Re: [CentOS] Tomcat Monitoring

2009-01-20 Thread Sergej kandyla
Sean Carolan wrote:
> What do you use for monitoring your Apache Tomcat servers?  I have 
> used jconsole to manually connect and look at the statistics.  I'm 
> wondering if there are any standard tools for watching the health of 
> the java process. 

Hi, I'm interesting too in tomcat monitoring.
Some times i have a problems with java, for example i get
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError

some idea is monitor catalina.out log for such errors, but may be there 
are a standard tools for java monitoring\restarting.


-- 
Best Wishes,
PAIX-UANIC | SK3929-RIPE

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Tomcat Monitoring

2009-01-20 Thread Gerhardus.Geldenhuis
Hi
You will probably get better answers by asking on the tomcat users list.
See tomcat.apache.org.

Tomcat publishes its health statistics using jmx and if your developers
were thorough it is likely that application statistics would also be
available in jmx. There is a number of expensive and not so expensive
commercial tools to setup monitoring for jmx. Tivoli and AppManager
comes to mind. I believe there might be support for jmx monitoring in
cacti so that would be worth googling. Other than that a good test would
be to monitor output of a wget request to your tomcat server which gives
a good indiction of the health of your application server.

Also have a look at http://www.lambdaprobe.org/d/index.htm which is a
tool to monitor multiple tomcats with.

Regards

> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Sergej kandyla
> Sent: 20 January 2009 11:06
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Tomcat Monitoring
> 
> Sean Carolan wrote:
> > What do you use for monitoring your Apache Tomcat servers?  I have
> > used jconsole to manually connect and look at the statistics.  I'm
> > wondering if there are any standard tools for watching the health of
> > the java process.
> 
> Hi, I'm interesting too in tomcat monitoring.
> Some times i have a problems with java, for example i get
> java.lang.OutOfMemoryError
> 
> some idea is monitor catalina.out log for such errors, but may be
there
> are a standard tools for java monitoring\restarting.
> 

__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
__
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Udev Rules for mounting usb disks

2009-01-20 Thread Rainer Traut
Hi,

Sys: C5.2, X86_64

my plan is to automatically mount five same brand usb disks in five 
different directories.

I have written the following udev rule;
Problem is, it does not mount them on boot, only when I plug them in.

KERNEL=="sd*", SYSFS{serial}=="57442D574341554830303133323337", 
SYSFS{product}=="My Book", SYMLINK+="usbdisc0", ACTION=="add", 
RUN+="/bin/mount -o noatime /dev/usbdisc0 /mnt/woche1"
KERNEL=="sd*", SYSFS{serial}=="57442D574341554631383831303534", 
SYSFS{product}=="My Book", SYMLINK+="usbdisc1", ACTION=="add", 
RUN+="/bin/mount -o noatime /dev/usbdisc1 /mnt/woche2"
KERNEL=="sd*", SYSFS{serial}=="57442D574341554631383831343136", 
SYSFS{product}=="My Book", SYMLINK+="usbdisc2", ACTION=="add", 
RUN+="/bin/mount -o noatime /dev/usbdisc2 /mnt/woche3"
KERNEL=="sd*", SYSFS{serial}=="57442D574341554631383831303930", 
SYSFS{product}=="My Book", SYMLINK+="usbdisc3", ACTION=="add", 
RUN+="/bin/mount -o noatime /dev/usbdisc3 /mnt/woche4"
KERNEL=="sd*", SYSFS{serial}=="57442D574341554B30303239303435", 
SYSFS{product}=="My Book", SYMLINK+="usbdisc4", ACTION=="add", 
RUN+="/bin/mount -o noatime /dev/usbdisc4 /mnt/woche5"

How can I make them mount on boot?

Thx
Rainer

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Tomcat Monitoring

2009-01-20 Thread Les Mikesell
gerhardus.geldenh...@gta-travel.com wrote:
> Hi
> You will probably get better answers by asking on the tomcat users list.
> See tomcat.apache.org.
> 
> Tomcat publishes its health statistics using jmx and if your developers
> were thorough it is likely that application statistics would also be
> available in jmx. There is a number of expensive and not so expensive
> commercial tools to setup monitoring for jmx. Tivoli and AppManager
> comes to mind. I believe there might be support for jmx monitoring in
> cacti so that would be worth googling. Other than that a good test would
> be to monitor output of a wget request to your tomcat server which gives
> a good indiction of the health of your application server.
> 
> Also have a look at http://www.lambdaprobe.org/d/index.htm which is a
> tool to monitor multiple tomcats with.

OpenNMS can monitor jmx values (as well as snmp and doing icmp and httpd 
probes, etc.).   http://www.opennms.org.

---
   Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Tomcat Monitoring

2009-01-20 Thread Jim Perrin
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:27 PM, Sean Carolan  wrote:
> What do you use for monitoring your Apache Tomcat servers?  I have used
> jconsole to manually connect and look at the statistics.  I'm wondering if
> there are any standard tools for watching the health of the java process.
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


You can use snmp and cacti to monitor some of the tomcat information.
You simply need to add a few configuration modifications.

See http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/management/SNMP.html


-- 
During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.
George Orwell
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Tomcat Monitoring

2009-01-20 Thread Gerhardus.Geldenhuis
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Jim Perrin
> Sent: 20 January 2009 13:50
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Tomcat Monitoring
> 
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:27 PM, Sean Carolan 
> wrote:
> > What do you use for monitoring your Apache Tomcat servers?  I have
> used
> > jconsole to manually connect and look at the statistics.  I'm
> wondering if
> > there are any standard tools for watching the health of the java
> process.
> > ___
> > CentOS mailing list
> > CentOS@centos.org
> > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> 
> 
> You can use snmp and cacti to monitor some of the tomcat information.
> You simply need to add a few configuration modifications.
> 
> See http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/management/SNMP.html
> 

some more usefull links:

http://www.snmp4j.org
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/management/SNMP.html
http://blogs.sun.com/jmxetc/entry/simple_is_not_easy
https://opendmk.dev.java.net/
http://java.sun.com/products/jdmk/index.jsp
http://www.agentpp.com/agen/agen.html
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/api/java/lang/management/package-sum
mary.html
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/816-7609/6mdjrf88g?a=view

Regards

__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
__
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Udev Rules for mounting usb disks

2009-01-20 Thread partha chowdhury
Rainer Traut wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Sys: C5.2, X86_64
> 
> my plan is to automatically mount five same brand usb disks in five 
> different directories.
> 
> I have written the following udev rule;
> Problem is, it does not mount them on boot, only when I plug them in.
> 
> KERNEL=="sd*", SYSFS{serial}=="57442D574341554830303133323337", 
> SYSFS{product}=="My Book", SYMLINK+="usbdisc0", ACTION=="add", 
> RUN+="/bin/mount -o noatime /dev/usbdisc0 /mnt/woche1"
> KERNEL=="sd*", SYSFS{serial}=="57442D574341554631383831303534", 
> SYSFS{product}=="My Book", SYMLINK+="usbdisc1", ACTION=="add", 
> RUN+="/bin/mount -o noatime /dev/usbdisc1 /mnt/woche2"
> KERNEL=="sd*", SYSFS{serial}=="57442D574341554631383831343136", 
> SYSFS{product}=="My Book", SYMLINK+="usbdisc2", ACTION=="add", 
> RUN+="/bin/mount -o noatime /dev/usbdisc2 /mnt/woche3"
> KERNEL=="sd*", SYSFS{serial}=="57442D574341554631383831303930", 
> SYSFS{product}=="My Book", SYMLINK+="usbdisc3", ACTION=="add", 
> RUN+="/bin/mount -o noatime /dev/usbdisc3 /mnt/woche4"
> KERNEL=="sd*", SYSFS{serial}=="57442D574341554B30303239303435", 
> SYSFS{product}=="My Book", SYMLINK+="usbdisc4", ACTION=="add", 
> RUN+="/bin/mount -o noatime /dev/usbdisc4 /mnt/woche5"
> 
> How can I make them mount on boot?
> 
> Thx
> Rainer
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> 

how do you expect to mount usb disks when they are not plugged in ? plug 
them in and reboot.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] default stty profile settings in CentOS

2009-01-20 Thread Sven
Hi folks

[Please CC me, I am not on the list]

I am here at a customer who have this in profile (.cshrc):

stty erase "^H" kill "^?" intr "^C"

Backspace clears the hole command line. How is the CentOS default?

kind regards
Sven
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Udev Rules for mounting usb disks

2009-01-20 Thread John Doe
> From: partha chowdhury 
> > my plan is to automatically mount five same brand usb disks in five 
> > different directories.
> > I have written the following udev rule;
> > Problem is, it does not mount them on boot, only when I plug them in.
>
> how do you expect to mount usb disks when they are not plugged in ? plug 
> them in and reboot.

He did not say he tried to boot with the drives not plugged; he said he needs 
the plugging action in order to get the drives mounted...
If he boots with the drives already plugged in, they apparently do not get 
mounted...

JD


  

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] default stty profile settings in CentOS

2009-01-20 Thread John Doe
> From: Sven 
> I am here at a customer who have this in profile (.cshrc):
> stty erase "^H" kill "^?" intr "^C"
> Backspace clears the hole command line. How is the CentOS default?

>From the man page:

   erase CHAR, will erase the last character typed
   intr CHAR, will send an interrupt signal
   kill CHAR, will erase the current line

So you might want to replace 'kill' with 'erase'...

JD


  

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Udev Rules for mounting usb disks

2009-01-20 Thread Rainer Traut
Am 20.01.2009 15:33, schrieb John Doe:
>> From: partha chowdhury
>>> my plan is to automatically mount five same brand usb disks in five
>>> different directories.
>>> I have written the following udev rule;
>>> Problem is, it does not mount them on boot, only when I plug them in.
>> how do you expect to mount usb disks when they are not plugged in ? plug
>> them in and reboot.
>
> He did not say he tried to boot with the drives not plugged; he said he needs 
> the plugging action in order to get the drives mounted...
> If he boots with the drives already plugged in, they apparently do not get 
> mounted...

Yes exactly. My problem description might have been ambiguous but common 
sense should have made this clear.

Rainer
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Udev Rules for mounting usb disks

2009-01-20 Thread John Doe
> From: Rainer Traut 
> Am 20.01.2009 15:33, schrieb John Doe:
> >> From: partha chowdhury
> >>> my plan is to automatically mount five same brand usb disks in five
> >>> different directories.
> >>> I have written the following udev rule;
> >>> Problem is, it does not mount them on boot, only when I plug them in.
> >> how do you expect to mount usb disks when they are not plugged in ? plug
> >> them in and reboot.
> >
> > He did not say he tried to boot with the drives not plugged; he said he 
> > needs 
> the plugging action in order to get the drives mounted...
> > If he boots with the drives already plugged in, they apparently do not get 
> mounted...
> 
> Yes exactly. My problem description might have been ambiguous but common 
> sense should have made this clear.

Did you try with simpler (no serial/model) rules?
Maybe, at boot time, there is a problem getting the disks serials/models...

JD



  

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Generating password string in /var/nis/passwd with Perl

2009-01-20 Thread Alexander Farber
Hello,

in our network we have AD (Win 2003) for user authentication
under Windows and NIS (CentOS 5.2) for same under Linux:

# rpm -qf /var/yp
filesystem-2.4.0-1.el5.centos
ypbind-1.19-8.el5
yp-tools-2.9-0.1
ypserv-2.19-3

I have written a CGI Script to add new users both to AD and
NIS and also to create the home dirs at our NetApp-Filer.
Unfortunately some steps still have to be made by hand
(the sysadmin copy-pastes it from a browser to a shell).

I could skip one manual step (calling yppasswd) if I knew
how to generate the passwd string for /var/nis/passwd:

farber:oav3dV4.Mnj/.:10154153:5725:Alexander
Farber,jn-05/02:/home/farber:/bin/bash

Has anybody already figured out, how to do it from Perl?
I'm sure there must be some way (smth. with Perl's crypt).

Regards
Alex

PS: Here is my script: http://pastebin.com/m46057a70
   feel free to modify and use
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Generating password string in /var/nis/passwd with Perl

2009-01-20 Thread Stephen Harris
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 05:11:27PM +0100, Alexander Farber wrote:

> I could skip one manual step (calling yppasswd) if I knew
> how to generate the passwd string for /var/nis/passwd:
> 
> farber:oav3dV4.Mnj/.:10154153:5725:Alexander


> Has anybody already figured out, how to do it from Perl?

crypt is the function to call.

eg
  print crypt("hello","ab")
  abl0JrMf6tlhw

The "ab" is the salt and should be chose from [a-zA-Z0-9./]

"man 3 crypt" for the C version, which the perl version mimics


-- 

rgds
Stephen
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 47, Issue 8

2009-01-20 Thread centos-announce-request
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. CESA-2009:0057 Important CentOS 3 i386squirrelmail -
  security  update (Tru Huynh)
   2. CESA-2009:0057 Important CentOS 3 x86_64  squirrelmail -
  security  update (Tru Huynh)


--

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:38:06 +0100
From: Tru Huynh 
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0057 Important CentOS 3 i386
squirrelmail - security update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: <20090119223806.ga19...@sillage.bis.pasteur.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2009:0057

squirrelmail security update for CentOS 3 i386:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0057.html

The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:

i386:
updates/i386/RPMS/squirrelmail-1.4.8-9.el3.centos.1.noarch.rpm

source:
updates/SRPMS/squirrelmail-1.4.8-9.el3.centos.1.src.rpm

You may update your CentOS-3 i386 installations by running the command:

yum update squirrelmail

Tru
-- 
Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance)
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : 
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20090119/fa8043f0/attachment-0001.bin
 

--

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:38:33 +0100
From: Tru Huynh 
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0057 Important CentOS 3 x86_64
squirrelmail - security update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: <20090119223833.gb19...@sillage.bis.pasteur.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2009:0057

squirrelmail security update for CentOS 3 x86_64:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0057.html

The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:

x86_64:
updates/x86_64/RPMS/squirrelmail-1.4.8-9.el3.centos.1.noarch.rpm

source:
updates/SRPMS/squirrelmail-1.4.8-9.el3.centos.1.src.rpm

You may update your CentOS-3 x86_64 installations by running the command:

yum update squirrelmail

Tru
-- 
Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance)
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : 
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20090119/9310a301/attachment-0001.bin
 

--

___
CentOS-announce mailing list
centos-annou...@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce


End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 47, Issue 8
**
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Apache Server Tuning for Performance

2009-01-20 Thread linux-crazy
Hi all,

I am facing  facing performance issues with our web servers which is
working for concurrent  250 requests properly and then stops
responding when the requests are more than 250 .

The current configuration parameters are as follows :

apachectl -version
Server version: Apache/2.0.52
Server built:   Jan 30 2007 09:56:16

Kernel : 2.6.9-55.ELsmp #1 SMP Fri Apr 20 16:36:54 EDT 2007 x86_64
x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

Server Hardware :
MAIN MEMORY
(i) Memory Size 4 GB  Dual-Core Intel 5160 processors.

httpd.conf

Timeout 300
KeepAlive On
MaxKeepAliveRequests 1000
KeepAliveTimeout 150

## Server-Pool Size Regulation (MPM specific)
# prefork MPM

# StartServers: number of server processes to start
# MinSpareServers: minimum number of server processes which are kept spare
# MaxSpareServers: maximum number of server processes which are kept spare
# ServerLimit: maximum value for MaxClients for the lifetime of the server
# MaxClients: maximum number of server processes allowed to start
# MaxRequestsPerChild: maximum number of requests a server process serves



StartServers   8
MinSpareServers5
MaxSpareServers   20
ServerLimit  251
MaxClients   251
MaxRequestsPerChild  4000


# worker MPM
# StartServers: initial number of server processes to start
# MaxClients: maximum number of simultaneous client connections
# MinSpareThreads: minimum number of worker threads which are kept spare
# MaxSpareThreads: maximum number of worker threads which are kept spare
# ThreadsPerChild: constant number of worker threads in each server process
# MaxRequestsPerChild: maximum number of requests a server process serves

StartServers 2
MaxClients150
MinSpareThreads 25
MaxSpareThreads 75
ThreadsPerChild 25
MaxRequestsPerChild  0


 I want to  know about  the difference  between worker MPM and
Prefork MPM , how to find out which one will be used by my apache
server and  the recommended one   for highly loaded server.If some one
provide me the link that best explains above two comparison also  be
very use full.


 Can any one guide me tuning to be  done for the maximum utilization
of the Resources  and better performance of the Servers.

 Regards,
lingu
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Apache Server Tuning for Performance

2009-01-20 Thread Rainer Duffner

Am 20.01.2009 um 19:39 schrieb linux-crazy:

> Hi all,
>
> I am facing  facing performance issues with our web servers which is
> working for concurrent  250 requests properly and then stops
> responding when the requests are more than 250 .
>
> The current configuration parameters are as follows :


Only use prefork MPM (worker is for Win32, AFAIK).

If you set ServerLimit to 251, that's the limit.
Set ServerLimit and MaxClients to the same value.
(Larger than 250)
OK?
And take a couple of minutes to study the apache documentation. It's  
actually quite good and tranlated into many languages...

BUT: what your server is being able to handle also depends on what you  
actually serve (PHP/JSP/Servelets/Perl/whatever!

This is usually not a problem that is easily described and solved in  
two sentences.



Rainer






___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Apache Server Tuning for Performance

2009-01-20 Thread nate
linux-crazy wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am facing  facing performance issues with our web servers which is
> working for concurrent  250 requests properly and then stops
> responding when the requests are more than 250 .

Increase your MaxClients configuration, also enable if you
haven't already the server-status module and monitor the
server via http:///server-status it will
show how many workers are busy and what they are doing.

As for which to use, prefork is the old forked method of
doing things, the other uses threads. Depending on what kind
of application your running on top of apache, if it is not
thread safe(at some point many PHP modules were not thread
safe), you may want to use prefork. Otherwise you can use
the threading model.

If your not sure I'd say stick to prefork to be safe until
you can determine for sure that threading is safe.

nate

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Apache Server Tuning for Performance

2009-01-20 Thread Jed Reynolds
linux-crazy wrote:
>  I want to  know about  the difference  between worker MPM and
> Prefork MPM , how to find out which one will be used by my apache
> server and  the recommended one   for highly loaded server.If some one
> provide me the link that best explains above two comparison also  be
> very use full.
>
>
>  Can any one guide me tuning to be  done for the maximum utilization
> of the Resources  and better performance of the Servers.
>   


Most list members would likely advise sticking with the prefork 
configuration.  Without knowing what kind of applications you are 
running on your webserver, I wouldn't suggest changing it.

Merely increasing the number of workers might make performance worse.

Use ps or top to figure out how much each apache worker is using. Then 
decide how much ram you want to dedicate on your server to Apache, 
without going into swap. (Over-allocating and then paging out memory 
will only make performance much worse.) For example, if I have 2G or 
ram, and I want 1.5 for apache workers, my average apache worker size 
(resident memory) is 65MB, then I have room for 23 workers. (1024 * 1.5 
) / 65. (There are more accurate ways to calculate this usage, like 
taking shared memory into account.)

Upgrading the ram in your web server is a pretty fast interim solution.

Consider your application performance, too. The longer a request in your 
application takes, the more workers are in use on your web server, 
taking up more memory. If you have long-running queries in your 
database, take care of those first.

Good luck

Jed
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Apache Server Tuning for Performance

2009-01-20 Thread Les Mikesell
Jed Reynolds wrote:
> 
> Merely increasing the number of workers might make performance worse.
> 
> Use ps or top to figure out how much each apache worker is using. Then 
> decide how much ram you want to dedicate on your server to Apache, 
> without going into swap. (Over-allocating and then paging out memory 
> will only make performance much worse.)  For example, if I have 2G or
> ram, and I want 1.5 for apache workers, my average apache worker size 
> (resident memory) is 65MB, then I have room for 23 workers. (1024 * 1.5 
> ) / 65. (There are more accurate ways to calculate this usage, like 
> taking shared memory into account.)

Pay attention to shared memory when doing this.  A freshly-forked 
process shares virtually all RAM with its parent.  How much and how 
quickly this changes varies wildly with the application type and 
activity that causes the child's data to become unique.  With some types 
of applications (especially mod_perl) you may want to tune down the 
number of hits each child services to increase memory sharing.  Also, if 
you are running external cgi programs you must take them into account.

> Upgrading the ram in your web server is a pretty fast interim solution.
> 
> Consider your application performance, too. The longer a request in your 
> application takes, the more workers are in use on your web server, 
> taking up more memory. If you have long-running queries in your 
> database, take care of those first.

You may also have to turn off or tune down the HTTP 1.1 connection 
keepalives, trading the time it takes to establish a new connection for 
the RAM it takes to keep the associated process waiting for another 
request from the same client.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Tomcat Monitoring

2009-01-20 Thread Sean Carolan
> > You can use snmp and cacti to monitor some of the tomcat information.
> > You simply need to add a few configuration modifications.
> >
> > See http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/management/SNMP.html\

Thank you all for the replies.  We already use Nagios so I'm hoping
for a nagios-friendly solution.  Unfortunately the check_jmx plugin
listed on the Nagios exchange doesn't seem to work properly, being
unable to monitor Heap Memory Usage over 2Gb.

Does anyone else have a dependable nagios plugin for keeping tabs on
Nagios?  If not we will write our own.

thanks

Sean
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] RHEL 5.3 released

2009-01-20 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
Hello list!

http://www.redhat.com/about/news/prarchive/2009/rhel_5_3.html

kernel (2.6.18-128.el5) changelog:
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0225.html

-- Pasi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] RHEL 5.3 released

2009-01-20 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:40:14PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> Hello list!
> 
> http://www.redhat.com/about/news/prarchive/2009/rhel_5_3.html
> 
> kernel (2.6.18-128.el5) changelog:
> http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0225.html
> 

"Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.3 GA Announcement":

https://www.redhat.com/archives/rhelv5-list/2009-January/msg00092.html

-- Pasi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] RHEL 5.3 released

2009-01-20 Thread Scott Silva
on 1-20-2009 1:40 PM Pasi � spake the following:
> Hello list!
> 
> http://www.redhat.com/about/news/prarchive/2009/rhel_5_3.html
> 
> kernel (2.6.18-128.el5) changelog:
> http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0225.html
> 
> -- Pasi

I hope this doesn't start a "When is CentOS 5.3 going to be out?" whine
thread!  ;-P



-- 
MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if they don't



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Tomcat Monitoring

2009-01-20 Thread nate
Sean Carolan wrote:
>> > You can use snmp and cacti to monitor some of the tomcat information.
>> > You simply need to add a few configuration modifications.
>> >
>> > See http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/management/SNMP.html\
>
> Thank you all for the replies.  We already use Nagios so I'm hoping
> for a nagios-friendly solution.  Unfortunately the check_jmx plugin
> listed on the Nagios exchange doesn't seem to work properly, being
> unable to monitor Heap Memory Usage over 2Gb.

Monitoring heap is somewhat black magic in my experience, filled with
false alarms.

You can use this jsp to poll the heap if you want:

<% Runtime runtime = Runtime.getRuntime(); %>
<%=runtime.freeMemory()%> memory free of <%=runtime.totalMemory()%> total
memory

I don't monitor heap in nagios, only in cacti. At my last company I
had simple crons to monitor when the JVMs spit out of memory errors
and restarted them automatically.

A couple companies ago I polled heap for weblogic and stored the
values in RRDtool then wrote scripts to get the averages over
a period of time to detect low heap levels and alert, took a lot
of work to get right and even after all the work there was still
some false alarms.

> Does anyone else have a dependable nagios plugin for keeping tabs on
> Nagios?  If not we will write our own.

Good luck..a big problem with some JMX client implementations is
that they spin up a JVM each time they want a stat. Last time I
talked to the people at Groundwork they said they had some sort
of JMX tie-in, and their stuff is nagios based you may find
something there.

nate

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] RHEL 5.3 released

2009-01-20 Thread John R Pierce
Scott Silva wrote:
> "When is CentOS 5.3 going to be out?" 


All Together Now

WHEN ITS READY!



there.  got that out of the way.   we now return to your regularlly 
scheduled threads on wifi problems and usb automounters...


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] RHEL 5.3 released

2009-01-20 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Scott Silva  wrote:
> on 1-20-2009 1:40 PM Pasi � spake the following:
>> Hello list!
>>
>> http://www.redhat.com/about/news/prarchive/2009/rhel_5_3.html
>>
>> kernel (2.6.18-128.el5) changelog:
>> http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0225.html
>>
>> -- Pasi
>
> I hope this doesn't start a "When is CentOS 5.3 going to be out?" whine
> thread!  ;-P

We have a "trap" for those people who ask this inevitable question,
and it worked quite well in the past.

Please redirect them to:

http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=18223&forum=37

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS failover cluster

2009-01-20 Thread Tom Lanyon
On 17/01/2009, at 9:46 AM, John R Pierce wrote:

> Giuseppe Fuggiano wrote:
>> What should I use to configure a failover cluster under CentOS?  Is
>> there Red Hat Cluster Suite or something like that?
>>
>> Thank you in advance.
>>
>
> in general, 'heartbeat'. RHCS (Red Hat Cluster Service) is some
> wrappers around heartbeat, and rather a finicky control panel for it  
> all.

It's RedHat Cluster Suite, not Service, and it's not wrappers around  
heartbeat.

In answer to Guiseppe's question, the RedHat Cluster Suite is  
available as part of CentOS and works great. Whether RHCS will help  
you or not, I cannot say due the fairly vague description of your  
requirements.

http://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/5.2/Cluster_Suite_Overview/
http://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/5.2/Cluster_Administration/

Regards,
Tom
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Compile Problem

2009-01-20 Thread Joseph L. Casale
I am trying to follow a solution that states "edit apache's libtool and
change the following option to "yes": build_libtool_libs=no" which begs
the question, how? :) Anyone care to show me the light?

Thanks!
jlc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Compile Problem

2009-01-20 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>I am trying to follow a solution that states "edit apache's libtool and
>change the following option to "yes": build_libtool_libs=no" which begs
>the question, how? :) Anyone care to show me the light?

Found it, /usr/lib/apr-1/build/libtool, but it was set to yes:/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] SquirrelMail Oddity SSL error

2009-01-20 Thread John Hinton
I have two users only under one virtual domain which after sending an 
email are returned to a screen which says:

Secure Connection Failed

An error occurred during a connection to replacedrealdomainnamehere.org:80.

SSL received a record that exceeded the maximum permissible length.

(Error code: ssl_error_rx_record_too_long)

The page you are trying to view can not be shown because the 
authenticity of the received data could not be verified.

* Please contact the web site owners to inform them of this problem.


First, this seems to be happening only with two users under one domain 
on the server. SSL for SquirrelMail is not enabled. I can't find a thing 
unique to these two users which would cause this error. I can't find 
anything in the logs to help.

Has anybody else seen anything like this and perhaps have a cure?

John Hinton
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] SquirrelMail Oddity SSL error

2009-01-20 Thread nate
John Hinton wrote:

> First, this seems to be happening only with two users under one domain
> on the server. SSL for SquirrelMail is not enabled. I can't find a thing
> unique to these two users which would cause this error. I can't find
> anything in the logs to help.

Is this a new installation of SM or an existing installation? Any
plugins that may be causing this issue? I've been using SM for
about 8 or 9 years now though all of my installations are 100%
SSL(I handle SSL redirections etc in apache rather than in
SM's config or plugins).

I suggest testing it in firefox and using the live http headers
plugin to see exactly where the browser is trying to go.

nate


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Apache Server Tuning for Performance

2009-01-20 Thread Jure Pečar
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 00:09:38 +0530
linux-crazy  wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> I am facing  facing performance issues with our web servers which is
> working for concurrent  250 requests properly and then stops
> responding when the requests are more than 250 .
>
> ...
> 
> Can any one guide me tuning to be  done for the maximum utilization
> of the Resources  and better performance of the Servers.

Also take a look at apache alternatives like lighttpd and nginx. In certain
cases they do miracles.


-- 

Jure Pečar
http://jure.pecar.org/
http://f5j.eu
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] RHEL 5.3 released

2009-01-20 Thread MHR
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Scott Silva  wrote:
> on 1-20-2009 1:40 PM Pasi � spake the following:
>> Hello list!
>>
>> http://www.redhat.com/about/news/prarchive/2009/rhel_5_3.html
>>
>> kernel (2.6.18-128.el5) changelog:
>> http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0225.html
>>
>> -- Pasi
>
> I hope this doesn't start a "When is CentOS 5.3 going to be out?" whine
> thread!  ;-P
>

Scott,

Thanks for posting this - I misread (probably in great hope) that it
_was_ CentOS 5.3.

I'm glad to wait, but it's actually a kind of relief knowing that it's
on the way.

THANKS, GUYS!

mhr
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] SquirrelMail Oddity SSL error

2009-01-20 Thread John Hinton
nate wrote:
> John Hinton wrote:
>
>   
>> First, this seems to be happening only with two users under one domain
>> on the server. SSL for SquirrelMail is not enabled. I can't find a thing
>> unique to these two users which would cause this error. I can't find
>> anything in the logs to help.
>> 
>
> Is this a new installation of SM or an existing installation? Any
> plugins that may be causing this issue? I've been using SM for
> about 8 or 9 years now though all of my installations are 100%
> SSL(I handle SSL redirections etc in apache rather than in
> SM's config or plugins).
>
> I suggest testing it in firefox and using the live http headers
> plugin to see exactly where the browser is trying to go.
>
> nate
>
>   
Apparently a new update to SquirrelMail just replaced one released late 
last week. Actually, this might be from the Dag repository. Either way, 
after doing the update and restarting my browser, SM started to work as 
it should. Note that this is a CentOS 4 box. I did notice PHP undefined 
variable charset over and over in the logs up until the new update was 
applied. This from mime.php line 317.

It's been more than a day here... sorry to not be putting together more 
info chasing this down.

Thanks,
John Hinton
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Apache Server Tuning for Performance

2009-01-20 Thread Rainer Duffner

Am 21.01.2009 um 00:47 schrieb Jure Pečar:

> On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 00:09:38 +0530
> linux-crazy  wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am facing  facing performance issues with our web servers which is
>> working for concurrent  250 requests properly and then stops
>> responding when the requests are more than 250 .
>>
>> ...
>>
>> Can any one guide me tuning to be  done for the maximum utilization
>> of the Resources  and better performance of the Servers.
>
> Also take a look at apache alternatives like lighttpd and nginx. In  
> certain
> cases they do miracles.



I don't know about lighttpd (our results were mixed) - but NGINX is  
really _very_ fast.
Last time I checked, it seems to be the fastest way to accelerate  
webpage-delivery on generic hardware and with OSS-software.

But it's not a feature-monster like apache, so you still need that.
;-)


Rainer
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] RHEL 5.3 released

2009-01-20 Thread Karanbir Singh
Akemi Yagi wrote:
> 
> http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=18223&forum=37
> 

Would it be possible to migrate this info to a wiki page ? So more 
people can edit the main content, perhaps a link from the wiki page to 
this forum post so people who want to talk about it, can carry on doing 
so - but still refer people to the wiki page for a real status update / 
release situation.

-- 
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/  : 2522...@icq
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] RHEL 5.3 released

2009-01-20 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Karanbir Singh  wrote:
> Akemi Yagi wrote:
>>
>> http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=18223&forum=37
>>
>
> Would it be possible to migrate this info to a wiki page ? So more
> people can edit the main content, perhaps a link from the wiki page to
> this forum post so people who want to talk about it, can carry on doing
> so - but still refer people to the wiki page for a real status update /
> release situation.

Certainly it is possible.  Tim? Ralph? Fabian? Ned?

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] ext4 in 5.3

2009-01-20 Thread Jerry Geis
Hi guys - I'm really looking forward to 5.3 for the potential of ext4.
I am moving/copying image files lately 8G file and it is slow. I am 
hoping that ext4 really speeds that up.

My question is: will we be able to boot ext4 file systems?
Will the boot partition still be ext3 and then have to mount the ext4 
filesystem?
I did not see mention of it in the release notes.

Thanks,

Jerry
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] ext4 in 5.3

2009-01-20 Thread Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 20:33 -0500, Jerry Geis wrote:
> Will the boot partition still be ext3 and then have to mount the ext4 
> filesystem?

Yes, but you wouldn't gain much by making /boot ext4.

-- 
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams 

PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] combining kickstart and DVD on a USB thumbdrive

2009-01-20 Thread Jerry Geis
Hi all,

I am trying to find information on taking a DVD of centos 5.2 x86_64
and putting it AND my kickstart file on a USB8G thumbdrive.

Note -  I am not INSTALLING  linux on the USB disk just trying to make
installation media for it. I am not taking just the bootdisk.img file to 
make the USB
bootable but the entire DVD content on the USB and my kickstart files.

I'd like to just be able to plug in a USB disk that I have made
that has all the kickstart information and the machine is just setup
based on WHICHEVER usb thumbdrive in place in the machine.

Is there something out there that explains this that I have not found?

Thanks for any pointers.

Jerry
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] combining kickstart and DVD on a USB thumbdrive

2009-01-20 Thread nate
Jerry Geis wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am trying to find information on taking a DVD of centos 5.2 x86_64
> and putting it AND my kickstart file on a USB8G thumbdrive.
>
> Note -  I am not INSTALLING  linux on the USB disk just trying to make
> installation media for it. I am not taking just the bootdisk.img file to
> make the USB
> bootable but the entire DVD content on the USB and my kickstart files.
>
> I'd like to just be able to plug in a USB disk that I have made
> that has all the kickstart information and the machine is just setup
> based on WHICHEVER usb thumbdrive in place in the machine.
>
> Is there something out there that explains this that I have not found?

Maybe things have changed in 5.x but I recall some annoying issues
with having a USB device plugged in during kickstart as the kernel
would sometimes map that device as sda and that could screw up my
partitioning scheme. I think it would be easier to put the kickstart
file on the DVD and have a different DVD for whatever purpose you
want, unless you anticipate needing to change the kickstart file
frequently.

Same goes for having external SCSI or fiber channel devices connected
during kickstart, I always disconnect all block devices other than
the boot device whenever possible when using kickstart.

That is assuming your looking for a fully automated installer, vs
loading kickstart with minimal configs and doing a bunch of manual
work during installation.

nate

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Compile Problem

2009-01-20 Thread Jim Perrin
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Joseph L. Casale
 wrote:
> I am trying to follow a solution that states "edit apache's libtool and
> change the following option to "yes": build_libtool_libs=no" which begs
> the question, how? :) Anyone care to show me the light?

If you'd tell us what it is that you're doing we can help out, or
explain any one of a hundred ways that you're doing it wrong. Either
one, really.

-- 
During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.
George Orwell
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Compile Problem

2009-01-20 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>If you'd tell us what it is that you're doing we can help out, or
>explain any one of a hundred ways that you're doing it wrong. Either
>one, really.


I was tearing my hair out trying to get mod_auth_ntlm_winbind working with
apache so I could later use adLDAP/Dokuwiki to migrate all our docs out of
Exchange Public Folders.

The goal was SSO in our AD domain. I had plain LDAP binding against the user
asking for permission to Dokuwiki which worked easy and was secure enough but
the goal was SSO...

I had a total brain fade on the mod_auth_ntlm_winbind compilation but got it
working, now I simply can't make apache authenticate a user? Firefox has the
network.negotiate-auth.trusted-uris value defined yet simply keeps prompting
for authentication while this module causes apache to deliver something to ie
that it simply can't even render the page. Samba, Kerberos and winbind are all
configured right as the CentOS box has been joined to the domain, and wbinfo
and getent return logical data. It's clearly this module and apache that are not
working, but this is the only module that provides group support versus username
only mapping that I know of.

As much as I am getting to like Dokuwiki, if you can reco an easy to use wiki
that facilitates SSO from AD clients but runs on Linux I would be grateful. I
only have one IIS server and I can't/wont hack at that box, its far to critical.

I officially have no more hair.

jlc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] ext4 in 5.3

2009-01-20 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 6:33 PM, Jerry Geis  wrote:
> Hi guys - I'm really looking forward to 5.3 for the potential of ext4.
> I am moving/copying image files lately 8G file and it is slow. I am
> hoping that ext4 really speeds that up.

I don't think it will speed things up much. 8GB files are mostly
hardware throughput and ext3/4 will actually be slower because the
journalling etc are to make it more robust but at a speed cost. You
would probably see better speed by going to ext2.





-- 
Stephen J Smoogen. -- BSD/GNU/Linux
How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed
in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice"
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Compile Problem

2009-01-20 Thread Craig White
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 21:00 -0700, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> >If you'd tell us what it is that you're doing we can help out, or
> >explain any one of a hundred ways that you're doing it wrong. Either
> >one, really.
> 
> 
> I was tearing my hair out trying to get mod_auth_ntlm_winbind working with
> apache so I could later use adLDAP/Dokuwiki to migrate all our docs out of
> Exchange Public Folders.
> 
> The goal was SSO in our AD domain. I had plain LDAP binding against the user
> asking for permission to Dokuwiki which worked easy and was secure enough but
> the goal was SSO...
> 
> I had a total brain fade on the mod_auth_ntlm_winbind compilation but got it
> working, now I simply can't make apache authenticate a user? Firefox has the
> network.negotiate-auth.trusted-uris value defined yet simply keeps prompting
> for authentication while this module causes apache to deliver something to ie
> that it simply can't even render the page. Samba, Kerberos and winbind are all
> configured right as the CentOS box has been joined to the domain, and wbinfo
> and getent return logical data. It's clearly this module and apache that are 
> not
> working, but this is the only module that provides group support versus 
> username
> only mapping that I know of.
> 
> As much as I am getting to like Dokuwiki, if you can reco an easy to use wiki
> that facilitates SSO from AD clients but runs on Linux I would be grateful. I
> only have one IIS server and I can't/wont hack at that box, its far to 
> critical.
> 
> I officially have no more hair.

mod_authz_ldap definitely can use groups or users to authenticate though
to be honest, I am only authenticating to OpenLDAP and I do see some
references to authenticating to active directory in the documentation.

also - my impression was that only IE could use the SSO and Firefox
would probably have to login.

Craig

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Compile Problem

2009-01-20 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>mod_authz_ldap definitely can use groups or users to authenticate though
>to be honest, I am only authenticating to OpenLDAP and I do see some
>references to authenticating to active directory in the documentation.

Yeah, I have LDAP working w/ groups using Dokuwiki's built in LDAP auth
backend. It was rather trivial to setup...

>also - my impression was that only IE could use the SSO and Firefox
>would probably have to login.

Well, all my firefox clients do it with Squid, it can be done.

Thanks!
jlc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Compile Problem

2009-01-20 Thread Craig White
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 21:45 -0700, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> >mod_authz_ldap definitely can use groups or users to authenticate though
> >to be honest, I am only authenticating to OpenLDAP and I do see some
> >references to authenticating to active directory in the documentation.
> 
> Yeah, I have LDAP working w/ groups using Dokuwiki's built in LDAP auth
> backend. It was rather trivial to setup...
> 
> >also - my impression was that only IE could use the SSO and Firefox
> >would probably have to login.
> 
> Well, all my firefox clients do it with Squid, it can be done.
> 

OK - well, I am pretty much sold on Alfresco but I can't guarantee that
it will do the SSO with FF - it definitely will do AD and I think kicks
Viewpoint butt.

Craig

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Firefox error msg.

2009-01-20 Thread Bob Taylor
After my / disk seemed to be failing and found many files disappeared, I
decided to remove it. I moved my other disk to it's place. Long story
omitted.

After installing my backup of /home and seeing firefox not restart, I
started it from the command line with the immediate error:

Could not find compatible GRE between version 1.9.0.5 and 1.9.0.5.

I'm sorry, I'm at a complete loss. What's a GRE?
-- 
Bob Taylor

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Apache Server Tuning for Performance

2009-01-20 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Linux-crazy wrote on Wed, 21 Jan 2009 00:09:38 +0530:

> KeepAliveTimeout 150

My god, reduce this to 10 or 5.

> ServerLimit  251
> MaxClients   251

There's your limit. However, you should check with your hardware if upping 
it is really desirable. With 4 GB I think you won't be able to handle much 
more anyway.


Kai

-- 
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos