Re: [CentOS] sendmail routing
John R Pierce wrote: > Christopher Chan wrote: > >>> Sorry, last I checked, there is no sender-based routing support in >>> sendmail. You cannot even try to create rulesets to get that. >>> >>> >>> >>> >> Looks like it is my turn to eat humble pie. You will need to rebuild >> sendmail.cf after applying this hack. >> >> http://www.cs.niu.edu/~rickert/cf/hack/sender_based_routing.m >> > > I note the comments on that patch talk about from: sen...@host rather > than sen...@domain ... so, its possible it triggers on the host that the > sender is using rather than the domain in the 'from' header. > > > You missed this part: dnl # If the sender address/domain is as given, then that relay will be dnl # chosen for the message. If the sender address $f has no dnl # "@domain" component, then $j is used. It triggers on the domain. If there is no domain, the local hostname is appended before being checked against the mailertable. At least, that is how I read the comments. As for the rulesets below...@_@ > ugh, i used to know what ... > > R$+ <@ $+ > $:$&f...@$j<>$1<@$2>prepend local sender > r...@$+@$j<>$+<@$+> $:$...@$2<>$3<@$4> avoid duplicate domain > r...@$+<>$+<@$+> $:$(mailertable From:$...@$2 $:@$2 $)<>$3<@$4> > r...@$+.$+<>$+<@$+> $:$(mailertable From:$2.$3 $...@$1 $:$...@.$3 > $)<>$4<@$5> > r...@$+<>$+<@$+> $:$(mailertable From:$2 $...@$1 $: $)<>$3<@$4> > R$-:$+<>$+$...@$>MailerToTriple <$1 : $2> $3 > R$*<>$+<$+> $:$2 <$3> > > > > > would do, but I'll be damned if I remember how that .cf stuff works > anymore :rofl: > > A beer to anyone who can still remember how sendmail rulesets work after one month of being away from the stuff! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] sendmail routing
> Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
[ ... ]
> Hi Again
>
> Unless I am completely confused won't using mailer table with the option
>
> .domain smtp:[gateway.domain]
>
> where .domain is the domain you are concerned with do what you wish ?
For using a mailertable rule the domain MUST NOT be local (means not class
{w}), which is the case for the OP.
Alexander
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] remote desktop configuration
From: Frank Cox > I manage some remote multi-user computers where it would be very handy to be > able to "edit" the users' panel bars remotely, adding, removing and arranging > applications and icons as needed. > It's easy to put an icon on a user's desktop -- just write a .desktop file and > put it into the user's Desktop directory. > Can I do the same thing with the users' panel bars somehow? Don't know if there is an application for that but, maybe have a look in: ~/.gconf/apps/panel/ You might need to modify several files... Do some tests: add an applet and see which files where modified... JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] RHEL 5.4 released / CentOS 5.4 schedule
Hello, It looks like RHEL 5.4 has been released: http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1243.html https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rhel-server-errata.html And before you ask: CentOS 5.4 will be released in 2-4 weeks or so, when it's ready :) -- Pasi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] RHEL 5.4 released / CentOS 5.4 schedule
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 01:16:31PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > Hello, > > It looks like RHEL 5.4 has been released: > > http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1243.html > https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rhel-server-errata.html > http://www.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5.4/html/Release_Notes/ http://www.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5.4/html/Technical_Notes/kernel.html -- Pasi > And before you ask: CentOS 5.4 will be released in 2-4 weeks or so, when > it's ready :) > > -- Pasi > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Cacti Installation on CentOS 5
Dear All, I am attempting to install cacti on CentOS 5.3 64 bit, and I checked the wiki, only to find that the instructions are a bit out of date. Have these instructions been updated somewhere, or does anyone have updated instructions, maybe with known gotchas etc? --- Kind Regards, Mr Gabriel ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Cacti Installation on CentOS 5
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Gabriel - IP Guys wrote: > Dear All, > > > > I am attempting to install cacti on CentOS 5.3 64 bit, and I checked the > wiki, only to find that the instructions are a bit out of date. Have these > instructions been updated somewhere, or does anyone have updated > instructions, maybe with known gotchas etc? I've had luck with http://linux.com/learn/tutorials/38270-installing-cacti-on-centos-5 -- Eduardo Grosclaude Universidad Nacional del Comahue Neuquen, Argentina ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Cacti Installation on CentOS 5
Am Mittwoch, den 02.09.2009, 12:51 +0200 schrieb Gabriel - IP Guys: > Dear All, > > > > I am attempting to install cacti on CentOS 5.3 64 bit, and I checked > the wiki, only to find that the instructions are a bit out of date. > Have these instructions been updated somewhere, or does anyone have > updated instructions, maybe with known gotchas etc? > > > > --- > > Kind Regards, > > Mr Gabriel > The cacti packackage from rpmforge works out of the box for me. Chris financial.com AG Munich head office/Hauptsitz München: Maria-Probst-Str. 19 | 80939 München | Germany Frankfurt branch office/Niederlassung Frankfurt: Messeturm | Friedrich-Ebert-Anlage 49 | 60327 Frankfurt | Germany Management board/Vorstand: Dr. Steffen Boehnert (CEO/Vorsitzender) | Dr. Alexis Eisenhofer | Dr. Yann Samson | Matthias Wiederwach Supervisory board/Aufsichtsrat: Dr. Dr. Ernst zur Linden (chairman/Vorsitzender) Register court/Handelsregister: Munich – HRB 128 972 | Sales tax ID number/St.Nr.: DE205 370 553 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Cacti Installation on CentOS 5
> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Eduardo Grosclaude > Sent: 02 September 2009 13:12 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Cacti Installation on CentOS 5 > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Gabriel - IP > Guys wrote: > > Dear All, > > > > > > > > I am attempting to install cacti on CentOS 5.3 64 bit, and I checked > the > > wiki, only to find that the instructions are a bit out of date. Have > these > > instructions been updated somewhere, or does anyone have updated > > instructions, maybe with known gotchas etc? > > I've had luck with > http://linux.com/learn/tutorials/38270-installing-cacti-on-centos-5 > Thank you for your response - I went through those instructions, and again, I got the same error as below. FATAL: Cannot connect to MySQL server on 'localhost'. Please make sure you have specified a valid MySQL database name in 'include/config.php' The database configuration in config.php is correct, and is readable, because if I change the hostname, the error message changes accordingly. I can connect to the MySQL database just fine with the configuration information that is in config.php. Any ideas would be appreciated - If this become too off topic, someone feel free to say so. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Cacti Installation on CentOS 5
> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Christoph Maser > Sent: 02 September 2009 13:32 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Cacti Installation on CentOS 5 > > Am Mittwoch, den 02.09.2009, 12:51 +0200 schrieb Gabriel - IP Guys: > > Dear All, > > > > > > > > I am attempting to install cacti on CentOS 5.3 64 bit, and I checked > > the wiki, only to find that the instructions are a bit out of date. > > Have these instructions been updated somewhere, or does anyone have > > updated instructions, maybe with known gotchas etc? > > > > > > > > --- > > > > Kind Regards, > > > > Mr Gabriel > > > > > The cacti packackage from rpmforge works out of the box for me. > > Chris That is the package that I used - *sigh* so many projects to work on, and so little time! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Cacti Installation on CentOS 5
Am Mittwoch, den 02.09.2009, 14:36 +0200 schrieb Gabriel - IP Guys: > > Thank you for your response - I went through those instructions, and > again, I got the same error as below. > > FATAL: Cannot connect to MySQL server on 'localhost'. Please make sure > you have specified a valid MySQL database name in 'include/config.php' > > The database configuration in config.php is correct, and is readable, > because if I change the hostname, the error message changes accordingly. > I can connect to the MySQL database just fine with the configuration > information that is in config.php. Any ideas would be appreciated - If > this become too off topic, someone feel free to say so. If you have selinux enabled as you should you need to set sebool httpd_can_network_connect_db on. Chris financial.com AG Munich head office/Hauptsitz München: Maria-Probst-Str. 19 | 80939 München | Germany Frankfurt branch office/Niederlassung Frankfurt: Messeturm | Friedrich-Ebert-Anlage 49 | 60327 Frankfurt | Germany Management board/Vorstand: Dr. Steffen Boehnert (CEO/Vorsitzender) | Dr. Alexis Eisenhofer | Dr. Yann Samson | Matthias Wiederwach Supervisory board/Aufsichtsrat: Dr. Dr. Ernst zur Linden (chairman/Vorsitzender) Register court/Handelsregister: Munich – HRB 128 972 | Sales tax ID number/St.Nr.: DE205 370 553 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Cacti Installation on CentOS 5
From: Gabriel - IP Guys > FATAL: Cannot connect to MySQL server on 'localhost'. Please make sure > you have specified a valid MySQL database name in 'include/config.php' > > The database configuration in config.php is correct, and is readable, > because if I change the hostname, the error message changes accordingly. > I can connect to the MySQL database just fine with the configuration > information that is in config.php. Any ideas would be appreciated - If > this become too off topic, someone feel free to say so. Checked about hostname vs socket connection to mysql? http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/can-not-connect-to-server.html JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 install on gigabyte GA-MA790FX-UD5P motherboard
Hi with the kernel parameters ... nousb nousbstorage nomsi nodm nodmraid noapic acpi=off pci=nomsi worked for me ... Nathan Norton schrieb: > Hi, > > I am having some difficulties installing centos 5.3 on the gigabyte > GA-MA790FX-UD5P motherboard. > > Has anyone got centos booting on this motherboard? > > so far I have tried the following. > > + disabled the jmicron controller as this caused errors on booting > JMB363 bad irq(0): will probe later error (this error caused the > installation to stop at this point) > > + tested all components in another computer, they all work. > > + remove all unnecessary components from the pci bus. > > + power supply is not an issue since I have used a 850W PSU > > Basically what I am seeing is once the installation process starts and asks > do i have another sata disk, and I select no the screen freezes at this point > *every* single time, the screen is always blue with a couple of greek looking > characters on the screen. No logs are left at this point in the installation, > so it is making it difficult to diagnose. > > Today I installed the grml distribution and it worked with no issues, it > uses a base kernel of 2.6.28. so there is nothing wrong with the hardware but > centos still does not want to install on this motherboard. > > Anyone have any ideas? > > Nathan ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Cacti Installation on CentOS 5
> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Christoph Maser > Sent: 02 September 2009 13:38 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Cacti Installation on CentOS 5 > > Am Mittwoch, den 02.09.2009, 14:36 +0200 schrieb Gabriel - IP Guys: > > > > > Thank you for your response - I went through those instructions, and > > again, I got the same error as below. > > > > FATAL: Cannot connect to MySQL server on 'localhost'. Please make > sure > > you have specified a valid MySQL database name in > 'include/config.php' > > > > The database configuration in config.php is correct, and is readable, > > because if I change the hostname, the error message changes > accordingly. > > I can connect to the MySQL database just fine with the configuration > > information that is in config.php. Any ideas would be appreciated - > If > > this become too off topic, someone feel free to say so. > > > If you have selinux enabled as you should you need to set sebool > httpd_can_network_connect_db on. > > Chris OHH DAMN Of course! SE Linux!! Man, I hate SE Linux sometimes! I'll look into that, and hopefully, it would fix it. Thank you Chris ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Cacti Installation on CentOS 5
> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of John Doe > Sent: 02 September 2009 14:13 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Cacti Installation on CentOS 5 > > From: Gabriel - IP Guys > > FATAL: Cannot connect to MySQL server on 'localhost'. Please make > sure > > you have specified a valid MySQL database name in > 'include/config.php' > > > > The database configuration in config.php is correct, and is readable, > > because if I change the hostname, the error message changes > accordingly. > > I can connect to the MySQL database just fine with the configuration > > information that is in config.php. Any ideas would be appreciated - > If > > this become too off topic, someone feel free to say so. > > Checked about hostname vs socket connection to mysql? >http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/can-not-connect-to- > server.html > > JD > Thank you JD! (But I can't do this all on my own, no I know, I'm no superman!) In case this doesn't make sense, Google the words in brackets I can connect locally from the CLI to mysql, and I have a number of website using the mysql also running on that system. But thank you for the tips ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Cacti Installation on CentOS 5
> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Gabriel - IP Guys > Sent: 02 September 2009 15:47 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Cacti Installation on CentOS 5 > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > > Behalf Of Christoph Maser > > Sent: 02 September 2009 13:38 > > To: CentOS mailing list > > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Cacti Installation on CentOS 5 > > > > Am Mittwoch, den 02.09.2009, 14:36 +0200 schrieb Gabriel - IP Guys: > > > > > > > > Thank you for your response - I went through those instructions, > and > > > again, I got the same error as below. > > > > > > FATAL: Cannot connect to MySQL server on 'localhost'. Please make > > sure > > > you have specified a valid MySQL database name in > > 'include/config.php' > > > > > > The database configuration in config.php is correct, and is > readable, > > > because if I change the hostname, the error message changes > > accordingly. > > > I can connect to the MySQL database just fine with the > configuration > > > information that is in config.php. Any ideas would be appreciated - > > If > > > this become too off topic, someone feel free to say so. > > > > > > If you have selinux enabled as you should you need to set sebool > > httpd_can_network_connect_db on. > > > > Chris > > > > OHH DAMN Of course! SE Linux!! Man, I hate SE Linux sometimes! I'll > look into that, and hopefully, it would fix it. Thank you Chris SE Linux is already configured properly, /usr/sbin/getsebool httpd_can_network_connect_db returns httpd_can_network_connect_db => on So now, I'm more confused that before?! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] [rhelv5-list] Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.4 GA Announcement
- Forwarded message from rhelv5-l...@redhat.com - From: rhelv5-l...@redhat.com To: rhelv5-l...@redhat.com Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 10:17:35 -0500 Subject: [rhelv5-list] Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.4 GA Announcement Red Hat is pleased to announce the availability of the latest update to Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5, release 5.4 (with kernel-2.6.18-164.el5) for a family of products including: - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Advanced Platform for x86, AMD64/Intel(r) 64, Itanium Processor Family, Power Systems and System z - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Server for x86, AMD64/Intel(r) 64, Itanium Processor Family, Power Systems and System z - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Desktop for x86 and AMD64/Intel(r) 64 Enhancements New in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.4 is a reorganization of the release note material. Now the Release Notes are a condensed set of major release highlights. The Technical Notes contain the majority of the information regarding new feature descriptions and bug change notices. Due to the existence of the Release Notes highlights information, it is no longer necessary to duplicate that information in this release announcement. The Release Notes are available on the media as well as online as part of the general documentation. The online version of the Release Notes will contain the latest data. The Technical Notes are only available online. Please see the Documentation section in this announcement for locating the online Release Notes and Technical Notes. A technical white paper that describes the major enhancements can be found at: http://www.redhat.com/rhel/server/resource_center/ The following list summarizes improvements to this release: * Hardware - 10 GigE drivers with GRO support - FCoE support on standard NICs - SR I/OV support * System - Kernel tracepoints for systemtap use - Per process I/O accounting - FIEMAP support * Virtualization - Hypervisor scalability to 192 cpus - Additional hypervisor - Kernel Based Virtual Machine (KVM) Additional Information -- Additional information is provided below on Accessing the Software, Documentation, Support, and Mailing Lists. Enjoy the latest update to Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5. The Red Hat Enterprise Linux Team -- Accessing the Software -- Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.4 is available to existing Red Hat Enterprise Linux subscribers via RHN. The update will be in the appropriate channels in your account. Installable binary and source ISO images are available via Red Hat Network at: https://rhn.redhat.com/network/software/download_isos_full.pxt You will be required to log in using a valid RHN account with active entitlements. Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 errata are available at: https://rhn.redhat.com/ Documentation - Release Notes and Technical Notes for this update are available on the Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 site at: http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/ The Release Notes are also on your Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 installed system in the redhat-release-notes package. Support --- Red Hat Enterprise Linux customers using the Technical Account Manager (TAM) Service should raise all issues and questions with this release using your current Issue Tracker account. If you're interested in the Technical Account Manager Service, visit: https://www.redhat.com/support/offerings/technical.html All other customers can raise questions and issues through the normal Red Hat support channels. Details can be found at: https://www.redhat.com/support/process/ Mailing Lists - Red Hat has a public mailing list for communication during this and all future Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 programs. * rhelv5-announce redhat com A low-volume, moderated, announcement-only mailing list. Red Hat will use this list to communicate one-way information about Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 programs, such as notifications when releases are available or solicitations for feedback. Subscribe at: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-announce * rhelv5-list redhat com A public general discussion mailing list for users of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 releases. Subscribe at: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list ___ rhelv5-list mailing list rhelv5-l...@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list - End forwarded message - ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.3 - Activating laptop wireless card
On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 20:06 +0100, Ned Slider wrote: > Andrew Allen wrote: > > I've just installed CentOS 5.3 on my Dell laptop and it seems to have > > detected and set-up my wireless card (BCM 4311) correctly as eth1. > > However, so far I haven't been able to activate it and have read the > > wiki > > http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/Wireless#head-320d6fcf09b7e16e0b15d19ef76adcb023a95938 > > which indicates that this card isn't actually supported in CentOS - but > > there has been an improvement over earlier kernels because the card > > wasn't even detected in CentOS 5.0. So do I need to get the Windows > > driver from http://www.broadcom.com/support/802.11/linux_sta.php and do > > I need ndiswrapper as well? > > > > Andy > > > > That's not a Windows driver, it's a native Linux driver that you sould > download and compile for your kernel. Being a native Linux driver, it > doesn't require ndiswrapper. The ndiswrapper section is the next section > on that Wiki page and is unrelated (is it confusing?). > > I believe this topic was also discussed recently on this mailing list (a > few months back iirc). > Thanks, You don't happen to know when that was do you? It would be great to benefit from somebody else's experience, if they've managed to get this card working in CentOS (5.3). Trouble is, the instructions in the readme.txt on the Broadcom website obviously aren't CentOS specific. In the past I've installed additional stuff (eg skype) from repos using yum, which works brilliantly - I'm a bit wary of trying to install by other means! Andy ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.3 - Activating laptop wireless card
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Andrew Allen wrote: > Thanks, > You don't happen to know when that was do you? It would be great to > benefit from somebody else's experience, if they've managed to get this > card working in CentOS (5.3). Trouble is, the instructions in the > readme.txt on the Broadcom website obviously aren't CentOS specific. In > the past I've installed additional stuff (eg skype) from repos using > yum, which works brilliantly - I'm a bit wary of trying to install by > other means! I originally had a Broadcom wireless card in my Dell. It was based on the bcm4309 chipset which, unfortunately, is not completely supported by the bcm43xx project. I did get it to work using the fwcutter program (which "cuts" pertinent driver information from the Windows driver and allows you to compile it into the Linux kernel). I didn't really know what I was doing, I just followed step-by-step instructions. But unfortunately, as I mentioned, I got it working but the bcm4309 is not completely supported and I had very poor results. I think the bcm4311, however, is fully supported. Go to: http://linuxwireless.org/en/users/Drivers/b43 What I eventually did was just buy a wireless Intel network card from eBay -- Intel is fully supported by CentOS with a simple yum install. Since my Dell D400 uses an older style mini pci card, there are thousands of new ones on eBay for about $10 to $15 including shipping. Performance is great. And the bcm4309 card got installed into my wife's Dell C640, since she uses XP it works great for her there. -- RonB -- Using CentOS 5.3 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.3 - Activating laptop wireless card
Andrew Allen wrote: > On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 20:06 +0100, Ned Slider wrote: >> Andrew Allen wrote: >>> I've just installed CentOS 5.3 on my Dell laptop and it seems to have >>> detected and set-up my wireless card (BCM 4311) correctly as eth1. >>> However, so far I haven't been able to activate it and have read the >>> wiki >>> http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/Wireless#head-320d6fcf09b7e16e0b15d19ef76adcb023a95938 >>> which indicates that this card isn't actually supported in CentOS - but >>> there has been an improvement over earlier kernels because the card >>> wasn't even detected in CentOS 5.0. So do I need to get the Windows >>> driver from http://www.broadcom.com/support/802.11/linux_sta.php and do >>> I need ndiswrapper as well? >>> >>> Andy >>> >> That's not a Windows driver, it's a native Linux driver that you sould >> download and compile for your kernel. Being a native Linux driver, it >> doesn't require ndiswrapper. The ndiswrapper section is the next section >> on that Wiki page and is unrelated (is it confusing?). >> >> I believe this topic was also discussed recently on this mailing list (a >> few months back iirc). >> > Thanks, > You don't happen to know when that was do you? It would be great to > benefit from somebody else's experience, if they've managed to get this > card working in CentOS (5.3). Trouble is, the instructions in the > readme.txt on the Broadcom website obviously aren't CentOS specific. In > the past I've installed additional stuff (eg skype) from repos using > yum, which works brilliantly - I'm a bit wary of trying to install by > other means! > > Andy > Here you go: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2009-July/079638.html ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] sendmail routing
From: Christopher Chan Sent: September 1, 2009 23:04 > > Sorry, last I checked, there is no sender-based routing support in > > sendmail. You cannot even try to create rulesets to get that. > > > > > Looks like it is my turn to eat humble pie. You will need to rebuild > sendmail.cf after applying this hack. > > http://www.cs.niu.edu/~rickert/cf/hack/sender_based_routing.m4 While this does look promising I am hesitant to install anything that is either a) possibly version dependent and b) beyond my understanding as to what it is doing. I will have to review this thoroughly before I even consider implementing it. > I have not tested it let alone tried on 8.14.x Caveat noted. > I cannot believe the file is dated 2004. Ah well, I got rid of > sendmail and replaced it with postfix in 2003 while I was still a > mail admin. I must bow to the real sendmail bigots. Mail administration is just one of those "little" jobs that I am responsible for and I just have not had the time to review/learn a new MTA so I muddle on with the "devil I know". Thanks for your suggestion it has definitely given me something to think on and possibly work with. Regards, Hugh -- Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] EXT4 status for centos 5.3
Hi, I was wondering what is the current status fro ext4 support in Centos. I've noticed that is marked as dev when I try to use it from the installer. Does anybody have a scary story to prevent using it? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] sendmail routing
On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 11:38 -0700, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote: > From: Christopher Chan Sent: September 1, 2009 23:04 > > > Sorry, last I checked, there is no sender-based routing support in > > > sendmail. You cannot even try to create rulesets to get that. > > > > > > > > Looks like it is my turn to eat humble pie. You will need to rebuild > > sendmail.cf after applying this hack. > > > > http://www.cs.niu.edu/~rickert/cf/hack/sender_based_routing.m4 > > While this does look promising I am hesitant to install anything that > is either a) possibly version dependent and b) beyond my understanding > as to what it is doing. I will have to review this thoroughly before > I even consider implementing it. > > > I have not tested it let alone tried on 8.14.x > > Caveat noted. > > > I cannot believe the file is dated 2004. Ah well, I got rid of > > sendmail and replaced it with postfix in 2003 while I was still a > > mail admin. I must bow to the real sendmail bigots. > > Mail administration is just one of those "little" jobs that I am > responsible for and I just have not had the time to review/learn a > new MTA so I muddle on with the "devil I know". I'm certainly not going to throw stones at this philosophy, but I will suggest that you reconsider in this case. I'm not really a mail guru, or even that much of a mail admin, but I switched to Postfix about 3 years ago, and I have to say that the learning curve is a LOT less challenging than Sendmail ever was for me. I became "productive" with Postfix in less than a week, mostly because the documentation is a lot better, as well as the config files are readable by the average computer-literate humanoid. I suggest that you give it some thought. My $0.02 (US) worth. ;> > > Thanks for your suggestion it has definitely given me something to > think on and possibly work with. > > Regards, Hugh > -- Ron Loftin relof...@twcny.rr.com "God, root, what is difference ?" Piter from UserFriendly ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] sendmail routing
From: Les Mikesell Sent: September 1, 2009 22:35 > > You can use SMART_HOST to send the mail from any single host > through a specified relay. Single host and multiple domains so no go here. > If the same machine is sending for more than one domain, you may be > able to configure the application sending the automated emails to > send to a specified SMTP server. The automated emails are being generated on the alternate host so this is basically already in place. It is the users' emails that I am trying to reroute. > Users can almost certainly configure their mail agent to sent through > the SMTP server of their choice. This is my fallback position. The problem here is that my users are a rather uncooperative bunch and tend to think that they know better on what should be done and then go off and do things their way. And this attitude starts at the top and works its way down. Worse yet some of this has now become company policy (would you believe it is now company policy that we MUST top post and fully quote all previous messages). I was attempting to see if there was a way that I could do this behind the scenes without having to reconfigure everyone's MTA. Thanks again for your input (and everyone else's). Regards, Hugh -- Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] EXT4 status for centos 5.3
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 02:45:28PM -0400, mbneto wrote: > Hi, > > I was wondering what is the current status fro ext4 support in Centos. I've > noticed that is marked as dev when I try to use it from the installer. > > Does anybody have a scary story to prevent using it? RHEL 5.4 was just released, and it contains updates for ext4. It's called 'ext4' now, instead of 'ext4dev' earlier. But it's still a tech preview. See: http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1243.html (kernel changes/bugfixes) http://www.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5.4/html/Release_Notes/ http://www.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5.4/html/Technical_Notes/kernel.html http://www.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5.4/html/Release_Notes/Filesystems.html "The ext4 file system (included in Red Hat Enterprise Linux as a Technology Preview) has also been updated (BZ#485315)." https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485315 "The ext4 filesystem Technology Preview has been refreshed with updated userspace tools" "In previous versions of Red Hat Enterprise Linux utilizing the ext4 Technology Preview, ext4 filesystems were labeled as ext4dev. With this update, ext4 filesystems are now tagged as ext4." Hopefully that helps. -- Pasi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] sendmail routing
> The problem here is that my users are a > rather uncooperative bunch and tend to think that they know better on > what should be done and then go off and do things their way. And this > attitude starts at the top and works its way down. Worse yet some of > this has now become company policy I hate this kinda stuff. Delegation without authority. Ugh. > (would you believe it is > now company > policy that we MUST top post and fully quote all previous messages). Well, I did not top post and I trimmed previous messages, so tell your policymakers they can sue me if they want! Neil -- Neil Aggarwal, (281)846-8957, www.JAMMConsulting.com Will your e-commerce site go offline if you have a DB server failure, fiber cut, flood, fire, or other disaster? If so, ask about our geographically redundant database system. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] sendmail routing
Hugh E Cruickshank wrote: > From: Christopher Chan Sent: September 1, 2009 23:04 >>> Sorry, last I checked, there is no sender-based routing support in >>> sendmail. You cannot even try to create rulesets to get that. >>> >>> >> Looks like it is my turn to eat humble pie. You will need to rebuild >> sendmail.cf after applying this hack. >> >> http://www.cs.niu.edu/~rickert/cf/hack/sender_based_routing.m4 > > While this does look promising I am hesitant to install anything that > is either a) possibly version dependent and b) beyond my understanding > as to what it is doing. I will have to review this thoroughly before > I even consider implementing it. > >> I have not tested it let alone tried on 8.14.x > > Caveat noted. > >> I cannot believe the file is dated 2004. Ah well, I got rid of >> sendmail and replaced it with postfix in 2003 while I was still a >> mail admin. I must bow to the real sendmail bigots. > > Mail administration is just one of those "little" jobs that I am > responsible for and I just have not had the time to review/learn a > new MTA so I muddle on with the "devil I know". > > Thanks for your suggestion it has definitely given me something to > think on and possibly work with. As 'yet another way' that might work... You could set SMART_HOST to a name that has multiple MX entries in DNS, so everything will attempt to relay through the one with the lowest priority. On that box you could install a sendmail milter that would tmp_fail messages from senders in the domain you want the other relay to handle with a 4xx response. That should make the originating sendmail immediately retry the next-lowest priority MX address which would be the server you want these to use. The down side (besides not having tested it) would be that user agents configured to send directly to the 1st MX wouldn't know how to handle the rejection. MimeDefang is a good addition to sendmail because it has an efficient design and code for most milter operations you might need. You just write a small snippet of perl to control it and do any custom operations. For example, it has a 'filter_sender' hook where you could easily reject or tmp_fail based on the sender's domain. Hmmm, I guess you could do that in the access file with a custom error too - but mimedefang lets you think in perl instead of sendmail macros. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] dnsmasq - I'm a little confused....
I have attempted to update with yum over the last 27 hours, and all I
get is this:
[...@mhrichter ~]$ sudo yum update
Password:
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
* base: linux.mirrors.es.net
* updates: centos.g5selfstorage.com
* extras: centos.mirrors.redwire.net
kbs-CentOS-Extras| 951 B 00:00
base | 1.1 kB 00:00
updates | 951 B 00:00
extras | 1.1 kB 00:00
0 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
Setting up Update Process
No Packages marked for Update
You have new mail in /var/spool/mail/mhr
[...@mhrichter ~]$ yg dnsmasq
dnsmasq.x86_64 2.45-1.el5_2.1 installed
According to the announcement (see below), the lastest version is this:
9ee6bf903671f38806a119874ec74eec dnsmasq-2.45-1.1.el5_3.x86_64.rpm
What's up here? Is this really a case of incredibly slow mirrors or
is there something else?
mhr
-- Forwarded message --
From:
Date: Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 9:00 AM
Subject: [CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 55, Issue 1
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. CESA-2009:1238 Important CentOS 5 i386 dnsmasq Update
(Karanbir Singh)
2. CESA-2009:1238 Important CentOS 5 x86_64 dnsmasq Update
(Karanbir Singh)
--
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 15:10:22 +
From: Karanbir Singh
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:1238 Important CentOS 5 i386
dnsmasq Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: <20090901151022.ga10...@tantra.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1238 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1238.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
15068053a0aeea31232c06e17b88d2e7 dnsmasq-2.45-1.1.el5_3.i386.rpm
Source:
88bd7bb7252fd9f2ba5fdbdb09b57d95 dnsmasq-2.45-1.1.el5_3.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 15:10:23 +
From: Karanbir Singh
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:1238 Important CentOS 5 x86_64
dnsmasq Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: <20090901151023.ga10...@tantra.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1238 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1238.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
9ee6bf903671f38806a119874ec74eec dnsmasq-2.45-1.1.el5_3.x86_64.rpm
Source:
88bd7bb7252fd9f2ba5fdbdb09b57d95 dnsmasq-2.45-1.1.el5_3.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
centos-annou...@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 55, Issue 1
**
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] sendmail routing
From: Ron Loftin Sent: September 2, 2009 11:48 > On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 11:38 -0700, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote: > > From: Christopher Chan Sent: September 1, 2009 23:04 > > > > > > I cannot believe the file is dated 2004. Ah well, I got rid of > > > sendmail and replaced it with postfix in 2003 while I was still a > > > mail admin. I must bow to the real sendmail bigots. > > > > Mail administration is just one of those "little" jobs that I am > > responsible for and I just have not had the time to review/learn a > > new MTA so I muddle on with the "devil I know". > > I'm certainly not going to throw stones at this philosophy, but I will > suggest that you reconsider in this case. I'm not really a mail guru, > or even that much of a mail admin, but I switched to Postfix about 3 > years ago, and I have to say that the learning curve is a LOT less > challenging than Sendmail ever was for me. I became "productive" with > Postfix in less than a week, mostly because the documentation is a lot > better, as well as the config files are readable by the average > computer-literate humanoid. I suggest that you give it some thought. I will definitely consider it. The main problem I have is time. We are a small company and I am stretched very thin to cover a lot of tasks. Trying to carve out a week to learn a new MTA will be difficult but I will definitely consider it. Thanks for your comments. Regards, Hugh -- Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] dnsmasq - I'm a little confused....
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 3:05 PM, MHR wrote: > I have attempted to update with yum over the last 27 hours, and all I > get is this: > > [...@mhrichter ~]$ sudo yum update > Password: > Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities > Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile > * base: linux.mirrors.es.net > * updates: centos.g5selfstorage.com > * extras: centos.mirrors.redwire.net > kbs-CentOS-Extras | 951 B 00:00 > base | 1.1 kB 00:00 > updates | 951 B 00:00 > extras | 1.1 kB 00:00 > 0 packages excluded due to repository priority protections Mark: Verify that your priorities plugin is configured properly. Lanny http://wiki.centos.org/PackageManagement/Yum/Priorities ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] dnsmasq - I'm a little confused....
Hi, On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 16:05, MHR wrote: > I have attempted to update with yum over the last 27 hours, and all I > get is this: > > [...@mhrichter ~]$ yg dnsmasq > dnsmasq.x86_64 2.45-1.el5_2.1 > installed > > According to the announcement (see below), the lastest version is this: > 9ee6bf903671f38806a119874ec74eec dnsmasq-2.45-1.1.el5_3.x86_64.rpm > > What's up here? Is this really a case of incredibly slow mirrors or > is there something else? Is it maybe because 2.45-1.1.el5_3 < 2.45-1.el5_2.1 ??? Since '1' < 'e' ? I tried to confirm this, but did not find any tool to which I could give two RPM versions and it would tell me which one was higher... Do you know of any such tool/script? Cheers, Filipe ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] dnsmasq - I'm a little confused....
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 17:03, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
>> What's up here? Is this really a case of incredibly slow mirrors or
>> is there something else?
>
> Is it maybe because 2.45-1.1.el5_3 < 2.45-1.el5_2.1 ??? Since '1' < 'e' ?
No, doesn't seem so, I found a way to check that in Python:
[filbran...@adm2 ~]$ python
Python 2.4.3 (#1, Jul 27 2009, 17:57:39)
[GCC 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-44)] on linux2
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import rpm
>>> rpm.labelCompare(('0', '2.45', '1.1.el5_3'), ('0', '2.45', '1.el5_2.1'))
1
"1" means the first parameter is the greater version ("-1" would be the second).
Cheers,
Filipe
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] dnsmasq - I'm a little confused....
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 01:05:50PM -0700, MHR wrote: > I have attempted to update with yum over the last 27 hours, and all I > get is this: < trim your reply to the mailing list!, don't send us the daily digest > > > [...@mhrichter ~]$ sudo yum update > Password: > Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities > Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile > * base: linux.mirrors.es.net > * updates: centos.g5selfstorage.com > * extras: centos.mirrors.redwire.net > kbs-CentOS-Extras| 951 B 00:00 > base | 1.1 kB 00:00 > updates | 951 B 00:00 > extras | 1.1 kB 00:00 > 0 packages excluded due to repository priority protections > Setting up Update Process > No Packages marked for Update works for me: ... Setting up Update Process Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package dnsmasq.i386 0:2.45-1.1.el5_3 set to be updated --> Finished Dependency Resolution Dependencies Resolved == Package Arch Version Repository Size == Updating: dnsmasq i386 2.45-1.1.el5_3 updates 165 k Transaction Summary == Install 0 Package(s) Update 1 Package(s) Remove 0 Package(s) Total download size: 165 k Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: dnsmasq-2.45-1.1.el5_3.i386.rpm | 165 kB 00:00 Running rpm_check_debug Running Transaction Test Finished Transaction Test Transaction Test Succeeded Running Transaction Updating : dnsmasq [1/2] Cleanup: dnsmasq [2/2] Updated: dnsmasq.i386 0:2.45-1.1.el5_3 Complete! Try the usual 'yum clean all' and retry Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpCwbkyR2VJe.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] dnsmasq - I'm a little confused....
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Lanny Marcus wrote: > > Mark: Verify that your priorities plugin is configured properly. Lanny > Here's a grep of them: [...@mhrichter ~]$ sudo grep -H priority /etc/yum.repos.d/* Password: /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo:priority=1 [base] /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo:priority=1 [updates] /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo:priority=2 [addons] /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo:priority=1 [extras] /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo:priority=2 [centosplus] /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo:priority=2 [contrib] /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Media.repo:priority=2 /etc/yum.repos.d/epel.repo:failovermethod=priority /etc/yum.repos.d/epel.repo:priority=20 /etc/yum.repos.d/epel.repo:failovermethod=priority /etc/yum.repos.d/epel.repo:priority=20 /etc/yum.repos.d/epel.repo:failovermethod=priority /etc/yum.repos.d/epel.repo:priority=20 /etc/yum.repos.d/epel-testing.repo:failovermethod=priority /etc/yum.repos.d/epel-testing.repo:priority=20 /etc/yum.repos.d/epel-testing.repo:failovermethod=priority /etc/yum.repos.d/epel-testing.repo:priority=20 /etc/yum.repos.d/epel-testing.repo:failovermethod=priority /etc/yum.repos.d/epel-testing.repo:priority=20 /etc/yum.repos.d/FedoraExtras.repo:priority=4 /etc/yum.repos.d/FedoraExtras.repo:priority=4 /etc/yum.repos.d/kbs-CentOS-Extras.repo:priority=3 /etc/yum.repos.d/kbs-CentOS-Extras.repo:priority=3 /etc/yum.repos.d/planetccrma.repo:priority=25 /etc/yum.repos.d/planetccrma.repo:priority=25 /etc/yum.repos.d/rpmforge.repo:priority = 5 mhr ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] dnsmasq - I'm a little confused....
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Tru Huynh wrote: > > works for me: > I'm so excited! > Try the usual 'yum clean all' and retry > That was my first resort - no help. mhr ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] dnsmasq - I'm a little confused....
MHR wrote: > > What's up here? Is this really a case of incredibly slow mirrors or > is there something else? > > mhr > Same here, kind of. My rsync script pulled the package from my local (UK) mirror yesterday shortly after it's release was announced, but the metadata has yet to be refreshed (still dated 26/8/2009) so yum won't pick up the update until that happens. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] dnsmasq - I'm a little confused....
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 05:44:09PM -0400, Filipe Brandenburger wrote: > Hi, > Hi, > > For me it does not work either: > > # rpm -q dnsmasq > dnsmasq-2.45-1.el5_2.1 > # yum clean all > Loaded plugins: fastestmirror > Cleaning up Everything > Cleaning up list of fastest mirrors > # yum update dnsmasq > Loaded plugins: fastestmirror > Determining fastest mirrors it should list the mirrors you are pulling from at this point > base | 1.1 kB 00:00 > primary.xml.gz | 878 kB 00:00 > base 2508/2508 > updates | 951 B 00:00 > primary.xml.gz | 317 kB 00:00 > updates478/478 > addons | 951 B 00:00 > primary.xml.gz | 157 B 00:00 > extras | 1.1 kB 00:00 > primary.xml.gz | 107 kB 00:00 > extras 324/324 > Setting up Update Process > No Packages marked for Update > > It seems like my mirror has outdated repodata, see > http://centos.mirror.iweb.ca/5/updates/i386/repodata/, the files are > dated 26-Aug-2009, I checked http://mirror.centos.org/ and the files > are dated 02-Sep-2009 there... > > Do you have any scripts to check the date of the files in all mirrors > and see which of them are outdated? http://mirror-status.centos.org/ is using mirmon to check Cheers, Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgp8wQnOP9Dmd.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] dnsmasq - I'm a little confused....
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Tru Huynh wrote: > > http://mirror-status.centos.org/ is using mirmon to check > Ah, excellent - many thanks! mhr ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] dnsmasq - I'm a little confused....
MHR wrote: > On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Tru Huynh wrote: >> http://mirror-status.centos.org/ is using mirmon to check >> > > Ah, excellent - many thanks! > Here's my local mirror where you can see the package is there but the metadata is yet to be updated: http://mirror.bytemark.co.uk/centos/5/updates/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] dnsmasq - I'm a little confused....
Hi, On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 17:29, Tru Huynh wrote: > On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 01:05:50PM -0700, MHR wrote: >> I have attempted to update with yum over the last 27 hours, and all I >> get is this: > > > works for me: > > ... > Setting up Update Process > Resolving Dependencies > --> Running transaction check > ---> Package dnsmasq.i386 0:2.45-1.1.el5_3 set to be updated > --> Finished Dependency Resolution For me it does not work either: # rpm -q dnsmasq dnsmasq-2.45-1.el5_2.1 # yum clean all Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Cleaning up Everything Cleaning up list of fastest mirrors # yum update dnsmasq Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Determining fastest mirrors base | 1.1 kB 00:00 primary.xml.gz | 878 kB 00:00 base 2508/2508 updates | 951 B 00:00 primary.xml.gz | 317 kB 00:00 updates478/478 addons | 951 B 00:00 primary.xml.gz | 157 B 00:00 extras | 1.1 kB 00:00 primary.xml.gz | 107 kB 00:00 extras 324/324 Setting up Update Process No Packages marked for Update It seems like my mirror has outdated repodata, see http://centos.mirror.iweb.ca/5/updates/i386/repodata/, the files are dated 26-Aug-2009, I checked http://mirror.centos.org/ and the files are dated 02-Sep-2009 there... Do you have any scripts to check the date of the files in all mirrors and see which of them are outdated? Thanks! Filipe ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] dnsmasq - I'm a little confused....
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 11:01:06PM +0100, Ned Slider wrote: > MHR wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Tru Huynh wrote: > >> http://mirror-status.centos.org/ is using mirmon to check > >> > > > > Ah, excellent - many thanks! > > > > Here's my local mirror where you can see the package is there but the > metadata is yet to be updated: > > http://mirror.bytemark.co.uk/centos/5/updates/ I have checked most of the centos.org servers, the metadata are ok. Most public mirrors only sync from 1 to 4 times a day... The metadata generation script might have suffered a hiccup, but that should be resolved shortly on all the public mirrors. see http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5/updates/i386/repodata/ for the timestamps of the files Cheers, Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpiPOi0ssbPK.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] dnsmasq - I'm a little confused....
Tru Huynh wrote: > On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 11:01:06PM +0100, Ned Slider wrote: >> MHR wrote: >>> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Tru Huynh wrote: http://mirror-status.centos.org/ is using mirmon to check >>> Ah, excellent - many thanks! >>> >> Here's my local mirror where you can see the package is there but the >> metadata is yet to be updated: >> >> http://mirror.bytemark.co.uk/centos/5/updates/ > > I have checked most of the centos.org servers, the metadata are ok. > Most public mirrors only sync from 1 to 4 times a day... > The metadata generation script might have suffered a hiccup, but > that should be resolved shortly on all the public mirrors. > > see http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5/updates/i386/repodata/ > for the timestamps of the files > > Cheers, > > Tru > Looks like you pressed the right buttons - my mirror is suddenly up to date and all is working :) Thanks Tru. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] dnsmasq - I'm a little confused....
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Tru Huynh wrote: > > I have checked most of the centos.org servers, the metadata are ok. > Most public mirrors only sync from 1 to 4 times a day... > The metadata generation script might have suffered a hiccup, but > that should be resolved shortly on all the public mirrors. > > see http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5/updates/i386/repodata/ > for the timestamps of the files > Got it (finally!). Thanks. mhr ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] sendmail routing
From: Christopher Chan Sent: September 1, 2009 23:04 > > > Sorry, last I checked, there is no sender-based routing support in > > sendmail. You cannot even try to create rulesets to get that. > > > > > Looks like it is my turn to eat humble pie. You will need to rebuild > sendmail.cf after applying this hack. > > http://www.cs.niu.edu/~rickert/cf/hack/sender_based_routing.m4 For those that might be interested I have found one other alternative called Smart Table available at: http://www.jmaimon.com/sendmail/anfi.homeunix.net/sendmail/smarttab.html However it is for sendmail 8.5+ and will not work with my 8.13. I have also found some documentation for both at: http://www.theillien.com/Sys_Admin_v12/html/v13/i02/a8.htm HTH Regards, Hugh -- Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] sendmail routing
Hugh E Cruickshank wrote: > From: Christopher Chan Sent: September 1, 2009 23:04 > >>> Sorry, last I checked, there is no sender-based routing support in >>> sendmail. You cannot even try to create rulesets to get that. >>> >>> >>> >> Looks like it is my turn to eat humble pie. You will need to rebuild >> sendmail.cf after applying this hack. >> >> http://www.cs.niu.edu/~rickert/cf/hack/sender_based_routing.m4 >> > > For those that might be interested I have found one other alternative > called Smart Table available at: > > http://www.jmaimon.com/sendmail/anfi.homeunix.net/sendmail/smarttab.html > > However it is for sendmail 8.5+ and will not work with my 8.13. > > You are running 8.13.x? Well, give the ricker hack a try. Is that sendmail box also the mx for the domains concerned? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS/RHEL 4.x vs 5.x
I was just curious what the fundamental differences were between the 4.x and 5.x branches? Thanks. Scott ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS/RHEL 4.x vs 5.x
Scott Ehrlich wrote: > I was just curious what the fundamental differences were between the > 4.x and 5.x branches? quite extensive. just a few major components... c4 c5 kernel 2.6.9 2.6.18 glibc2.3.4 2.5 gcc 3.4.6 4.1.2 apache 2.0.52 2.2.3 php 4.3.9 5.1.6 mysql4.1.22 5.0.45 pgsql7.4.19 8.0.11(?) python 2.3.4 2.4.3 etc etc etc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] sendmail routing
From: Christopher Chan Sent: September 2, 2009 18:36 > > You are running 8.13.x? Yes. 8.13.1 on our primary development server (CentOS 4.8) which is also our primary mail server. 8.13.8 on our primary production server (RHEL 5.3 soon to be 5.4) which is the alternate mail server that I was looking to route some mail through. > Well, give the ricker hack a try. Will do but I want to understand it a bit better before I do. > Is that sendmail box also the mx for the domains concerned? Currently yes but I will be changing the MX for the one domain that I want to route from the development system to the production system. Now that we have moved the production systems to a co-location facility I am trying isolate the two environments as much as possible and moving the one domain name over is just one part of this. Part of the problem here is that we will be retaining sales/support staff at the our development offices (no mater how hard I tried I just could not squeeze them into that half-rack cage). Thanks again for your input. Regards, Hugh -- Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] sendmail routing
From: Hugh E Cruickshank Sent: September 2, 2009 18:27 > > For those that might be interested I have found one other alternative > called Smart Table available at: > > http://www.jmaimon.com/sendmail/anfi.homeunix.net/sendmail/smarttab.html > > However it is for sendmail 8.5+ and will not work with my 8.13. I am going to have to correct that last statement as it seems that I have lost the ability to read. The 8.5+ version restriction was for the Smart Table version not the sendmail version. This dawned on me when I discovered the 8.14.3 is the latest sendmail version so my statement above made no sense (even to me). My apologies for any confusion. Regards, Hugh -- Hugh E Cruickshank, Payroll Guardian, www.PayrollGuardian.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] sendmail routing
>> Well, give the ricker hack a try. >> > > Will do but I want to understand it a bit better before I do. > > Of course. Therefore the question I posed below. >> Is that sendmail box also the mx for the domains concerned? >> > > Currently yes but I will be changing the MX for the one domain that > I want to route from the development system to the production system. > Now that we have moved the production systems to a co-location facility > I am trying isolate the two environments as much as possible and moving > the one domain name over is just one part of this. Part of the problem > here is that we will be retaining sales/support staff at the our > development offices (no mater how hard I tried I just could not > squeeze them into that half-rack cage). > If the box is the also the mx for the domain for which you want to do special routing, I believe there will be a problem if you apply that sender_based_routing patch. They cannot share the same mailertable lookups. Another table lookup needs to be defined for sender_based routing. I will see if I can cook up something on a Centos 4 box. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] sendmail routing
From: Christopher Chan Sent: September 2, 2009 19:34 > > If the box is the also the mx for the domain for which you want to do > special routing, I believe there will be a problem if you apply that > sender_based_routing patch. They cannot share the same mailertable > lookups. Another table lookup needs to be defined for > sender_based routing. > > I will see if I can cook up something on a Centos 4 box. Thanks for the offer but I would hold off for now. I am going to give the Smart Table solution a try first as it seems to be a little cleaner/easier/somethinger. Regards, Hugh -- Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS/RHEL 4.x vs 5.x
Scott Ehrlich wrote: > I was just curious what the fundamental differences were between the > 4.x and 5.x branches? One is based on Fedora Core 3, the other is based on Fedora Core 6. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] user defined udev rules
Hi, I would like to change permissions of /dev/sda* and /dev/hda* files to 0644. I added the following rules to 99-udev.rules files: KERNEL=="[hs]d*", OWNER="root" GROUP="disk", MODE="0644 After restarting udev by strat_udev, I checked that permissions were changed: [r...@gini rules.d]# ll /dev/sda* brw-r--r-- 1 root disk 8, 0 Sep 2 2009 /dev/sda brw-r--r-- 1 root disk 8, 1 Sep 2 13:55 /dev/sda1 brw-r--r-- 1 root disk 8, 2 Sep 2 13:55 /dev/sda2 brw-r--r-- 1 root disk 8, 3 Sep 2 2009 /dev/sda3 brw-r--r-- 1 root disk 8, 4 Sep 2 2009 /dev/sda4 brw-r--r-- 1 root disk 8, 5 Sep 2 13:55 /dev/sda5 But permissions of /dev/hda file were not changed. Moreover, the owner of this file is changed: [r...@gini rules.d]# ll /dev/hda* brw--- 1 alexey-s disk 3, 0 Sep 2 13:55 /dev/hda Looking into /var/log/messages: Sep 2 16:26:53 gini udevd-event[29543]: udev_node_add: creating device node '/dev/hda', major = '3', minor = '0', mode = '0644', uid = '0', gid = '6' Sep 2 16:26:53 gini udevd-event[29543]: udev_node_add: creating symlink '/dev/cdrom' to 'hda' Sep 2 16:26:53 gini udevd-event[29543]: udev_node_add: creating symlink '/dev/cdrom-hda' to 'hda' Sep 2 16:26:53 gini udevd-event[29543]: udev_node_add: creating symlink '/dev/dvd' to 'hda' Sep 2 16:26:53 gini udevd-event[29543]: udev_node_add: creating symlink '/dev/dvd-hda' to 'hda' Sep 2 16:26:53 gini udevd-event[29543]: udev_node_add: creating symlink '/dev/disk/by-path/pci-:02:00.0-ide-0:0' to '../../hda' The problem: it's look like the udev rules file works fine, but permissions and owner of /dev/hda file are changed. Thanks, Alexey ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] EXT4 status for centos 5.3
2009/9/2 mbneto : > Hi, > > I was wondering what is the current status fro ext4 support in Centos. I've > noticed that is marked as dev when I try to use it from the installer. > > Does anybody have a scary story to prevent using it? For now, I'm running two C5.3 x86_64 with it without any problem (unless you consider that being faster that ext3 is one;). box1 /dev/sdb1 14T 7,3T 6,2T 54% /data /dev/sdb1 on /data type ext4dev (rw) box2 /dev/sdb1 14T 11T 2,7T 81% /data /dev/sdb1 on /data type ext4dev (rw) Laurent. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
