Re: [CentOS] Keeping iptables in sync across multiple machines
Dear Karan. ... > So, what I am looking for really is feedback on what people are using in > the wild on multiple machines, and bonus points for people who only use > tools and mechanisms already built into the CentOS [base] repo. We are using Spacewalk to manage /etc/sysconfig/iptables files. The files are version controlled with the integrated config management tool. As SW does not (yet) support depended command execution, we are using remote command execution through osad to reload iptables, afterwards. Testing could be done with Spacewalk's monitoring capabilities or external tools. Best Regards Marcus ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] iptables -d fqdn instead of IP
Hi again. >> and I have some examples from my own personal experience. So I don't >> believe that you can say there is a "best" method, for all situations. > > Yes I can. Host information can be spoofed. So can IP Addresses. Here is > the point you are missing, if he is going to connect to your system then he > is going to do it via IP address not using his FQDN and the network could > care less about FQDN. Packets are not routed using FQDN they are routed via > IP Address and Mac's. So while FQDN is an option it is not as reliable as > the IP Address. So what are you going to do now a reverse lookup? How often > do they match what you are looking for these days? Not often. > > You can always create a packet that says you are this or that but without the > true IP address you'll never get a response which means you will never get > connected. I agree on that and it's the reason why I finally decided not to use fqdns. Thank you both for the detailed explanation :) Best Regards Marcus ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Problem mounting CIFS shares with credential file after SAMBA update
Hello all, This morning i updated my CentOS (5.4) and that included: samba-3.0.33-3.14.el5.i386.rpm samba-client-3.0.33-3.14.el5.i386.rpm samba-common-3.0.33-3.14.el5.i386.rpm samba-swat-3.0.33-3.14.el5.i386.rpm I have several mounts if fstab using a .credentials file that worked until i rebooted with this updates. I remember time ago was an issue with the format of credentials file (something about a LF at the end or something else) I've checked the file, added spaces between "=", added a line at the end, between username and passwd... but it doesn't work, i always get an error like (when i do mount -a): mount error 13 = Permission denied Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual page (e.g.man mount.cifs) (this is repeated for every CIFS share mounted in fstab) If i mount it "by hand" it works fine: # mount -tcifs -ousername= //192.168.0.100/x /media/x Password: And then, if i do a mount -a then works! (until i reboot, of course) # mount -a # Do anyone knows what is happening? Best, Jose Maria =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Scanned with Copfilter Version 0.84beta3a (ProxSMTP 1.6) AntiVirus: ClamAV 0.95.2/9971 - Sun Nov 1 03:25:12 2009 by Markus Madlener @ http://www.copfilter.org ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.4: yum-priorities seems to be MIA
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 16:56 -0400, Boris Epstein wrote: > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Boris Epstein wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I just installed 5.4 on a machine here... All seems running fine, > >> except I decided to put on the extra repositories - and as usual I > >> decided to install yum-priorities (as directed here: > >> http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/RPMForge ) but > >> it seems like this package is nowhere to be found. Does anybody know > >> why this would be? > > > > It is a known issue: > > > > http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3923 > > > > Akemi > > > > > > Thanks... Hopefully that will be sorted out soon then. > > Boris. I thought it was replaced by protectbase, and configured that instead. Dave ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] No entry in /var/log/boot.log
Rod Rook wrote on Sat, 31 Oct 2009 23:55:52 -0500: > The problem mentioned in the thread you referred to is usually caused by > Network Manager, which has nothing to do with boot.log. You may want to elaborate what your *problem* really is. And please trim your answers, thanks. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Problem mounting CIFS shares with credential file afterSAMBA update
Hi, I've the same problem on RHEL 5.4 after samba update. I almost tried everything but I had to switch to -username=...,-password=... to get CIFS mount point to work. I opened a case which has been closed because a second system also running on RHEL 5.4 works with this update. Hope they will fix this issue... Sam On 1 nov. 2009, at 12:38, José María Terry Jiménez wrote: > Hello all, > > This morning i updated my CentOS (5.4) and that included: > > samba-3.0.33-3.14.el5.i386.rpm > samba-client-3.0.33-3.14.el5.i386.rpm > samba-common-3.0.33-3.14.el5.i386.rpm > samba-swat-3.0.33-3.14.el5.i386.rpm > > I have several mounts if fstab using a .credentials file that worked > until i rebooted with this updates. > > I remember time ago was an issue with the format of credentials file > (something about a LF at the end or something else) > > I've checked the file, added spaces between "=", added a line at the > end, between username and passwd... but it doesn't work, i always > get an > error like (when i do mount -a): > mount error 13 = Permission denied > Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual page (e.g.man mount.cifs) > > (this is repeated for every CIFS share mounted in fstab) > > If i mount it "by hand" it works fine: > # mount -tcifs -ousername= //192.168.0.100/x /media/x > Password: > > And then, if i do a mount -a then works! (until i reboot, of course) > > # mount -a > # > > Do anyone knows what is happening? > > Best, > Jose Maria > > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > Scanned with Copfilter Version 0.84beta3a (ProxSMTP 1.6) > AntiVirus: ClamAV 0.95.2/9971 - Sun Nov 1 03:25:12 2009 > by Markus Madlener @ http://www.copfilter.org > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Automatical resync of MD, why?
Hello, I have three MDs on two HDDs in RAID 1. In last days, thanks to my monitoring (which is installed longer time), I have recognized, that one of these MDs is automatically started resync. First was at 25th October and second resync of the same MD was today. It started in same daytime (about 4:00 AM). Now is MD resynced and working well. Can someone tell me what means this automatic resync? Is it standard? Is it means some possible problems with one HDD (but other two MDs are working without resync)? Thank you Martin Šťastný ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Problem mounting CIFS shares with credential file afterSAMBA update
Hello I've just solved this (because i remembered what happened last time) The problem is that the credentials file must be being parsed incorrectly and any char after the password is passed as part of password (don't know if you understand me because my poor english). What i did is editing the .credentials file with an hex editor and deleting everything after the last character in the password. I've used ghex (yum install ghex) (ghex2 /path/to/.credentials) You'll find anything before the last password character (in my case was 0A (represented as a dot (.) ) in the ascii panel. Then goto the Ascii view (the right) and delete that dot, the (0A in hex becomes 0). That worked for me and this is being mounted on reboot without problems. Tell here if this worked for you. Best Samuel Contesse escribió: > Hi, > > I've the same problem on RHEL 5.4 after samba update. I almost tried > everything but I had to switch to -username=...,-password=... to get > CIFS mount point to work. I opened a case which has been closed > because a second system also running on RHEL 5.4 works with this update. > > Hope they will fix this issue... > > Sam > > On 1 nov. 2009, at 12:38, José María Terry Jiménez > wrote: > > >> Hello all, >> >> This morning i updated my CentOS (5.4) and that included: >> >> samba-3.0.33-3.14.el5.i386.rpm >> samba-client-3.0.33-3.14.el5.i386.rpm >> samba-common-3.0.33-3.14.el5.i386.rpm >> samba-swat-3.0.33-3.14.el5.i386.rpm >> >> I have several mounts if fstab using a .credentials file that worked >> until i rebooted with this updates. >> >> I remember time ago was an issue with the format of credentials file >> (something about a LF at the end or something else) >> >> I've checked the file, added spaces between "=", added a line at the >> end, between username and passwd... but it doesn't work, i always >> get an >> error like (when i do mount -a): >> mount error 13 = Permission denied >> Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual page (e.g.man mount.cifs) >> >> (this is repeated for every CIFS share mounted in fstab) >> >> If i mount it "by hand" it works fine: >> # mount -tcifs -ousername= //192.168.0.100/x /media/x >> Password: >> >> And then, if i do a mount -a then works! (until i reboot, of course) >> >> # mount -a >> # >> >> Do anyone knows what is happening? >> >> Best, >> Jose Maria >> >> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- >> Scanned with Copfilter Version 0.84beta3a (ProxSMTP 1.6) >> AntiVirus: ClamAV 0.95.2/9971 - Sun Nov 1 03:25:12 2009 >> by Markus Madlener @ http://www.copfilter.org >> ___ >> CentOS mailing list >> CentOS@centos.org >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >> > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Scanned with Copfilter Version 0.84beta3a (ProxSMTP 1.6) AntiVirus: ClamAV 0.95.2/9971 - Sun Nov 1 03:25:12 2009 by Markus Madlener @ http://www.copfilter.org ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Keeping iptables in sync across multiple machines
Marcus Moeller wrote: > Dear Karan. > ... >> So, what I am looking for really is feedback on what people are using in >> the wild on multiple machines, and bonus points for people who only use >> tools and mechanisms already built into the CentOS [base] repo. > > We are using Spacewalk to manage /etc/sysconfig/iptables files. The > files are version controlled with the integrated config management > tool. As SW does not (yet) support depended command execution, we are > using remote command execution through osad to reload iptables, > afterwards. So, what version is Spacewalk up to? When I installed it this past spring, it was version 0.4, and I upgraded to 0.5, which had just been released, the week before my contract ended the end of April. *I* would *never* put something that was under 1.0 (actually, 1.0.1) into production. At work, we're getting pressure to provide all kinds of info and control on what's on the servers and desktops (we're heavy tech - a lot of our users are on Linux), and he just brought up OCS Inventory. He said it took him about 5 min (sounded more like half an hour, actually), and though there are a number of things - docs not great, and the translations leave something to be desired (it from the French), I'm impressed. It's a *lot* slicker, a lot more finished, and easier to install and configure, it seems, than Spacewalk, which took me *many* weeks to install, configure, and get working correctly. OCS Inventory *looks* (I've only played with it for an hour or two) as though I can build scripts for it to run, to install, upgrade, etc, remote systems. mark -- Frodo: "(Gollum) deserves death!" Gandalf: "...I daresay he does. Many that live deserve death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgement." ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] No entry in /var/log/boot.log
Rod Rook wrote: > Hi, Lee, > The problem mentioned in the thread you referred to is usually caused > by Network Manager, which has nothing to do with boot.log. > Thanks to you anyway. Perhaps he meant the thread beginning at http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2009-October/084836.html My boot log looks like this: [r...@mavis log]# pwd /var/log [r...@mavis log]# ls -l | grep boot -rw--- 1 rootroot 0 Nov 1 04:02 boot.log -rw--- 1 rootroot 0 Oct 25 04:02 boot.log.1 -rw--- 1 rootroot 0 Oct 18 04:02 boot.log.2 -rw--- 1 rootroot 0 Oct 11 04:02 boot.log.3 -rw--- 1 rootroot 0 Oct 4 04:02 boot.log.4 [r...@mavis log]# The zero length most like indicates that there are no entries :-; yet we can see that the machine has been rebooted: [r...@mavis log]# grep boot messages* messages.2:Oct 22 11:39:13 mavis shutdown[26207]: shutting down for system reboot messages.4:Oct 5 16:17:33 mavis shutdown[19739]: shutting down for system reboot messages.4:Oct 5 16:27:07 mavis shutdown[4979]: shutting down for system reboot messages.4:Oct 5 16:33:25 mavis shutdown[4738]: shutting down for system reboot messages.4:Oct 10 15:01:46 mavis shutdown[11680]: shutting down for system reboot [r...@mavis log]# Frankly, I can do very well without have boot.log at all but it seems that if we have it, it really should work! Mounting an old CentOS-4 disk, we see that it worked in CentOS 4: [r...@mavis log]# pwd /old-sys/var/log [r...@mavis log]# ls -l | grep boot -rw--- 1 root root 107353 May 21 2007 boot.log -rw--- 1 root root 8867 May 20 2007 boot.log.1 -rw--- 1 root root 17265 May 13 2007 boot.log.2 -rw--- 1 root root 2224 May 6 2007 boot.log.3 -rw--- 1 root root105 Apr 29 2007 boot.log.4 [r...@mavis log]# It's interesting to note that my current /etc/syslog.conf and the one in the older version both contain the entry: # Save boot messages also to boot.log local7.* /var/log/boot.log Beyond ferreting out those details, I am LOST. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] No entry in /var/log/boot.log
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 10:13 AM, Robert wrote: > > > Rod Rook wrote: > > > > > Hi, Lee, > > The problem mentioned in the thread you referred to is usually caused > > by Network Manager, which has nothing to do with boot.log. > > Thanks to you anyway. > Perhaps he meant the thread beginning at > http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2009-October/084836.html > > My boot log looks like this: > >[r...@mavis log]# pwd >/var/log >[r...@mavis log]# ls -l | grep boot >-rw--- 1 rootroot 0 Nov 1 04:02 boot.log >-rw--- 1 rootroot 0 Oct 25 04:02 boot.log.1 >-rw--- 1 rootroot 0 Oct 18 04:02 boot.log.2 >-rw--- 1 rootroot 0 Oct 11 04:02 boot.log.3 >-rw--- 1 rootroot 0 Oct 4 04:02 boot.log.4 >[r...@mavis log]# > > The zero length most like indicates that there are no entries :-; yet > we can see that the machine has been rebooted: > > [r...@mavis log]# grep boot messages* >messages.2:Oct 22 11:39:13 mavis shutdown[26207]: shutting down >for system reboot >messages.4:Oct 5 16:17:33 mavis shutdown[19739]: shutting down >for system reboot >messages.4:Oct 5 16:27:07 mavis shutdown[4979]: shutting down >for system reboot >messages.4:Oct 5 16:33:25 mavis shutdown[4738]: shutting down >for system reboot >messages.4:Oct 10 15:01:46 mavis shutdown[11680]: shutting down >for system reboot >[r...@mavis log]# > > Frankly, I can do very well without have boot.log at all but it seems > that if we have it, it really should work! > Mounting an old CentOS-4 disk, we see that it worked in CentOS 4: > >[r...@mavis log]# pwd >/old-sys/var/log >[r...@mavis log]# ls -l | grep boot >-rw--- 1 root root 107353 May 21 2007 boot.log >-rw--- 1 root root 8867 May 20 2007 boot.log.1 >-rw--- 1 root root 17265 May 13 2007 boot.log.2 >-rw--- 1 root root 2224 May 6 2007 boot.log.3 >-rw--- 1 root root105 Apr 29 2007 boot.log.4 >[r...@mavis log]# > > It's interesting to note that my current /etc/syslog.conf and the one > in the older version both contain the entry: > > # Save boot messages also to boot.log >local7.* /var/log/boot.log > > Beyond ferreting out those details, I am LOST. > > Robert, I responded to Lee's statement which referred to http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2009-October/083346.html It is all there if you follow the thread. Anyway, you agree with me that there is a bug or bugs in CentOS 5.4. As I said earlier, it is not a critical matter, but it does not instill confidence in me about CentOS distro. What other bugs are there? The interesting thing, at least to me, is that there seems to be conspiratorial silence about such bugs. Nobody wants to speak ill of their beloved distro? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Problem mounting CIFS shares with credential file afterSAMBA update
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 6:05 AM, Samuel Contesse wrote: > Hi, > > I've the same problem on RHEL 5.4 after samba update. I almost tried > everything but I had to switch to -username=...,-password=... to get > CIFS mount point to work. I opened a case which has been closed > because a second system also running on RHEL 5.4 works with this update. > > Hope they will fix this issue... I was also hit by this bug. Reported at the CentOS bug tracker: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3960 The upstream bugzilla entries: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532153 (RHEL5) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532094 (RHEL4) Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] relatime in plus kernel
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > A CentOS forum user (gulikoza) has a patch, tested it with the > 2.6.18-164.2.1 kernel, and offered it in this post: > > https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php? > viewmode=flat&topic_id=22924&forum=37 > > I am going to give it a try and see if I can include it in the next > centosplus kernel update. The status can be monitored in this bug tracker: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3956 Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Problem mounting CIFS shares with credential file afterSAMBA update
Akemi Yagi escribió: > On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 6:05 AM, Samuel Contesse > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I've the same problem on RHEL 5.4 after samba update. I almost tried >> everything but I had to switch to -username=...,-password=... to get >> CIFS mount point to work. I opened a case which has been closed >> because a second system also running on RHEL 5.4 works with this update. >> >> Hope they will fix this issue... >> > > I was also hit by this bug. Reported at the CentOS bug tracker: > > http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3960 > > The upstream bugzilla entries: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532153 (RHEL5) > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532094 (RHEL4) > > Akemi > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > You can workaround this by editing the credentials file and removing the tail LF with an hex editor as i posted early Best, =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Scanned with Copfilter Version 0.84beta3a (ProxSMTP 1.6) AntiVirus: ClamAV 0.95.2/9971 - Sun Nov 1 03:25:12 2009 by Markus Madlener @ http://www.copfilter.org ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Problem mounting CIFS shares with credential file afterSAMBA update
2009/11/1 José María Terry Jiménez : > Akemi Yagi escribió: >> On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 6:05 AM, Samuel Contesse >> wrote: >> http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3960 >> >> The upstream bugzilla entries: >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532153 (RHEL5) >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532094 (RHEL4) > You can workaround this by editing the credentials file and removing the > tail LF with an hex editor as i posted early Yes, I have seen it, thank you. The patch offered in the bugzilla deals with that issue. The bug has to be fixed upstream, thus the above links. Something that was done in the latest update broke the use of credential file which was previously working fine. Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] No entry in /var/log/boot.log
Rod Rook wrote: > Robert, I responded to Lee's statement which referred to > http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2009-October/083346.html > It is all there if you follow the thread. > Anyway, you agree with me that there is a bug or bugs in CentOS 5.4. > As I said earlier, it is not a critical matter, but it does not > instill confidence in me about CentOS distro. What other bugs are > there? The interesting thing, at least to me, is that there seems to > be conspiratorial silence about such bugs. Nobody wants to speak ill > of their beloved distro? I'm sure there are other bugs. I'm equally sure there's no "conspiracy of silence" here, though. I guess the bug tracker would no longer exist if that was the case... ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] No entry in /var/log/boot.log
Robert wrote: > Rod Rook wrote: > > >> Robert, I responded to Lee's statement which referred to >> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2009-October/083346.html >> It is all there if you follow the thread. >> Anyway, you agree with me that there is a bug or bugs in CentOS 5.4. >> As I said earlier, it is not a critical matter, but it does not >> instill confidence in me about CentOS distro. What other bugs are >> there? The interesting thing, at least to me, is that there seems to >> be conspiratorial silence about such bugs. Nobody wants to speak ill >> of their beloved distro? >> > I'm sure there are other bugs. I'm equally sure there's no "conspiracy > of silence" here, though. I guess the bug tracker would no longer exist > if that was the case... > Going a bit further, the empty boot.log is listed in RedHat's bugzilla (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=boot.log) as bug # 529221 and 489838 The only reason I'm interested in it is that the nuances in syslog.conf still haven't penetrated my thick skull. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Automatical resync of MD, why?
happymaster23 wrote: > Hello, > > I have three MDs on two HDDs in RAID 1. In last days, thanks to my > monitoring (which is installed longer time), I have recognized, that > one of these MDs is automatically started resync. First was at 25th > October and second resync of the same MD was today. It started in same > daytime (about 4:00 AM). Now is MD resynced and working well. Can > someone tell me what means this automatic resync? Is it standard? Is > it means some possible problems with one HDD (but other two MDs are > working without resync)? > > Thank you > Martin Šťastný Have a look at /etc/cron.weekly Glenn ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] No entry in /var/log/boot.log
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Robert wrote: > > > Rod Rook wrote: > > > Robert, I responded to Lee's statement which referred to > > http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2009-October/083346.html > > It is all there if you follow the thread. > > Anyway, you agree with me that there is a bug or bugs in CentOS 5.4. > > As I said earlier, it is not a critical matter, but it does not > > instill confidence in me about CentOS distro. What other bugs are > > there? The interesting thing, at least to me, is that there seems to > > be conspiratorial silence about such bugs. Nobody wants to speak ill > > of their beloved distro? > I'm sure there are other bugs. I'm equally sure there's no "conspiracy > of silence" here, though. I guess the bug tracker would no longer exist > if that was the case... > > Robert, Thank you for having found some other sources to say it is a bug. Having used Fedora 8 and 10 for a long time and Fedora 11 for a few months and never experienced this in these distros, I can say this bug occurs only in old versions of Red Had distros like CentOS. Now that I know this is a bug, I will move on hoping that others will solve the problem ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Automatical resync of MD, why?
Thank you very much, this is new feature of 5.4? 2009/11/1 RedShift : > happymaster23 wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I have three MDs on two HDDs in RAID 1. In last days, thanks to my >> monitoring (which is installed longer time), I have recognized, that >> one of these MDs is automatically started resync. First was at 25th >> October and second resync of the same MD was today. It started in same >> daytime (about 4:00 AM). Now is MD resynced and working well. Can >> someone tell me what means this automatic resync? Is it standard? Is >> it means some possible problems with one HDD (but other two MDs are >> working without resync)? >> >> Thank you >> Martin Šťastný > > > Have a look at /etc/cron.weekly > > > Glenn > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] No entry in /var/log/boot.log
2009/11/1 Rod Rook : > Anyway, you agree with me that there is a bug or bugs in CentOS 5.4. As I > said earlier, it is not a critical matter, but it does not instill > confidence in me about CentOS distro. What other bugs are there? The > interesting thing, at least to me, is that there seems to be conspiratorial > silence about such bugs. Nobody wants to speak ill of their beloved distro? Let's face it, it's pretty damned good for free! Ben ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Disk error (kicking from MD) during smartctl -t short
Hello,
I started smartctl -t short of disk in RAID1, but during this
operation this disk was kicked from RAID (only from one MD of three).
/var/log/messages:
Nov 1 16:45:45 server kernel: ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0
SErr 0x0 action 0x0
Nov 1 16:45:45 server kernel: ata1.00: cmd
ea/00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/a0 tag 0
Nov 1 16:45:45 server kernel: res
51/04:00:38:df:f7/00:00:00:00:00/a7 Emask 0x1 (device error)
Nov 1 16:45:45 server kernel: ata1.00: status: { DRDY ERR }
Nov 1 16:45:45 serve kernel: ata1.00: error: { ABRT }
Nov 1 16:45:45 server kernel: ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
Nov 1 16:45:45 server kernel: ata1: EH complete
Nov 1 16:45:45 server kernel: SCSI device sda: 625142448 512-byte
hdwr sectors (320073 MB)
Nov 1 16:45:45 server kernel: sda: Write Protect is off
Nov 1 16:45:45 server kernel: SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back
Nov 1 16:45:52 server kernel: ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0
SErr 0x0 action 0x0
Nov 1 16:45:52 server kernel: ata1.00: cmd
ea/00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/a0 tag 0
Nov 1 16:45:52 server kernel: res
51/04:00:38:df:f7/00:00:00:00:00/a7 Emask 0x1 (device error)
Nov 1 16:45:52 server kernel: ata1.00: status: { DRDY ERR }
Nov 1 16:45:52 server kernel: ata1.00: error: { ABRT }
Nov 1 16:45:52 server kernel: ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
Nov 1 16:45:52 server kernel: ata1: EH complete
Nov 1 16:45:52 server kernel: SCSI device sda: 625142448 512-byte
hdwr sectors (320073 MB)
Nov 1 16:45:52 server kernel: sda: Write Protect is off
Nov 1 16:45:52 server kernel: SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back
Nov 1 16:47:43 server kernel: ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0
SErr 0x0 action 0x0
Nov 1 16:47:43 server kernel: ata1.00: BMDMA stat 0x25
Nov 1 16:47:43 server kernel: ata1.00: cmd
ca/00:08:1f:41:1e/00:00:00:00:00/e1 tag 0 dma 4096 out
Nov 1 16:47:43 server kernel: res
51/10:08:1f:41:1e/00:00:00:00:00/e1 Emask 0x81 (invalid argument)
Nov 1 16:47:43 server kernel: ata1.00: status: { DRDY ERR }
Nov 1 16:47:43 server kernel: ata1.00: error: { IDNF }
Nov 1 16:47:43 server kernel: ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
Nov 1 16:47:43 server kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: SCSI error: return code = 0x0802
Nov 1 16:47:43 server kernel: sda: Current [descriptor]: sense key:
Aborted Command
Nov 1 16:47:43 server kernel: Add. Sense: Recorded entity not found
Nov 1 16:47:43 server kernel:
Nov 1 16:47:44 server kernel: Descriptor sense data with sense
descriptors (in hex):
Nov 1 16:47:44 server kernel: 72 0b 14 00 00 00 00 0c 00 0a
80 00 00 00 00 00
Nov 1 16:47:44 server kernel: 01 1e 41 1f
Nov 1 16:47:44 server kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev sda, sector 18759967
Nov 1 16:47:44 server kernel: raid1: Disk failure on sda1, disabling device.
Nov 1 16:47:44 server kernel: Operation continuing on 1 devices
Nov 1 16:47:44 server kernel: ata1: EH complete
Nov 1 16:47:44 server kernel: SCSI device sda: 625142448 512-byte
hdwr sectors (320073 MB)
Nov 1 16:47:44 server kernel: sda: Write Protect is off
Nov 1 16:47:44 server kernel: SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back
Nov 1 16:47:44 server kernel: RAID1 conf printout:
Nov 1 16:47:44 server kernel: --- wd:1 rd:2
Nov 1 16:47:44 server kernel: disk 0, wo:1, o:0, dev:sda1
Nov 1 16:47:44 server kernel: disk 1, wo:0, o:1, dev:sdb1
Nov 1 16:47:44 server kernel: RAID1 conf printout:
Nov 1 16:47:44 server kernel: --- wd:1 rd:2
Nov 1 16:47:44 server kernel: disk 1, wo:0, o:1, dev:sdb1
And output of smarctl -all:
=== START OF INFORMATION SECTION ===
Device Model: WDC WD3201ABYS-01B9A0
Serial Number:
Firmware Version: 13.01C02
User Capacity:320 072 933 376 bytes
Device is:Not in smartctl database [for details use: -P showall]
ATA Version is: 8
ATA Standard is: Exact ATA specification draft version not indicated
Local Time is:Sun Nov 1 19:26:47 2009 CET
SMART support is: Available - device has SMART capability.
SMART support is: Enabled
=== START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION ===
SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED
General SMART Values:
Offline data collection status: (0x84) Offline data collection activity
was suspended by an
interrupting command from host.
Auto Offline Data Collection: Enabled.
Self-test execution status: ( 0) The previous self-test routine completed
without error or no self-test has ever
been run.
Total time to complete Offline
data collection: (8400) seconds.
Offline data collection
capabilities:(0x7b) SMART execute Offline immediate.
Auto Offline data collection
on/off support.
Suspend Offline collection upon new
command.
Re: [CentOS] No entry in /var/log/boot.log
Rod Rook wrote: > Having used Fedora 8 and 10 for a long time and Fedora 11 for a few > months and never experienced this in these distros, I can say this bug > occurs only in old versions of Red Had distros like CentOS. Now that I > know this is a bug, I will move on hoping that others will solve the > problem The problem with zero-length boot.log has existed in RHEL releases since 2007, and Red Hat has shown little interest in fixing it. You won't find an official fix from CentOS because CentOS strives to be bug-for- bug compatible with the corresponding RHEL release. Fedora, beginning with release 10, has made major changes to the boot sequence, and does write to boot.log. My guess is that you might see these changes show up in RHEL/CentOS 6. (RHEL 5 is based on Fedora Core 6.) The data recorded in boot.log is typically not very interesting, so it's not likely you'll see a fix in RHEL 5. If you search on Google you can find some additions you can make in /etc/init.d/functions to record what init scripts were started. The only thing missing (from what I see in a Fedora 11 boot.log) would be the "OK" or "FAIL" status reports, but those can generally be inferred from what services started successfully. -- Bob Nichols "NOSPAM" is really part of my email address. Do NOT delete it. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] DoveCot and Postfix Setup? or Zimbra?
Hi All, I have not really setup e-mail serving on Linux before by myself. I have a setup now where it was setup for me running Dovecot and postfix. The setup works. I want to set this up again on my own system. Does anyone have a good tutorial? Zimbra...does it replace dovecot and postfx setup? Best, -Jason ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] DoveCot and Postfix Setup? or Zimbra?
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 9:19 PM, ML wrote: > Hi All, > > I have not really setup e-mail serving on Linux before by myself. I have a > setup now where it was setup for me running Dovecot and postfix. The setup > works. I want to set this up again on my own system. > > Does anyone have a good tutorial? > > Zimbra...does it replace dovecot and postfx setup? > > Best, > -Jason Hello ML, I think http://howtoforge.com/isp-mailserver-with-virtual-users-domains-postfix-dovecot-mysql-centos5.0 is what you're looking for. I suggest you use phpMyAdmin from epel. Here you can find how to add epel to your yum repository: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL. Best Regards, Bazy ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] DoveCot and Postfix Setup? or Zimbra?
ML wrote: > Hi All, > > I have not really setup e-mail serving on Linux before by myself. I have a > setup now where it was setup for me running Dovecot and postfix. The setup > works. I want to set this up again on my own system. > > Does anyone have a good tutorial? > > Zimbra...does it replace dovecot and postfx setup? > Zimbra is a Microsoft Exchange Server compatible groupware server, for use with Microsoft Outlook in enterprise mode, with features like calendar scheduling, shared mail folders, groupware applications development, etc. If you want a conventional POP/IMAP mail server, dovecot (or cyrus) and postfix (or sendmail) is just fine. since you didn't state what your parameters are (is this for a few users, or for 100s/1000s, etc), its pretty hard to make recommendations. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Keeping iptables in sync across multiple machines
On 11/01/2009 07:51 AM, Marcus Moeller wrote: >> So, what I am looking for really is feedback on what people are using in >> the wild on multiple machines, and bonus points for people who only use >> tools and mechanisms already built into the CentOS [base] repo. > > We are using Spacewalk to manage /etc/sysconfig/iptables files. isnt that just achieving a case of sending out static iptables files ? -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522...@icq ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Keeping iptables in sync across multiple machines
On 10/31/2009 10:01 PM, Christoph Maser wrote: >> Just wondering what people use / recommend to keep multiple machines in >> sync with their iptables policy. >> > I did use fwbuilder it can create and deploy rules. For a small number > of machines it worked well for me. > how do you achieve the actual 'distribution' of content ? -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522...@icq ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Automatical resync of MD, why?
Hi. My question is the same, why so many times my RAID 1 is resynced, when i upgrade to CentOS 5.4 ? Any idea ? With may RAID1 is no all OK ? It is to worry about it ? Jancio Wodnik ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] loading a program in memory for faster startup
> more /etc/readahead.d/impress.later > /usr/bin/soffice > /opt/openoffice.org3/program/soffice.bin I created the above file /etc/readahead.d/impress.later Put in it the two lines above. The /etc/init.d/readahead_later script takes any file name *.later so I made a new file instead of editing /etc/readahead.d/default.later I did service readahead_later restart I then started impress a couple times and it still takes a LONG time to startup. I was "hoping" it would be cached in memory and start right up. I can find anything in dmesg or /var/log/messages that says any error for readahead or that anything is happening. How do I know the server is or is not doing anything for me? As I mentioned I did not notice any difference in application load time. Thanks, Jerry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Keeping iptables in sync across multiple machines
Am Sonntag, den 01.11.2009, 21:07 +0100 schrieb Karanbir Singh: > On 10/31/2009 10:01 PM, Christoph Maser wrote: > >> Just wondering what people use / recommend to keep multiple machines in > >> sync with their iptables policy. > >> > > I did use fwbuilder it can create and deploy rules. For a small number > > of machines it worked well for me. > > > > how do you achieve the actual 'distribution' of content ? It compiles shell scripts which are simply copied and launched. From the FAQ: -- 1) you can simply copy it to the firewall machine and then run it by hand; 2) you can use built-in installer and 3) you can use a shell script to copy this file to where it should be and then run it. Built-in installer uses ssh to communicate with the firewall, -- You could propably also simply commit the compiled rules to some repository and have puppet ship/execute the files. One thing i really liked about fwbuilder is that you have a central object pool for custom ports, ip addresses and networks which you can use in different firewall rulesets so if something updates you simply recomplile/distribute all firewall rules. Chris financial.com AG Munich head office/Hauptsitz München: Maria-Probst-Str. 19 | 80939 München | Germany Frankfurt branch office/Niederlassung Frankfurt: Messeturm | Friedrich-Ebert-Anlage 49 | 60327 Frankfurt | Germany Management board/Vorstand: Dr. Steffen Boehnert | Dr. Alexis Eisenhofer | Dr. Yann Samson | Matthias Wiederwach Supervisory board/Aufsichtsrat: Dr. Dr. Ernst zur Linden (chairman/Vorsitzender) Register court/Handelsregister: Munich – HRB 128 972 | Sales tax ID number/St.Nr.: DE205 370 553 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] DoveCot and Postfix Setup? or Zimbra?
ML wrote: > Hi All, > > I have not really setup e-mail serving on Linux before by myself. I have a > setup now where it was setup for me running Dovecot and postfix. The setup > works. I want to set this up again on my own system. > > Does anyone have a good tutorial? > Yes, on the CentOS Wiki: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/postfix > Zimbra...does it replace dovecot and postfx setup? > I believe so. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] DoveCot and Postfix Setup? or Zimbra?
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 1:19 PM, ML wrote: ---8< > Zimbra...does it replace dovecot and postfx setup? Yes, it does. I *think* it's possible to change the ports that Zimbra listens on, but by default it will install it's on mta, pop, and imap servers, and installs them into it's own directory. -jon ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS Mirrored On RapidShare [Links Here]
Hey List, Firstly I am sorry for the length of this email and that you are all having too receive it but the point is that this email will now go into the archive and be indexed by Google (hopefully) and thusly, people will be able to find these links through Google. My goal is to mirror CentOS on RapidShare. "Why you fool there are loads of mirrors?" you might ask; simply for convenience. For those of you that like me are premium account holders with RapidShare, if you need to acquire a copy of CentOS and you have access to a high speed connection, for premium account holders RapidShare can deliver up 100Mbps download speeds. You don't have to reply to this post, my plan is to simply continue to mirror CentOS and continually post here my mirrors to keep the archive updated. Anyway, enough of my ramblings, lets get down to business ;) CentOS 5.2 i386 CD Install (These are 200MB ZIP parts): http://rapidshare.com/files/255564308/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-1of6.zip.001 http://rapidshare.com/files/255581907/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-1of6.zip.002 http://rapidshare.com/files/255596630/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-1of6.zip.003 http://rapidshare.com/files/255603689/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-2of6.zip.001 http://rapidshare.com/files/255772602/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-2of6.zip.002 http://rapidshare.com/files/255802198/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-2of6.zip.003 http://rapidshare.com/files/255804551/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-2of6.zip.004 http://rapidshare.com/files/255828188/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-3of6.zip.001 http://rapidshare.com/files/255878952/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-3of6.zip.002 http://rapidshare.com/files/255896576/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-3of6.zip.003 http://rapidshare.com/files/255898266/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-3of6.zip.004 http://rapidshare.com/files/255914626/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-4of6.zip.001 http://rapidshare.com/files/255929523/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-4of6.zip.002 http://rapidshare.com/files/255943334/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-4of6.zip.003 http://rapidshare.com/files/255945238/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-4of6.zip.004 http://rapidshare.com/files/256179874/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-5of6.zip.001 http://rapidshare.com/files/256203647/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-5of6.zip.002 http://rapidshare.com/files/256226839/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-5of6.zip.003 http://rapidshare.com/files/256229769/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-5of6.zip.004 http://rapidshare.com/files/256250972/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-6of6.zip.001 http://rapidshare.com/files/256270423/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-6of6.zip.002 http://rapidshare.com/files/256289081/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-6of6.zip.003 http://rapidshare.com/files/256292372/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-6of6.zip.004 CentOS 5.2 i386 NetIntsall ISO (This is about 10MB but hey, its sharing!) http://rapidshare.com/files/255469169/CentOS-5.2-i386-netinstall.zip CentOS 5.3 i386 CD Install (These are 200MB ZIP parts) http://rapidshare.com/files/296169543/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-1of6.zip.001 http://rapidshare.com/files/296275649/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-1of6.zip.002 http://rapidshare.com/files/296415902/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-1of6.zip.003 http://rapidshare.com/files/296169014/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-2of6.zip.001 http://rapidshare.com/files/296276513/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-2of6.zip.002 http://rapidshare.com/files/296422312/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-2of6.zip.003 http://rapidshare.com/files/296564426/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-2of6.zip.004 http://rapidshare.com/files/296203545/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-3of6.zip.001 http://rapidshare.com/files/296318686/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-3of6.zip.002 http://rapidshare.com/files/296469730/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-3of6.zip.003 http://rapidshare.com/files/296563457/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-3of6.zip.004 http://rapidshare.com/files/296204046/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-4of6.zip.001 http://rapidshare.com/files/296320087/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-4of6.zip.002 http://rapidshare.com/files/296475600/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-4of6.zip.003 http://rapidshare.com/files/296568289/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-4of6.zip.004 http://rapidshare.com/files/296238388/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-5of6.zip.001 http://rapidshare.com/files/296366303/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-5of6.zip.002 http://rapidshare.com/files/296524892/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-5of6.zip.003 http://rapidshare.com/files/296570853/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-5of6.zip.004 http://rapidshare.com/files/296238210/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-6of6.zip.001 http://rapidshare.com/files/296366070/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-6of6.zip.002 http://rapidshare.com/files/296527702/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-6of6.zip.003 http://rapidshare.com/files/296572192/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-6of6.zip.004 CentOS 5.3 i386 NetIntsall ISO (Again this is tiny but its another mirror!) http://rapidshare.com/files/261816982/CentOS-5.3-i386-netinstall.iso CentOS 5.3 x86_64 CD Install (These are 200MB ZIP parts) http://rapidshare.com/files/298357389/CentOS-5.3-x86_64-bin-1of7.zip.001 http://rapidshare.com/files/298357173/CentOS-5.3-x86_64-bin-1of7.zip.002 http://rapidshare.com/files/298394408/CentOS-5.3-x86_64-bin-1of7.zip.003 http://rapidshare.com/files/298400898/CentOS-5.3-x86_64-bin-2of7.zip.001 http://rapidshare.com/files/298430595/CentOS-5.3-x86_64-bin-2of7.zip.002 http://rapidshare.com/files/298426183/CentOS-5.3-x86_64-bi
Re: [CentOS] NTFS and elrepo
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 8:14 PM, Ron Loftin wrote: >> > I have here a box which I dual-boot between CentOS 5.4 and an older >> > version of that "other OS" that I'm using to check out the ELrepo >> > version of kmod-ntfs. After installing as per the directions on the >> > ELrepo site, I can mount an NTFS filesystem, and when I type "mount" >> > with no options the output tells me that the target filesystem is >> > mounted read-write. However, when I try to create a file on that >> > filesystem as root, I get a "Permission denied" error, which leads me >> > to think that I'm missing something here. So far, Google has not >> > been very helpful here, so if anyone can shine some light on this, it >> > would be welcome. > but I'm trying to evaluate the kmod-ntfs package from ELrepo.org. There > seems to be something I'm not understanding about this approach, or I'm > not finding the correct documentation for it. Could you show us the output returned by: uname -mr ls -l `find /lib/modules -name ntfs.ko` ls -l `find /lib/modules -name fuse.ko` Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS Mirrored On RapidShare [Links Here]
On 11/01/2009 10:15 PM, James Bensley wrote: > for premium account holders RapidShare can deliver up > 100Mbps download speeds. Just want to point out that there are centos mirrors that deliver > 700mbps fairly regularly, and there are ( specially if you are on I2 ) mirrors that do a gigabit as well. As a second point of reference the CentOS-5.4/DVD/x86_64 torrent is currently seeding at > 390MB/sec. I dont know how much faster, since the machine I can test on cant handle more than that on i/o ( only has 6 disks under there ). -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522...@icq ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS Mirrored On RapidShare [Links Here]
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 4:15 PM, James Bensley wrote: > Hey List, > > Firstly I am sorry for the length of this email and that you are all > having too receive it but the point is that this email will now go > into the archive and be indexed by Google (hopefully) and thusly, > people will be able to find these links through Google. My goal is to > mirror CentOS on RapidShare. "Why you fool there are loads of > mirrors?" you might ask; simply for convenience. For those of you that > like me are premium account holders with RapidShare, if you need to > acquire a copy of CentOS and you have access to a high speed > connection, for premium account holders RapidShare can deliver up > 100Mbps download speeds. > > You don't have to reply to this post, my plan is to simply continue to > mirror CentOS and continually post here my mirrors to keep the archive > updated. Anyway, enough of my ramblings, lets get down to business ;) > > CentOS 5.2 i386 CD Install (These are 200MB ZIP parts): > http://rapidshare.com/files/255564308/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-1of6.zip.001 > http://rapidshare.com/files/255581907/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-1of6.zip.002 > http://rapidshare.com/files/255596630/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-1of6.zip.003 > http://rapidshare.com/files/255603689/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-2of6.zip.001 > http://rapidshare.com/files/255772602/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-2of6.zip.002 > http://rapidshare.com/files/255802198/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-2of6.zip.003 > http://rapidshare.com/files/255804551/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-2of6.zip.004 > http://rapidshare.com/files/255828188/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-3of6.zip.001 > http://rapidshare.com/files/255878952/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-3of6.zip.002 > http://rapidshare.com/files/255896576/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-3of6.zip.003 > http://rapidshare.com/files/255898266/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-3of6.zip.004 > http://rapidshare.com/files/255914626/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-4of6.zip.001 > http://rapidshare.com/files/255929523/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-4of6.zip.002 > http://rapidshare.com/files/255943334/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-4of6.zip.003 > http://rapidshare.com/files/255945238/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-4of6.zip.004 > http://rapidshare.com/files/256179874/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-5of6.zip.001 > http://rapidshare.com/files/256203647/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-5of6.zip.002 > http://rapidshare.com/files/256226839/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-5of6.zip.003 > http://rapidshare.com/files/256229769/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-5of6.zip.004 > http://rapidshare.com/files/256250972/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-6of6.zip.001 > http://rapidshare.com/files/256270423/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-6of6.zip.002 > http://rapidshare.com/files/256289081/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-6of6.zip.003 > http://rapidshare.com/files/256292372/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-6of6.zip.004 > > CentOS 5.2 i386 NetIntsall ISO (This is about 10MB but hey, its sharing!) > http://rapidshare.com/files/255469169/CentOS-5.2-i386-netinstall.zip > > CentOS 5.3 i386 CD Install (These are 200MB ZIP parts) > http://rapidshare.com/files/296169543/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-1of6.zip.001 > http://rapidshare.com/files/296275649/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-1of6.zip.002 > http://rapidshare.com/files/296415902/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-1of6.zip.003 > http://rapidshare.com/files/296169014/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-2of6.zip.001 > http://rapidshare.com/files/296276513/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-2of6.zip.002 > http://rapidshare.com/files/296422312/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-2of6.zip.003 > http://rapidshare.com/files/296564426/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-2of6.zip.004 > http://rapidshare.com/files/296203545/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-3of6.zip.001 > http://rapidshare.com/files/296318686/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-3of6.zip.002 > http://rapidshare.com/files/296469730/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-3of6.zip.003 > http://rapidshare.com/files/296563457/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-3of6.zip.004 > http://rapidshare.com/files/296204046/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-4of6.zip.001 > http://rapidshare.com/files/296320087/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-4of6.zip.002 > http://rapidshare.com/files/296475600/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-4of6.zip.003 > http://rapidshare.com/files/296568289/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-4of6.zip.004 > http://rapidshare.com/files/296238388/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-5of6.zip.001 > http://rapidshare.com/files/296366303/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-5of6.zip.002 > http://rapidshare.com/files/296524892/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-5of6.zip.003 > http://rapidshare.com/files/296570853/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-5of6.zip.004 > http://rapidshare.com/files/296238210/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-6of6.zip.001 > http://rapidshare.com/files/296366070/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-6of6.zip.002 > http://rapidshare.com/files/296527702/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-6of6.zip.003 > http://rapidshare.com/files/296572192/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-6of6.zip.004 > > CentOS 5.3 i386 NetIntsall ISO (Again this is tiny but its another mirror!) > http://rapidshare.com/files/261816982/CentOS-5.3-i386-netinstall.iso > > CentOS 5.3 x86_64 CD Install (These are 200MB ZIP parts) > http://rapidshare.com/files/298357389/CentOS-5.3-x86_64-bin-1of7.zip.001 > http://rapidshare.com/files/298357173/CentOS-5.3-x86_64-bin-1of7.zip.002 > http://rapidshare.com/files/298394408/CentOS-5.3-x86_64-bin-1of7.zip.003 > h
Re: [CentOS] NTFS and elrepo
On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 14:49 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 8:14 PM, Ron Loftin wrote: > > >> > I have here a box which I dual-boot between CentOS 5.4 and an older > >> > version of that "other OS" that I'm using to check out the ELrepo > >> > version of kmod-ntfs. After installing as per the directions on the > >> > ELrepo site, I can mount an NTFS filesystem, and when I type "mount" > >> > with no options the output tells me that the target filesystem is > >> > mounted read-write. However, when I try to create a file on that > >> > filesystem as root, I get a "Permission denied" error, which leads me > >> > to think that I'm missing something here. So far, Google has not > >> > been very helpful here, so if anyone can shine some light on this, it > >> > would be welcome. > > > but I'm trying to evaluate the kmod-ntfs package from ELrepo.org. There > > seems to be something I'm not understanding about this approach, or I'm > > not finding the correct documentation for it. > > Could you show us the output returned by: > > uname -mr > ls -l `find /lib/modules -name ntfs.ko` > ls -l `find /lib/modules -name fuse.ko` > uname -mr 2.6.18-164.2.1.el5 i686 ls -l `find /lib/modules -name ntfs.ko` lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 46 Oct 31 19:45 /lib/modules/2.6.18-164.2.1.el5/weak-updates/ntfs/ntfs.ko -> /lib/modules/2.6.18-128.el5/extra/ntfs/ntfs.ko lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 46 Oct 31 19:45 /lib/modules/2.6.18-92.1.13.el5/weak-updates/ntfs/ntfs.ko -> /lib/modules/2.6.18-128.el5/extra/ntfs/ntfs.ko ls -l `find /lib/modules -name fuse.ko` -rwxr--r-- 1 root root 57464 Sep 30 15:26 /lib/modules/2.6.18-164.2.1.el5/kernel/fs/fuse/fuse.ko Be careful of the line wrapping, and thanks for the help. > Akemi > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Ron Loftin relof...@twcny.rr.com "God, root, what is difference ?" Piter from UserFriendly ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] NTFS and elrepo
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Ron Loftin wrote: > > On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 14:49 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote: >> Could you show us the output returned by: >> >> uname -mr >> ls -l `find /lib/modules -name ntfs.ko` >> ls -l `find /lib/modules -name fuse.ko` > uname -mr > 2.6.18-164.2.1.el5 i686 > > ls -l `find /lib/modules -name ntfs.ko` > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 46 Oct 31 > 19:45 /lib/modules/2.6.18-164.2.1.el5/weak-updates/ntfs/ntfs.ko > -> /lib/modules/2.6.18-128.el5/extra/ntfs/ntfs.ko > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 46 Oct 31 > 19:45 /lib/modules/2.6.18-92.1.13.el5/weak-updates/ntfs/ntfs.ko > -> /lib/modules/2.6.18-128.el5/extra/ntfs/ntfs.ko Something is wrong here. You are missing /lib/modules/2.6.18-128.el5/extra/ntfs/ntfs.ko that the symlinks are pointing to. Are those symlinks red-blinking? > ls -l `find /lib/modules -name fuse.ko` > -rwxr--r-- 1 root root 57464 Sep 30 > 15:26 /lib/modules/2.6.18-164.2.1.el5/kernel/fs/fuse/fuse.ko This one is as expected. Just fine. Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] NTFS and elrepo
On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 15:20 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Ron Loftin wrote: > > > > On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 14:49 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote: > > >> Could you show us the output returned by: > >> > >> uname -mr > >> ls -l `find /lib/modules -name ntfs.ko` > >> ls -l `find /lib/modules -name fuse.ko` > > > uname -mr > > 2.6.18-164.2.1.el5 i686 > > > > ls -l `find /lib/modules -name ntfs.ko` > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 46 Oct 31 > > 19:45 /lib/modules/2.6.18-164.2.1.el5/weak-updates/ntfs/ntfs.ko > > -> /lib/modules/2.6.18-128.el5/extra/ntfs/ntfs.ko > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 46 Oct 31 > > 19:45 /lib/modules/2.6.18-92.1.13.el5/weak-updates/ntfs/ntfs.ko > > -> /lib/modules/2.6.18-128.el5/extra/ntfs/ntfs.ko > > Something is wrong here. You are missing > /lib/modules/2.6.18-128.el5/extra/ntfs/ntfs.ko that the symlinks are > pointing to. Are those symlinks red-blinking? It's there. I must have missed it with my cut-and-paste before. ( Side note: I can't stand all that color-coding with the "ls" command, so I disable it. That's just my prejudice from growing up with UNIX in the '80s and '90s on REAL monochrome terminals. ;) ls -l /lib/modules/2.6.18-128.el5/extra/ntfs/ntfs.ko -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 235684 Oct 9 13:00 /lib/modules/2.6.18-128.el5/extra/ntfs/ntfs.ko > > > ls -l `find /lib/modules -name fuse.ko` > > -rwxr--r-- 1 root root 57464 Sep 30 > > 15:26 /lib/modules/2.6.18-164.2.1.el5/kernel/fs/fuse/fuse.ko > > This one is as expected. Just fine. > > Akemi > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Ron Loftin relof...@twcny.rr.com "God, root, what is difference ?" Piter from UserFriendly ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] connection refused resolving - after 5.4 upgrade
Hi all, prior to 5.4 upgrade, my two DNS servers would only get 'connection refused resolving .' on rare infrequent occasions (once or twice a month) after upgrade to 5.4 I get 500+ per day. Google has suggestions for |logging category lame-servers null; ; ; |however this strikes me as severe overkill as it will mask genuine problems. Anyone else noticed this? Suggestions as to why or what is causing? Thanks Rob <>___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] NTFS and elrepo
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Ron Loftin wrote: > > On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 15:20 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote: >> Something is wrong here. You are missing >> /lib/modules/2.6.18-128.el5/extra/ntfs/ntfs.ko that the symlinks are >> pointing to. Are those symlinks red-blinking? > > It's there. I must have missed it with my cut-and-paste before. > > ( Side note: I can't stand all that color-coding with the "ls" command, > so I disable it. That's just my prejudice from growing up with UNIX in > the '80s and '90s on REAL monochrome terminals. ;) I fully understand (similar generation?!). > ls -l /lib/modules/2.6.18-128.el5/extra/ntfs/ntfs.ko > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 235684 Oct 9 > 13:00 /lib/modules/2.6.18-128.el5/extra/ntfs/ntfs.ko Alright. Then as far as installation of the modules are concerned, there does not seem to be a problem. So, just for a confirmation, 'modprobe ntfs' and 'modprobe fuse' run without any errors and lsmod shows both modules loaded? If ntfs-3g is working for you, I would expect the ntfs module from kmod-ntfs works, too. However, they are not the same. The latter was built from the ntfs code in CentOS 5.3 (which was originally broken). I believe it worked after a patch was applied and this was tested by CentOS QA members. Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] NTFS and elrepo
On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 16:41 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Ron Loftin wrote: > > > > On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 15:20 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote: > > >> Something is wrong here. You are missing > >> /lib/modules/2.6.18-128.el5/extra/ntfs/ntfs.ko that the symlinks are > >> pointing to. Are those symlinks red-blinking? > > > > It's there. I must have missed it with my cut-and-paste before. > > > > ( Side note: I can't stand all that color-coding with the "ls" command, > > so I disable it. That's just my prejudice from growing up with UNIX in > > the '80s and '90s on REAL monochrome terminals. ;) > > I fully understand (similar generation?!). > > > ls -l /lib/modules/2.6.18-128.el5/extra/ntfs/ntfs.ko > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 235684 Oct 9 > > 13:00 /lib/modules/2.6.18-128.el5/extra/ntfs/ntfs.ko > > Alright. Then as far as installation of the modules are concerned, > there does not seem to be a problem. So, just for a confirmation, > 'modprobe ntfs' and 'modprobe fuse' run without any errors and lsmod > shows both modules loaded? Seems to work. Both "modprobe" commands run with no error, and lsmod shows this: lsmod | egrep 'fuse|ntfs' fuse 49237 0 ntfs 196760 0 > > If ntfs-3g is working for you, I would expect the ntfs module from > kmod-ntfs works, too. That's what I thought. However, when I mount a partition created with Windoze 2000, I can read files and directories, but not create or modify anything. Here's the actual scenario ( all commands performed as root): # dmesg | tail FS-Cache: Loaded [drm] Initialized drm 1.0.1 20051102 ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKA] enabled at IRQ 9 PCI: setting IRQ 9 as level-triggered ACPI: PCI Interrupt :00:01.0[A] -> Link [LNKA] -> GSI 9 (level, low) -> IRQ 9 [drm] Initialized i810 1.4.0 20030605 on minor 0 [drm] Using v1.4 init. NTFS driver 2.1.27 [Flags: R/W MODULE]. fuse init (API version 7.10) NTFS volume version 3.0. # fdisk -l /dev/hda Disk /dev/hda: 8700 MB, 8700346368 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 1057 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/hda1 * 1 522 4192933+ 7 HPFS/NTFS /dev/hda2 5231056 4289355f W95 Ext'd (LBA) /dev/hda5 523 783 20964517 HPFS/NTFS /dev/hda6 7841056 2192841b W95 FAT32 # mount /dev/hda5 /mnt ( no error returned ) # mount /dev/hdb1 on / type ext3 (rw,nodev) proc on /proc type proc (rw) sysfs on /sys type sysfs (rw) devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,gid=5,mode=620) tmpfs on /dev/shm type tmpfs (rw) /dev/hdb3 on /var type ext3 (rw,nosuid,nodev) /dev/hdb2 on /tmp type ext3 (rw,nosuid,nodev) none on /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc type binfmt_misc (rw) sunrpc on /var/lib/nfs/rpc_pipefs type rpc_pipefs (rw) /dev/hda5 on /mnt type ntfs (rw) Note the last line claims that hda5 is mounted with type "ntfs" and "rw". # /bin/ls -la /mnt total 1048592 drwx-- 1 root root 4096 Oct 31 22:47 . drwxr-xr-x 26 root root 4096 Nov 1 19:05 .. -rw--- 1 root root 1073741824 Oct 31 22:43 pagefile.sys drwx-- 1 root root 0 Feb 2 2006 RECYCLER drwx-- 1 root root 0 Oct 31 21:31 spool drwx-- 1 root root 0 Jan 24 2006 System Volume Information drwx-- 1 root root 4096 Oct 31 22:50 tmp # touch /mnt/testfile touch: cannot touch `/mnt/testfile': Permission denied # touch /mnt/tmp/testfile touch: cannot touch `/mnt/tmp/testfile': Permission denied So, what am I missing, and where should I look ? > However, they are not the same. The latter was > built from the ntfs code in CentOS 5.3 (which was originally broken). > I believe it worked after a patch was applied and this was tested by > CentOS QA members. > > Akemi > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Ron Loftin relof...@twcny.rr.com "God, root, what is difference ?" Piter from UserFriendly ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS Mirrored On RapidShare [Links Here]
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 1:04 AM, Victor Padro wrote: > On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 4:15 PM, James Bensley wrote: >> Hey List, >> >> Firstly I am sorry for the length of this email and that you are all >> having too receive it but the point is that this email will now go >> into the archive and be indexed by Google (hopefully) and thusly, >> people will be able to find these links through Google. My goal is to >> mirror CentOS on RapidShare. "Why you fool there are loads of >> mirrors?" you might ask; simply for convenience. For those of you that >> like me are premium account holders with RapidShare, if you need to >> acquire a copy of CentOS and you have access to a high speed >> connection, for premium account holders RapidShare can deliver up >> 100Mbps download speeds. >> >> You don't have to reply to this post, my plan is to simply continue to >> mirror CentOS and continually post here my mirrors to keep the archive >> updated. Anyway, enough of my ramblings, lets get down to business ;) >> >> CentOS 5.2 i386 CD Install (These are 200MB ZIP parts): >> http://rapidshare.com/files/255564308/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-1of6.zip.001 >> http://rapidshare.com/files/255581907/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-1of6.zip.002 >> http://rapidshare.com/files/255596630/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-1of6.zip.003 >> http://rapidshare.com/files/255603689/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-2of6.zip.001 >> http://rapidshare.com/files/255772602/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-2of6.zip.002 >> http://rapidshare.com/files/255802198/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-2of6.zip.003 >> http://rapidshare.com/files/255804551/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-2of6.zip.004 >> http://rapidshare.com/files/255828188/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-3of6.zip.001 >> http://rapidshare.com/files/255878952/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-3of6.zip.002 >> http://rapidshare.com/files/255896576/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-3of6.zip.003 >> http://rapidshare.com/files/255898266/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-3of6.zip.004 >> http://rapidshare.com/files/255914626/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-4of6.zip.001 >> http://rapidshare.com/files/255929523/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-4of6.zip.002 >> http://rapidshare.com/files/255943334/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-4of6.zip.003 >> http://rapidshare.com/files/255945238/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-4of6.zip.004 >> http://rapidshare.com/files/256179874/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-5of6.zip.001 >> http://rapidshare.com/files/256203647/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-5of6.zip.002 >> http://rapidshare.com/files/256226839/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-5of6.zip.003 >> http://rapidshare.com/files/256229769/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-5of6.zip.004 >> http://rapidshare.com/files/256250972/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-6of6.zip.001 >> http://rapidshare.com/files/256270423/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-6of6.zip.002 >> http://rapidshare.com/files/256289081/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-6of6.zip.003 >> http://rapidshare.com/files/256292372/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-6of6.zip.004 >> >> CentOS 5.2 i386 NetIntsall ISO (This is about 10MB but hey, its sharing!) >> http://rapidshare.com/files/255469169/CentOS-5.2-i386-netinstall.zip >> >> CentOS 5.3 i386 CD Install (These are 200MB ZIP parts) >> http://rapidshare.com/files/296169543/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-1of6.zip.001 >> http://rapidshare.com/files/296275649/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-1of6.zip.002 >> http://rapidshare.com/files/296415902/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-1of6.zip.003 >> http://rapidshare.com/files/296169014/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-2of6.zip.001 >> http://rapidshare.com/files/296276513/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-2of6.zip.002 >> http://rapidshare.com/files/296422312/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-2of6.zip.003 >> http://rapidshare.com/files/296564426/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-2of6.zip.004 >> http://rapidshare.com/files/296203545/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-3of6.zip.001 >> http://rapidshare.com/files/296318686/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-3of6.zip.002 >> http://rapidshare.com/files/296469730/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-3of6.zip.003 >> http://rapidshare.com/files/296563457/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-3of6.zip.004 >> http://rapidshare.com/files/296204046/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-4of6.zip.001 >> http://rapidshare.com/files/296320087/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-4of6.zip.002 >> http://rapidshare.com/files/296475600/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-4of6.zip.003 >> http://rapidshare.com/files/296568289/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-4of6.zip.004 >> http://rapidshare.com/files/296238388/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-5of6.zip.001 >> http://rapidshare.com/files/296366303/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-5of6.zip.002 >> http://rapidshare.com/files/296524892/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-5of6.zip.003 >> http://rapidshare.com/files/296570853/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-5of6.zip.004 >> http://rapidshare.com/files/296238210/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-6of6.zip.001 >> http://rapidshare.com/files/296366070/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-6of6.zip.002 >> http://rapidshare.com/files/296527702/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-6of6.zip.003 >> http://rapidshare.com/files/296572192/CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-6of6.zip.004 >> >> CentOS 5.3 i386 NetIntsall ISO (Again this is tiny but its another mirror!) >> http://rapidshare.com/files/261816982/CentOS-5.3-i386-netinstall.iso >> >> CentOS 5.3 x86_64 CD Install (These are 200MB ZIP parts) >> http://rapidshare.com/files/298357389/CentOS-5.3-x86_64-bin-1of7.zip.001 >> http://rapidshare.co
Re: [CentOS] CentOS Mirrored On RapidShare [Links Here]
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 03:15:36AM +0200, Bazy wrote: > > This is spam, since CentOS has mirrors in most of the world's countries. The 174 lines of noise you didn't bother to trim out of your reply can be construed as "spam" too. Folks, can you please trim replies to mailing list posts in the future? Please? It's every bit as annoying as top-posting. Thanks :) John -- It is not bigotry to be certain we are right; but it is bigotry to be unable to imagine how we might possibly have gone wrong. -- G. K. Chesterton pgp63EqDgMQ7d.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS Mirrored On RapidShare [Links Here]
> > The 174 lines of noise you didn't bother to trim out of your > reply can be construed as "spam" too. > > Folks, can you please trim replies to mailing list posts in > the future? Please? It's every bit as annoying as top-posting. > > Thanks :) > > > > > > > John > > -- > It is not bigotry to be certain we are right; but it is bigotry to be unable > to imagine how we might possibly have gone wrong. > -- G. K. Chesterton > Gmail hide's it as quoted text... sorry. Regards, Bazy ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS Mirrored On RapidShare [Links Here]
My apologies, it won't happen again. Cheers. -- Linux User #452368 http://twitter.com/vpadro "Everything that irritates us about others can lead us to an understanding of ourselves" ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] NTFS and elrepo
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Ron Loftin wrote: >> If ntfs-3g is working for you, I would expect the ntfs module from >> kmod-ntfs works, too. > > That's what I thought. However, when I mount a partition created with > Windoze 2000, I can read files and directories, but not create or modify > anything. Here's the actual scenario ( all commands performed as root): (big snip) > So, what am I missing, and where should I look ? Looks like you are doing everything just fine. Perhaps, we should move this conversation to the ELRepo mailing list because this is now all about kmod-ntfs and not all members of the ELRepo team are reading this mailing list on a regular basis. http://elrepo.org/tiki/MailingLists What do you think? Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] NTFS and elrepo
On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 17:38 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Ron Loftin wrote: > > >> If ntfs-3g is working for you, I would expect the ntfs module from > >> kmod-ntfs works, too. > > > > That's what I thought. However, when I mount a partition created with > > Windoze 2000, I can read files and directories, but not create or modify > > anything. Here's the actual scenario ( all commands performed as root): > > (big snip) > > > So, what am I missing, and where should I look ? > > Looks like you are doing everything just fine. Perhaps, we should > move this conversation to the ELRepo mailing list because this is now > all about kmod-ntfs and not all members of the ELRepo team are reading > this mailing list on a regular basis. > > http://elrepo.org/tiki/MailingLists > > What do you think? I think that I just signed up for the ELRepo mailing list. I will post my last message there ( unless you think more of the background is useful ) and see what turns up. > > Akemi > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Ron Loftin relof...@twcny.rr.com "God, root, what is difference ?" Piter from UserFriendly ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] NTFS and elrepo
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Ron Loftin wrote: > > On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 17:38 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote: >> >> Looks like you are doing everything just fine. Perhaps, we should >> move this conversation to the ELRepo mailing list because this is now >> all about kmod-ntfs and not all members of the ELRepo team are reading >> this mailing list on a regular basis. >> >> http://elrepo.org/tiki/MailingLists >> >> What do you think? > > I think that I just signed up for the ELRepo mailing list. I will post > my last message there ( unless you think more of the background is > useful ) and see what turns up. Adding the link to your original post of this thread will help: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2009-November/084896.html Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Bug in freeradius 1.1.3-1.5.el5_4 rpm
I upgraded one of my servers to CentOS 5.4 today. The freeradius service (radiusd) didn't start up due to permissions errors. I tracked it to the permissions on the /etc/raddb/certs/ directory being set to 640 rather than 750, so the radius user couldn't enter the directory. In the spec file from the source rpm, line 200 should read: %attr(750,root,radiusd) %config (noreplace) /etc/raddb/certs rather than the current: %attr(640,root,radiusd) %config (noreplace) /etc/raddb/certs Note that this bug also exists in the the 1.1.3-1.4.el5 version that's part of the CentOS 5.4 release. I'm not sure if it exists upstream though, but there it is... ;) -I ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Free or low cost online backup?
Hello: Does anyone know a free or low cost online backup system for CentOS? Thanks, Neil -- Neil Aggarwal, (281)846-8957, http://www.JAMMConsulting.com CentOS 5.4 KVM VPS $55/mo, no setup fee, no contract, dedicated 64bit CPU 1GB dedicated RAM, 40GB RAID storage, 500GB/mo premium BW, Zero downtime ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Free or low cost online backup?
Neil Aggarwal wrote: > Does anyone know a free or low cost online backup > system for CentOS? > tar(1) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Free or low cost online backup?
John: > tar(1) I can use that on the server, but what is the other side to store the files? I want the storage to be remote. Thanks, Neil -- Neil Aggarwal, (281)846-8957, http://www.JAMMConsulting.com CentOS 5.4 KVM VPS $55/mo, no setup fee, no contract, dedicated 64bit CPU 1GB dedicated RAM, 40GB RAID storage, 500GB/mo premium BW, Zero downtime ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Free or low cost online backup?
On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 23:21:15 -0600 Neil Aggarwal wrote: > I can use that on the server, but what is the other side > to store the files? I want the storage to be remote. I use rsync to do backups, which automatically works over a ssh connection. -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Free or low cost online backup?
Neil Aggarwal wrote: > John: > >> tar(1) > > I can use that on the server, but what is the other side > to store the files? I want the storage to be remote. > Did you mean you want to run something yourself remotely to collect and store backups or do you want a service? For the former case, look at backuppc (http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/ or the package in epel). It can use rsync over ssh to collect the backups and uses compression and links duplicates to increase the history you can keep online. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Free or low cost online backup?
> Did you mean you want to run something yourself remotely to > collect and store > backups or do you want a service? I want a service. Thanks, Neil -- Neil Aggarwal, (281)846-8957, http://www.JAMMConsulting.com CentOS 5.4 KVM VPS $55/mo, no setup fee, no contract, dedicated 64bit CPU 1GB dedicated RAM, 40GB RAID storage, 500GB/mo premium BW, Zero downtime ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Free or low cost online backup?
Neil Aggarwal wrote: >> Did you mean you want to run something yourself remotely to >> collect and store >> backups or do you want a service? >> > > I want a service. > and what exactly do you want this 'service' to do? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] OFFTOPIC MAILSERVER PROBLEM WITH JAMMCONSULTING.COM Re: Free or low cost online backup?
I have made several attempts to send you this privately so as not to embarrass you here, but there appears to be no other way to get an email to you. On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 23:46:19 -0600 Neil Aggarwal wrote: > I want a service. You haven't got much of a service going on there now. I have sent an email to you at n...@jammconsulting.com,webmas...@jammconsulting.com and postmas...@jammconsulting.com. Your postmaster address apparently does not exist at all as required by RFC 2821. Your neil and webmaster addresses reject mail from sasktel.net (the largest ISP in Saskatchewan, Canada), my own mailserver (melvilletheatre.com), and gmail.com. Your mailserver definitely needs some attention and repair. If you're in charge of it, please fix it. If you are not in charge of it, then bring this message to the attention of your system administrator and ask him to deal with it. An individual email from me is probably not that important but you're likely losing a lot of stuff that you really do want to be able to receive with everything blocked like that. And again, your mailserver is also in violation of RFC 2821. -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Automatical resync of MD, why?
When you cat /proc/mdstat does it actually say "syncing" or does it say "checking"? I believe a newer version of mdadm creates a weekly cron job to check the arrays. I first mistakenly assumed it was resyncing and started worrying since it was doing all 8 of my RAID1 arrays at once, but after looking twice I saw it was actually just checking the arrays thanks to a new cronjob. Regards, Oliver On 02/11/2009, at 6:40 AM, Jancio Wodnik wrote: > Hi. > > My question is the same, why so many times my RAID 1 is resynced, > when i > upgrade to CentOS 5.4 ? Any idea ? With may RAID1 is no all OK ? It is > to worry about it ? > > Jancio Wodnik > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
