[CentOS] NFS automount error

2010-02-20 Thread sync 
hi, guys:

  Today when i typed  "mount " command on the server and found  this
message:

..
...
192.168.9.252: /home/share/tmp on /net/tmp/share  type nfs ( rw, bg,
soft,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,addr=192.168.9.252)
192.168.9.252: /home/share/tmp on /net/tmp/share  type nfs ( rw, bg,
soft,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,addr=192.168.9.252)
192.168.9.252: /home/share/tmp on /net/tmp/share  type nfs ( rw, bg,
soft,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,addr=192.168.9.252)
192.168.9.252: /home/share/tmp on /net/tmp/share  type nfs ( rw, bg,
soft,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,addr=192.168.9.252)
192.168.9.252: /home/share/tmp on /net/tmp/share  type nfs ( rw, bg,
soft,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,addr=192.168.9.252)
192.168.9.252: /home/share/tmp on /net/tmp/share  type nfs ( rw, bg,
soft,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,addr=192.168.9.252)



This message was  told to  me that the "/home/share/tmp" directory was
mountd repeat more and more times .

I guess it maybe is the NFS problem . But I have no idea of  solving  it .


Could someone give me some suggestions ?  Thanks in advance~
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] tcpdump?

2010-02-20 Thread Alexander Dalloz 
Am 20.02.2010 07:03, schrieb Hadi Motamedi:
> 
> Dear All
> 
> I have put tcpdump trace on port 4957 on my CentOS server , as the following :
> 
> #tcpdump port 4957
> 
> I want to obtain the payload data to see what is realy being exchanged 
> between my CentOS server and the outside network element . Can you please let 
> me know how I can modify my command ?
> 
> Thank you

tcpdump -i ethX -p -s 0 -w /path/to/4957.trace.pcap port 4957

After finishing the trace you can load the saved pcap file into
wireshark for a detailed analysis.

Alexander
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Limiting bandwidth

2010-02-20 Thread Bob McConnell 
Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
> Greetings,
> 
> Scenario:
> Centos box with eth1 (10.0.0.0/24) and eth0 (192.168.0.0/24)
> segment on eth0 has access to full bandwidth of uplink
> Both are on 100mbps switches
> 
> Requirements:
> bandwith on segment on eth1 needs to be throttled to different speeds - say
> 32, 64, 128kbps and the such. Required for application performance testing
> purposes.

The best tool I have found for this is DummyNet, which is built into 
FreeBSD. It was created to test protocol designs then adapted for 
traffic management. However, I am not aware of any ports into Linux.

  
  

Bob McConnell
N2SPP
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Limiting bandwidth

2010-02-20 Thread News 
Il 20/02/2010 13.25, Bob McConnell ha scritto:
> Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> Scenario:
>> Centos box with eth1 (10.0.0.0/24) and eth0 (192.168.0.0/24)
>> segment on eth0 has access to full bandwidth of uplink
>> Both are on 100mbps switches
>>
>> Requirements:
>> bandwith on segment on eth1 needs to be throttled to different speeds - say
>> 32, 64, 128kbps and the such. Required for application performance testing
>> purposes.
>
> The best tool I have found for this is DummyNet, which is built into
> FreeBSD. It was created to test protocol designs then adapted for
> traffic management. However, I am not aware of any ports into Linux.
>
>
>
>
> Bob McConnell
> N2SPP
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>

I try to use shorewall for this.
Amedeo
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 60, Issue 5

2010-02-20 Thread centos-announce-request 
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. CESA-2010:0115 Moderate CentOS 4 i386 pidgin -security
  update (Tru Huynh)
   2. CESA-2010:0115 Moderate CentOS 4 x86_64 pidgin -  security
  update (Tru Huynh)


--

Message: 1
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 01:04:47 +0100
From: Tru Huynh 
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0115 Moderate CentOS 4 i386
pidgin -security update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: <2010022447.ga32...@sillage.bis.pasteur.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2010:0115

pidgin security update for CentOS 4 i386:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0115.html

The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:

i386:
updates/i386/RPMS/finch-2.6.6-1.el4.i386.rpm
updates/i386/RPMS/finch-devel-2.6.6-1.el4.i386.rpm
updates/i386/RPMS/libpurple-2.6.6-1.el4.i386.rpm
updates/i386/RPMS/libpurple-devel-2.6.6-1.el4.i386.rpm
updates/i386/RPMS/libpurple-perl-2.6.6-1.el4.i386.rpm
updates/i386/RPMS/libpurple-tcl-2.6.6-1.el4.i386.rpm
updates/i386/RPMS/pidgin-2.6.6-1.el4.i386.rpm
updates/i386/RPMS/pidgin-devel-2.6.6-1.el4.i386.rpm
updates/i386/RPMS/pidgin-perl-2.6.6-1.el4.i386.rpm

source:
updates/SRPMS/pidgin-2.6.6-1.el4.src.rpm

You may update your CentOS-4 i386 installations by running the command:

yum update pidgin\* finch\*

Tru
-- 
Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance)
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : 
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20100220/4205f0e8/attachment-0001.bin
 

--

Message: 2
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 01:05:16 +0100
From: Tru Huynh 
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0115 Moderate CentOS 4 x86_64
pidgin -security update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: <2010022516.gb32...@sillage.bis.pasteur.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2010:0115

pidgin security update for CentOS 4 x86_64:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0115.html

The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:

x86_64:
updates/x86_64/RPMS/finch-2.6.6-1.el4.x86_64.rpm
updates/x86_64/RPMS/finch-devel-2.6.6-1.el4.x86_64.rpm
updates/x86_64/RPMS/libpurple-2.6.6-1.el4.x86_64.rpm
updates/x86_64/RPMS/libpurple-devel-2.6.6-1.el4.x86_64.rpm
updates/x86_64/RPMS/libpurple-perl-2.6.6-1.el4.x86_64.rpm
updates/x86_64/RPMS/libpurple-tcl-2.6.6-1.el4.x86_64.rpm
updates/x86_64/RPMS/pidgin-2.6.6-1.el4.x86_64.rpm
updates/x86_64/RPMS/pidgin-devel-2.6.6-1.el4.x86_64.rpm
updates/x86_64/RPMS/pidgin-perl-2.6.6-1.el4.x86_64.rpm

source:
updates/SRPMS/pidgin-2.6.6-1.el4.src.rpm

You may update your CentOS-4 x86_64 installations by running the command:

yum update pidgin\* finch\*

Tru
-- 
Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance)
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : 
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20100220/d43d5ed5/attachment-0001.bin
 

--

___
CentOS-announce mailing list
centos-annou...@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce


End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 60, Issue 5
**
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.3 host not seeing storage device

2010-02-20 Thread Sean Carolan 
> Did you check the output of "/proc/scsi/scsi"?

Yea, it's empty.

> I would do a SCSI rescan using
>
>   echo "- - -" > /sys/class/scsi_host/hostX/scan

Tried this and also:

echo 1 > /sys/class/fc_host/host0/issue_lip

Still, nothing is seen by the host.  We have also tried changing the
port settings from Loop, to NPIV, to Auto on the d2d device but the
results are the same.  Unfortunately all HP's documentation is
directed towards windows users, who simply use a GUI to discover the
virtual drive.

> To configure (i.e. speed and connection type) and control the QLogic FC
> HBA I recommend to install the QLogic SANsurfer CLI.

Ok, I may try this but I had hoped the default settings would work.
We have no problem talking to our SAN on the same fabric, from other
hosts with Qlogic HBAs.

> Do you use port zoning or WWN zoning? The switch sees the attached WWNs of
> both the server and the tape library?

WWN zoning, and yes, the switch can see the host HBA, the virtual tape
library and the tape changer.  I've double-checked the zone and
refreshed it several times but no dice.

I have a ticket open with HP, but their support folks seemed a bit
stumped as well.  /sigh...
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Problem updating curl

2010-02-20 Thread Ski Dawg 
Hello everyone,

I am having some difficulty updating curl on my updated CentOS 5.4 box
(CentOS release 5.4 (Final)).

I have a client that is needing a library (librets) updated. I have
version 1.3.38 installed, but they need 1.3.40. When I try to build
that library, it tells me that it requires curl 7.18.2 or greater.

I found information for building an updated curl packages (7.20.0 in
this case), and was able to successfully build those rpm packages, but
when I try to install them, I get the following error:
libcurl.so.3 is needed by (installed) gnupg-1.4.5-14.i386

The curl packages that I built (from source 7.20.0) are trying to
install libcurl.so.4 (libcurl.so.4.2.0 specifically). I checked and
the curl package 7.18.2 will also build libcurl.so.4, so that wouldn't
help me in this case.

Is anyone aware of anyway of getting around this without rebuilding
gnupg as well? I am just afraid that if I have to rebuild the gnupg
package also, it will cause many other dependency issues that will
completely break my system.

Any thoughts/advice to get around this problem?
-- 
Doug

Registered Linux User #285548 (http://counter.li.org)

Never trust a computer you can't throw out a window.
   -- Steve Wozniak
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] NFS automount error

2010-02-20 Thread gachoyi 
check your fstab,,, or post it

2010/2/20 sync 

> hi, guys:
>
>   Today when i typed  "mount " command on the server and found  this
> message:
>
> ..
> ...
> 192.168.9.252: /home/share/tmp on /net/tmp/share  type nfs ( rw, bg,
> soft,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,addr=192.168.9.252)
> 192.168.9.252: /home/share/tmp on /net/tmp/share  type nfs ( rw, bg,
> soft,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,addr=192.168.9.252)
> 192.168.9.252: /home/share/tmp on /net/tmp/share  type nfs ( rw, bg,
> soft,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,addr=192.168.9.252)
> 192.168.9.252: /home/share/tmp on /net/tmp/share  type nfs ( rw, bg,
> soft,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,addr=192.168.9.252)
> 192.168.9.252: /home/share/tmp on /net/tmp/share  type nfs ( rw, bg,
> soft,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,addr=192.168.9.252)
> 192.168.9.252: /home/share/tmp on /net/tmp/share  type nfs ( rw, bg,
> soft,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,addr=192.168.9.252)
>
> 
>
> This message was  told to  me that the "/home/share/tmp" directory was
> mountd repeat more and more times .
>
> I guess it maybe is the NFS problem . But I have no idea of  solving  it .
>
>
> Could someone give me some suggestions ?  Thanks in advance~
>
>
>
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] updated some packages now some windows hang after open or close

2010-02-20 Thread Jerry Geis 
I had a need on a centos 5.4 x86_64 box to try and run with a later totem.
I desired to do this by source.

After installing the packages below my system comes up, I thought 
everything was good.
thunderbird comes up firefox comes up. totem works  however 
there seems to be
an issue with closing or opening windows some random time later with all 
three programs.
It gives the impression that X is hung. Keyboard no longer works - mouse 
moves but cannot
click on anything. ssh into the box still works. I can kill the X server 
and start all up again for a random time
then it looks like it hangs again.

I am wondering if anyone knows what this might be - perhaps another 
package I need to update.
I am also running a  radeon 3200 driver with the Catalyst binary driver.

Thanks for your thoughts.

Jerry

---

atk-1.29.4.tar.gz libogg-1.1.4.tar.gz
autoconf-2.65.tar.gz  liboil-0.3.16.tar.gz
cairo-1.8.8.tar.gzlibpng-1.4.0.tar.gz
flex-2.5.35.tar.gzlibproxy-0.2.3.tar.bz2
libsoup-2.29.90.tar.gz
fontconfig-2.8.0.tar.gz   libtheora-1.1.1.tar.bz2
gettext-0.17.tar.gz   libunique-1.0.8.tar.gz
glib-2.23.3.tar.gzlibvorbis-1.2.3.tar.gz
gmime-2.4.14.tar.gz   m4-1.4.13.tar.gz
gnome-common-2.28.0.tar.gz   
gnome-vfs-2.24.2.tar.gz   pango-1.26.2.tar.gz
gnutls-2.8.5.tar.bz2  pixman-0.17.4.tar.gz
gst-plugins-bad-0.10.17.tar.gz   
gst-plugins-base-0.10.26.tar.gz   shared-mime-info-0.70.tar.bz2
gst-plugins-good-0.10.18.tar.gz   totem-2.29.4.tar.gz
gst-plugins-ugly-0.10.13.tar.gz  
gstreamer-0.10.26.tar.gz   
gst-rtsp-0.10.5.tar.bz2   
gtk+-2.19.5.tar.gz   
gtk-doc-1.13.tar.gz   
gtk-engines-2.19.0.tar.gz 
intltool-0.40.6.tar.gz
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] eSATA drive enclosure of a full PC?

2010-02-20 Thread Slack-Moehrle 
HI All,

I have a dilemma and I would appreciate advice

1. Get a good size case, mobo, processor, etc and put 8 hard drives it in and 
RAID them. (yes an 8 port SATA mobo). Running CentOS.

or

2. Get an eSATA enclosure that has room for 8 or 10 drives and just connect it 
to box?

I know that RAID is not a full proof backup, but I am looking for a solution to 
store all of my data, projects, music, etc, etc

Can I get thoughts for ideas for solutions?

Thank You
-Jason
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] eSATA drive enclosure of a full PC?

2010-02-20 Thread John R Pierce 
Slack-Moehrle wrote:
> HI All,
>
> I have a dilemma and I would appreciate advice
>
> 1. Get a good size case, mobo, processor, etc and put 8 hard drives it in and 
> RAID them. (yes an 8 port SATA mobo). Running CentOS.
>
> or
>
> 2. Get an eSATA enclosure that has room for 8 or 10 drives and just connect 
> it to box?
>   

esata enclosure will be on a single SATA port, which will be a 
bottleneck for 4 or more drives.  maybe even for 3 drives.  8 or more 
drives should be on a 4 channel SAS port at least.

how about getting something like a QNAP and putting your storage on the 
network?

for instance, http://www.qnap.com/pro_detail_feature.asp?p_id=134





___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] eSATA drive enclosure of a full PC?

2010-02-20 Thread Slack-Moehrle 
Hi John,

Yes, I looked into this and I was looking for a solution with a large number of 
drives, but at a good cost point.

So you are saying a full fledged PC with an 8-port sata mobo is a better 
solution.

--Jason

- Original Message -
From: "John R Pierce" 
To: "CentOS mailing list" 
Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2010 9:36:59 PM
Subject: Re: [CentOS] eSATA drive enclosure of a full PC?

Slack-Moehrle wrote:
> HI All,
>
> I have a dilemma and I would appreciate advice
>
> 1. Get a good size case, mobo, processor, etc and put 8 hard drives it in and 
> RAID them. (yes an 8 port SATA mobo). Running CentOS.
>
> or
>
> 2. Get an eSATA enclosure that has room for 8 or 10 drives and just connect 
> it to box?
>   

esata enclosure will be on a single SATA port, which will be a 
bottleneck for 4 or more drives.  maybe even for 3 drives.  8 or more 
drives should be on a 4 channel SAS port at least.

how about getting something like a QNAP and putting your storage on the 
network?

for instance, http://www.qnap.com/pro_detail_feature.asp?p_id=134





___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] eSATA drive enclosure of a full PC?

2010-02-20 Thread Rudi Ahlers 
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 7:17 AM, Slack-Moehrle  wrote:

> HI All,
>
> I have a dilemma and I would appreciate advice
>
> 1. Get a good size case, mobo, processor, etc and put 8 hard drives it in
> and RAID them. (yes an 8 port SATA mobo). Running CentOS.
>
> or
>
> 2. Get an eSATA enclosure that has room for 8 or 10 drives and just connect
> it to box?
>
> I know that RAID is not a full proof backup, but I am looking for a
> solution to store all of my data, projects, music, etc, etc
>
> Can I get thoughts for ideas for solutions?
>
> Thank You
> -Jason
> ___
>
>

If you're building something on the cheap, then you could get an even
cheaper setup with a 4port SATA motherboad, and an add 4port SATA PCI /
PCI-e card.

Some of those eSATA enclosures will use 1x SATA port per HDD, and some even
work on USB which is even worse.

If you can run each HDD on it's own port, you'll get optimal performance.
For a cheap in-office storage, I use these:
http://www.google.com/products/catalog?hl=en&safe=off&q=icy+dock&cid=7046738176421693906&sa=title#p

It's basically a hot-swap cage, but I need to manually tell the OS that the
drive was removed, since it doesn't run on a server back-plane. But it does
the job as far as cheap storage goes :)
Put 4x 2TB HDD's in there and you have 4TB storage on RAID10


-- 
Kind Regards
Rudi Ahlers
SoftDux

Website: http://www.SoftDux.com
Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com
Office: 087 805 9573
Cell: 082 554 7532
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] eSATA drive enclosure of a full PC?

2010-02-20 Thread Slack-Moehrle 
Hi Rudi,

>>If you're building something on the cheap, then you could get an even cheaper 
>>setup with a 4port SATA >>motherboad, and an add 4port SATA PCI / PCI-e card. 

True, that would be each drive on its own port, which is optimal. 

With 8 ports, I could get 8 x 2tb and and have 8th in RAID10.

What about this: 
http://www.google.com/products/catalog?q=8+x+sata&cid=13835643122069874118&sa=title#p

And just a normal PC with lots of drives?

-Jason



Some of those eSATA enclosures will use 1x SATA port per HDD, and some even 
work on USB which is even worse. 

If you can run each HDD on it's own port, you'll get optimal performance. For a 
cheap in-office storage, I use these: 
http://www.google.com/products/catalog?hl=en&safe=off&q=icy+dock&cid=7046738176421693906&sa=title#p
 

It's basically a hot-swap cage, but I need to manually tell the OS that the 
drive was removed, since it doesn't run on a server back-plane. But it does the 
job as far as cheap storage goes :) 
Put 4x 2TB HDD's in there and you have 4TB storage on RAID10 


-- 
Kind Regards 
Rudi Ahlers 
SoftDux 

Website: http://www.SoftDux.com 
Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com 
Office: 087 805 9573 
Cell: 082 554 7532 

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] eSATA drive enclosure of a full PC?

2010-02-20 Thread John R Pierce 
Slack-Moehrle wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Yes, I looked into this and I was looking for a solution with a large number 
> of drives, but at a good cost point.
>
> So you are saying a full fledged PC with an 8-port sata mobo is a better 
> solution.
>   

yeah, its cheaper to go direct connect internal jbod.make sure the 
drives get plenty of airflow, don't pack them too close together.

a bunch of vendors sell 5-in-3 sata hotswap adapters that hold 5 SATA 
drives in 3 HH external bays of a jumbo tower chassis.  they seem to run 
about $100.  each drive bay has its own sata port on the back of these.

example of one of these,
http://www.amazon.com/SUPERMICRO-Hot-Swap-Mobile-System-Cabinet/dp/B9ILU0

if you get a motherboard that has a 2nd x8 or x16 slot, you can put an 
x4 PCI-express card in that for lots more SATA/SAS channels if you feel 
the need to really expand.   I wouldn't put more than 4 SATA ports on a 
PCI-E x1 slot.


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] eSATA drive enclosure of a full PC?

2010-02-20 Thread Slack-Moehrle 
Hi John,

>> So you are saying a full fledged PC with an 8-port sata mobo is a better 
>> solution.>   

>a bunch of vendors sell 5-in-3 sata hotswap adapters that hold 5 SATA 
>drives in 3 HH external bays of a jumbo tower chassis.  they seem to run 
>about $100.  each drive bay has its own sata port on the back of these.

>example of one of these,
>http://www.amazon.com/SUPERMICRO-Hot-Swap-Mobile-System-Cabinet/dp/B9ILU0

So I am confused, where does this go? It is external? Or does it fit inside a 
full tower case?

-Jason

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos