[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 40, Issue 8

2008-06-15 Thread centos-announce-request
TECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0529

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0529.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:

s390:
updates/s390/RPMS/net-snmp-5.0.9-2.30E.24.s390.rpm
updates/s390/RPMS/net-snmp-devel-5.0.9-2.30E.24.s390.rpm
updates/s390/RPMS/net-snmp-libs-5.0.9-2.30E.24.s390.rpm
updates/s390/RPMS/net-snmp-perl-5.0.9-2.30E.24.s390.rpm
updates/s390/RPMS/net-snmp-utils-5.0.9-2.30E.24.s390.rpm

s390x:
updates/s390x/RPMS/net-snmp-5.0.9-2.30E.24.s390x.rpm
updates/s390x/RPMS/net-snmp-devel-5.0.9-2.30E.24.s390x.rpm
updates/s390x/RPMS/net-snmp-libs-5.0.9-2.30E.24.s390x.rpm
updates/s390x/RPMS/net-snmp-perl-5.0.9-2.30E.24.s390x.rpm
updates/s390x/RPMS/net-snmp-utils-5.0.9-2.30E.24.s390x.rpm


-- 
Pasi Pirhonen - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/
Top-postings silently ignored
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : 
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20080614/2bfbfb94/attachment-0001.bin

--

Message: 11
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 01:18:12 +0300
From: Pasi Pirhonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0522 Important CentOS 4 s390(x)
perl -  security update
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0522

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0522.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:

s390:
updates/s390/RPMS/perl-5.8.5-36.c4.3.s390.rpm
updates/s390/RPMS/perl-suidperl-5.8.5-36.c4.3.s390.rpm

s390x:
updates/s390x/RPMS/perl-5.8.5-36.c4.3.s390x.rpm
updates/s390x/RPMS/perl-suidperl-5.8.5-36.c4.3.s390x.rpm


-- 
Pasi Pirhonen - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/
Top-postings silently ignored
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : 
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20080615/e85f0a08/attachment-0001.bin

--

Message: 12
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 01:54:51 +0300
From: Pasi Pirhonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0522 Important CentOS 3 s390(x)
perl -  security update
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0522

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0522.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:

s390:
updates/s390/RPMS/perl-5.8.0-98.EL3.s390.rpm
updates/s390/RPMS/perl-CGI-2.89-98.EL3.s390.rpm
updates/s390/RPMS/perl-CPAN-1.61-98.EL3.s390.rpm
updates/s390/RPMS/perl-DB_File-1.806-98.EL3.s390.rpm
updates/s390/RPMS/perl-suidperl-5.8.0-98.EL3.s390.rpm

s390x:
updates/s390x/RPMS/perl-5.8.0-98.EL3.s390x.rpm
updates/s390x/RPMS/perl-CGI-2.89-98.EL3.s390x.rpm
updates/s390x/RPMS/perl-CPAN-1.61-98.EL3.s390x.rpm
updates/s390x/RPMS/perl-DB_File-1.806-98.EL3.s390x.rpm
updates/s390x/RPMS/perl-suidperl-5.8.0-98.EL3.s390x.rpm


-- 
Pasi Pirhonen - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/
Top-postings silently ignored
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : 
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20080615/173cb105/attachment-0001.bin

--

___
CentOS-announce mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce


End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 40, Issue 8
**
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Desktop Effects -- questions/issues

2008-06-15 Thread fred smith
Hi!

I finally tried enabling the desktop effects yesterday. I'm using an old
Nvidia card (GeForce 4 MX440) with, of course, Nvidia's drivers. this is
on a fully updated Centos 5 system.

Enabling from the gnome menu doesn't exactly work compltely, one needs to
google around a bit to find out the remaining magic incantations to make 
it fully work. So, I've done that and it's working.

Issues:
1. I notice that the text in the bar at the top of each window appears to be 
a different font, and it is outlined in black. Is there any way to tweak
that setting? 
2. If I have a window that is slid partially off the edge of an individual
desktop it now oveerlaps the edge of the one "next" to it, when it never
did before. Not sure if I like that or not, is there any way to change
that behavior should I decide I don't like it?
3. I have (and always have had) the panel settings set to "autohide". I
now notice that it sometimes does not hide itself until I explicitly
click in an empty part of the panel, then somewhere else on the desktop.
Anyone know if there's a way to resovle this?

Question:
Should I decide I want to revert to the way it was before I enabled these
effects, how would I go about that? there is no "disable" button on the
gnome menu, only the "enable" button. I know how to un-do the changes I
made manually in the xorg.conf file, but no idea how to undo whatever it
is that the "enable desktop effects" button does. Clues would be appreciated.

Thanks in advance!

-- 
 Fred Smith -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
  "For him who is able to keep you from falling and to present you before his 
 glorious presence without fault and with great joy--to the only God our Savior
 be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before
 all ages, now and forevermore! Amen."
- Jude 1:24,25 (niv) -


pgprr9p0mj4w7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Re: CUPS problem

2008-06-15 Thread Scott Silva

on 6-14-2008 1:00 PM Ivan Arteaga spake the following:

Hello,

I am running centOS 4.3 and my cups print server suddenly stopped 
working,  now when i reboot the server it hangs a time starting the cups 
service and when finally the system boots up, everything remains in the 
queue but not printing at all. Strange thing is all the print jobs 
appears owned by the user nobody.
anytime i try to cancel a job i cant because it tell me i have no rights 
to do  it despite im logged as root.

Via webmin i got the error: lprm: unable to lprm jobs

I will appreciate any comment or tip.

Regards,

--Ivan.

Are you really that far behind updates that you are still on 4.3?

Current is 4.6, and there have been at least 3 cups updates since 4.3.

--
MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if they don't



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] RHDS ON CENTOS 5 for squid authentication

2008-06-15 Thread Fabian Arrotin

Ralph Angenendt wrote:

lingu wrote:
  

Hi,

 I AM RUINING  squid PROXY ON CENTOS 5



Don't do that, then.

SCNR, really.

Ralph
  
hehe, Ruining a squid proxy on centos 5 . i already knew the ./ 
effect, but not (yet) the CAPS lock effect ... ;-)


--
- 
Fabian Arrotin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

"Internet network currently down, TCP/IP packets delivered now by UPS/Fedex ..."




___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] USB Wireless device for CentOS?

2008-06-15 Thread MHR
I need to get a wireless device for an upcoming trip (USB is
preferable to PCMCIA for a long list of reasons) and I'm wondering if
anyone has any experience with or recommendations for such items,
particularly which ones work with Linux/CentOS.  Right now I'm
debating between a reasonably cheap Belkin 54G and a slightly more
expensive Netgear 54G.

Thanks.

mhr
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] USB Wireless device for CentOS?

2008-06-15 Thread Terry Polzin
On Sunday June 15 2008, MHR wrote:
> I need to get a wireless device for an upcoming trip (USB is
> preferable to PCMCIA for a long list of reasons) and I'm wondering if
> anyone has any experience with or recommendations for such items,
> particularly which ones work with Linux/CentOS.  Right now I'm
> debating between a reasonably cheap Belkin 54G and a slightly more
> expensive Netgear 54G.
>
> Thanks.
>
> mhr
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Anything that has the Zydas chip set just works so long as you've installed 
the firmware which I believe is available with v4x, 5x as an RPM


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


RE: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 and Xen

2008-06-15 Thread Robert - elists
I have an 8 gig dram server I am playing with Xen on in centos 5.1 on right
now.

Are you telling us that Xen on centos 5.1 only uses 4 Gig Dram?

Or will it allow all 8 Gig to be used if setup correctly between main dom
and virt doms

 - rh


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 and Xen

2008-06-15 Thread Tim Verhoeven
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 10:05 PM, Robert - elists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have an 8 gig dram server I am playing with Xen on in centos 5.1 on right
> now.
>
> Are you telling us that Xen on centos 5.1 only uses 4 Gig Dram?
>
> Or will it allow all 8 Gig to be used if setup correctly between main dom
> and virt doms

As far as my experience goes you can use the 8GB completely for all
the domU's. I think you are still limited to 4GB per domU.

Regards,
Tim

-- 
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83

Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the
"microsoft approach to programming" and should never be allowed.
(Linus Torvalds)
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] USB Wireless device for CentOS?

2008-06-15 Thread MHR
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 12:58 PM, Terry Polzin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Anything that has the Zydas chip set just works so long as you've installed
> the firmware which I believe is available with v4x, 5x as an RPM
>

Interesting - the google page for zydas usb units lists nothing by the
big names (netgear, dlink, linksys or belkin) and only the "off"
brands like TrendWARE and Zonet.

Also according to google hits, the zydas driver is incorporated into
the 2.6.18 kernel, so it should already be in CentOS 5.x (yeah!).

I'll post what I find

Thanks.

mhr
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] USB Wireless device for CentOS?

2008-06-15 Thread Lanny Marcus
On 6/15/08, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 12:58 PM, Terry Polzin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Anything that has the Zydas chip set just works so long as you've
>> installed
>> the firmware which I believe is available with v4x, 5x as an RPM
>>
>
> Interesting - the google page for zydas usb units lists nothing by the
> big names (netgear, dlink, linksys or belkin) and only the "off"
> brands like TrendWARE and Zonet.
>
> Also according to google hits, the zydas driver is incorporated into
> the 2.6.18 kernel, so it should already be in CentOS 5.x (yeah!).
>
> I'll post what I find

Check out the specs on the Netgear and other web sites, to see if you
can find out which chip they use. If not, send an email to their Sales
or Tech Support Department and ask which chip they use in the unit(s)
you are considering.  So far, I don't think we've ever had a failure,
with anything from Netgear, but other companies make good products
too.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 and Xen

2008-06-15 Thread Ruslan Sivak

Robert - elists wrote:

I have an 8 gig dram server I am playing with Xen on in centos 5.1 on right
now.

Are you telling us that Xen on centos 5.1 only uses 4 Gig Dram?

Or will it allow all 8 Gig to be used if setup correctly between main dom
and virt doms

 - rh


  


I think if you're on an x64 bit platform you can use up to 8GB of ram 
for dom0 (well you need to leave enough for dom0, mine takes up about 
600mb after a clean install, and if you allocate too much to domU, the 
server goes down - hard).


What I was talking about is XenServer - the commercial product based on 
Xen now owned by citrix.  They have a bare metal installer that installs 
a version of CentOS 5 and their version of Xen in about 10 minutes, and 
has a very nice windows based administrative console.  Their free 
version XenServer Express only allows DomU to use up to 4GB of RAM 
collectivelly, and I believe only 4 VMs total.  They also have fairly 
nice paravirtualized drivers for windows (although James' GPLPV drivers 
are catching up to them).


I think I will run XenServer at home where I have a box with only 4GB of 
RAM, but for work, I'm probably going to go with CentOS 5.2 and Xen 3.2, 
since XenServer is too limiting, and I don't think it's worth shelling 
out $1k per box to get use of the other 3.5GB of RAM.


Russ
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 and Xen

2008-06-15 Thread Luke S Crawford
Ruslan Sivak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > running vmware under a xenU guest wouldn't lift any ram limit
> > imposed by the xen kernel or dom0.

...

> The 4GB limit is artificial, and only applies to the vm's started
> using their closed source XenSource.  The host OS is most likely
> CentOS 5, and sees the whole 8GB (although it's not x64, so I'm
> guessing they use PAE or something.)

It is PAE.

> I only need 8GB of ram support, and no other features that are offered
> in XenStandard, so it seems kind of a waste to pay $1k per server for
> that. If another virtualization technology was installed on that OS,
> you can get the use of the other 4GB, and if not, I can always run my
> apps on Dom0, although I'd prefer to not install too much stuff on
> Dom0.

First,  The Dom0 OS runs as a guest of the Xen hypervisor-  it is just
a guest that happens to have access to the PCI bus as well.  The Xen
hypervisor still controls what ram and CPU all domains including the Dom0,
 can see;  if the xen kernel is limiting you to 4G ram total, that 
limit will apply in the Dom0 as well.

Also, you are not going to be able to run a virtualization technology that
uses the hardware virtualization support from within a Xen guest, even
if that Xen guest happens to be the Dom0.   The Xen hypervisor
controls access to those instructions.  

You can run virtualization technologies that don't require HVM-   OpenVZ and
linux vserver will both work fine.  Heck, you can do that within an 
unprivileged Xen DomU, but that won't help you if you want to run
windows.  



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] RPM creation question

2008-06-15 Thread Clint Dilks

Karanbir Singh wrote:

Clint Dilks wrote:

For those who care
- On FC6 / CentOS 4 - To Disable this you must hack the script as far 
as I can tell.  I am told that on New Versions of Fedora (and I 
assume CentOS 5) that you can add %__jar_repack %{nil}  to the top of 
the spec file.


Why cant you twiddle with __os_install_post ?

I tried this, and it didn't work at all as I expected.  I know that you 
build significantly more RPMS than I do and that they will be of better 
quality than mine.  So if this is the prefered strategy then I sit 
corrected and appologies for an confusion I have bought to the list :)

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 and Xen

2008-06-15 Thread Ruslan Sivak

Luke S Crawford wrote:

Ruslan Sivak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
  

running vmware under a xenU guest wouldn't lift any ram limit
imposed by the xen kernel or dom0.
  


...

  

The 4GB limit is artificial, and only applies to the vm's started
using their closed source XenSource.  The host OS is most likely
CentOS 5, and sees the whole 8GB (although it's not x64, so I'm
guessing they use PAE or something.)



It is PAE.

  
If it's PAE, then I'm a bit confused, as they advertise it as "*Native 
64-bit hypervisor:* Scalability and support for enterprise applications"

I only need 8GB of ram support, and no other features that are offered
in XenStandard, so it seems kind of a waste to pay $1k per server for
that. If another virtualization technology was installed on that OS,
you can get the use of the other 4GB, and if not, I can always run my
apps on Dom0, although I'd prefer to not install too much stuff on
Dom0.



First,  The Dom0 OS runs as a guest of the Xen hypervisor-  it is just
a guest that happens to have access to the PCI bus as well.  The Xen
hypervisor still controls what ram and CPU all domains including the Dom0,
 can see;  if the xen kernel is limiting you to 4G ram total, that 
limit will apply in the Dom0 as well.


Also, you are not going to be able to run a virtualization technology that
uses the hardware virtualization support from within a Xen guest, even
if that Xen guest happens to be the Dom0.   The Xen hypervisor
controls access to those instructions.  


You can run virtualization technologies that don't require HVM-   OpenVZ and
linux vserver will both work fine.  Heck, you can do that within an 
unprivileged Xen DomU, but that won't help you if you want to run
windows.  

  
Well I have up to 4GB of run windows and I can have the other 4GB for 
dom0, so if I can get OpenVZ or linux vserver running on there, I can 
use that to run my linux VM's. 

Doesn't openVZ require a different kernel?  That would replace the Xen 
kernel wouldn't it?  Or is there a way to custom compile Xen+OpenVZ kernel?


I'm not too familiar with linux vserver, but my guess is you can't run 
it in Dom0 either...


Russ


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] mdadm on reboot

2008-06-15 Thread drew einhorn
Hi,

I'm in the process of trying mdadm for the first time

I've been trying stuff out of tutorials, etc.

At this point I know how to create stripes, and mirrors.

My stripe is automatically restarting on reboot,
but the degraded mirror isn't.

-- 
Drew Einhorn
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] mdadm on reboot

2008-06-15 Thread Les Mikesell

drew einhorn wrote:

Hi,

I'm in the process of trying mdadm for the first time

I've been trying stuff out of tutorials, etc.

At this point I know how to create stripes, and mirrors.

My stripe is automatically restarting on reboot,
but the degraded mirror isn't.


Is the partition type set to FD?

--
  Les Mikesell
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] mdadm on reboot

2008-06-15 Thread Theo Band [GreenPeak]

drew einhorn wrote:

Hi,

I'm in the process of trying mdadm for the first time

I've been trying stuff out of tutorials, etc.

At this point I know how to create stripes, and mirrors.

My stripe is automatically restarting on reboot,
but the degraded mirror isn't.

Did you create  /etc/mdadm.conf ?

echo "DEVICE /dev/sd*" > /etc/mdadm.conf
mdadm --brief --examine /dev/sd* >> /etc/mdadm.conf

Check the raid with
cat /proc/mdstat

It tells you which devices are part of the array.

Finally put the raid flag on the partitions. I'm not sure whether it's 
really needed, I just do it:

parted /dev/sda
set 1 raid
set 2 raid
print
1  0.031101.975  primary   ext3boot, raid
2101.975 194474.355  primary   raid
quit

Theo
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos