RE: [CentOS] Slightly OT? - How do I set up Win98 to access aprinter on my CentOS box?
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Hull-Richter Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 1:19 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: RE: [CentOS] Slightly OT? - How do I set up Win98 to access aprinter on my CentOS box? On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 15:54 -0600, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > >However, I also have a Win98 box on the LAN that I would like to be > >able to print on the CentOS printer. When I try to connect to the > >printer, Win98 tells me that it can't find the network...? > > > >Any suggestions? > > Possibly name resolution issues on the Win98 box? There was no hosts file - I edited the hosts.sam (sample) file and added both machines to it. But there must be more. > Can you resolve a ping using the exact hostname you use for the > printer I can ping the CentOS host by IP address and, now that there's a hosts file, by host name as well. However, Win98 can't see the network at all - claims there isn't one. It is running the M$ client for M$ networks (and for NetBIOS networks, as well), but the network is not getting properly initialized. And now we are definitely sliding OT here (is there a forum where and answer to this can be found?). > (I assume the CentOS box emulates a Lanman printer? Never printed on a CentOS box...). > 'fraid I don't know what that means - the printer is just available to be shared via samba and so should be visible on a M$ network (like in the XP guest?). I'm going to be playing with the Windows box RSN - when I'm done with it, it will have Win98, XP Pro and, of course, CentOS, but there's a fair amount of work to be done before that will work. mhr Have you enabled netbios in the win98 machine? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] ext3 filesystems larger than 8TB
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eduardo Silvestre Sent: Sunday, May 04, 2008 9:04 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] ext3 filesystems larger than 8TB But... Can i do that just with centos install cd and 3ware drivers? Format the volumes with 8TB/9TB/10TB without problems? Regards, --- Eduardo Silvestre nfsi telecom, lda. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel. (+351) 21 949 2300 - Fax (+351) 21 949 2301 http://www.nfsi.pt/ - Original Message - From: "Ray Van Dolson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: centos@centos.org Sent: Sexta-feira, 2 de Maio de 2008 21H15m GMT +00:00 GMT Britain, Ireland, Portugal Subject: Re: [CentOS] ext3 filesystems larger than 8TB On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 04:09:48PM -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote: > > I think it *theoretically* should work as ext3 should to 16TB. > > However, we ran into issues with userland tools and such. Possibly > > related to x86_64 vs i386 stuff, but in the end to avoid continued > > troubleshooting we just used centosplus + jfs. Works perfectly for > > our 10TB filesystem. > > I'm curious what you store that you need 10TB of linear storage? > > I have had 4-6-8TB storage systems, but the storage was always divvied > up between different applications. > > -Ross > It's almost all Oracle database dump files... one database by itself is 4.5TB! Don't ask me what's in these things... :) Ray -- Using Oracle you are better of using "XFS" or "RAW" (raw meaning a drive partitioned with no filesystem). RAW would be better performance wise also. Or using RAW on a fast SAN network will work also. Hope that machine has plenty of RAM!!! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ext3 filesystems larger than 8TB
I believe Florin Andrei had a typo in his message. No other file system will be as reliable as *XFS*. I've had XFS recover from system failures that Ext3 would/could not recover from. If you want dependability, reliability, and also large file systems, only use XFS. You'll find none better. You should also be using the 64 bit kernels as well, but then, you want that for a whole lot other reasons anyways. -- Brent L. Bates (UNIX Sys. Admin.) M.S. 912 Phone:(757) 865-1400, x204 NASA Langley Research CenterFAX:(757) 865-8177 Hampton, Virginia 23681-0001 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.vigyan.com/~blbates/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ext3 filesystems larger than 8TB
Ross S. W. Walker wrote: Ray Van Dolson wrote: On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 02:36:41PM -0500, Monty Shinn wrote: Greetings. I am trying to create a 10TB (approx) ext3 filesystem. I am able to successfully create the partition using parted, but when I try to use mkfs.ext3, I get an error stating there is an 8TB limit for ext3 filesystems. I looked at the specs for 5 on the "upstream" vendor's website, and they indicate that there is a 16TB limit on ext3. Has anyone been able to create a ext3 filesystem larger than 8TB? If ext3 isn't an option, has anyone used the kmod-xfs-smp.i686 module mentioned on the centos site? Surely it doesn't have an 8TB limit... specs: Centos 5.1 kernel-2.6.18-53.1.14.el5 3Ware 9550SXU 12port raid card Am I just walking into a big nightmare? Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated. I think it *theoretically* should work as ext3 should to 16TB. However, we ran into issues with userland tools and such. Possibly related to x86_64 vs i386 stuff, but in the end to avoid continued troubleshooting we just used centosplus + jfs. Works perfectly for our 10TB filesystem. I'm curious what you store that you need 10TB of linear storage? I have had 4-6-8TB storage systems, but the storage was always divvied up between different applications. -Ross __ This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy or printout thereof. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Ross, We basically store video image sequences (edited and source) and audio/video files on our servers. We are an editing and broadcast design facility, doing mostly HD work. The files are relatively large, and there are a lot of them. I am trying to "max out" our current server population, moving from 250 and 500 gig drives to the Seagate 1TB enterprise (ES.2) SATA drives using the 12 port 3ware raid card. I have at least 4 servers that I am wanting to upgrade this way. They're just file servers running NFS and Samba. Do I *need* a 10TB partition? No, not really. I could segment into 2 5TB partitions if needed, and I may still end up doing that. I am beginning to wonder if the >8TB ext3 limit has been vetted enough. It is just easier for the users if it was one partition. I have to say when the mkfs.ext3 code hasn't been changed to allow >8TB partitions without adding the -F, (which did seem to work) it gives me pause. Naively perhaps, I didn't think it would be an issue. Thanks, Monty ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ext3 filesystems larger than 8TB
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 7:30 AM, Brent L. Bates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I believe Florin Andrei had a typo in his message. No other file system > will be as reliable as *XFS*. I've had XFS recover from system failures that > Ext3 would/could not recover from. If you want dependability, reliability, > and also large file systems, only use XFS. Have you also had emacs write files where vim would not? Have you had qmail deliver where postfix would not? I mean, if you're going to attempt to start a holy war here in the mailing list, why stop at just filesystems :-P I believe XFS has some very good points where ext3 definitely lacks. That said, on RHEL/CentOS with the 4k stack compilation, xfs on x86 systems where you were using an abstraction layer (lvm, software raid, etc) xfs could get angry with you pretty quickly. EXT3 is widely regarded as being more stable than others over the long-term, which is why it's the default for a number of distros. Personal experiences may vary. -- During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act. George Orwell ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] wine question
fred smith wrote: to use the Centos-released version of wine to run the software installers for quite a few apps. However, at no time during the installer do I actually see any text in any of the dialogs that appear. This makes it a little hard to choose options :) I had this problem. The solution was provided on this list. From my notes (sorry, no credit to the person who provided the info): I resolved the problem copying the fonts from windows, I know that this is not the best solution but it works with that, y copied the fonts from c:/windows/fonts and pasted on /home/user/.wine/drive_c/windows/fonts after I did that finally I got a wine menu with fonts -- Sincerely, John Thomas ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ext3 filesystems larger than 8TB
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Monty Shinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We basically store video image sequences (edited and source) and > audio/video files on our servers. We are an editing and broadcast design > facility, doing mostly HD work. The files are relatively large, and there > are a lot of them. Having worked for a large film and television post-production facility in London for just over six years, XFS has been the primary filesystem for all our servers. Much of the data was split across multiple disk servers - each with around 2-3Tb of data. The whole filesystem was presented to the workstations over NFS with scripts to manage links to the different file servers - presenting a unified filesystem to the artist. XFS had given us the performance and reliability required and has gotten us out of some nasty scrapes. It's a shame that RHEL/CentOS does not include XFS as a choice of filesystem out of the box without having to compile the XFS module or use CentOS Extras repository, but perhaps one day it may happen.. ;) M. -- Martyn Drake http://www.drake.org.uk http://www.mindthegapps.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] ext3 filesystems larger than 8TB
Monty Shinn wrote: > > Ross, > > We basically store video image sequences (edited and source) and > audio/video files on our servers. We are an editing and broadcast > design facility, doing mostly HD work. The files are relatively large, > and there are a lot of them. > > I am trying to "max out" our current server population, moving from 250 > and 500 gig drives to the Seagate 1TB enterprise (ES.2) SATA drives > using the 12 port 3ware raid card. > > I have at least 4 servers that I am wanting to upgrade this way. > > They're just file servers running NFS and Samba. > > Do I *need* a 10TB partition? No, not really. I could segment into 2 > 5TB partitions if needed, and I may still end up doing that. I am > beginning to wonder if the >8TB ext3 limit has been vetted enough. It > is just easier for the users if it was one partition. > > I have to say when the mkfs.ext3 code hasn't been changed to allow >8TB > partitions without adding the -F, (which did seem to work) it gives me > pause. > > Naively perhaps, I didn't think it would be an issue. Makes sense, does NFS support sharing such large volumes? I suppose that will depend on both the server version of NFS and the client, but it's something you need to keep in mind. I think for a large file file system xfs is probably what you want, but you will want to run CentOS 64-bit with the 8k stacks to see it's full robustness and stability. Some people think xfs is good everywhere, but that's simply not true, I always recommend putting the OS on ext3 and then choosing the file system for your application data that best suits the application. Basically you have ext3, jfs, xfs, gfs and ocfs, the last 2 being clustered file systems. ext3 is good because it is widely supported and performs well under mixed work load, jfs is supposedly excellent if you have a lot of small files like a mail/news server, xfs for large files and of course gfs or ocfs for clusters that need simultaneous file system access from multiple nodes (but they are slower due to locking overhead). If you have volumes over 8TB then you really need to use either jfs or xfs depending on the application and if you are using xfs I highly recommend you run 64-bit for stability reasons. -Ross __ This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy or printout thereof. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] kingston usb memory stick and file mode permissions
I wish to change the ownership and access permissions of files and directories contained on this device. The device is immediately recognized and mounted when plugged in and I can create and move files on it. However, I cannot change either the permissions or the owner of any file or directory on this device, nor of the device mount itself, whether logged in as the owner or as root. Why is this so and is their any way to alter this behaviour. Sincerely, -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrnemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] kingston usb memory stick and file mode permissions
On Mon, 5 May 2008, James B. Byrne wrote: I wish to change the ownership and access permissions of files and directories contained on this device. The device is immediately recognized and mounted when plugged in and I can create and move files on it. However, I cannot change either the permissions or the owner of any file or directory on this device, nor of the device mount itself, whether logged in as the owner or as root. Why is this so and is their any way to alter this behaviour. Most flash memory devices are formatted with a FAT or VFAT filesystem, which doesn't support Unix file permissions. If you're only using the device under Linux, you can re-format it with your filesystem of choice (ext3, xfs, ...) et voila! If you need to pass the device back and forth between Linux, Windows, and/or Macs, then V/FAT (warts and all) is probably the only good solution. -- Paul Heinlein <> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <> http://www.madboa.com/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: kingston usb memory stick and file mode permissions
Thank you for this information. Regards, -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrnemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] wine question
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 06:45:34AM -0700, John Thomas wrote: > fred smith wrote: > > to use the Centos-released version of wine to run the > >software installers for quite a few apps. However, at no time during the > >installer do I actually see any text in any of the dialogs that appear. > >This makes it a little hard to choose options :) > > I had this problem. The solution was provided on this list. From my > notes (sorry, no credit to the person who provided the info): > > I resolved the problem copying the fonts from windows, I know that this > is not the best solution but it works with that, y copied the fonts > from c:/windows/fonts and pasted on /home/user/.wine/drive_c/windows/fonts > after I did that finally I got a wine menu with fonts Thanks, John, I'll look into htat. -- Fred Smith -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The eyes of the Lord are everywhere, keeping watch on the wicked and the good. - Proverbs 15:3 (niv) - pgpDfHy7ZCumA.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] SELinux policy module sources
Hi. I'm trying to figure out where the SELinux policy modules shipped with the system live, and how they work. The modules listed by 'semodule -l' are the same as those available in /etc/selinux/targeted/modules/active/modules, but those are not part of any package, and are presumably added and removed to this location as they are added and removed to the kernel. I later found these modules to live in /usr/share/selinux. If I create a policy module of my own, is this the place to put it to make sure that it is loaded when the system boots? Or do I also need to list it somewhere, such in a configuration file? The reason why I ask is because there are a few .pp files in this directory that are not visible in the list of loaded modules, and they are also not available in the /etc/selinux/.../modules directory above. I today tried to figure out what these precompiled policy packages contain, but that isn't exactly obvious. I found .if files in /usr/share/selinux/devel/include/... that correspond to the .pp files in /usr/share/selinux, but nothing else. The .if files only contain definitions, but don't these need to be used somewhere, such as in .te files? And what about the .fc files that the policy generation tool in system-config-selinux creates? Are such files not needed? Lots of questions, but the documentation on this subject isn't exactly stellar. :) Regards Ingemar ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SELinux policy module sources
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Ingemar Nilsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Lots of questions, but the documentation on this subject isn't exactly > stellar. :) With CentOS 5, you don't really need the selinux module source anymore. It's usually enough to clear the logs and in permissive mode, run the offending application. Then 'grep yourapp /var/log/audit/audit.log | audit2allow -M localmodname'. Check the module for sanity and make sure it's not allowing god-knows-what, then semodule -i localmodname. It'll be there on reboot from now on. no need (although it's a good idea) to keep the module file hanging around. -- During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act. George Orwell ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ext3 filesystems larger than 8TB
Martyn Drake wrote: Having worked for a large film and television post-production facility in London for just over six years, XFS has been the primary filesystem for all our servers. Much of the data was split across multiple disk servers - each with around 2-3Tb of data. The whole filesystem was presented to the workstations over NFS with scripts to manage links to the different file servers - presenting a unified filesystem to the artist. XFS had given us the performance and reliability required and has gotten us out of some nasty scrapes. Well, XFS was designed exactly for the kind of scenario you're describing. No wonder it performs really well in that sort of situation. -- Florin Andrei http://florin.myip.org/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ext3 filesystems larger than 8TB
Florin Andrei wrote: Martyn Drake wrote: Having worked for a large film and television post-production facility in London for just over six years, XFS has been the primary filesystem for all our servers. Much of the data was split across multiple disk servers - each with around 2-3Tb of data. The whole filesystem was presented to the workstations over NFS with scripts to manage links to the different file servers - presenting a unified filesystem to the artist. XFS had given us the performance and reliability required and has gotten us out of some nasty scrapes. Well, XFS was designed exactly for the kind of scenario you're describing. No wonder it performs really well in that sort of situation. Thanks to all for your help. I decided to go with XFS, since it could be loaded as a module and I have worked with it on SGI platforms for years. Thanks again. Monty ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ext3 filesystems larger than 8TB
Jim Perrin wrote: Personal experiences may vary. Yup. Do your own tests, involving your particular situation, then draw conclusions. The average may just not apply very well in your case. -- Florin Andrei http://florin.myip.org/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SELinux policy module sources
Jim Perrin wrote: With CentOS 5, you don't really need the selinux module source anymore. It's usually enough to clear the logs and in permissive mode, run the offending application. Then 'grep yourapp /var/log/audit/audit.log | audit2allow -M localmodname'. Check the module for sanity and make sure it's not allowing god-knows-what, then semodule -i localmodname. It'll be there on reboot from now on. no need (although it's a good idea) to keep the module file hanging around. I know that you can generate policy modules from audit logs with audit2allow, but I'd like to know how it all works. This is for a variety of reasons: * Is the denial because of a bug in the policy with the default configuration, or because I made some configuration change that requires additional permissions? In the first case, a bug report would probably be appropriate. * Maybe the error actually occurs because of some mislabeled file? Correcting a label is surely better than adding some unnecessary permission. * I might want to develop policy modules for our own software, using new file contexts and new types. In this case, simply adding avc rules with audit2allow would be inappropriate, since the system does not know about my planned policy module. * I'd like to use the source for existing policy modules as inspiration for my own work. In addition, the policy generation tool (accessed through system-config-selinux) asks a few questions and then produces a .te, a .fc, a .if and (IIRC) a .pp file for my custom software. I know that the .te file is compiled into the .pp file, but what about e.g. the .fc file? Is it stored somewhere where restorecon will look for it, or is it simply used for the initial relabeling? Can I put it somewhere, like a /etc/selinux/.../file_contexts.d/ directory (no, it doesn't exist), or do I have to add the corresponding rules to the monolithic /etc/selinux/.../file_contexts file? Regards Ingemar ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ext3 filesystems larger than 8TB
Ross S. W. Walker wrote: jfs is supposedly excellent if you have a lot of small files like a mail/news server Hm, last time I tested ReiseFS turned out to be the best FS for that situation. But it's been a while, perhaps things have changed a bit. -- Florin Andrei http://florin.myip.org/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] ext3 filesystems larger than 8TB
Florin Andrei wrote: > > Ross S. W. Walker wrote: > > > > jfs is > > supposedly excellent if you have a lot of small files like a > > mail/news server > > Hm, last time I tested ReiseFS turned out to be the best FS for that > situation. But it's been a while, perhaps things have changed a bit. Yeah, but reiserfs is all but dead these days. At least I wouldn't plan a long-term deployment around it... -Ross __ This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy or printout thereof. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: ext3 filesystems larger than 8TB
on 5-5-2008 11:41 AM Ross S. W. Walker spake the following: Florin Andrei wrote: Ross S. W. Walker wrote: jfs is supposedly excellent if you have a lot of small files like a mail/news server Hm, last time I tested ReiseFS turned out to be the best FS for that situation. But it's been a while, perhaps things have changed a bit. Yeah, but reiserfs is all but dead these days. At least I wouldn't plan a long-term deployment around it... And Hans Reiser's legal woes are deeper than ever. http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/04/28/2243232&from=rss http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9930857-7.html But here in California a man can spend most of his life in appeals. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] Re: ext3 filesystems larger than 8TB
Scott Silva wrote: > on 5-5-2008 11:41 AM Ross S. W. Walker spake the following: > > Florin Andrei wrote: > >> Ross S. W. Walker wrote: > >>> jfs is > >>> supposedly excellent if you have a lot of small files like a > >>> mail/news server > >> Hm, last time I tested ReiseFS turned out to be the best FS for that > >> situation. But it's been a while, perhaps things have changed a bit. > > > > Yeah, but reiserfs is all but dead these days. At least I wouldn't > > plan a long-term deployment around it... > > > And Hans Reiser's legal woes are deeper than ever. > > http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/04/28/2243232&from=rss > > http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9930857-7.html > > But here in California a man can spend most of his life in appeals. Even though the technology would still be around even if Hans isn't, there has been a lot of pain trying to get reiserfs to continue to work well in the kernel tree from release to release. It's very tempermental, so I don't know if it will last much longer, especially given the slew of existing file systems that don't need such work to maintain. ext4 is being previewed in Fedora 9 this month, so add one more to the list. I heard the Reiser FS is going to be replaced with the Peterson FS ;-) -Ross __ This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy or printout thereof. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] Re: ext3 filesystems larger than 8TB
Ross S. W. Walker wrote: > Scott Silva wrote: > > on 5-5-2008 11:41 AM Ross S. W. Walker spake the following: > > > Florin Andrei wrote: > > >> Ross S. W. Walker wrote: > > >>> jfs is > > >>> supposedly excellent if you have a lot of small files like a > > >>> mail/news server > > >> Hm, last time I tested ReiseFS turned out to be the best FS for that > > >> situation. But it's been a while, perhaps things have changed a bit. > > > > > > Yeah, but reiserfs is all but dead these days. At least I wouldn't > > > plan a long-term deployment around it... > > > > > And Hans Reiser's legal woes are deeper than ever. > > > > http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/04/28/2243232&from=rss > > > > http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9930857-7.html > > > > But here in California a man can spend most of his life in appeals. > > Even though the technology would still be around even if Hans isn't, > there has been a lot of pain trying to get reiserfs to continue to > work well in the kernel tree from release to release. It's very > tempermental, so I don't know if it will last much longer, especially > given the slew of existing file systems that don't need such > work to maintain. Well I wanted the facts about ReiserFS in the kernel and so I poked and googled some more and the part about the maintenance of reiserfs in the kernel was unfounded hearsay. The real reason it is being phased out in distributions (not the kernel tree) is the questions surrounding it's long term survival without Hans and Namesys to provide support for it. > ext4 is being previewed in Fedora 9 this month, so add one more to > the list. > > I heard the Reiser FS is going to be replaced with the Peterson FS ;-) There is a punch line in there somewhere, but my mind just isn't that sharp today. -Ross __ This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy or printout thereof. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] Re: ext3 filesystems larger than 8TB
Scott Silva wrote: > on 5-5-2008 11:41 AM Ross S. W. Walker spake the following: > > Florin Andrei wrote: > >> Ross S. W. Walker wrote: > >>> jfs is > >>> supposedly excellent if you have a lot of small files like a > >>> mail/news server > >> Hm, last time I tested ReiseFS turned out to be the best FS for that > >> situation. But it's been a while, perhaps things have changed a bit. > > > > Yeah, but reiserfs is all but dead these days. At least I wouldn't > > plan a long-term deployment around it... > > > And Hans Reiser's legal woes are deeper than ever. > > http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/04/28/2243232&from=rss > > http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9930857-7.html > > But here in California a man can spend most of his life in appeals. I finally read the news.com article and all I have to say is, what an idiot. Just goes to show you that being intelligent doesn't necessarily make you smart. -Ross __ This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy or printout thereof. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] wine question
fred smith wrote: Thanks, John, I'll look into htat. You may also enable the EPEL repository and, this way, install more recent Wine packages. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/FAQ#howtouse Or you can manually download and install the packages from an EPEL mirror (but that will make it harder to keep up with the updates): http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/epel/ Wine is making a lot of progress recently, so it's probably worth tracking the recent versions. -- Florin Andrei http://florin.myip.org/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] OT- Re: ext3 filesystems larger than 8TB
on 5-5-2008 2:31 PM Ross S. W. Walker spake the following: Scott Silva wrote: on 5-5-2008 11:41 AM Ross S. W. Walker spake the following: Florin Andrei wrote: Ross S. W. Walker wrote: jfs is supposedly excellent if you have a lot of small files like a mail/news server Hm, last time I tested ReiseFS turned out to be the best FS for that situation. But it's been a while, perhaps things have changed a bit. Yeah, but reiserfs is all but dead these days. At least I wouldn't plan a long-term deployment around it... And Hans Reiser's legal woes are deeper than ever. http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/04/28/2243232&from=rss http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9930857-7.html But here in California a man can spend most of his life in appeals. I finally read the news.com article and all I have to say is, what an idiot. Just goes to show you that being intelligent doesn't necessarily make you smart. -Ross "It is better to keep quiet and be thought an idiot then to open your mouth and remove all doubt!" -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] OT- Re: ext3 filesystems larger than 8TB
Scott Silva wrote: > on 5-5-2008 2:31 PM Ross S. W. Walker spake the following: > > Scott Silva wrote: > >> on 5-5-2008 11:41 AM Ross S. W. Walker spake the following: > >>> Florin Andrei wrote: > Ross S. W. Walker wrote: > > jfs is > > supposedly excellent if you have a lot of small files like a > > mail/news server > Hm, last time I tested ReiseFS turned out to be the best FS for that > situation. But it's been a while, perhaps things have changed a bit. > >>> Yeah, but reiserfs is all but dead these days. At least I wouldn't > >>> plan a long-term deployment around it... > >>> > >> And Hans Reiser's legal woes are deeper than ever. > >> > >> http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/04/28/2243232&from=rss > >> > >> http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9930857-7.html > >> > >> But here in California a man can spend most of his life in appeals. > > > > I finally read the news.com article and all I have to say is, what > > an idiot. > > > > Just goes to show you that being intelligent doesn't necessarily make > > you smart. > > > > "It is better to keep quiet and be thought an idiot then to open your mouth > and remove all doubt!" No doubt! The worse part is I don't believe it was premeditated. I think she came over to drop off the kids and told him oh by the way I'm taking the children to live with me in Russia, at that point he went into a fit of anger and threw here against the pillar causing a fatal head injury. If he had simply called the paramedics right away and told the truth then he would have received a minimum sentence with parole, but no he decided to try and hide what happened... Sad really, now he still loses the children and the best years of his life too. Oh well, now that the thread has been taken far OT and turned into a soap. -Ross __ This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy or printout thereof. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] httpd reverse proxy
I am trying to figure this out and I always seem to have trouble configuring apache to do more than basic stuff... I have a web server that has several cnames assigned to it. I want srv1.tobyhouse.com to be served by apache. I want to proxy connections to www.tobyhouse.com to cms.tobyhouse.com (different system) If I do this... ProxyPass / http://cms.tobyhouse.com ProxyPassReverse / http://cms.tobyhouse.com then I am good but it seemed to not pull the assets like css and javascripts from cms.tobyhouse.com When I did this... RedirectPermanent / http://cms.tobyhouse.com It sent ALL traffic over to the other server which is clearly not what I want. How can handle this? Must I give a unique ip address to www.tobyhouse.com? Craig ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] httpd reverse proxy
Craig White wrote: I am trying to figure this out and I always seem to have trouble configuring apache to do more than basic stuff... I have a web server that has several cnames assigned to it. I want srv1.tobyhouse.com to be served by apache. I want to proxy connections to www.tobyhouse.com to cms.tobyhouse.com (different system) If I do this... ProxyPass / http://cms.tobyhouse.com ProxyPassReverse / http://cms.tobyhouse.com then I am good but it seemed to not pull the assets like css and javascripts from cms.tobyhouse.com That should work - but I'd put a trailing / on the target. The files that don't appear to work are probably cached in your browser or an intermediate cache. Check the logs to see if a request even came in. You can get finer-grained control by using rewriterules with the P flag but you shouldn't need it. Just make sure the links from the backend server are all relative and don't mention its real hostname. -- Les Mikesell [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] httpd reverse proxy
On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 17:08 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > Craig White wrote: > > I am trying to figure this out and I always seem to have trouble > > configuring apache to do more than basic stuff... > > > > I have a web server that has several cnames assigned to it. > > > > I want srv1.tobyhouse.com to be served by apache. > > I want to proxy connections to www.tobyhouse.com to cms.tobyhouse.com > > (different system) > > > > If I do this... > > > > > > ProxyPass / http://cms.tobyhouse.com > > ProxyPassReverse / http://cms.tobyhouse.com > > > > > > then I am good but it seemed to not pull the assets like css and > > javascripts from cms.tobyhouse.com > > That should work - but I'd put a trailing / on the target. The files > that don't appear to work are probably cached in your browser or an > intermediate cache. Check the logs to see if a request even came in. > You can get finer-grained control by using rewriterules with the P flag > but you shouldn't need it. Just make sure the links from the backend > server are all relative and don't mention its real hostname. OK - well adding the backslash to the end seemed to fix the issue with css but the problem is that stuff that is going to srv1.tobyhouse.com is also proxied over to the same site and I want that to stay at home. So it still is a problem Craig ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] httpd reverse proxy
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 03:14:35PM -0700, Craig White wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 17:08 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > > Craig White wrote: > > > > > > ProxyPass / http://cms.tobyhouse.com > > > ProxyPassReverse / http://cms.tobyhouse.com > > > > > > > That should work - but I'd put a trailing / on the target. The files > OK - well adding the backslash to the end seemed to fix the issue with > css but the problem is that stuff that is going to srv1.tobyhouse.com is > also proxied over to the same site and I want that to stay at home. Try putting a "ServerName www.tobyhouse.com" entry into the VirtualHost config. -- rgds Stephen ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT- Re: ext3 filesystems larger than 8TB
Ross S. W. Walker wrote: No doubt! The worse part is I don't believe it was premeditated. I think she came over to drop off the kids and told him oh by the way I'm taking the children to live with me in Russia, at that point he went into a fit of anger and threw here against the pillar causing a fatal head injury. I followed the trial blogs day by day on the SF Chronicle site. His wife was very close to gaining her US medical license (she had been a doctor in Russia), had lined up a good job, and various other indications of planning for a long term life here, nothing indicating any plans to leave for Russia. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] httpd reverse proxy
Stephen Harris wrote: On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 03:14:35PM -0700, Craig White wrote: On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 17:08 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: Craig White wrote: ProxyPass / http://cms.tobyhouse.com ProxyPassReverse / http://cms.tobyhouse.com That should work - but I'd put a trailing / on the target. The files OK - well adding the backslash to the end seemed to fix the issue with css but the problem is that stuff that is going to srv1.tobyhouse.com is also proxied over to the same site and I want that to stay at home. Try putting a "ServerName www.tobyhouse.com" entry into the VirtualHost config. I missed that - the name in the VirtualHost directive will just be evaluated as an IP address. To actually identify a named virtual host the ServerName must match what the client sends the the Host: header. ServerName can only have one entry. If there are more names this host should accept you can have a ServerAlias entry with multiple names. If none of your virtualhost entries have a match and you don't have an explict default, the first one is used. -- Les Mikesell [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] httpd reverse proxy
On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 17:27 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > Stephen Harris wrote: > > On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 03:14:35PM -0700, Craig White wrote: > >> On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 17:08 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > >>> Craig White wrote: > > ProxyPass / http://cms.tobyhouse.com > ProxyPassReverse / http://cms.tobyhouse.com > > >>> That should work - but I'd put a trailing / on the target. The files > > > >> OK - well adding the backslash to the end seemed to fix the issue with > >> css but the problem is that stuff that is going to srv1.tobyhouse.com is > >> also proxied over to the same site and I want that to stay at home. > > > > Try putting a "ServerName www.tobyhouse.com" entry into the VirtualHost > > config. > > I missed that - the name in the VirtualHost directive will just be > evaluated as an IP address. To actually identify a named virtual host > the ServerName must match what the client sends the the Host: header. > ServerName can only have one entry. If there are more names this host > should accept you can have a ServerAlias entry with multiple names. If > none of your virtualhost entries have a match and you don't have an > explict default, the first one is used. yeah...I ended up... NameVirtualHost *:80 ServerName www.tobyhouse.com ProxyTimeout 1 ProxyPass / http://cms.tobyhouse.com/ ProxyPassReverse / http://cms.tobyhouse.com/ ServerName srv1.tobyhouse.com DocumentRoot /var/www/html awesome...thanks Les/Stephen - I can now take my time and figure out what we're going to do before I make any DNS changes Craig ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT- Re: ext3 filesystems larger than 8TB
I was basing that on the fact that she had secured Russian citizenship for her children prior to the divorce, but I cannot get the complete details as I just don't have the time these days to follow any story in great length. I still stand behind the idea that it was a case of accidental manslaughter that was attempted to be covered up. Is there a court tv mailing list out there? -Ross - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: CentOS mailing list Sent: Mon May 05 18:24:40 2008 Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT- Re: ext3 filesystems larger than 8TB Ross S. W. Walker wrote: > No doubt! > > The worse part is I don't believe it was premeditated. I think she came > over to drop off the kids and told him oh by the way I'm taking the > children to live with me in Russia, at that point he went into a fit of > anger and threw here against the pillar causing a fatal head injury. > I followed the trial blogs day by day on the SF Chronicle site. His wife was very close to gaining her US medical license (she had been a doctor in Russia), had lined up a good job, and various other indications of planning for a long term life here, nothing indicating any plans to leave for Russia. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos __ This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy or printout thereof. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Way OT Re: OT- Re: ext3 filesystems larger than 8TB
on 5-5-2008 3:24 PM John R Pierce spake the following: Ross S. W. Walker wrote: No doubt! The worse part is I don't believe it was premeditated. I think she came over to drop off the kids and told him oh by the way I'm taking the children to live with me in Russia, at that point he went into a fit of anger and threw here against the pillar causing a fatal head injury. I followed the trial blogs day by day on the SF Chronicle site. His wife was very close to gaining her US medical license (she had been a doctor in Russia), had lined up a good job, and various other indications of planning for a long term life here, nothing indicating any plans to leave for Russia. The fact that he could be convicted with little to no real evidence, but someone like O.J. Simpson could be acquitted with what seemed like a smoking gun still in his hands just shows how money makes the law go away in the US. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Way OT Re: OT- Re: ext3 filesystems larger than 8TB
Ahm, it wasn't money that influenced the OJ case, it was, race, coupled with incompetence on the side of the prosecution. Now if Reiser had kept his mouth shut he might have just been acquitted. He had a good attorney, that attorney gave him sound advise and he chose to ignore it anyways. I also believe if he had confessed to what happened he would have received manslaughter, though after the cover up he would have gotten the max sentence plus obstruction of justice and God knows what else, but still less than first degree. -Ross - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: centos@centos.org Sent: Mon May 05 18:41:10 2008 Subject: [CentOS] Way OT Re: OT- Re: ext3 filesystems larger than 8TB on 5-5-2008 3:24 PM John R Pierce spake the following: > Ross S. W. Walker wrote: >> No doubt! >> >> The worse part is I don't believe it was premeditated. I think she came >> over to drop off the kids and told him oh by the way I'm taking the >> children to live with me in Russia, at that point he went into a fit of >> anger and threw here against the pillar causing a fatal head injury. >> > > I followed the trial blogs day by day on the SF Chronicle site. His > wife was very close to gaining her US medical license (she had been a > doctor in Russia), had lined up a good job, and various other > indications of planning for a long term life here, nothing indicating > any plans to leave for Russia. The fact that he could be convicted with little to no real evidence, but someone like O.J. Simpson could be acquitted with what seemed like a smoking gun still in his hands just shows how money makes the law go away in the US. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't __ This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy or printout thereof. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Watching Netflix movies on CentOS
Rogelio wrote: Has anyone here been able to view Netflix movies on CentOS? (It requires Internet Explorer, and I'm wondering what the workaround is for Firefox) I wonder if IE + Win Media Player under (a recent version of) Wine would be able to play the Netflix on demand movies. -- Florin Andrei http://florin.myip.org/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] httpd reverse proxy
Craig White wrote on Mon, 05 May 2008 14:57:05 -0700: > this is very old-fashioned and unreliable syntax, use this instead: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/vhosts/name-based.html > RedirectPermanent / http://cms.tobyhouse.com > It sent ALL traffic over to the other server which is clearly not what I > want. I don't understand. Isn't that exactly what you want, redirect all traffic for www.tobyhouse.com to cms.tobyhouse.com? > How can handle this? Must I give a unique ip address to > www.tobyhouse.com? Ah, you have several virtual hosts on it and all of them get redirected to cms.tobyhouse.com? That's the result of the wrong virtual host syntax you use. Use name-based virtual hosts and it will work. Why don't you solve this at dns level? Wouldn't that be much "cleaner"? Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] httpd reverse proxy
On Tue, 2008-05-06 at 01:31 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Craig White wrote on Mon, 05 May 2008 14:57:05 -0700: > > > > > this is very old-fashioned and unreliable syntax, use this instead: > http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/vhosts/name-based.html that's what I ended up doing...you took the first message in the thread > > > RedirectPermanent / http://cms.tobyhouse.com > > > It sent ALL traffic over to the other server which is clearly not what I > > want. > > I don't understand. Isn't that exactly what you want, redirect all traffic > for www.tobyhouse.com to cms.tobyhouse.com? > > > How can handle this? Must I give a unique ip address to > > www.tobyhouse.com? > > Ah, you have several virtual hosts on it and all of them get redirected to > cms.tobyhouse.com? That's the result of the wrong virtual host syntax you > use. Use name-based virtual hosts and it will work. > > Why don't you solve this at dns level? Wouldn't that be much "cleaner"? sure - but I needed a way to do this temporarily to demonstrate to bosses who don't always understand these technical issues and to figure out if and how I handle things at the DNS level. Craig ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Postfix+MySQL - how to create DB
Hi All, I'm toying around with Postfix and MySQL on a CentOS 4 server (no longer using stock postfix and mysql rpms, obviously). I've read several "How-TOs", and it all looks fairly easy to do. The one thing that puzzles me is the table structure for the postfix mysql database: where is everyone getting it? Also, I've noticed that some people create more tables than others. But, this looks like it's just based on which bits of postfix people want to put into the database. I can just copy the SQL people have posted to create the tables I want. I'd much rather know if there is an official source for this, though. So far I haven't found it. Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.22.14-72.fc6 i686 GNU/Linux 22:25:36 up 9 days, 16:23, 2 users, load average: 0.29, 0.27, 0.27 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] httpd reverse proxy
Craig White wrote: On Tue, 2008-05-06 at 01:31 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote: Craig White wrote on Mon, 05 May 2008 14:57:05 -0700: this is very old-fashioned and unreliable syntax, use this instead: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/vhosts/name-based.html that's what I ended up doing...you took the first message in the thread RedirectPermanent / http://cms.tobyhouse.com It sent ALL traffic over to the other server which is clearly not what I want. I don't understand. Isn't that exactly what you want, redirect all traffic for www.tobyhouse.com to cms.tobyhouse.com? How can handle this? Must I give a unique ip address to www.tobyhouse.com? Ah, you have several virtual hosts on it and all of them get redirected to cms.tobyhouse.com? That's the result of the wrong virtual host syntax you use. Use name-based virtual hosts and it will work. Why don't you solve this at dns level? Wouldn't that be much "cleaner"? sure - but I needed a way to do this temporarily to demonstrate to bosses who don't always understand these technical issues and to figure out if and how I handle things at the DNS level. Its actually very useful to access backend hosts on private networks or to transparently spread the load across several machines. -- Les Mikesell [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ext3 filesystems larger than 8TB
On Mon, May 05, 2008, Florin Andrei wrote: >Ross S. W. Walker wrote: >> >>jfs is >>supposedly excellent if you have a lot of small files like a >>mail/news server > >Hm, last time I tested ReiseFS turned out to be the best FS for that >situation. But it's been a while, perhaps things have changed a bit. Best only if one ignores the reiserfs' tendency to trash data, particularly on abnormal shutdowns. Bill -- INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC URL: http://www.celestial.com/ PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way Voice: (206) 236-1676 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820 Fax:(206) 232-9186 Ah, you know the type. They like to blame it all on the Jews or the Blacks, 'cause if they couldn't, they'd have to wake up to the fact that life's one big, scary, glorious, complex and ultimately unfathomable crapshoot -- and the only reason THEY can't seem to keep up is they're a bunch of misfits and losers. -- A analysis of Neo-Nazis, from "The Badger" comic ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
