Re: [CentOS] c5-webstack: where can I get it (to test)
mbneto wrote: > Hi, > > Where can I find the test (or final) version of the c5-webstack? > > Regards. > There is no official c5-webstack now , but all the components (afaik) are in the [testing] repo for a while ... One day they'll move to [centosplus] -- -- Fabian Arrotin idea=`grep -i clue /dev/brain` test -z "$idea" && echo "sorry, init 6 in progress" || sh ./answer.sh ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] how to find out dependencies
At install I had Gnome and Not KDE. doing rpm -qa | grep qt results in qt-3.3.6-23.el5 qt4-4.2.1-1 How can I find out what package loaded the qt4 and qt? Thanks, Jerry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] how to find out dependencies
Jerry Geis wrote:
> At install I had Gnome and Not KDE.
>
> doing rpm -qa | grep qt results in
> qt-3.3.6-23.el5
> qt4-4.2.1-1
rpm -q --whatrequires qt{,4}
--
Duncan Hutty
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] how to find out dependencies
Jerry Geis wrote: > At install I had Gnome and Not KDE. > > doing rpm -qa | grep qt results in > qt-3.3.6-23.el5 > qt4-4.2.1-1 > > How can I find out what package loaded the qt4 and qt? > Easy way... 'yum erase qt4' and see what deps yum would like to remove. For example: # yum erase qt4 Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities Setting up Remove Process Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package qt4.x86_64 0:4.2.1-1 set to be erased --> Processing Dependency: qt4 >= 4.2 for package: skype ---> Package qt4.i386 0:4.2.1-1 set to be erased --> Running transaction check ---> Package skype.i586 0:2.0.0.72-centos set to be erased --> Finished Dependency Resolution Dependencies Resolved = Package Arch Version Repository Size = Removing: qt4 x86_64 4.2.1-1 installed 18 M qt4 i386 4.2.1-1 installed 17 M Removing for dependencies: skype i586 2.0.0.72-centos installed 19 M Transaction Summary = Install 0 Package(s) Update 0 Package(s) Remove 3 Package(s) Is this ok [y/N]: n Exiting on user Command Complete! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] GFS and Small Files
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 07:01:17PM +0800, Hairul Ikmal Mohamad Fuzi wrote: > > Hi all, > > We are running CentOS 5.2 64bit as our file server. > Currently, we used GFS (with CLVM underneath it) as our filesystem > (for our multiple 2TB SAN volume exports) since we plan to add more > file servers (serving the same contents) later on. > > The issue we are facing at the moment is we found out that command > such as 'ls' gives a very slow response.(e.g 3-4minutes for the > outputs of ls to be printed out, or in certain cases, 20minutes or so) > This is completely true especially in directories containing "large > number" of small files (e.g 9+ of 1-4kb files). The thing is, most > of system users are generating these small files frequently as part of > their workflow. > > We tried emulating the same scenario (9+ of small files) on a ext3 > partition and it gives almost the same result. This is likely related to the size of the "ls" process growing. To sort by date etc. "ls" pulls all the meta data into memory then reports. > > I believe most of the CLVM/GFS settings done are using the defaults > parameters. Additionally, we would prefer to stick to GFS (or at least > ext3) as it is part of CentOS / RHEL distribution rather than changing > into other small-files 'friendly' filesystems (such as XFS, ReiserFS). > > I'm exploring whether is there anyway we can tune the GFS parameters > to make the system more responsive? With 'gobs' of files you may find that find, xargs and stat are the tools of choice. > I have read that we can apply 'dir_index' option to ext3 partition to > speedup things, but I'm not so sure about GFS. Do look at "ls" with strace, top or a debugger. -- T o m M i t c h e l l Found me a new hat, now what? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] find tux comic picture help
does anyone knows/have that comic picture of "tux" the Linux penguin that: - has four pictures in it - it defines 4 "levels" of the knowledge of tux, who is "symbolizing a learning person" - the first one: tux is just a Linux "fanboy"; second: tux is working, and say's: "...stupid rpm"; three: I can't remember that:D sorry; four: tux has a beard, and the picture says don't mess with it. thank you, and sorry for the question, but I just can't find it on google :D :S ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] webgui, gui
Are there any good "GUI"s, webGUIs for managing an "Linux" server? For several use, like the mandriva directory server? thanks ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] GFS and Small Files
On Sun, 2009-05-03 at 06:09 -0700, Nifty Cluster Mitch wrote: > On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 07:01:17PM +0800, Hairul Ikmal Mohamad Fuzi wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > We are running CentOS 5.2 64bit as our file server. > > Currently, we used GFS (with CLVM underneath it) as our filesystem > > (for our multiple 2TB SAN volume exports) since we plan to add more > > file servers (serving the same contents) later on. > > > > The issue we are facing at the moment is we found out that command > > such as 'ls' gives a very slow response.(e.g 3-4minutes for the > > outputs of ls to be printed out, or in certain cases, 20minutes or so) > > This is completely true especially in directories containing "large > > number" of small files (e.g 9+ of 1-4kb files). The thing is, most > > of system users are generating these small files frequently as part of > > their workflow. > > > > We tried emulating the same scenario (9+ of small files) on a ext3 > > partition and it gives almost the same result. > > This is likely related to the size of the "ls" process growing. > To sort by date etc. "ls" pulls all the meta data into memory > then reports. > > > > > I believe most of the CLVM/GFS settings done are using the defaults > > parameters. Additionally, we would prefer to stick to GFS (or at least > > ext3) as it is part of CentOS / RHEL distribution rather than changing > > into other small-files 'friendly' filesystems (such as XFS, ReiserFS). > > > > I'm exploring whether is there anyway we can tune the GFS parameters > > to make the system more responsive? > > With 'gobs' of files you may find that find, xargs and stat are the tools > of choice. > > > I have read that we can apply 'dir_index' option to ext3 partition to > > speedup things, but I'm not so sure about GFS. > > Do look at "ls" with strace, top or a debugger. --- I don't know if this will help you but if there is more than 100,000 files you can use UPPERCASE or lowercase file naming. That will speeds things greatly under samba with over 200,000 images. Ahh I see you have 90,000. This is also workable in samba 4 with a GFS Cluster. JohnStanley ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] webgui, gui
On sunnuntai 03 toukokuu 2009 17:34:57 Erik Xavior wrote: > Are there any good "GUI"s, webGUIs for managing an "Linux" server? For > several use, like the mandriva directory server? > thanks How about Webmin? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 51, Issue 2
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-requ...@centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-ow...@centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2009:0458 Important CentOS 4 ia64 gpdf - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 2. CESA-2009:0457 Moderate CentOS 4 ia64 libwmf -security update (Pasi Pirhonen) -- Message: 1 Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 15:25:03 +0300 From: Pasi Pirhonen Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0458 Important CentOS 4 ia64 gpdf - security update To: centos-annou...@centos.org Message-ID: <20090503122503.ga17...@centos.fi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0458 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0458.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ia64: updates/ia64/RPMS/gpdf-2.8.2-7.7.2.c4.4.ia64.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - u...@iki.fi - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently ignored -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20090503/943400ae/attachment-0001.bin -- Message: 2 Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 15:26:02 +0300 From: Pasi Pirhonen Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0457 Moderate CentOS 4 ia64 libwmf -security update To: centos-annou...@centos.org Message-ID: <20090503122602.gb17...@centos.fi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0457 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0457.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ia64: updates/ia64/RPMS/libwmf-0.2.8.3-5.8.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/libwmf-devel-0.2.8.3-5.8.ia64.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - u...@iki.fi - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently ignored -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20090503/b56b5269/attachment-0001.bin -- ___ CentOS-announce mailing list centos-annou...@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 51, Issue 2 ** ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 5.3 on an EeePC??
