Re: [CentOS] update to 5.5 small issues
On Sun, 16 May 2010, fred smith wrote: > a couple hours after the update (and requisite reboot and reinstallation > of nvidia proprietary driver), I noticed I wasn't gettting any email. > upon a little investigation, I noted that the update had replaced my > custom sendmail.cf with its own. I don't recall updates to sendmail > doing that previously, This did not happen for me and I just completed updating around 500 hosts. Each time it created a sendmail.file.rpmnew > also, around that time my panels stopped unhiding, so they remained in a > hidden state that I could not recover them from. logged off and on and > it didn't help, in fact it was worse: no panels at all. so I did a > reboot and now they seem to be working. I'll have to keep an eagle-eye > on them. > > so far, all else seems well. > > Thanks to the whole team who makes Centos possible! > > -- James A. Peltier Systems Analyst (FASNet), VIVARIUM Technical Director HPC Coordinator Simon Fraser University - Burnaby Campus Phone : 778-782-6573 Fax : 778-782-3045 E-Mail : jpelt...@sfu.ca Website : http://www.fas.sfu.ca | http://vivarium.cs.sfu.ca http://blogs.sfu.ca/people/jpeltier MSN : subatomic_s...@hotmail.com TEAMWORK There's power in numbers. Learn to work together. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6 Beta available for public download
On 05/15/2010 11:48 PM, Ron Loftin wrote: > > What would be the proper way to request such a thing? s/request/offer to do this/ and its game on. Open an issue at bugs.centos.org, with the details, and we can help from there on. - KB ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Update successful. Thanks.
On 05/15/2010 08:05 PM, Ron Blizzard wrote: > My desktop updated without a hitch... well, actually, I ran out of > disk space after the download completed, so had to clear some space, yum tries to do some space required estimates before starting the process, so its clearly got that wrong in your case here. Would you mind filing a bugreport at bugs.centos.org about this issue ? and also add details like a 'df -h' and exactly how much yum got things wrong by. thanks - KB ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] update to 5.5 small issues
On 05/16/2010 12:01 AM, Robert Nichols wrote: > On 05/15/2010 11:23 PM, fred smith wrote: >> a couple hours after the update (and requisite reboot and reinstallation >> of nvidia proprietary driver), I noticed I wasn't gettting any email. >> upon a little investigation, I noted that the update had replaced my >> custom sendmail.cf with its own. I don't recall updates to sendmail >> doing that previously, > > Sounds like you installed a sendmail.cf that was not generated from > /etc/mail/sendmail.mc and left the original sendmail.mc unmodified. > The rpm updated the unmodified sendmail.mc configuration file. The > startup script for sendmail then saw an apparently out-of-date > sendmail.mc and rebuilt it from the new sendmail.cf. Got the file names reversed in that last sentence. Sorry. Should read: "The startup script for sendmail then saw an apparently out-of-date sendmail.cf and rebuilt it from the new sendmail.mc." -- Bob Nichols "NOSPAM" is really part of my email address. Do NOT delete it. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] update to 5.5 small issues
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 07:44:37AM -0500, Robert Nichols wrote: > On 05/16/2010 12:01 AM, Robert Nichols wrote: > > On 05/15/2010 11:23 PM, fred smith wrote: > >> a couple hours after the update (and requisite reboot and reinstallation > >> of nvidia proprietary driver), I noticed I wasn't gettting any email. > >> upon a little investigation, I noted that the update had replaced my > >> custom sendmail.cf with its own. I don't recall updates to sendmail > >> doing that previously, > > > > Sounds like you installed a sendmail.cf that was not generated from > > /etc/mail/sendmail.mc and left the original sendmail.mc unmodified. > > The rpm updated the unmodified sendmail.mc configuration file. The > > startup script for sendmail then saw an apparently out-of-date > > sendmail.mc and rebuilt it from the new sendmail.cf. > > Got the file names reversed in that last sentence. Sorry. Should > read: > >"The startup script for sendmail then saw an apparently out-of-date > sendmail.cf and rebuilt it from the new sendmail.mc." thanks for the clarification. that's odd (unless my memory is going--a real possibility). I've got "fcshome.mc" and "fcshome.cf", the latter made from the former, and then copied to sendmail.cf. I've done it that way for over a decade. that way my custom .mc never gets clobbered by a new one from the RPM package being installed. nevertheless, your suggestion sounds reasonable. I think I'll try making a copy of fcshome.mc as sendmail.mc then see if the right thing happens next time sendmail gets an update. that way, if sendmail.mc gets stepped on it won't affect my customized one and I can always fall back to the manual way of doing things. Thanks again! -- Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us - But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us. --- Romans 5:8 (niv) -- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 63, Issue 2
I have been unable to find firefox-3.0.19-1 in the 5.5 os or the 5.5 updates. Is is being handled separately or was it overlooked in the transition between 5.4 and 5.5 ? regards, ben ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] update to 5.5 small issues
Hi Fred, were you able to fix your mail problem is seem to be having the same issue. On Sun, 2010-05-16 at 13:17 -0400, fred smith wrote: > sendmail.cf ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] update to 5.5 small issues
fred smith wrote: > On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 07:44:37AM -0500, Robert Nichols wrote: >> On 05/16/2010 12:01 AM, Robert Nichols wrote: >>> On 05/15/2010 11:23 PM, fred smith wrote: a couple hours after the update (and requisite reboot and reinstallation of nvidia proprietary driver), I noticed I wasn't gettting any email. upon a little investigation, I noted that the update had replaced my custom sendmail.cf with its own. I don't recall updates to sendmail doing that previously, >>> Sounds like you installed a sendmail.cf that was not generated from >>> /etc/mail/sendmail.mc and left the original sendmail.mc unmodified. >>> The rpm updated the unmodified sendmail.mc configuration file. The >>> startup script for sendmail then saw an apparently out-of-date >>> sendmail.mc and rebuilt it from the new sendmail.cf. >> Got the file names reversed in that last sentence. Sorry. Should >> read: >> >>"The startup script for sendmail then saw an apparently out-of-date >> sendmail.cf and rebuilt it from the new sendmail.mc." > > thanks for the clarification. > > that's odd (unless my memory is going--a real possibility). > > I've got "fcshome.mc" and "fcshome.cf", the latter made from the former, > and then copied to sendmail.cf. I've done it that way for over a decade. > that way my custom .mc never gets clobbered by a new one from the RPM > package being installed. > > nevertheless, your suggestion sounds reasonable. I think I'll try making > a copy of fcshome.mc as sendmail.mc then see if the right thing happens > next time sendmail gets an update. that way, if sendmail.mc gets stepped > on it won't affect my customized one and I can always fall back to the > manual way of doing things. This is probably a matter of the timestamps on sendmail.cf vs sendmail.mc which until now have coincidentally been right. If you had not modified your sendmail.mc, an updated version in an rpm would overwrite it. Then the makefile that runs at sendmail startup would notice that your sendmail.cf was outdated and helpfully build you a new one. All expected behaviour. If your custom version had been named sendmail.mc, the new version would probably have been renamed as sendmail.mc.rpmnew instead of overwriting it. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 63, Issue 2
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Ben Mohilef wrote: > I have been unable to find firefox-3.0.19-1 in the 5.5 os or the 5.5 updates. > Is is being handled separately or was it overlooked in the transition between > 5.4 and 5.5 ? > I would recommend updating to FF 3.6 directly from Mozilla. Of course, I also recommend using OOo 3.2, directly from openoffice.org. As a stable enterprise release, CentOS is way behind on a number of things like these, but the more recent releases are available elsewhere if you really need them. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] update to 5.5 small issues
On 05/16/2010 12:17 PM, fred smith wrote: > On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 07:44:37AM -0500, Robert Nichols wrote: >> On 05/16/2010 12:01 AM, Robert Nichols wrote: >>> On 05/15/2010 11:23 PM, fred smith wrote: a couple hours after the update (and requisite reboot and reinstallation of nvidia proprietary driver), I noticed I wasn't gettting any email. upon a little investigation, I noted that the update had replaced my custom sendmail.cf with its own. I don't recall updates to sendmail doing that previously, >>> >>> Sounds like you installed a sendmail.cf that was not generated from >>> /etc/mail/sendmail.mc and left the original sendmail.mc unmodified. >>> The rpm updated the unmodified sendmail.mc configuration file. The >>> startup script for sendmail then saw an apparently out-of-date >>> sendmail.mc and rebuilt it from the new sendmail.cf. >> >> Got the file names reversed in that last sentence. Sorry. Should >> read: >> >> "The startup script for sendmail then saw an apparently out-of-date >> sendmail.cf and rebuilt it from the new sendmail.mc." > > thanks for the clarification. > > that's odd (unless my memory is going--a real possibility). > > I've got "fcshome.mc" and "fcshome.cf", the latter made from the former, > and then copied to sendmail.cf. I've done it that way for over a decade. > that way my custom .mc never gets clobbered by a new one from the RPM > package being installed. That sets you up for the problem you had. The startup script for sendmail runs /etc/mail/make, which will rebuild out-of-date files based on timestamps. You've just been lucky until now. Either the sendmail update contained a sendmail.mc file with a timestamp older than your custom sendmail.cf, or there were enough changes to your system that you rebuilt your custom file anyway. > nevertheless, your suggestion sounds reasonable. I think I'll try making > a copy of fcshome.mc as sendmail.mc then see if the right thing happens > next time sendmail gets an update. that way, if sendmail.mc gets stepped > on it won't affect my customized one and I can always fall back to the > manual way of doing things. That's certainly the safest way to do it, but really, the only way your customized sendmail.mc would get replaced is if the new sendmail were somehow incompatible with the original sendmail.mc. The update procedure would then save your customized file as sendmail.mc.rpmsave and install a new sendmail.mc, that rather than leaving your almost certainly incompatible file in place. -- Bob Nichols "NOSPAM" is really part of my email address. Do NOT delete it. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] How to create a printer that prints directly to a file?
I am trying to learn how to share printers using samba. I am doing most of my experiments at home w/ libvirt and where there are no printers. How can I set up a printer device that just prints to a file on my system? That would really help me in my experiments. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] How to create a printer that prints directly to a file?
2010/5/16 Bryan Berry > I am trying to learn how to share printers using samba. I am doing most of > my experiments at home w/ libvirt and where there are no printers. > > How can I set up a printer device that just prints to a file on my system? > That would really help me in my experiments. > try this: http://www.linux.com/archive/feed/61826 -- Among the maxims on Lord Naoshige's wall, there was this one: "Matters of great concern should be treated lightly." Master Ittei commented, "Matters of small concern should be treated seriously." (Ghost Dog : The Way of The Samurai) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Update successful. Thanks.
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 5:01 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 05/15/2010 08:05 PM, Ron Blizzard wrote: >> My desktop updated without a hitch... well, actually, I ran out of >> disk space after the download completed, so had to clear some space, > > yum tries to do some space required estimates before starting the > process, so its clearly got that wrong in your case here. Would you mind > filing a bugreport at bugs.centos.org about this issue ? and also add > details like a 'df -h' and exactly how much yum got things wrong by. > > thanks I can give a current 'df -h' but, unfortunately, I didn't write down any specifics while updating. Here's what I currently have. [r...@localhost ~]$ df -h FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00 35G 30G 3.4G 90% / /dev/hda1 97M 37M 56M 40% /boot tmpfs502M 0 502M 0% /dev/shm The issue came up *after* I had downloaded all the update files. My used space was 99%, approximately 230 Megs were shown available at /. There was no memory available in my tmpfs directory/partition. I believe yum kicked me out of the update process. There were a lot of messages without line breaks -- filled up the screen. When I cleared about 3 Gigs of memory and re-ran 'yum update' it started back up where I left off and finished the updated without issue.. If you think that I have enough information to file a bug report I'll go ahead and do that. Thanks again. -- RonB -- Using CentOS 5.5 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] OO and Firefox
On Sun, 2010-05-16 at 12:07 -0700, MHR wrote: > > I would recommend updating to FF 3.6 directly from Mozilla. Of > course, I also recommend using OOo 3.2, directly from openoffice.org. I use OO 3.2 from openoffice.org but I have never been able to find an x86_64 version of Firefox on the Mozilla website. -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OO and Firefox
To my knowledge they don't build that version. The ff I use on systems that need ff 3.6 is the one from mark Harris's repo. http://www.mharris.ca/mharris-yumrepo.html James On May 16, 2010 9:56 PM, "Frank Cox" wrote: On Sun, 2010-05-16 at 12:07 -0700, MHR wrote: > > I would recommend updating to FF 3.6 directly from Mozilla. Of > course, I also recommend using OOo 3.2, directly from openoffice.org. I use OO 3.2 from openoffice.org but I have never been able to find an x86_64 version of Firefox on the Mozilla website. -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OO and Firefox
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Frank Cox wrote: > > I use OO 3.2 from openoffice.org but I have never been able to find an > x86_64 version of Firefox on the Mozilla website. > I just ran my FF and here's what it says in Help->About: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.2) Gecko/20100115 Firefox/3.6 I think with SeaMonkey version 2.0+ and FF 3.5+, they integrated the 64-bit builds into the main release, so you get what your CPU needs. Just guessing, but there it is. OOo also recently incorporated proper 64-bit builds that work (as of 3.1, I think - I had problems with earlier 64-bit "builds"). 64-bit builds are catching on, finally, with the advent of cheap 64-bit CPUs (like mine - the quad-core Athlon II X4 - $95 retail). All AMD Athlon IIs and the whole line of Intel multi-core CPUs is making 64-bit more commonplace, especially in business. mhr ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 63, Issue 2
On 05/16/2010 06:34 PM, Ben Mohilef wrote: > I have been unable to find firefox-3.0.19-1 in the 5.5 os or the 5.5 updates. > Is is being handled separately or was it overlooked in the transition between > 5.4 and 5.5 ? Some of the updates are still due, including the centosplus kernels. You should be able to see them all in place by Monday the 17th midday'ish ( UTC ) - KB ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Update successful. Thanks.
On 05/15/2010 05:05 PM, Ned Slider informed us: > Robert wrote: > >> > > > >> Only disappointment so far is that lm_sensors still doesn't grok the AMD >> K-10 thermal sensors - a situation I grumble about even as I file it in >> the "beggars can't be choosers" folder. >> >> > That's because your kernel does not have a k10temp driver - it was only > introduced into the mainline kernel around 2.6.32. There is a backported > driver in ELRepo: > > http://elrepo.org/tiki/kmod-k10temp > > yum install kmod-k10temp > > Red Hat did do a huge backport refresh of the /hwmon tree in el5.5, but > they pulled from around kernel-2.6.26 which was before k10temp made it > into the mainline kernel. > > Hope that helps. > Indeed! Many thanks. It hasn't helped yet but it will as soon as I get the yum-priorities straight. I'm pretty skiddish -- if not downright paranoid -- about repo mixing and I'm using all due caution before allowing yum to replace my existing lm_sensors-2.10.7-9.el5.i386 with the pre-requisite lm_sensors-2.10.8-2.el5.elrepo.i386.rpm. Thanks again to you and to Yves, who also responded. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Problems after update to 5.5
On Sat, 2010-05-15 at 12:27 +0100, Colin Coles wrote: > Hi, > I have updated 8 machines so far and 2 are refusing to boot on > 2.6.18-194.3.1.el5 kernel, they just hang at: 'Starting udev:' but when I > revert to 2.6.18-164.15.1.el5 kernel they boot fine. Any pointers? I just updated a machine and also got a hang at udev. When I revert to kernel 2.6.18-164 it works fine. It appears to be a hard hang. Caps lock and num lock have no effect and I have to hit the reset button. I tried increasing udev log level to debug and it did not hang. I reduced the log level to info and it still did not hang. However, when I start X, esd seems to get stuck in a loop on a short segment of audio. If I kill esd, the desktop will finish initializing. Logging out of X also hung, but killing X manually worked. I have reverted to the old kernel. Linus ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] How to create a printer that prints directly to a file?
thanks a lot cornel, i will try that out On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 12:49 PM, cornel panceac wrote: > > > 2010/5/16 Bryan Berry > > I am trying to learn how to share printers using samba. I am doing most of >> my experiments at home w/ libvirt and where there are no printers. >> >> How can I set up a printer device that just prints to a file on my system? >> That would really help me in my experiments. >> > > try this: > > http://www.linux.com/archive/feed/61826 > > -- > Among the maxims on Lord Naoshige's wall, there was this one: "Matters of > great concern should be treated lightly." Master Ittei commented, "Matters > of small concern should be treated seriously." > (Ghost Dog : The Way of The Samurai) > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] rsync - dirs and symlinks only, not contents
Hi all, I have a need to copy only dirs, subdirs and sym links only without the need to copy contents. I originally used the following test to observe behavior; rsync -a -f"+ */" -f"- *" source destination So I noticed that dirs/subdirs were copied but without contents as desired. I have several sym links (dir sym links) that I would also to to copy over. I tried this; rsync -a -f"+ */" -f"- * -l" source destination Although my sym links show, they are broken. Any thoughts on how to copy dirs, subdirs and sym links only w/o contents? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] update to 5.5 small issues
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 01:56:58PM -0400, samuel machua wrote: > Hi Fred, were you able to fix your mail problem is seem to be having the > same issue. > On Sun, 2010-05-16 at 13:17 -0400, fred smith wrote: > > sendmail.cf Yes, something in the 5.5 update probably put a new sendmail.mc or sendmail.cf on my system and since my customized one was named fcshome.mc the new one was used instead. So, if you've got a customized sendmail.mc (or .mc, rather) you should rebuild the cf from it (while in /etc/mail, as root): make .cf then copy that .cf file over sendmail.cf, then restart sendmail: /etc/rc.d/init.d/sendmail restart -- Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us - "Not everyone who says to me, 'Lord, Lord,' will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only he who does the will of my Father who is in heaven." -- Matthew 7:21 (niv) - ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Problems after update to 5.5
On Sun, 2010-05-16 at 20:10 -0400, C Linus Hicks wrote: > On Sat, 2010-05-15 at 12:27 +0100, Colin Coles wrote: > > Hi, > > I have updated 8 machines so far and 2 are refusing to boot on > > 2.6.18-194.3.1.el5 kernel, they just hang at: 'Starting udev:' but when I > > revert to 2.6.18-164.15.1.el5 kernel they boot fine. Any pointers? > > I just updated a machine and also got a hang at udev. When I revert to > kernel 2.6.18-164 it works fine. It appears to be a hard hang. Caps lock > and num lock have no effect and I have to hit the reset button. > > I tried increasing udev log level to debug and it did not hang. I > reduced the log level to info and it still did not hang. However, when I > start X, esd seems to get stuck in a loop on a short segment of audio. > If I kill esd, the desktop will finish initializing. Logging out of X > also hung, but killing X manually worked. I have reverted to the old > kernel. --- I am just wondering if any of you guys with the udev hang problem have tried: rpm -e the new kernel? Then try to reinstall it via yum install. You should delete the new kernel from /var/cache/yum first. Just a point in why I say that is I have seen several machines that have yummed corrupt packages and bad repo metadata. After pegging yum to pull from a distinct mirror the problem has gone away. John ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [SOLVED] Re: Formatting file system too slow on CentOS
Am Samstag, den 15.05.2010, 09:04 +0700 schrieb David Suhendrik: > Thanks for the help, a solution to this problem is to update the bios, > and after using the newest version of bios I can use AHCI mode on the > sata controller, and indeed this is the problem. > > But I had to install windows server to update the bios, then installed > again using Linux. > > -- > Best regards, > David > http://blog.pnyet.web.id > Usually you can download a bootable CD Image from HP for BIOS updates. Chris ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [SOLVED] Re: Formatting file system too slow on CentOS
David Suhendrik wrote: > Thanks for the help, a solution to this problem is to update the bios, > and after using the newest version of bios I can use AHCI mode on the > sata controller, and indeed this is the problem. > > But I had to install windows server to update the bios, then installed > again using Linux. > you can put most windows-only flash updaters and such on a USB stick or CD with Hirens Boot or similar, and run them from there. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] centos release 5.5 issue
Hi
One of our developers has come across an issue with the new release. He
provided this piece of code to show the problem:-
cat failure.c
#include
int main( int argc, char* argv[] )
{
return 0;
}
gcc failure.c
/usr/include/asm-x86_64/msr.h:169: error: expected declaration
specifiers or ‘...’ before ‘u32’
/usr/include/asm-x86_64/msr.h:169: error: expected declaration
specifiers or ‘...’ before ‘u32’
/usr/include/asm-x86_64/msr.h:169: error: expected declaration
specifiers or ‘...’ before ‘u32’
/usr/include/asm-x86_64/msr.h: In function ‘rdmsr_on_cpu’:
/usr/include/asm-x86_64/msr.h:171: error: ‘l’ undeclared (first use in
this function)
/usr/include/asm-x86_64/msr.h:171: error: (Each undeclared identifier is
reported only once
/usr/include/asm-x86_64/msr.h:171: error: for each function it appears in.)
/usr/include/asm-x86_64/msr.h:171: error: ‘h’ undeclared (first use in
this function)
/usr/include/asm-x86_64/msr.h:171: error: ‘msr_no’ undeclared (first use
in this function)
/usr/include/asm-x86_64/msr.h:171: error: invalid lvalue in asm output 0
/usr/include/asm-x86_64/msr.h:171: error: invalid lvalue in asm output 1
/usr/include/asm-x86_64/msr.h: At top level:
/usr/include/asm-x86_64/msr.h:173: error: expected declaration
specifiers or ‘...’ before ‘u32’
/usr/include/asm-x86_64/msr.h:173: error: expected declaration
specifiers or ‘...’ before ‘u32’
/usr/include/asm-x86_64/msr.h:173: error: expected declaration
specifiers or ‘...’ before ‘u32’
/usr/include/asm-x86_64/msr.h: In function ‘wrmsr_on_cpu’:
/usr/include/asm-x86_64/msr.h:175: error: ‘msr_no’ undeclared (first use
in this function)
/usr/include/asm-x86_64/msr.h:175: error: ‘l’ undeclared (first use in
this function)
/usr/include/asm-x86_64/msr.h:175: error: ‘h’ undeclared (first use in
this function)
Anyone else seen this or found a bug with these function definitions ?
Thanks
Phil
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
