: I notice that the router claims to be 192.168.0.1, but so does the modem. Could that be part of the problem, i.e., should I change the router's IP address to something else? I remember it was 192.168.0.2 before the fiasco Thanks again. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] DSL battling rojter - help!
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 07:58:02AM -0700, Mark wrote: > And after that I can't reach the modem or the internet. If I run > ifdown eth0 and then ifup eth0, I get the 192.168.0.100 IP address > back, and I can reach the modem, but not the internet. What do you see with "ip ro ls"? Is there a default route? Whit ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] DSL battling rojter - help!
On Sun, 2010-07-18 at 07:58 -0700, Mark wrote: > And after that I can't reach the modem or the internet. If I run > ifdown eth0 and then ifup eth0, I get the 192.168.0.100 IP address > back, and I can reach the modem, but not the internet. Ok you getting a dhcp addy here? Look at "system-config-network" your not getting a proper gateway or dns entry. You will have to probaly define it manually as I've come to find out with many cheap routers or either this is a bug in linux. Use "route" to check for the DFG. > One other question: I notice that the router claims to be 192.168.0.1, > but so does the modem. Could that be part of the problem, i.e., > should I change the router's IP address to something else? I remember > it was 192.168.0.2 before the fiasco If you Bridge the DSL to function as a Modem Only it does not matter that goes out the window. It's no concern when your in Routing Mode with the other. But you can not have two same ips defined as your seeing so the bridge needs one for management and the router a different one. So one has to be changed. John ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] DSL battling rojter - help!
realistically you are not getting any dns when in dhcp mode, the /etc/resolv.conf file typically will point to the router ip instead of real dns servers once you deal with that, you should be ok... thing is, if you stay in dhcp mode, the next time you dhcp or reboot, the resolv.conf will go back to pointing at the router ip to get dns so, as others mentioned, if you disable dhcp mode and hard code your ip, netmask, gateway, and resolv.conf file among other things, you will be ok - rh ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] DSL battling rojter - help!
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 8:18 AM, Whit Blauvelt wrote: > > What do you see with "ip ro ls"? Is there a default route? > Yes, but it's going to the router even when the router is not in the loop. On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 8:23 AM, JohnS wrote: > > Ok you getting a dhcp addy here? Look at "system-config-network" your > not getting a proper gateway or dns entry. You will have to probaly > define it manually as I've come to find out with many cheap routers or > either this is a bug in linux. Use "route" to check for the DFG. > route shows 192.168.0.2 (the router) as the DFG. In s-c-n, the gateways are 192.168.0.2 & 192.168.0.1, in that order. > If you Bridge the DSL to function as a Modem Only it does not matter > that goes out the window. It's no concern when your in Routing Mode > with the other. But you can not have two same ips defined as your > seeing so the bridge needs one for management and the router a different > one. So one has to be changed. > According to AT&T, the modem has to be in PPP mode to work, and that does work for XP I changed the router to 192.168.0.2, but that has no effect when the router is out of the loop. I still can't get out thru the modem hrom CentOS, with or without the router. Without the router, is the modem the DFG? If not, what is (or should be)? On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 8:37 AM, R-Elists wrote: > realistically you are not getting any dns > > when in dhcp mode, the /etc/resolv.conf file typically will point to the > router ip instead of real dns servers > I thought thot was working before > once you deal with that, you should be ok... > > thing is, if you stay in dhcp mode, the next time you dhcp or reboot, the > resolv.conf will go back to pointing at the router ip to get dns > I expect it has, many times - wasn't a problem until now. > so, as others mentioned, if you disable dhcp mode and hard code your ip, > netmask, gateway, and resolv.conf file among other things, you will be ok > I was using a static IP with the router, but without it,... Part of the problem is that these things come up so rarely I forget the details in between, so how do I set the GW & netmask by hand? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] DSL battling rojter - help!
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 09:34:06AM -0700, Mark wrote: > > What do you see with "ip ro ls"? Is there a default route? > > > Yes, but it's going to the router even when the router is not in the loop. Generally when someone asks "What do you see" in a computer context, the right answer is to run the command and paste the results. We need, not your interpretation of the data - which you know is confused, right? - but the data itself. Best, Whit ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] DSL battling rojter - help!
On 07/18/10 07:58 AM, Mark wrote: > If I run ifup eth0, here's what I get: > > eth0Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1E:90:F3:D2:8D >inet addr:192.168.0.100 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 > The mask: 255.255.255.0 above looks right, but down below: Local Network > Modem IP Address 192.168.0.1 > Ethernet Status Connected > > In this shape, I can ping, say, google.com from the modem and get a response. > > But, when I run dhclient, I get this: > > # dhclient > Internet Systems Consortium DHCP Client V3.0.5-RedHat > Copyright 2004-2006 Internet Systems Consortium. > All rights reserved. > For info, please visit http://www.isc.org/sw/dhcp/ > > /sbin/dhclient-script: configuration for vmnet8 not found. Continuing > with defaults. > /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/network-functions: line 78: vmnet8: No > such file or directory > Listening on LPF/vmnet8/00:50:56:c0:00:08 > Sending on LPF/vmnet8/00:50:56:c0:00:08 > Listening on LPF/eth0/00:1e:90:f3:d2:8d > Sending on LPF/eth0/00:1e:90:f3:d2:8d > Sending on Socket/fallback > DHCPREQUEST on vmnet8 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 > DHCPREQUEST on eth0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 > DHCPACK from 192.168.0.1 > bound to 69.234.16.38 -- renewal in 291 seconds. > > And on the above, the mask is: 255.255.255.255 I don't run dhclient or anything so I'm not sure where the config file is, but I'd suggest that in addition to what's already been suggested you probably want to change the above to have a subnet mask matching what comes up under the ifup, namely: 255.255.255.0 HTH. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 2X app server alternatives
On 07/18/10 2:45 AM, Silviu Hutanu wrote: > Does anyone know any oss alternatives to 2x aplication server ? thats MS Windows Terminal Server based, isn't it? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] DSL battling rojter - help!
On Sun, 2010-07-18 at 09:34 -0700, Mark wrote: > route shows 192.168.0.2 (the router) as the DFG. > > In s-c-n, the gateways are 192.168.0.2 & 192.168.0.1, in that order. Aww take out the 192.168.0.1 and leave the 192.168.0.2 that is the Siemens Modem. Your dhcp range starts @ 192.168.0.100 > > If you Bridge the DSL to function as a Modem Only it does not matter > > that goes out the window. It's no concern when your in Routing Mode > > with the other. But you can not have two same ips defined as your > > seeing so the bridge needs one for management and the router a different > > one. So one has to be changed. > > > According to AT&T, the modem has to be in PPP mode to work, and that > does work for XP Well appanently I dont think they know to much. Try PPoE Mode for Bridging, I have the Manual to it. Would you like to have it? Send a email to my inbox. "Bridged mode – this means a manual connection must take place each time you want to connect to the internet, similar to a dial-up connection. This is a better way to connect as it poses less of a security risk than routed mode, and is easier to change settings such as your ISP username/password." In other words this is an old Gateway Modem. John ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 2X app server alternatives
2010/7/18 Silviu Hutanu : > Does anyone know any oss alternatives to 2x aplication server ? No-machine ? -- Eero ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 2X app server alternatives
On Sun, 2010-07-18 at 21:56 +0300, Eero Volotinen wrote: > 2010/7/18 Silviu Hutanu : > > Does anyone know any oss alternatives to 2x aplication server ? > > No-machine ? > > -- > Eero > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos LTSP http://www.ltsp.org/ -- Calin Key fingerprint = 37B8 0DA5 9B2A 8554 FB2B 4145 5DC1 15DD A3EF E857 = You know you're a little fat if you have stretch marks on your car. -- Cyrus, Chicago Reader 1/22/82 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] DSL battling rojter - help!
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Whit Blauvelt wrote: > > Generally when someone asks "What do you see" in a computer context, the > right answer is to run the command and paste the results. We need, not your > interpretation of the data - which you know is confused, right? - but the > data itself. > Right now that's easier said than done - I fave to keep switching between machines & connections, and the Win box fas a mixed dvorak keybd However, pls see my next response ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] DSL battling rojter - help!
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Cia Watson wrote: > > And on the above, the mask is: 255.255.255.255 I don't run dhclient or > anything so I'm not sure where the config file is, but I'd suggest that > in addition to what's already been suggested you probably want to change > the above to have a subnet mask matching what comes up under the ifup, > namely: 255.255.255.0 > How, pls? Latest effort: [r...@mhrichter mhr]# ifconfig -a eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1E:90:F3:D2:8D inet addr:192.168.0.100 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::21e:90ff:fef3:d28d/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:5576135 errors:5 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:5 TX packets:3511245 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:7123318597 (6.6 GiB) TX bytes:414398292 (395.2 MiB) Interrupt:58 Base address:0xc000 loLink encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:33279 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:33279 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:44053531 (42.0 MiB) TX bytes:44053531 (42.0 MiB) sit0 Link encap:IPv6-in-IPv4 NOARP MTU:1480 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b) vmnet8Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:50:56:C0:00:08 inet addr:172.16.212.129 Bcast:172.16.212.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::250:56ff:fec0:8/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:59 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:2304 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b) [r...@mhrichter mhr]# dhclient Internet Systems Consortium DHCP Client V3.0.5-RedHat Copyright 2004-2006 Internet Systems Consortium. All rights reserved. For info, please visit http://www.isc.org/sw/dhcp/ /sbin/dhclient-script: configuration for vmnet8 not found. Continuing with defaults. /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/network-functions: line 78: vmnet8: No such file or directory Listening on LPF/vmnet8/00:50:56:c0:00:08 Sending on LPF/vmnet8/00:50:56:c0:00:08 Listening on LPF/eth0/00:1e:90:f3:d2:8d Sending on LPF/eth0/00:1e:90:f3:d2:8d Sending on Socket/fallback DHCPDISCOVER on vmnet8 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 5 DHCPDISCOVER on eth0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 8 DHCPOFFER from 172.16.212.254 DHCPREQUEST on vmnet8 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 DHCPOFFER from 192.168.0.1 DHCPREQUEST on eth0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 DHCPACK from 192.168.0.1 bound to 69.234.42.7 -- renewal in 247 seconds. [r...@mhrichter mhr]# ping google.com ping: unknown host google.com [r...@mhrichter mhr]# ping 192.168.0.1 PING 192.168.0.1 (192.168.0.1) 56(84) bytes of data. >From 172.16.212.129 icmp_seq=2 Destination Host Unreachable >From 172.16.212.129 icmp_seq=3 Destination Host Unreachable >From 172.16.212.129 icmp_seq=4 Destination Host Unreachable --- 192.168.0.1 ping statistics --- 4 packets transmitted, 0 received, +3 errors, 100% packet loss, time 3000ms , pipe 3 [[ So why is it going through the vmnet8 device ?]] [r...@mhrichter mhr]# ip ro ls 172.16.212.0/24 dev vmnet8 proto kernel scope link src 172.16.212.129 69.234.42.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 69.234.42.7 default via 172.16.212.2 dev vmnet8 [[Why is the virtual network interface the default?]] [r...@mhrichter mhr]# ifconfig vmnet8 down [r...@mhrichter mhr]# ifc eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1E:90:F3:D2:8D inet addr:69.234.42.7 Bcast:69.234.42.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::21e:90ff:fef3:d28d/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:5576170 errors:5 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:5 TX packets:3511277 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:7123321997 (6.6 GiB) TX bytes:414401782 (395.2 MiB) Interrupt:66 Base address:0xc000 loLink encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:33300 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:33300 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:44055767 (42.0 MiB) TX bytes:44055767 (42.0 MiB) sit0 Link encap:IPv6-in-IPv4 NOARP MTU:1480 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame
Re: [CentOS] 2X app server alternatives
On 07/18/10 11:15 AM, Silviu Hutanu wrote: > Yeap, but it will be nice to be based on VNC, actually I use Ulteo > Virtual Desktop ( http://www.ulteo.com ) I'm trying to figure out if > there is a better alternative.2X app server is just an example of a > better alternative. > > NX could be also an alternative. I suspect you'll need to define what your requirements are before discussing alternatives to some commercial package. 2X runs windows apps on a windows server, using the RDP protocol. apparently if you're considering VNC and other such things, none of those are requirements, leading me to wonder just what your requirements are. otoh, this discussion really has nothing to do with CentOS per se. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Finding DHCP IP of guest system
On 18/07/10 12:04, David Dyer-Bennet wrote: >> An alternative, if you have some control over the DHCP server, might be >> to enforce a mapping of MAC addresses to IPs. You can pretty much set >> you guest MAC addresses to whatever you want so long as they don't >> conflict with anything else. > > In the long run, they'll be static; but at the moment the permanent IPs > haven't been assigned, and I'm just letting them pick something up via > corporate DHCP (to avoid conflicting with anything else on the network). > It's at this early experimental stage that it'd be handy to find out > externally what they ended up being. As a quick hack, while you experiment, you could just get the guest to send you an email on boot with its current IP. Say, by putting the following at the end of your /etc/rc.local /sbin/ip ad | /bin/mailx -s "IP details for `hostname`" Kal ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re-exporting an NFS mount.. Possible?
Either userspace NFS daemon should be able to re-export an NFS mount: http://sourceforge.net/projects/unfs/ http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=632786&group_id=66203&atid=513688 http://nfs-ganesha.sourceforge.net/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
