[CentOS] wireless resourches for RHEL3
Does anybody have any good RHEL3 wireless (802.11) resources? I'm googling and haven't yet found anything good and am hoping someone here can point me in the right direction. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 29, Issue 2
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can reach the person managing the list at [EMAIL PROTECTED] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CentOS 5 i386 Live CD (Johnny Hughes) -- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 05:51:59 -0500 From: Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CentOS 5 i386 Live CD To: CentOS-Announce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" The CentOS Development team is pleased to announce the availability of the CentOS 5 i386 Live CD. This CD is based on our CentOS-5.0 i386 distribution. It can be used as a Workstation, with the following software: OpenOffice.org 2.0.4 Firefox 1.5.0.10 Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 Gaim-2.0.0 Scribus-1.3.3 xchat-2.6.6 k3b-0.12.17 Gimp-2.2.13 It can also be used as a rescue CD with the following tools: 1. Full set of LVM and RAID command line tools 2. QTParted 3. Nmap and NMapFE 4. Graphical Traceroute 5. samba-3.0.23c with cifs kernel support to connect to Windows file shares 6. System Log Viewer 7. GUI Hardware Device Manager The CentOS 5 i386 Live CD is based on the ADIOS Live CD Project: http://os.cqu.edu.au/adios/adk.html This CD has a non writable /usr directory, which means it is not able to have software installed on it after boot up. The CentOS team is working hard to create a Live CD for CentOS 5 that is based on the Fedora Live CD Project (that is writable in all directories and even able to be used for installs) ... unfortunately we were not able to get this working with CentOS 5 for this release. We hope to get that Live CD working by the release of CentOS 5.1. That means that the purposes of this CD are to see if CentOS will boot/work on your hardware, to test some of the features of CentOS as a workstation, and to use as a Rescue CD. It does not contain all the features of the 7 CD CentOS 5 Distribution on one CD :) The CentOS Project would like to thank Patrice Guay ( http://www.nanotechnologies.qc.ca ) for the creation of this CD. Patrice did the Tao Linux live CDs in the past and graciously donated his time and effort to make this one too. You can get the CentOS 5 i386 Live CD from the mirrors listed here: http://isoredirect.centos.org/centos/5/isos/i386/ Filename: CentOS-5.0-i386-LiveCD.iso Size: 711890944 MD5Sum: 67894bd2530c0063baa01ac2e93435b0 SHA1Sum: befbc2bbb7409b84e33a3c19980e48d91f08901b Please see the CentOS specific release notes here: http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.0 detailed upstream release notes here: http://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/release-notes/as-x86/index.html CentOS-5 Documentation is here: http://www.centos.org/docs/5/ To stay current with CentOS: Visit our website at http://www.centos.org/ Join the CentOS mailing list at: http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Catch the Wiki at http://wiki.centos.org Join various team members on IRC at irc.freenode.net #centos Thanks, The CentOS Development Team -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 252 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20070710/51e1142f/signature-0001.bin -- ___ CentOS-announce mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 29, Issue 2 ** ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] kernel-module-drbd <=> kernel-2.6.9-55.0.2
Le Sat, 07 Jul 2007 08:16:24 -0500 Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait: > Martin Hamant wrote: > > Should be clearer now ;) > > > > Martin Hamant a écrit : > >> Hello Johnny, > >> > >> I'm looking for the corresponding kernel-module-drbd package to be > >> able to update some kernel's :) > >> > >> If you have time, of course. > >> > >> Le Tue, 26 Jun 2007 18:50:46 -0500 > >> Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait: > >> > >>> CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0488 > >>> > >>> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0488.html > >>> > >>> The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently > >>> syncing to the mirrors: > >>> > >>> i386: > >>> kernel-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL.i586.rpm > >>> kernel-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL.i686.rpm > >>> kernel-devel-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL.i586.rpm > >>> kernel-devel-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL.i686.rpm > >>> kernel-doc-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL.noarch.rpm > >>> kernel-hugemem-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL.i686.rpm > >>> kernel-hugemem-devel-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL.i686.rpm > >>> kernel-smp-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL.i586.rpm > >>> kernel-smp-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL.i686.rpm > >>> kernel-smp-devel-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL.i586.rpm > >>> kernel-smp-devel-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL.i686.rpm > >>> kernel-xenU-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL.i686.rpm > >>> kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL.i686.rpm > >>> > >>> src: > >>> kernel-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL.src.rpm > > I am working on the CentOSPlus kernel for this now ... and I should > have the plus kernel and all modules (drbd, xfs) done today. Hello Johnny, So the new common name for drbd modules is kmod-drbd... ? Because when i try this: # yum install kmod-drbd-smp.i686 Setting up Install Process Setting up repositories Reading repository metadata in from local files Parsing package install arguments Resolving Dependencies --> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait. ---> Package kmod-drbd-smp.i686 0:0.7.24-1.2.6.9_55.0.2.plus.c4 set to be updated --> Running transaction check --> Processing Dependency: kernel-smp-i686 = 2.6.9-55.0.2.plus.c4 for package: kmod-drbd-smp --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Missing Dependency: kernel-smp-i686 = 2.6.9-55.0.2.plus.c4 is needed by package kmod-drbd-smp Whereas I have a basic EL kernel-smp package installed ? -- Martin Hamant ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] kernel-module-drbd <=> kernel-2.6.9-55.0.2
Martin Hamant wrote: > Le Sat, 07 Jul 2007 08:16:24 -0500 > Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait: > >> Martin Hamant wrote: >>> Should be clearer now ;) >>> >>> Martin Hamant a écrit : Hello Johnny, I'm looking for the corresponding kernel-module-drbd package to be able to update some kernel's :) If you have time, of course. Le Tue, 26 Jun 2007 18:50:46 -0500 Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait: > CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0488 > > https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0488.html > > The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently > syncing to the mirrors: > > i386: > kernel-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL.i586.rpm > kernel-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL.i686.rpm > kernel-devel-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL.i586.rpm > kernel-devel-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL.i686.rpm > kernel-doc-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL.noarch.rpm > kernel-hugemem-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL.i686.rpm > kernel-hugemem-devel-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL.i686.rpm > kernel-smp-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL.i586.rpm > kernel-smp-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL.i686.rpm > kernel-smp-devel-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL.i586.rpm > kernel-smp-devel-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL.i686.rpm > kernel-xenU-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL.i686.rpm > kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL.i686.rpm > > src: > kernel-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL.src.rpm >> I am working on the CentOSPlus kernel for this now ... and I should >> have the plus kernel and all modules (drbd, xfs) done today. > > > Hello Johnny, > > So the new common name for drbd modules is kmod-drbd... ? > > Because when i try this: > > # yum install kmod-drbd-smp.i686 > Setting up Install Process > Setting up repositories > Reading repository metadata in from local files > Parsing package install arguments > Resolving Dependencies > --> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait. > ---> Package kmod-drbd-smp.i686 0:0.7.24-1.2.6.9_55.0.2.plus.c4 set to be > updated > --> Running transaction check > --> Processing Dependency: kernel-smp-i686 = 2.6.9-55.0.2.plus.c4 for > package: kmod-drbd-smp > --> Finished Dependency Resolution > Error: Missing Dependency: kernel-smp-i686 = 2.6.9-55.0.2.plus.c4 is needed > by package kmod-drbd-smp > > Whereas I have a basic EL kernel-smp package installed ? Since both the plus and regular module are in the extras directory (and since plus is GREATER than EL) you will need to add this to the extras section of CentOS-Base.repo exclude=kmod-drbd\*plus\* signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] kernel-module-drbd <=> kernel-2.6.9-55.0.2
Johnny Hughes a écrit : Martin Hamant wrote: Le Sat, 07 Jul 2007 08:16:24 -0500 Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait: Martin Hamant wrote: Should be clearer now ;) Martin Hamant a écrit : Hello Johnny, I'm looking for the corresponding kernel-module-drbd package to be able to update some kernel's :) If you have time, of course. Le Tue, 26 Jun 2007 18:50:46 -0500 Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait: CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0488 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0488.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: kernel-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL.i586.rpm kernel-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL.i686.rpm kernel-devel-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL.i586.rpm kernel-devel-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL.i686.rpm kernel-doc-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL.noarch.rpm kernel-hugemem-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL.i686.rpm kernel-hugemem-devel-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL.i686.rpm kernel-smp-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL.i586.rpm kernel-smp-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL.i686.rpm kernel-smp-devel-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL.i586.rpm kernel-smp-devel-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL.i686.rpm kernel-xenU-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL.i686.rpm kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL.i686.rpm src: kernel-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL.src.rpm I am working on the CentOSPlus kernel for this now ... and I should have the plus kernel and all modules (drbd, xfs) done today. Hello Johnny, So the new common name for drbd modules is kmod-drbd... ? Because when i try this: # yum install kmod-drbd-smp.i686 Setting up Install Process Setting up repositories Reading repository metadata in from local files Parsing package install arguments Resolving Dependencies --> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait. ---> Package kmod-drbd-smp.i686 0:0.7.24-1.2.6.9_55.0.2.plus.c4 set to be updated --> Running transaction check --> Processing Dependency: kernel-smp-i686 = 2.6.9-55.0.2.plus.c4 for package: kmod-drbd-smp --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Missing Dependency: kernel-smp-i686 = 2.6.9-55.0.2.plus.c4 is needed by package kmod-drbd-smp Whereas I have a basic EL kernel-smp package installed ? Since both the plus and regular module are in the extras directory (and since plus is GREATER than EL) you will need to add this to the extras section of CentOS-Base.repo exclude=kmod-drbd\*plus\* Ok thanks ! Do you think it's possible to do an "auto-select" dependence check ? Or why not create a kmod-drbd-smp package and another kmod-drbd-smp-plus ? Plus, when I issue a: # yum list kmod\* kmod-drbd.i686 0.7.24-1.2.6.9_55.0.2. extras kmod-drbd-hugemem.i686 0.7.24-1.2.6.9_55.0.2. extras kmod-drbd-smp.i686 0.7.24-1.2.6.9_55.0.2. extras kmod-drbd-xenU.i686 0.7.24-1.2.6.9_55.0.2. extras There is nothing I can see about "plus" :O With yum search , i got : kmod-drbd-smp.i686 0.7.24-1.2.6.9_55.0.2. extras Matched from: kmod-drbd-smp kmod-drbd-smp.i686 0.7.24-1.2.6.9_55.0.2. extras Matched from: kmod-drbd-smp Same history :( That's just ideas ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] wireless resourches for RHEL3
Rogelio Bastardo wrote: Does anybody have any good RHEL3 wireless (802.11) resources? When was RHEL3? Had we any good wireless stuff then? When was RHEL4? There was quite a bit of effort for wireless starting with FC4. I don't know of anything for earlier bases. I'm googling and haven't yet found anything good and am hoping someone here can point me in the right direction. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] kernel-module-drbd <=> kernel-2.6.9-55.0.2
Martin Hamant wrote: > Johnny Hughes a écrit : >> Martin Hamant wrote: >>> Le Sat, 07 Jul 2007 08:16:24 -0500 >>> Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait: >>> Martin Hamant wrote: > Should be clearer now ;) > > Martin Hamant a écrit : >> Hello Johnny, >> >> I'm looking for the corresponding kernel-module-drbd package to be >> able to update some kernel's :) >> >> If you have time, of course. >> >> Le Tue, 26 Jun 2007 18:50:46 -0500 >> Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait: >> >>> CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0488 >>> >>> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0488.html >>> >>> The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently >>> syncing to the mirrors: >>> >>> i386: >>> kernel-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL.i586.rpm >>> kernel-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL.i686.rpm >>> kernel-devel-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL.i586.rpm >>> kernel-devel-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL.i686.rpm >>> kernel-doc-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL.noarch.rpm >>> kernel-hugemem-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL.i686.rpm >>> kernel-hugemem-devel-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL.i686.rpm >>> kernel-smp-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL.i586.rpm >>> kernel-smp-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL.i686.rpm >>> kernel-smp-devel-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL.i586.rpm >>> kernel-smp-devel-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL.i686.rpm >>> kernel-xenU-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL.i686.rpm >>> kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL.i686.rpm >>> >>> src: >>> kernel-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL.src.rpm I am working on the CentOSPlus kernel for this now ... and I should have the plus kernel and all modules (drbd, xfs) done today. >>> >>> Hello Johnny, >>> >>> So the new common name for drbd modules is kmod-drbd... ? >>> >>> Because when i try this: >>> >>> # yum install kmod-drbd-smp.i686 >>> Setting up Install Process >>> Setting up repositories >>> Reading repository metadata in from local files >>> Parsing package install arguments >>> Resolving Dependencies >>> --> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait. >>> ---> Package kmod-drbd-smp.i686 0:0.7.24-1.2.6.9_55.0.2.plus.c4 set >>> to be updated >>> --> Running transaction check >>> --> Processing Dependency: kernel-smp-i686 = 2.6.9-55.0.2.plus.c4 for >>> package: kmod-drbd-smp >>> --> Finished Dependency Resolution >>> Error: Missing Dependency: kernel-smp-i686 = 2.6.9-55.0.2.plus.c4 is >>> needed by package kmod-drbd-smp >>> >>> Whereas I have a basic EL kernel-smp package installed ? >> >> Since both the plus and regular module are in the extras directory (and >> since plus is GREATER than EL) you will need to add this to the extras >> section of CentOS-Base.repo >> >> exclude=kmod-drbd\*plus\* > > Ok thanks ! > > Do you think it's possible to do an "auto-select" dependence check ? > Or why not create a kmod-drbd-smp package and another kmod-drbd-smp-plus ? > > Plus, when I issue a: > > # yum list kmod\* > kmod-drbd.i686 0.7.24-1.2.6.9_55.0.2. extras > kmod-drbd-hugemem.i686 0.7.24-1.2.6.9_55.0.2. extras > kmod-drbd-smp.i686 0.7.24-1.2.6.9_55.0.2. extras > kmod-drbd-xenU.i686 0.7.24-1.2.6.9_55.0.2. extras > > There is nothing I can see about "plus" :O > > With yum search , i got : > > kmod-drbd-smp.i686 0.7.24-1.2.6.9_55.0.2. extras > Matched from: > kmod-drbd-smp > > > kmod-drbd-smp.i686 0.7.24-1.2.6.9_55.0.2. extras > Matched from: > kmod-drbd-smp > That is because it is too big to fit ... one of this is the plus one, the other is not. I could do any number of things, but the PLUS kernel is by design an upgrade to the regular kernel ... I guess I could move all plus modules to the centos plus area. The exclude should work. Thanks, Johnny Hughes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Postfix and mysql
CentOS doesn't because RHEL doesn't. If you don't like it, take it up with them. :-) CentOS realizes that many people will want this, so they rebuild postfix and put it in centosplus for your convenience (at least they did for 4 - I'm not sure where they are with 5 on this aspect). Ok Matt; I've done it. * download the source RPM. * install it * modify the spec file * rebuild with new spec file. I has been easy, at least in i386 packages (x86_64 packages rebuild processes has failed in mysqlclient library link). -- Thanks, Jordi Espasa Clofent ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Postfix and mysql
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 04:01:23PM +0200, Jordi Espasa Clofent enlightened us: > >CentOS doesn't because RHEL doesn't. If you don't like it, take it up with > >them. :-) CentOS realizes that many people will want this, so they rebuild > >postfix and put it in centosplus for your convenience (at least they did > >for > >4 - I'm not sure where they are with 5 on this aspect). > > Ok Matt; I've done it. > > * download the source RPM. > * install it > * modify the spec file > * rebuild with new spec file. > > I has been easy, at least in i386 packages (x86_64 packages rebuild > processes has failed in mysqlclient library link). 64 bit packages can be weird if you have 32-bit packages installed on the system. I'm glad the process worked for you. Now you can yell at Jim Perrin to update what's in centosplus so you don't have to do it yourself anymore. (You're welcome, Jim) Matt -- Matt Hyclak Department of Mathematics Department of Social Work Ohio University (740) 593-1263 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 4 or 5 for VMware server?
On 7/8/07, Oliver Schulze L. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If you need a certified platform, install centos4 because RHEL5 is not yet certified on vmware-server HTH Oliver WipeOut wrote: > I am soon going to be setting up a box to run VMware server but have > to make the choice between Centos 4.x or 5.x.. I have tested both and > VMware installs in both.. > > So are there any pros or cons to either version or does it make no > difference at all? > > TIA > -- Oliver Schulze L. | http://tinymailto.com/oliver Asuncion - Paraguay | http://www.solojuegos.mobi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos My experisense is that some x.0 release are a bit unmature, and its its wise to wait for a x.1 or x.2 release. I use 4.4 with vmware-server, and it run perfectly, and i dont need any gui. So I'll wait for a x.2 or x.3 release -- "The box said: Requires MS Windows or better, so I installed Linux" ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 4 or 5 for VMware server?
Tronn Wærdahl wrote: If you need a certified platform, install centos4 because RHEL5 is not yet certified on vmware-server My experisense is that some x.0 release are a bit unmature, and its its wise to wait for a x.1 or x.2 release. I use 4.4 with vmware-server, and it run perfectly, and i dont need any gui. So I'll wait for a x.2 or x.3 release But that's not the case for CentOS x.0 releases -- Les Mikesell [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] udev - by-id
Hi, I am trying to set up a CentOS 4 machine with various iSCSI mounts for Oracle, but devices keep on moving around, causing the mounts to fail while called by the sd[a-f] names. We thought about using labels, but, as some of the partitions do not use EXT3, that was discarded, so we thought about using udev and by-id. The problem is that udev does not seem to create the by-id folder or any files within it, while the by-path all get created. The rules file, 51-by-id.rules contains details for the both of them, but the by-id do not get detected, at least the logs don't indicate so. The current contents of the rules file is as follows: KERNEL="dasd*[!0-9]", PROGRAM="/sbin/dasd_id", SYMLINK="disk/by-id/ccw-%c" KERNEL="dasd*[0-9]", PROGRAM="/sbin/dasd_id", SYMLINK="disk/by-id/ccw-%c-part%n" SYMLINK="disk/by-id/scsi-%c" SYMLINK="disk/by-id/scsi-%c-part%n" KERNEL="sd*", PROGRAM="/sbin/path_id", SYMLINK="disk/by-path/%c" KERNEL="hd*", PROGRAM="/sbin/path_id", SYMLINK="disk/by-path/%c" KERNEL="dasd*", PROGRAM="/sbin/path_id", SYMLINK="disk/by-path/%c" KERNEL="sd*", PROGRAM="/sbin/scsi_id", SYMLINK="disk/by-id/scsi-%c" Any help will be appreciated. Thanks Gabriel ___ Yahoo! Mail is the world's favourite email. Don't settle for less, sign up for your free account today http://uk.rd.yahoo.com/evt=44106/*http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/mail/winter07.html ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 4 or 5 for VMware server?
On 7/10/07, Tronn Wærdahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: My experisense is that some x.0 release are a bit unmature, and its its wise to wait for a x.1 or x.2 release. I use 4.4 with vmware-server, and it run perfectly, and i dont need any gui. So I'll wait for a x.2 or x.3 release I am running VMWare Server 1.0.4 on a CentOS 5.0 box with no problems at all. In fact, I have been using my Windows guest on VMWS 1.0.4 to create DVDs from some AVIs I downloaded from the web. Maybe I've just become more comfortable with CentOS over the last few months, but I thik this is a really nice, solid product, and VMWS works fine with it. mhr ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 4 or 5 for VMware server?
Mark Hull-Richter wrote: I am running VMWare Server 1.0.4 on a CentOS 5.0 box with no problems at all. In fact, I have been using my Windows guest on VMWS 1.0.4 to create DVDs from some AVIs I downloaded from the web. Maybe I've just become more comfortable with CentOS over the last few months, but I thik this is a really nice, solid product, and VMWS works fine with it. mhr ___ I did go with CentOS5 because it worked with everything I wanted to have running on the host box.. Where did you get VMware Server 1.0.4? The website only shows 1.0.3.. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 4 or 5 for VMware server?
On 7/10/07, WipeOut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I did go with CentOS5 because it worked with everything I wanted to have running on the host box.. Where did you get VMware Server 1.0.4? The website only shows 1.0.3.. Brain lapse - it is 1.0.3 mhr ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Centos 5 Live CD
I just tried the Centos 5 Live CD on my Thinkpad T41. It works pretty good but did not recognize my Laptop's modem or WiFi (I guess no surprise there). I do have a CardBus modem that is not a Win-modem that I could try when I get home. I did not see anyway to configure a PPP dialup call. Is there a way to run kppp or Gnome's equivalent? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] latest Asterisk on CentOS 5 64 bit ?
I will install CentOS 5 x86_64 on my home server. Among other things, that machine will run Asterisk with an analog card connected to my analog phone line, sort of a home-brewed PBX with VoIP capabilities. The latest Asterisk version as of now is 1.4.7.1 I am trying to find RPM packages for CentOS 5 but so far no luck. The best site so far is this: http://djflux.net/rpms/fedora/6/ It's Fedora 6 so it may recompile on CentOS 5. Anyone else using recent Asterisk versions on CentOS 5 64 bit? Where did you get your packages from? -- Florin Andrei http://florin.myip.org/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] latest Asterisk on CentOS 5 64 bit ?
On 7/10/07, Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I will install CentOS 5 x86_64 on my home server. Among other things, that machine will run Asterisk with an analog card connected to my analog phone line, sort of a home-brewed PBX with VoIP capabilities. The latest Asterisk version as of now is 1.4.7.1 I am trying to find RPM packages for CentOS 5 but so far no luck. The best site so far is this: http://djflux.net/rpms/fedora/6/ It's Fedora 6 so it may recompile on CentOS 5. Anyone else using recent Asterisk versions on CentOS 5 64 bit? Where did you get your packages from? ATrpms has asterisk-1.4.6. Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] SMP motherboard not recognized
I'm having trouble with IBM xseries 345/dual Xeon 2.66GHz showing only one processor. At boot I see "SMP motherboard not recognized". Using title CentOS (2.6.18-8.1.8.el5xen) root (hd0,0) kernel /xen.gz-2.6.18-8.1.8.el5 module /vmlinuz-2.6.18-8.1.8.el5xen ro root=/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 rhgb quiet module /initrd-2.6.18-8.1.8.el5xen.img have tried acpi=no (causes boot-hang), acpi=ht (boot hang), noapic (no effect), and noht (no effect) Booting to gentoo-minimal CDrom shows expected 4 cores (dual HT) with cat /proc/cpuinfo, only 1 using 2.6.18-8.1.8.el5xen Any ideas? many thanks ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