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:20:30 -0500, Ron Blizzard wrote: [...] > I like CentOS better than Debian also but, apparently, the new Ubuntu > 9.04 works really well on netbooks. > > It's here: http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/download-netbook For the record, I went there, got that, burned it to a medium, and started an install. It came up with some startlingly strong caveat, to the effect that "This will wipe your drive." I took that to be so much more ubuntoid protecting me from myself, and went ahead, taking for granted that the installer would give me at least one choice which would preserve CentOS. Ba-aa-aadd move. It meant what it said : never gave me any other choice of anything, but went ahead and, sure enough, completely trashed my CentOS install. After that, the machine ran UNR and only UNR, even with thumbsticks in it. I finally ended up running DBAN against it -- and am still looking for other, *NON*-ubuntoid distros ... -- Beartooth Staffwright, PhD, Neo-Redneck Linux Convert Remember I know precious little of what I am talking about. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 5.3 on an EeePC??
Hmmm "This will wipe your drive." normally means what it says it wipes your drive to be honest if it was me then I would skip centos and go for the uhuntu, it's designed for the netbook and from what I hear i runs like the clappers on the netbook. Regards Per Qvindesland --- Original message follows --- SUBJECT: Re: [CentOS] 5.3 on an EeePC?? FROM: Beartooth TO: "centos@centos.org" DATE: 03-05-2009 21:02 On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:20:30 -0500, Ron Blizzard wrote: [...] > I like CentOS better than Debian also but, apparently, the new Ubuntu > 9.04 works really well on netbooks. > > It's here: http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/download-netbook For the record, I went there, got that, burned it to a medium, and started an install. It came up with some startlingly strong caveat, to the effect that "This will wipe your drive." I took that to be so much more ubuntoid protecting me from myself, and went ahead, taking for granted that the installer would give me at least one choice which would preserve CentOS. Ba-aa-aadd move. It meant what it said : never gave me any other choice of anything, but went ahead and, sure enough, completely trashed my CentOS install. After that, the machine ran UNR and only UNR, even with thumbsticks in it. I finally ended up running DBAN against it -- and am still looking for other, *NON*-ubuntoid distros ... -- Beartooth Staffwright, PhD, Neo-Redneck Linux Convert Remember I know precious little of what I am talking about. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 5.3 on an EeePC??
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:55:52 -0700, Craig White wrote: [] > I currently have Fedora 11 (testing) installed on it and it rocks. I downloaded that, burned a medium, and tried three times to install it, getting bug reports every time. I'm presently doing a fresh download (which looks like taking all night). Lish me wuck. -- Beartooth Staffwright, PhD, Neo-Redneck Linux Convert Remember I know precious little of what I am talking about. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 5.3 on an EeePC??
On Sun, 3 May 2009 19:02:26 + (UTC) Beartooth wrote: > > >> It's here: http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/download-netbook > > For the record, I went there, got that, burned it to a medium, >and started an install. It came up with some startlingly strong caveat, >to the effect that "This will wipe your drive." I just checked the URL and it looks like that's a version of the Live ubuntu CD. It's install option doesn't always play nice with existing info on hard drives; you need the 'alternate' CD instead (and it's not clear that that exists for the netbook config). -- Julian Thomas: j...@jt-mj.nethttp://jt-mj.net In the beautiful Genesee Valley of Western New York State! -- -- A bus station is where the the bus stops. A train station is where the trains stop. On my desk I have a workstation ... ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Best mobile SSH client?
I'm up for a cell phone contract renewal and am considering upgrading my handset. I looked at some devices at my local AT&T store but nothing really jumped out at me. I'm particularly interested in a cell phone that has a reliable ssh client, with ssh-agent and public key authentication abilities. Those of you who administer systems remotely, what mobile ssh client do you recommend? What phone would you recommend? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Best mobile SSH client?
The iphone runs UNIX natively underneath, so if you jailbreak it you get access to a full openssh install as well as a bash shell. There are also ssh terminal apps available from the Apple App store, though I have not used them so I cannot comment. Rumors are that Android phones are coming out soon other than the G1 (which is T-Mobile only), so maybe some of them will show up on AT&T. They run Linux under the hood, though I have no experience with them to know if you can get ssh or a terminal. On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Sean Carolan wrote: > I'm up for a cell phone contract renewal and am considering upgrading > my handset. I looked at some devices at my local AT&T store but > nothing really jumped out at me. I'm particularly interested in a > cell phone that has a reliable ssh client, with ssh-agent and public > key authentication abilities. Those of you who administer systems > remotely, what mobile ssh client do you recommend? What phone would > you recommend? > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Best mobile SSH client?
Sean Carolan wrote: > I'm up for a cell phone contract renewal and am considering upgrading > my handset. I looked at some devices at my local AT&T store but > nothing really jumped out at me. I'm particularly interested in a > cell phone that has a reliable ssh client, with ssh-agent and public > key authentication abilities. Those of you who administer systems > remotely, what mobile ssh client do you recommend? What phone would > you recommend? I use ConnectBot (http://code.google.com/p/connectbot/) on Android (I have a T-Mobile G1). I absolutely recommend it. I have used it several times in emergency situations. -- Ryan Pugatch Systems Administrator TripAdvisor ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Best mobile SSH client?
> I use ConnectBot (http://code.google.com/p/connectbot/) on Android (I > have a T-Mobile G1). I absolutely recommend it. I have used it several > times in emergency situations. Looks cool, if I wasn't stuck with AT&T I would consider getting a G1. Perhaps Samsung will come out with their Android phone soon! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Best mobile SSH client?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sean Carolan wrote: > I'm up for a cell phone contract renewal and am considering upgrading > my handset. I looked at some devices at my local AT&T store but > nothing really jumped out at me. I'm particularly interested in a > cell phone that has a reliable ssh client, with ssh-agent and public > key authentication abilities. Those of you who administer systems > remotely, what mobile ssh client do you recommend? What phone would > you recommend? > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > If you go with a Blackberry, MidpSSH is what I use and reccomend. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkn+RlMACgkQe0Ain3PYkIZOEgCdEroglZrhmgIhUXZ3vfGP9skx UHMAn3DFvb8tqaKeQq+48Pc2Cbh3HjuQ =c2G3 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] c5-webstack: where can I get it (to test)
Hi Fabian, Besides PHP what will be part of webstack? (apache, mysql etc?)I am assuming that it will be better if I use all rpms from the future 'webstack' in order to test my enviroment and see if there is something that may break. Thanks. On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 3:02 AM, Fabian Arrotin wrote: > There is no official c5-webstack now , but all the components (afaik) > are in the [testing] repo for a while ... > One day they'll move to [centosplus] > > -- > -- > Fabian Arrotin > idea=`grep -i clue /dev/brain` > test -z "$idea" && echo "sorry, init 6 in progress" || sh ./answer.sh > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Best mobile SSH client?
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Brian Mathis wrote: > The iphone runs UNIX natively underneath, so if you jailbreak it you > get access to a full openssh install as well as a bash shell. There > are also ssh terminal apps available from the Apple App store, though > I have not used them so I cannot comment. There are a few ssh client applications available for the iPhone. No need to jailbreak. I am using TouchTerm (free version) and it works for me. I have never tried others, so cannot tell if this is better or worse than others. Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Best mobile SSH client?
On May 3, 2009, at 10:48 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > There are a few ssh client applications available for the iPhone. No > need to jailbreak. I am using TouchTerm (free version) and it works > for me. I have never tried others, so cannot tell if this is better > or worse than others. +1 for TouchTerm. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Best mobile SSH client?
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 8:19 AM, Chris Boyd wrote: > > On May 3, 2009, at 10:48 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > >> There are a few ssh client applications available for the iPhone. No >> need to jailbreak. I am using TouchTerm (free version) and it works >> for me. I have never tried others, so cannot tell if this is better >> or worse than others. > > +1 for TouchTerm. > ___ I have been using Putty on both my HTC Touch (Windows Mobile), and Nokia E61 (Symbian OS) with great success. -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers CEO, SoftDux Hosting Web: http://www.SoftDux.com Office: 087 805 9573 Cell: 082 554 7532 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
