[CentOS] First official release candidate of the com.oonics open shared root cluster installation DVD is available (RC3)
Hello, we are very happy to announce the availability of the first official release candidate of the com.oonics open shared root cluster installation DVD (RC3). The com.oonics open shared root cluster installation DVD allows the installation of a single node open shared root cluster with the use of anaconda, the well known installation software provided by Red Hat. After the installation, the open shared root cluster can be easily scaled up to more than hundred cluster nodes. You can now download the open shared root installation DVD from www.open-sharedroot.org. We are very interested in feetback. Please either file a bug or feature or post to the mailinglist (see www.open-sharedroot.org). More details can be found here: http://www.open-sharedroot.org/news-archive/availability-of-first-beta-of-the-com-oonics-version-of-anaconda. Note: The download isos are based on Centos5.1! Have fun testing it and let us know the outcome. -- Gruss / Regards, Marc Grimme http://www.atix.de/ http://www.open-sharedroot.org/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Move hard disk to a new machine
On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 17:49 -0700, Kenneth Porter wrote: > On Saturday, March 15, 2008 3:41 PM -0400 "William L. Maltby" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Unless it is an LVM volume? OP didn't say much. If so, export the volume > > first, then import it on the target machine. > > For those of us not familiar with the details of LVM, what does the > export/import do? >From "man vgimport": DESCRIPTION vgimport allows you to make a Volume Group that was previously exported using vgexport(8) known to the system again, perhaps after moving its Physical Volumes from a different machine. Essentially, IIUC, vgexport updates the LVM configuration to remove the group from the system. I *guess* it might also put some status information into the descriptors on the volume being removed so that critical information is available when a vgimport is done. I can tell you from first-hand experience that moving the volume without doing this makes for extra work when re-installing, though I can say that it can be done. Again, from first-hand experience. > > I was going to take the 300 GB PATA drive out of an old HP Vectra and move > it to a newer box with more memory, and didn't realize I'd need to do this > step. One of the *few* advantages to not using LVM. Overall, I'd rather use it in most cases. > -- Bill ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: How to prevent installer using disk labels?
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tony Mountifield wrote: > > Is there any way, when installing CentOS (or any RH-based distro), > > to prevent it from using disk labels in /etc/fstab and /boot/grub/grub.conf, > > and to force it to just use the actual device names? > > I dont think there is any sane way, in either the C4 or C5 installers. > If you do find a way to do that, let me know. > > There is presently a conversation going on with the anaconda developers > about dropping labelling completely, but that might be a long time > before we see that in EL / CentOS released distros OK, thanks for the info. > > For testing purposes, I am installing two different CentOS versions in > > different partitions, and am having to change from labels to device names > > by hand, and re-label the disks, in order to avoid the boot process getting > > confused between the filesystems. > > you could always just change fstab, perhaps a sneaky script in %post of > the kickstart to do the hard work for you ? Yes, for now I am just editing fstab and grub.conf by hand, but it might be possible to automate it somehow in a script, using e2label to find the correct device names. Cheers Tony -- Tony Mountifield Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.softins.co.uk Play: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://tony.mountifield.org ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] what is this address meaning?
ann kok wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] network-scripts]# more ifcfg-eth1 # Intel Corporation 82541PI Gigabit Ethernet Controller DEVICE=eth1 HWADDR=00:1B:21:07:A5:94 ONBOOT=yes # BOOTPROTO=dhcp TYPE=Ethernet # BOOTPROTO=dhcp --- Warren Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ann kok wrote: inet addr:0.0.0.6 Bcast:255.255.255.255 What is this address meaning? It means something's misconfigured. Can you post the contents of /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1 ? Do you want this NIC to be on or off ... If you want it off, set ONBOOT=no If you want it on, you will either need to turn on DHCP or assign a static address. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] clarifications
James B. Byrne wrote: Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sam Drinkard wrote: Hello all, I've been trying to get spamassassin and clamav working, but got really confused when I realized there are various incarnations of the software. Originally, I started out with just spamassassin, but learned there is also an SA-milter. Can someone tell me which of the various spam fighting packages i.e., sa, sa-milter, clamav, clamave-milter, and so forth? Welcome to the club. Setting up anti-spam and anti-virus software can be a very tedious process. I tried various approaches over a period of months before hitting upon our current solution. We now use MailScanner to integrate spamassassin and clamav into our sendmail MTA. This seems to be the least burdensome from a maintenance point of view and still provides a useful degree of configurability . postfix + amavisd-new is not hard to setup: http://www.postfix.org/documentation.html http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/README.postfix.html note that both amavisd-new and mailscanner rely on spamassassin for spam filtering (so spamassassin must be installed). The MailScanner people can also point you to a reasonable fee for service organization to assist you in setting things up.. HTH ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Info about the NIC
On Wednesday 19 March 2008, Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 March 2008 08:37:21 Tronn Wærdahl wrote:
...
> > I wounder about RX bytes and TX bytes, what does it mean, how does it
> > collect its data
>
> RX= received, TX = transmitted.
>
> > How often does it zero the counters, every boot, hour or somethings
> > else?. Is the information reliable
>
> As far as I know, it zeros on boot.
On interface-bring-up actually :-) (not that far away).
> And yes, it is reliable.
> However, 'transmitted' will include checksums etc.
Yes, this is bytes on ethernet level, not aware of higher levels (like
tcp/ip).
Also, these counters are wrapping counters (32-bit on i386 (wraps every now
and then), 64-bit on x86_64 ("never" wraps)).
/Peter
> , so won't match exactly
> to a file length. Not an expert explanation, but adequate, I think :-)
>
> Anne
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 37, Issue 8
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can reach the person managing the list at [EMAIL PROTECTED] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2008:0180 Critical CentOS 4 i386 krb5 - security update (Johnny Hughes) 2. CESA-2008:0180 Critical CentOS 4 x86_64 krb5 -security update (Johnny Hughes) -- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 06:48:34 -0500 From: Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0180 Critical CentOS 4 i386 krb5 - security update To: CentOS-Announce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0180 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0180.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: krb5-devel-1.3.4-54.el4_6.1.i386.rpm krb5-libs-1.3.4-54.el4_6.1.i386.rpm krb5-server-1.3.4-54.el4_6.1.i386.rpm krb5-workstation-1.3.4-54.el4_6.1.i386.rpm src: krb5-1.3.4-54.el4_6.1.src.rpm -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 252 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20080320/e192cd82/signature-0001.bin -- Message: 2 Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 06:48:44 -0500 From: Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0180 Critical CentOS 4 x86_64 krb5 - security update To: CentOS-Announce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0180 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0180.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: krb5-devel-1.3.4-54.el4_6.1.x86_64.rpm krb5-libs-1.3.4-54.el4_6.1.i386.rpm krb5-libs-1.3.4-54.el4_6.1.x86_64.rpm krb5-server-1.3.4-54.el4_6.1.x86_64.rpm krb5-workstation-1.3.4-54.el4_6.1.x86_64.rpm src: krb5-1.3.4-54.el4_6.1.src.rpm -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 252 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20080320/41b66e5c/signature-0001.bin -- ___ CentOS-announce mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 37, Issue 8 ** ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Regd: Info about supported Printer for CentOS and RHEL
Dear All, I am searched net info about CentOS and RHEL Supported Printer Details and i am not able to find out the Supported printer details from net. Please can any one send me the supported printer details document or link Regards -S.Balaji ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Regd: Info about supported Printer for CentOS and RHEL
On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 17:39 +0530, Balaji wrote: > Dear All, > >I am searched net info about CentOS and RHEL Supported Printer > Details and i am not able to find out the Supported printer details from > net. >Please can any one send me the supported printer details document or link Generally, there is no printer-specific support in CentOS/RHEL. Usually the print facilities are provided by a package such as CUPS or the traditional LP package. These packages can be searched on the web (google) and their home sites browsed for the information you seek. > > Regards > -S.Balaji > -- Bill ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Regd: Info about supported Printer for CentOS and RHEL
William L. Maltby wrote: > Generally, there is no printer-specific support in CentOS/RHEL. Usually > the print facilities are provided by a package such as CUPS or the > traditional LP package. These packages can be searched on the web > (google) and their home sites browsed for the information you seek. He should rather search for foomatic, because that is the package the printer definitions (drivers, if you want to say so) live in. "The site http://www.linuxprinting.org/ is based on this database." Ralph pgpHb8b55UcM2.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] 0pensource MAPI client for Exchange
Anyone know a good Linux client for Exchange that is MAPI based and not IMAP based? Using Evolution, but going from Outlook/MAPI to this is not fun☺ Thanks! jlc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 0pensource MAPI client for Exchange
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Joseph L. Casale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anyone know a good Linux client for Exchange that is MAPI based and not IMAP > based? Using Evolution, but going from Outlook/MAPI to this is not fun☺ > Thanks! > jlc I've been using Evolution with our Exchange servers and instead of using MAPI, I enabled Outlook OWA (http) and connect that way. You just point Evolution to the URL of your server, usually http://servername/exchange -- -matt ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] 0pensource MAPI client for Exchange
> I've been using Evolution with our Exchange servers and instead of using MAPI, > I enabled Outlook OWA (http) and connect that way. You just point Evolution > to the URL of your server, usually http://servername/exchange > > > -- > -matt I presume that requires FBA not be used? By the look of your url, I take it your <=E2k3. We are on E2k7, I will have to look at disabling FBA if that's the case. Thanks! jlc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Dag Repos
Anyone else experiencing issues with dags repo? I keep getting: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# yum update Setting up Update Process Setting up repositories http://apt.sw.be/redhat/el4/en/x86_64/dag/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno 12] Timeout: Trying other mirror. Cannot open/read repomd.xml file for repository: dag failure: repodata/repomd.xml from dag: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try. Error: failure: repodata/repomd.xml from dag: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] Dag Repos
> Anyone else experiencing issues with dags repo? I keep getting: > Yup, I was hoping to use Dags for a FC8 machine I set up a day ago, as I understand Dag's repo is the best for RHEL/FC, but I had to use rpm.livna.org which as Dags's points out, isn't a friendly mirror IIRC. jlc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Enterprisable IP Camera recording/monitoring software
Anyone have any experiences with this they care to share? Thanks! jlc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Dag Repos
On 20/03/2008, Ed Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Anyone else experiencing issues with dags repo? I keep getting: Yes. I've had to disable the repo today. Alan. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Enterprisable IP Camera recording/monitoring software
On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 09:43 -0600, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > Anyone have any experiences with this they care to share? zoneminder - incredible - flexible - sophisticated http://www.zoneminder.com/ Craig ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Dag Repos
Ed Morrison wrote: Anyone else experiencing issues with dags repo? I keep getting: the master mirror seems down (apt.sw.be), but you can use one of the secondary mirrors ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Enterprisable IP Camera recording/monitoring software
Go to: http://www.axis.com/ pick out and buy the camera that matches your needs. We've been using one of these cameras for a number of years and they work great. We can set up the camera to automatically send image files to a server on a preset schedule and rate. With some home grown scripts, we convert the images to movie files for viewing. We first tried a D-LINK camera before the AXIS, but it just doesn't work well at all and often goes out to lunch for no apparent reason. Hope this helps some. -- Brent L. Bates (UNIX Sys. Admin.) M.S. 912 Phone:(757) 865-1400, x204 NASA Langley Research CenterFAX:(757) 865-8177 Hampton, Virginia 23681-0001 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.vigyan.com/~blbates/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] Enterprisable IP Camera recording/monitoring software
> Go to: > > http://www.axis.com/ > > pick out and buy the camera that matches your needs. We've been using one of > these cameras for a number of years and they work great. We can set up the > camera to automatically send image files to a server on a preset schedule and > rate. With some home grown scripts, we convert the images to movie files for > viewing. > We first tried a D-LINK camera before the AXIS, but it just doesn't work > well at all and often goes out to lunch for no apparent reason. > Hope this helps some. > Yea, I was convinced about Axis already. Zoneminder looks neat, but you use a script to convert to movie files? Care to share that? Thanks! jlc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Enterprisable IP Camera recording/monitoring software
Joseph L. Casale wrote: Anyone have any experiences with this they care to share? Thanks! jlc http://www.mobotix.com and example of use http://www.ilm.ee/~uploader/loodus/?leht=art07engmetsakaamera Cheers, Kari -- Kari Salovaara Hanko, Finland ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] Enterprisable IP Camera recording/monitoring software
On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 10:14 -0600, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > > Go to: > > > > http://www.axis.com/ > > > > pick out and buy the camera that matches your needs. We've been using one > > of > > these cameras for a number of years and they work great. We can set up the > > camera to automatically send image files to a server on a preset schedule > > and > > rate. With some home grown scripts, we convert the images to movie files > > for > > viewing. > > We first tried a D-LINK camera before the AXIS, but it just doesn't > > work > > well at all and often goes out to lunch for no apparent reason. > > Hope this helps some. > > > > Yea, I was convinced about Axis already. Zoneminder looks neat, but you use a > script to convert to movie files? Care to share that? > Thanks! zoneminder is all perl scripts zoneminder is the answer you need Craig ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Enterprisable IP Camera recording/monitoring software
The problem with the script is that it currently only works on SGI's. I haven't had a chance to try and find/build/install Linux/Open Source equivalents. On SGI's, there is one command to take a list of JPEG files and dump out a single Quick Time file. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] Enterprisable IP Camera recording/monitoring software
> The problem with the script is that it currently only works on SGI's. I > haven't had a chance to try and find/build/install Linux/Open Source > equivalents. On SGI's, there is one command to take a list of JPEG files and > dump out a single Quick Time file. No prob. As recommended, I will stick with Zoneminder. I am just primarily concerned with the reliability and uptime of the application. I take it that Zoneminder can run unattended for long periods without issue? Thanks! jlc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] Enterprisable IP Camera recording/monitoring software
On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 10:43 -0600, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > > The problem with the script is that it currently only works on SGI's. > > I > > haven't had a chance to try and find/build/install Linux/Open Source > > equivalents. On SGI's, there is one command to take a list of JPEG files > > and > > dump out a single Quick Time file. > > No prob. As recommended, I will stick with Zoneminder. > I am just primarily concerned with the reliability and uptime of the > application. I take it that Zoneminder can run unattended for long periods > without issue? absolutely but you will have to plan it out because capturing data takes up HUGE chunks of disk space. Zoneminder is brilliant Craig ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] build custom kernel
Hi guys! i followed tutorial for building custom kernel for centos5 http://howtoforge.com/kernel_compilation_centos with lastest kernel downloaded from kernel.org . in menuconfig i used /boot/config-(mycurrentcentoskernel) as a configuration. then i compiled with make rpm. Result was ok, but my kernel was about 400MB of size! :( Next problem was that alltought i we had ip_nat as a module selected in menuconfig, i did not had it, and i was not able to modprobe ip_nat , so my iptables were not working. I am looking for some help and experiences. Probably in thinks like : howto make new kernel for centos to be the most compatible (using /boot/config... probably). The reason why i need this is : - problem with pptpd on x64 centos 5.1 (causes freezing --- found that it is a kernel bug .. still not fixed in rhel - centos :( ) - problem with ath_pci (atheros module) which causes masine freezing after hours of use without any footprints in logs , tested that on fedora 8 this works stable :( Thanks in advance! David ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] build custom kernel
You'll get the huge kernel if you accidentally mark all the modules to be compiled in instead of modularized. Make sure the modules are marked 'M'. Why not just take the latest Fedora 8 kernel SRPM and with rpmbuild build it on CentOS? A lot easier and more reliable then adapting a vanilla kernel. -Ross From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Hlácik Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 4:39 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: [CentOS] build custom kernel Hi guys! i followed tutorial for building custom kernel for centos5 http://howtoforge.com/kernel_compilation_centos with lastest kernel downloaded from kernel.org . in menuconfig i used /boot/config-(mycurrentcentoskernel) as a configuration. then i compiled with make rpm. Result was ok, but my kernel was about 400MB of size! :( Next problem was that alltought i we had ip_nat as a module selected in menuconfig, i did not had it, and i was not able to modprobe ip_nat , so my iptables were not working. I am looking for some help and experiences. Probably in thinks like : howto make new kernel for centos to be the most compatible (using /boot/config... probably). The reason why i need this is : - problem with pptpd on x64 centos 5.1 (causes freezing --- found that it is a kernel bug .. still not fixed in rhel - centos :( ) - problem with ath_pci (atheros module) which causes masine freezing after hours of use without any footprints in logs , tested that on fedora 8 this works stable :( Thanks in advance! David __ This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy or printout thereof. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Un Installing a hard drive in a Centos 5.1 box
>I'm fairly new to Linux and I'm trying to un install a hard drive from my >Centos 5.1 >box running KDE. When I built the PC, I installed two 500 gig maxtors in >the tower, >then I installed Centos. Now I've decided that I want to remove the slave >drive and >use it as an external backup drive - I am mounting it into one of those >external drive cases with a built in fan. > >When I physically removed the drive and restarted the PC, centos would not >boot up and >went into a kernel panic. I'm sure I'm supposed to somehow unmount the >thing before >I do this, and that's my question - how do I un-install the hard drive - >software >wise - so that on next boot up, centos don't go crazy looking for it? run # mount this will show the mounted partitions. find the partitions that are on the second drive and unmount them: # umount /path/to/partition if a service uses them, you'll see an error. you will need to fix the errors until you can unmount them. then comment out these partitions in /etc/fstab. >>> >>>OK this is what I have when I run mount - does it appear that >>>I have both drives on one volume?: >>> >>> >>> /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00 on / >>>type ext3 (rw) >>>proc on /proc type proc (rw) >>>sysfs on /sys type sysfs (rw) >>>devpts on /dev/pts type devpts >>>(rw,gid=5,mode=620) >>>/dev/sda1 on /boot type ext3 (rw) >>>tmpfs on /dev/shm type tmpfs (rw) >>>none on /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc type >>>binfmt_misc (rw) >>>sunrpc on /var/lib/nfs/rpc_pipefs type >>>rpc_pipefs (rw) >> >>If the machine panics at boot time, there is a good chance that you >>installed with LVM and its got both the drives into one volume. You will >>need to reinstall that second harddrive, then work out the process of >>shrinking the filesystem down to only 1 drive, then remove the second >>drive. The scope of this work might be too much for an email, so I can >>best point you at the LVM HowTo. There are also some good lvm tips in >>the CentOS5 docs ( http://www.centos.org/docs/5/ ) >> > >am Astor wrote: >> OK this is what I have when I run mount - does it appear that >> I have both drives on one volume?: >> >> /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00 on / type ext3 (rw) >> >> >>what output to do you get from : >>pvdisplay; vgdisplay; lvdisplay >[root at localhost ~]# pvdisplay; vgdisplay; lvdisplay > --- Physical volume --- > PV Name /dev/sdb1 > VG Name VolGroup00 > PV Size 465.76 GB / not usable 9.50 MB > Allocatable yes (but full) > PE Size (KByte) 32768 > Total PE 14904 > Free PE 0 > Allocated PE 14904 > PV UUID IAmE1f-dCMo-c035-cSQQ-g9yE-6yOo-mfKhHv > > --- Physical volume --- > PV Name /dev/sda2 > VG Name VolGroup00 > PV Size 465.66 GB / not usable 3.56 MB > Allocatable yes (but full) > PE Size (KByte) 32768 > Total PE 14901 > Free PE 0 > Allocated PE 14901 > PV UUID fi5A7U-dao0-ruuP-TSc0-LfFu-7yRL-iKnwGr > > --- Volume group --- > VG Name VolGroup00 > System ID > Format lvm2 > Metadata Areas 2 > Metadata Sequence No 3 > VG Access read/write > VG Status resizable > MAX LV 0 > Cur LV 2 > Open LV 2 > Max PV 0 > Cur PV 2 > Act PV 2 > VG Size 931.41 GB > PE Size 32.00 MB > Total PE 29805 > Alloc PE / Size 29805 / 931.41 GB > Free PE / Size 0 / 0 > VG UUID pwO7bQ-0eRs-W8O4-b4uf-hYe6-JIm6-27p8wu > > --- Logical volume --- > LV Name /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 > VG Name VolGroup00 > LV UUID avhFcY-30N6-2BPz-A89X-Ai0V-v5B7-xxzhIe > LV Write Access read/write > LV Status available > # open 1 > LV Size 929.47 GB > Current LE 29743 > Segments 2 > Allocation inherit > Read ahead sectors 0 > Block device 253:0 > > --- Logical volume --- > LV Name /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol01 > VG Name VolGroup00 > LV UUID ZW2z5f-5x58-0vDI-ru5S-iZge-mVE6-yVp160 > LV Write Access read/write > LV Status available > # open 1 > LV Size 1.94 GB > Current LE 62 > Segments 1 > Allocation inherit > Read ahead sectors 0 > Block device 253:1 > >And... > >[root at localhost ~]# df -h >Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on >/dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00 > 901G 6.7G 848G 1% / >/dev/sda1 99M 18M 76M 20% /boot >tmpfs 1.9G 0 1.9G 0% /dev/shm >[root at localhost ~]# >yup, its all 1 Volume, you are going to need to shrink the lv's - then >get your volgroup onto /dev/sda only. info on howto do that is in the l>vm howto. also, I'd recommend you download the centos-5.1/livecd and >actually do the work once booted from the livecd. shinking filesystems >requires you to have the filesystem unmounted, so doing it from the >livecd is the only way you are going to manage it here. OK when you say livecd, do you mean the Centos 5.1 distro disks? I have a full set of them, a 7 disk set I got from Linux Central. Can I just boot off disk 1 from my set? ...or, if I left the install the way it is now, are there any dis advantages of leaving the file system the way it is - spread over two hard drives? Should just get another hard drive and back it up the way it is? Would ther be any pro
[CentOS] Fwd: ath_pci in modprobe.conf on Centos/Fedora
hi friends, i am sending this to centos mailinglist as i didnt solved problem and guys from madwifi are probably dead, as they are not giving me any reply . Thanks D. -- Forwarded message -- From: David Hláčik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:39 AM Subject: ath_pci in modprobe.conf on Centos/Fedora To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi friends, i am loooking for help as i am unable to solve it by myself Scenario is following : I have two atheros cards, one works as AP (for local wifi network), second one as STA (connection to internet trought 13dB wifi anthena) My current scenario is that i am loading module with autocreate=none i have in modprobe.conf : options ath_pci autocreate=no and then in /etc/rc.local script i will create from wifi0 ap , from wifi1 station and configure other settings (ip adresses and so). What i am trying to do, is to put all configuration to modprobe.conf using install and remove directives What i want as a result is to create during startup and loading module AP from wifi0 (ath0) and STA from wifi1 (ath1) i have tried to put to modprobe.conf : install wifi /sbin/modprobe ath_pci autocreate=none; /usr/local/bin/wlanconfig ath0 create wlandev wifi0 wlanmode ap; /usr/local/bin/wlanconfig ath1 create wlandev wifi1 wlanmode sta remove wifi /sbin/modprobe -r ath_pci next what i want to do is not to load ath_pci module automatically during startup , but to load instead that wifi module , and here comes my problem, how can i do it?? If i try install ath_pci /sbin/modprobe --ignore-install ath_pci; /sbin/modprobe wifi install wifi /sbin/modprobe ath_pci autocreate=none; /usr/local/bin/wlanconfig ath0 create wlandev wifi0 wlanmode ap; /usr/local/bin/wlanconfig ath1 create wlandev wifi1 wlanmode sta remove wifi /sbin/modprobe -r ath_pci It does not work. Thanks in advance! David ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Un Installing a hard drive in a Centos 5.1 box
Pam Astor wrote: > OK when you say livecd, do you mean the Centos 5.1 distro > disks? I have a full set of them, a 7 disk set I got from Linux Central. > Can I just boot off disk 1 from my set? LiveCD as in the livecd: eg : http://mirrors.kernel.org/centos/5.1/isos/i386/CentOS-5.1-i386-LiveCD.iso > ...or, if I left the install the way it is now, are there any dis advantages > of leaving the file > system the way it is - spread over two hard drives? nope, just that if you loose one drive, you loose everything ( potentially ) on the entire filesystem > Should just get another hard drive and back it up the way it is? > Would ther be any problems with my backup if left the way it is? Both those should be fine > > Or ahould I just do a complete re install of the OS after backing up my > data... > > What do you reccomend -leave it as is, re configure it, or re install it? > I'd recommend you spend the time in learning about lvm and resize the filesystem down to one drive, LVM does take about 2 - 3 hours to work out, but once you do work it out - its fantastic and something that makes Linux really worthwhile :D but that is my personal opinion, you should still do whatever you feel like - it is, after all, a free world :D -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] simple DNS question - reverse nslookup fails.
Hello all, I am trying to configure a subdomain DNS server on a Cent OS 5.1 - for my lab. Brief configuration: Lab machine ---> 192.168.17.2 (should respond to DNS queries from hosts in 192.168.16.0/20 network) 1. I would also like to forward any queries outside the above network to our corporate domain (no firewalls between our 192.168.16.x network and the corporate network. The domain server is: dns.company.com with an IP of 10.100.1.2 (255.255.255.0). 2. What I have configured is: 192.168.17.2 --> myhost.lab.company.com 10.100.1.2 --> dns.company.com 3. Installed the dns bind 9 in myhost and set basic configuration via the system-config-bind GUI. My configuration file specific to my setup there is: cat lab.maxiscale.com.db $TTL 1H @ SOA myhost.lab.company.com. root.myhost.lab.company.com. ( 2 3H 1H 1W 1H ) NS myhost.lab.company.com. qaserver2 A 192.168.17.3 qaserver1 A 192.168.17.1 myhost A 192.168.17.2 = The rest of the DNS/Bind records were based upon the auto-generated files from the Bind GUI Config tool. 3. I also changed myhost's resolv.conf to reflect the following: search lab.mycompany.com 192.168.17.2 search mycompany.com 10.100.1.2 == PROBLEM: 1. When I am in myhost.com, I can perform: a. nslookup hostname (to any host within 192.168.x and 10.100.x networks) b. nslookup ip to anyhost wtihin both networks. 2. When I am in one of the hosts within 192.168.x aside from myhost.com (for example, qaserver1 or qaserver2): a: SUCCESS to nslookup hostname to any host within BOTH networks. b. FAILS to nslookup ip (reverse nslookup) to anyhost within the 10.100.x network. this is the error I get: nslookup 10.100.1.2 Server: 192.168.17.2 Address:192.168.17.2#53 Non-authoritative answer: 24.1.100.10.in-addr.arpaname = dns.company.com. Authoritative answers can be found from: . nameserver = e.root-servers.net. . nameserver = f.root-servers.net. . nameserver = g.root-servers.net. . nameserver = h.root-servers.net. . nameserver = i.root-servers.net. . nameserver = j.root-servers.net. . nameserver = k.root-servers.net. . nameserver = l.root-servers.net. . nameserver = m.root-servers.net. . nameserver = a.root-servers.net. . nameserver = b.root-servers.net. . nameserver = c.root-servers.net. . nameserver = d.root-servers.net. a.root-servers.net internet address = 198.41.0.4 b.root-servers.net internet address = 192.228.79.201 c.root-servers.net internet address = 192.33.4.12 d.root-servers.net internet address = 128.8.10.90 e.root-servers.net internet address = 192.203.230.10 f.root-servers.net internet address = 192.5.5.241 g.root-servers.net internet address = 192.112.36.4 h.root-servers.net internet address = 128.63.2.53 i.root-servers.net internet address = 192.36.148.17 j.root-servers.net internet address = 192.58.128.30 k.root-servers.net internet address = 193.0.14.129 k.root-servers.net has address 2001:7fd::1 l.root-servers.net internet address = 199.7.83.42 = I must be missing something stupid and apparent any help would be greatly appreciated!!! :) thanks in advance! -- best, Vince ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Printer drivers
Hello, I see in the repo there are some printer drivers like foomatic and hpijs. I'm just wondering if there are plans to also include hplip in the future? -- Regards Robert Smile... it increases your face value! Linux User #296285 http://counter.li.org ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Printer drivers
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 6:08 PM, Robert Spangler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I see in the repo there are some printer drivers like foomatic and hpijs. > I'm just wondering if there are plans to also include hplip in the future? hplip is included in CentOS-5 but not in CentOS-4. Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
