Re: [CentOS] vmware
So ubuntu is not supported? Ok but you can insstall it But i understand how you meen -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] För Alexander Dalloz Skickat: den 10 juli 2010 02:14 Till: CentOS mailing list Ämne: Re: [CentOS] vmware Am 10.07.2010 01:59, schrieb mattias: > How can vmware run more stable on centos and not on ubuntu? > I meen > Usb works fine on centos but not on ubuntu VMware is a company, not a specific product. One (CentOS) may be supprted, the other (Ubuntu) not. Alexander ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] vmware
What do you meen? abandoned ? -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] För Mark Skickat: den 10 juli 2010 02:56 Till: CentOS mailing list Ämne: Re: [CentOS] vmware On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Athmane Madjoudj wrote: > > I'm not talking about VMware Server 2.x because VMware has abandoned > it, although I use it on CentOS 5.5 with some workarounds. > Can you expand on that? Did they abandon VMWare Server altogether, or just version 2? I'm still using version 1.08, and it works fine, except that Win XP SP3 won't Hibernate or Stand-by due to an incompatibility with one of the VMWare drivers. I was using the VMWare save machine state, but it turns out that shutdown and reboot is faster Let us know :-) Mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] lm_sensors and Shuttle
On 10/07/10 03:07, Yves Bellefeuille wrote: > On Friday 09 July 2010 21:37, listmail wrote: > >> I'm trying to get lm_sensors to work on a Shuttle with an AMD K10. >> The version of lm_sensors in the main CentOS repo is 2.10.7, which is >> two years old now. Support for the K10 was added about a year ago. >> >> So, does anyone know if there are binaries available for more recent >> versions of lm_sensors? > > The version at ElRepo works with my Phenom II: > http://elrepo.org/linux/elrepo/el5/i386/RPMS/lm_sensors-2.10.8-2.el5.elrepo.i386.rpm > ELRepo also has a kernel module for the AMD K10 core temperature sensor: http://elrepo.org/tiki/kmod-k10temp ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OpenOffice.org 3.1 installation was corrupted-installed again, nothing in Applications/Office menu
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
wrote:
> Lanny Marcus wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 5:33 AM, Lanny Marcus
>> wrote:
> I had a corrupted installation of OpenOffice.org 3.1.
> you should ba able to list all installed rpms from OO.org with this command:
> rpm -qa | grep -P 'openoffice|ooobasis'
>
> you then want to feed these packages to 'rpm -e' ("erase", ie uninstall).
Nicolas: Three questions:
Question #1: Do I have the correct CentOS version of OpenOffice
installed now and are there any other OpenOffice packages I need to
install with yum?
Question #2: What yum command can I use, to install everything in the
OpenOffice "Group", such as writer, calc, and many other packages?
Question #3: What yum command should I use (the one below obviously
is not correct) to install the Applications/Office menus? (If I can do
that, I suspect this will work properly again)
I had removed (with yum) openoffice.org3.1-redhat-menus-noarch
0:3.1-9393 because I got a long list of Transaction Errors Thursday
night, when trying to install OpenOffice with yum and that's probably
why there's nothing in Applications/Office for the OpenOffice.org
Applications now.
Thank you, again, for your time and help. Much appreciated! Lanny
[r...@dell2400 ~]# yum install openoffice.org-core
Setting up Install Process
Package 1:openoffice.org-core-3.1.1-19.5.el5_5.1.i386 already
installed and latest version
Nothing to do
[r...@dell2400 ~]# yum install openoffice.org3.1-redhat-menus
No package openoffice.org3.1-redhat-menus available.
Nothing to do
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OpenOffice.org 3.1 installation was corrupted-installed again, nothing in Applications/Office menu
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Ross Walker wrote: > On Jul 9, 2010, at 9:13 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg > wrote: >> Lanny Marcus wrote: >>> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 5:33 AM, Lanny Marcus >>> wrote: >> I had a corrupted installation of OpenOffice.org 3.1. > You can use yum to remove what was manually installed via rpm. > # yum remove 'openoffice*' Ross: Thank you. I see the asterisk and single quote marks. Probably the other problem is that I deleted the openoffice.org redhat menus package Thursday night. Lanny ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Simple solution for small network in a school ?
Hi, I have to install a small network in a school in a nearby village. The network will be Linux-only, one server and fifteen desktops. Here's the idea. 1) Authentication should be managed centrally on the server. 2) User home directories should also be on the server. 3) Users should all have disk quotas, something like 1 GB per user. 4) Some shared directories should be read/write for a defined group of users (teachers) and read-only for others. So far, I've only dealt with local authentication. I have a little practice in basic setups of Samba and NFS and managed to get these to work OK. On the other hand, I've never worked with NIS, LDAP or the likes. My question is more general, and I don't want to go into technical details. According to the KISS principle, which solution would you recommend (or explicitly *not* recommend)? A mix of LDAP and Samba? Or NIS and NFS? And what's this thing called Directory Server, which vaguely sounds like it's the right way to go? Any suggestions? Cheers from the hot South of France, Niki ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] wlan
How to search after wlans using command prompt I have no gui ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] wlan
mattias a écrit : > How to search after wlans using command prompt # iwlist scan ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] wlan
Thanks My last question How to connect? -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] För Niki Kovacs Skickat: den 10 juli 2010 17:13 Till: CentOS mailing list Ämne: Re: [CentOS] wlan mattias a écrit : > How to search after wlans using command prompt # iwlist scan ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Simple solution for small network in a school ?
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Niki Kovacs wrote: > > Hi, > > I have to install a small network in a school in a nearby village. The > network will be Linux-only, one server and fifteen desktops. Here's the > idea. > > 1) Authentication should be managed centrally on the server. > 2) User home directories should also be on the server. > 3) Users should all have disk quotas, something like 1 GB per user. > 4) Some shared directories should be read/write for a defined group of > users (teachers) and read-only for others. We have a similar setup with OpenLDAP and NFS. Works OK, except all directories defined are home to the users, and only their owner can read them. Adding users or changing passwords is an admin-only hassle, because we have never found a user management tool for LDAP which was convincingly able to be given away to teachers. -- Eduardo Grosclaude Universidad Nacional del Comahue Neuquen, Argentina ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Simple solution for small network in a school ?
On Jul 10, 2010, at 10:59 AM, Niki Kovacs wrote: > Hi, > > I have to install a small network in a school in a nearby village. The > network will be Linux-only, one server and fifteen desktops. Here's the > idea. > > 1) Authentication should be managed centrally on the server. Use some type of directory service (LDAP/NIS) coupled with an authentication service like Kerberos. Basically keep passwords out of the directory and you need to have a Kerberos ticket to access the directory. > 2) User home directories should also be on the server. Not a problem, you can share these out via NFS and/or Samba. > 3) Users should all have disk quotas, something like 1 GB per user. Also not a problem to setup quotas and use rquotad to remotely query these from NFS clients. Samba has builtin support for quotas. > 4) Some shared directories should be read/write for a defined group of > users (teachers) and read-only for others. Standard posix perms can take care of that, for finer grained perms you can use ACLs. > So far, I've only dealt with local authentication. I have a little > practice in basic setups of Samba and NFS and managed to get these to > work OK. On the other hand, I've never worked with NIS, LDAP or the likes. NIS is easier then LDAP and might be a good quick-n-dirty way to get going initially. Just use a separate authentication service like Kerberos and keep passwords out of the directory service. > My question is more general, and I don't want to go into technical > details. According to the KISS principle, which solution would you > recommend (or explicitly *not* recommend)? A mix of LDAP and Samba? Or > NIS and NFS? And what's this thing called Directory Server, which > vaguely sounds like it's the right way to go? You can really mash all these technologies up. If all clients are Linux then start with NFS/NIS/Kerberos then as things grow you can look to move to LDAP. The "Directory Server" is a turn-key package for implementing LDAP plus Kerberos with a pre-established LDAP schema and tools to manage it. Definitely worth taking a look at. Personally I don't have experience with it so can't recommend or not recommend it. You COULD also have a Windows Active Directory server to provide LDAP and Kerberos services to your Linux environment. They definitely have nice management tools. MS for not-for-profit is dirt cheap. Run it as a VMware/VirtualBox/KVM/Xen VM. Hell, run the whole server as an ESXi host and have multiple VMs for redundancy/load spreading. -Ross ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Simple solution for small network in a school ?
At Sat, 10 Jul 2010 16:59:44 +0200 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > Hi, > > I have to install a small network in a school in a nearby village. The > network will be Linux-only, one server and fifteen desktops. Here's the > idea. > > 1) Authentication should be managed centrally on the server. LDAP (install openldap-servers on the server, install openldap-clients on the clients). > > 2) User home directories should also be on the server. NFS (everything you need is installed by default) > > 3) Users should all have disk quotas, something like 1 GB per user. ext2/ext3 (everything you need is installed by default) > > 4) Some shared directories should be read/write for a defined group of > users (teachers) and read-only for others. Standard UNIX uid/gid, served by LDAP, and handled by NFS. > > So far, I've only dealt with local authentication. I have a little > practice in basic setups of Samba and NFS and managed to get these to > work OK. On the other hand, I've never worked with NIS, LDAP or the likes. LDAP is pretty straightforward. There is a quite good article about setting up LDAP (OpenLDAP) and migrating from file-based authentication on the RedHat RHEL documentation site (this applys equally well to CentOS). > > My question is more general, and I don't want to go into technical > details. According to the KISS principle, which solution would you > recommend (or explicitly *not* recommend)? A mix of LDAP and Samba? Or > NIS and NFS? And what's this thing called Directory Server, which > vaguely sounds like it's the right way to go? LDAP and NFS. Samba really only makes sense if you are serving MS-Windows and/or Macs. Samba would be combersome in a pure-Linux environment. NFS would propagate standard UNIX permissions transparently. You could also use automount to reduce 'clutter' (only mount what is needfull on an as-needed basis). Visit: http://www.deepsoft.com/2009/08/setting-up-thin-clients-at-the-wendell-free-library-part-1/ For an article on how I set things up at our local Library. While this article mostly covers a server serving a bunch of *diskless* workstations, many of the basic ideas also apply to a situation with workstations with local disks. > > Any suggestions? > > Cheers from the hot South of France, > > Niki > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > -- Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933 Deepwoods Software-- Download the Model Railroad System http://www.deepsoft.com/ -- Binaries for Linux and MS-Windows hel...@deepsoft.com -- http://www.deepsoft.com/ModelRailroadSystem/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] wlan
mattias a écrit : > Thanks > My last question > How to connect? > Simple use 'iwconfig' instead of 'ifconfig'. 'man iwconfig' for the gory details. :o) Niki ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] wlan
At Sat, 10 Jul 2010 17:17:14 +0200 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > Thanks > My last question > How to connect? Edit /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth?, then 'ifup eth?'. > > -Ursprungligt meddelande- > FrÃ¥n: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] För Niki > Kovacs > Skickat: den 10 juli 2010 17:13 > Till: CentOS mailing list > Ãmne: Re: [CentOS] wlan > > > mattias a écrit : > > How to search after wlans using command prompt > > # iwlist scan > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > > -- Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933 Deepwoods Software-- Download the Model Railroad System http://www.deepsoft.com/ -- Binaries for Linux and MS-Windows hel...@deepsoft.com -- http://www.deepsoft.com/ModelRailroadSystem/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Simple solution for small network in a school ?
Niki Kovacs wrote: > Hi, > > I have to install a small network in a school in a nearby village. The > network will be Linux-only, one server and fifteen desktops. Here's the > idea. > > 1) Authentication should be managed centrally on the server. > > 2) User home directories should also be on the server. > > 3) Users should all have disk quotas, something like 1 GB per user. > > 4) Some shared directories should be read/write for a defined group of > users (teachers) and read-only for others. > > So far, I've only dealt with local authentication. I have a little > practice in basic setups of Samba and NFS and managed to get these to > work OK. On the other hand, I've never worked with NIS, LDAP or the likes. > > My question is more general, and I don't want to go into technical > details. According to the KISS principle, which solution would you > recommend (or explicitly *not* recommend)? A mix of LDAP and Samba? Or > NIS and NFS? And what's this thing called Directory Server, which > vaguely sounds like it's the right way to go? > > Any suggestions? You might want to look at ClearOS before tackling this yourself. It is CentOS-based but comes up with a slick web based administration program and uses LDAP for authentication out of the box. It uses openldap and I think it is integrated with samba so you could use windows clients if you wanted. On something of that scale I don't think you'd have to worry about the performance or replication differences in openldap or directory server - the administrative tools you use will be more important. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Redundant LAN routing possible?
I've been reading that it's possible to set up a system with multiple NIC to provide redundant internet connectivity such that it will switch to a secondary connection if the primary ISP fails. Is it possible in a similar way to setup redundant LAN routing? I read that it is possible to aggregate/bond multiple NIC to stackable switches that support link aggregation and redundancy. But if only simple switches are available, is something like this possible? e.g. System A eth0 -> lan switch/router 1 eth1 -> lan switch/router 2 System B eth0 -> lan switch 1 eth1 -> lan switch 2 Then somehow specify that, if lan switch 1 fails, the two systems will switch to using switch 2 so that in case of a switch failure, the network continues to remain operational. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Redundant LAN routing possible?
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: > > I've been reading that it's possible to set up a system with multiple > NIC to provide redundant internet connectivity such that it will > switch to a secondary connection if the primary ISP fails. > > Is it possible in a similar way to setup redundant LAN routing? I read > that it is possible to aggregate/bond multiple NIC to stackable > switches that support link aggregation and redundancy. But if only > simple switches are available, is something like this possible? > > e.g. > System A > eth0 -> lan switch/router 1 > eth1 -> lan switch/router 2 > > System B > eth0 -> lan switch 1 > eth1 -> lan switch 2 > > Then somehow specify that, if lan switch 1 fails, the two systems will > switch to using switch 2 so that in case of a switch failure, the > network continues to remain operational. > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos I'd think for this to be possible you will need a router with multiple WAN addresses/interfaces... I am not sure how that pertains to your LAN per se. Boris. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Simple solution for small network in a school ?
Greetings, On 7/10/10, Niki Kovacs wrote: > Hi, > > I have to install a small network in a school in a nearby village. The > network will be Linux-only, one server and fifteen desktops. Here's the > idea. KISS Princple: ext3 with ACL enabled (better xfs/zfs -- in centos if available) with a script for adding users wrapping the newusers.And oh, gulsterefs or whatever if you want to throw in hpc.. y'know R and renderers just love hpc and children would love their animation coming up so fast... A million dollar Idea if all the nodes had hard disks.. [sigh.. this wrong way to promote business in this list...] HTH Regards, Rajagopal ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Redundant LAN routing possible?
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 05:21:50AM +0800, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: > e.g. > System A > eth0 -> lan switch/router 1 > eth1 -> lan switch/router 2 > > System B > eth0 -> lan switch 1 > eth1 -> lan switch 2 > > Then somehow specify that, if lan switch 1 fails, the two systems will > switch to using switch 2 so that in case of a switch failure, the > network continues to remain operational. If you're clever with scripting and iproute2 commands, rules and multiple routing tables, and everything's Linux, this is certainly doable. You could have your System A ping System B's IP via eth0 every minute, and on failure reassign its default route and IP to eth1. Meanwhile you can set up rules and routes on System B so that whichever NIC traffic comes in on, the response will use the same NIC ... stuff you'll find if you google around for how to be dual-homed between ISPs is quite applicable here. It's too complex to work it out for you in detail without spending an hour on it. But I've done this sort of thing and had it work very well. Whit ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] lm_sensors and Shuttle
On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 11:48:50 +0100, Ned Slider wrote > On 10/07/10 03:07, Yves Bellefeuille wrote: > > On Friday 09 July 2010 21:37, listmail wrote: > > > >> I'm trying to get lm_sensors to work on a Shuttle with an AMD K10. > >> The version of lm_sensors in the main CentOS repo is 2.10.7, which is > >> two years old now. Support for the K10 was added about a year ago. > >> > >> So, does anyone know if there are binaries available for more recent > >> versions of lm_sensors? > > > > The version at ElRepo works with my Phenom II: > > http://elrepo.org/linux/elrepo/el5/i386/RPMS/lm_sensors-2.10.8-2.el5.elrepo.i386.rpm > > > > ELRepo also has a kernel module for the AMD K10 core temperature sensor: > > http://elrepo.org/tiki/kmod-k10temp Many thanks to both Yves and Ned for the pointers. After installing lm_sensors-2.10.8.-2 from elrepo, then installing the necessary drivers (also from elrepo) for the sensors on my Shuttle SA76G2, the readings are now available. For anyone else who runs into this, the SA76G2 needs the it87 and k10temp kernel drivers. Now I just have to get the ranges set correctly. Unfortunately, Shuttle publishes absolutely nothing in the way of documentation, and their tech support people refuse to provide information, claiming that it is proprietary. I guess I'll post it in their user forums once I figure which measurements are meaningful. Thanks Again, --Bill ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Redundant LAN routing possible?
Greetings, On 7/11/10, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: > I've been reading that it's possible to set up a system with multiple > NIC to provide redundant internet connectivity such that it will > switch to a secondary connection if the primary ISP fails. > > Is it possible in a similar way to setup redundant LAN routing? I read > that it is possible to aggregate/bond multiple NIC to stackable > switches that support link aggregation and redundancy. But if only > simple switches are available, is something like this possible? > > e.g. > System A > eth0 -> lan switch/router 1 > eth1 -> lan switch/router 2 > > System B > eth0 -> lan switch 1 > eth1 -> lan switch 2 > > Then somehow specify that, if lan switch 1 fails, the two systems will > switch to using switch 2 so that in case of a switch failure, the > network continues to remain operational. hmm.. lartc.org comes to mind to begin with... duh.. that was too primitive. pfSense perhaps... But then there is untangle if you want to pay them.. etc. etc. Regards, Rajagopal ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Redundant LAN routing possible?
On 7/10/2010 2:21 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: > I've been reading that it's possible to set up a system with multiple > NIC to provide redundant internet connectivity such that it will > switch to a secondary connection if the primary ISP fails. > > Is it possible in a similar way to setup redundant LAN routing? I read > that it is possible to aggregate/bond multiple NIC to stackable > switches that support link aggregation and redundancy. But if only > simple switches are available, is something like this possible? > > e.g. > System A > eth0 -> lan switch/router 1 > eth1 -> lan switch/router 2 > > System B > eth0 -> lan switch 1 > eth1 -> lan switch 2 > > Then somehow specify that, if lan switch 1 fails, the two systems will > switch to using switch 2 so that in case of a switch failure, the > network continues to remain operational. Yes. You can do it. I've done it before. All you need is the right choice of bonding mode . You set up bond0 for eth0 and eth1 and it 'just works'. To make it more robust, cross-connect the two switches as well. -- Benjamin Franz ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Redundant LAN routing possible?
Thanks for the suggestion, I'll read up more about them. The bond0 and just works sounds simple which is a Good Thing! The problem was the last time I tried to cross connect multiple switches, everything just died so there must be something a bit more involved? :D In the mean time since my post, I came across STP (spanning tree protocol) that seems to be designed to handle this sort of thing, i.e. figure out the shortest path and prevent network shortcircuit like what I had experienced with cross connecting multiple switches. But it apparently takes 50 seconds to reconfigure anytime sometime in the circuit fails. There is supposedly a Rapid STP that only takes 3 seconds. Several couple-of-years old search results indicate that it was tested in 2.4 kernel and will be in 2.6 kernel. However, I cannot seem to find anything newer that confirms if such functionality is really in the current kernel. Anybody has any idea? On 7/11/10, Jerry Franz wrote: > On 7/10/2010 2:21 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: >> I've been reading that it's possible to set up a system with multiple >> NIC to provide redundant internet connectivity such that it will >> switch to a secondary connection if the primary ISP fails. >> >> Is it possible in a similar way to setup redundant LAN routing? I read >> that it is possible to aggregate/bond multiple NIC to stackable >> switches that support link aggregation and redundancy. But if only >> simple switches are available, is something like this possible? >> >> e.g. >> System A >> eth0 -> lan switch/router 1 >> eth1 -> lan switch/router 2 >> >> System B >> eth0 -> lan switch 1 >> eth1 -> lan switch 2 >> >> Then somehow specify that, if lan switch 1 fails, the two systems will >> switch to using switch 2 so that in case of a switch failure, the >> network continues to remain operational. > > Yes. You can do it. I've done it before. All you need is the right > choice of bonding mode . You set up bond0 for eth0 and eth1 and it 'just > works'. To make it more robust, cross-connect the two switches as well. > > -- > Benjamin Franz > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] lm_sensors and Shuttle
On Sat, 2010-07-10 at 18:47 -0700, listmail wrote: > On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 11:48:50 +0100, Ned Slider wrote > > On 10/07/10 03:07, Yves Bellefeuille wrote: > > > > > > The version at ElRepo works with my Phenom II: > > > > http://elrepo.org/linux/elrepo/el5/i386/RPMS/lm_sensors-2.10.8-2.el5.elrepo.i386.rpm > > > > > > > ELRepo also has a kernel module for the AMD K10 core temperature sensor: > > > > http://elrepo.org/tiki/kmod-k10temp > > Many thanks to both Yves and Ned for the pointers. After installing > lm_sensors-2.10.8.-2 from elrepo, then installing the necessary drivers (also > from elrepo) for the sensors on my Shuttle SA76G2, the readings are now > available. For anyone else who runs into this, the SA76G2 needs the it87 and > k10temp kernel drivers. > > Now I just have to get the ranges set correctly. Unfortunately, Shuttle > publishes absolutely nothing in the way of documentation, and their tech > support people refuse to provide information, claiming that it is proprietary. > I guess I'll post it in their user forums once I figure which measurements are > meaningful. Since the elrepo kmod-k10temp/lm_sensors packages worked, then you may also benefit from the elrepo kmod-powernow-k8 package. With AMD Phenom II quad-cores running centos 5, kmod-powernow-k8 typically gives a 8-10C drop in core temperature at idle and a significant reduction in power consumption at idle as described in this centos bug report: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3766 You will also likely notice that your cpu fan slows down at idle. It is worth installing the kmod if just to quieten down the cpu fan. As per the bug report, this issue should be fixed in rhel/centos 5.6 Steve ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
