[CentOS] ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0xB887
Hello, We have recently purchased two Supermicro servers, AS-1021M-T2RB (http://www.supermicro.com/Aplus/system/1U/1021/AS-1021M-T2RV.cfm), and have built them both with CentOS 5 operating system. They are identical, apart from the manufacturer of the disk drives. Kernel is: Linux version 2.6.18-8.1.6.el5 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.1.1 20070105 (Red Hat 4.1.1-52)) #1 SMP Thu Jun 14 17:29:04 EDT 2007 Both servers have 2 SATA disks, and using software RAID 1. When they boot, we see this error in dmesg: ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0xB887 The servers seem to be working OK, but we're a little worried. The full dmsg is below. Is anyone able to help explain what this problem/message could be? Thank you. pcie_portdrv_probe->Dev[0375:10de] has invalid IRQ. Check vendor BIOS assign_interrupt_mode Found MSI capability Allocate Port Service[:00:0e.0:pcie00] PCI: Setting latency timer of device :00:0f.0 to 64 pcie_portdrv_probe->Dev[0377:10de] has invalid IRQ. Check vendor BIOS assign_interrupt_mode Found MSI capability Allocate Port Service[:00:0f.0:pcie00] pci_hotplug: PCI Hot Plug PCI Core version: 0.5 Real Time Clock Driver v1.12ac Non-volatile memory driver v1.2 Linux agpgart interface v0.101 (c) Dave Jones Serial: 8250/16550 driver $Revision: 1.90 $ 4 ports, IRQ sharing enabled serial8250: ttyS0 at I/O 0x3f8 (irq = 4) is a 16550A serial8250: ttyS1 at I/O 0x2f8 (irq = 3) is a 16550A 00:05: ttyS0 at I/O 0x3f8 (irq = 4) is a 16550A 00:06: ttyS1 at I/O 0x2f8 (irq = 3) is a 16550A RAMDISK driver initialized: 16 RAM disks of 16384K size 4096 blocksize Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver Revision: 7.00alpha2 ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx NFORCE-MCP55: IDE controller at PCI slot :00:04.0 NFORCE-MCP55: chipset revision 161 NFORCE-MCP55: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later NFORCE-MCP55: :00:04.0 (rev a1) UDMA133 controller ide0: BM-DMA at 0xffa0-0xffa7, BIOS settings: hda:pio, hdb:DMA Probing IDE interface ide0... hdb: MATSHITADVD-ROM SR-8178, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14 Probing IDE interface ide1... ide-floppy driver 0.99.newide usbcore: registered new driver hiddev usbcore: registered new driver usbhid drivers/usb/input/hid-core.c: v2.6:USB HID core driver PNP: PS/2 Controller [PNP0303:PS2K,PNP0f03:PS2M] at 0x60,0x64 irq 1,12 serio: i8042 AUX port at 0x60,0x64 irq 12 serio: i8042 KBD port at 0x60,0x64 irq 1 mice: PS/2 mouse device common for all mice md: md driver 0.90.3 MAX_MD_DEVS=256, MD_SB_DISKS=27 md: bitmap version 4.39 TCP bic registered Initializing IPsec netlink socket NET: Registered protocol family 1 NET: Registered protocol family 17 powernow-k8: Found 4 Dual-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 2212 processors (version 2.10.00) powernow-k8: MP systems not supported by PSB BIOS structure powernow-k8: MP systems not supported by PSB BIOS structure powernow-k8: MP systems not supported by PSB BIOS structure powernow-k8: MP systems not supported by PSB BIOS structure ACPI: (supports S0 S1 S4 S5) Freeing unused kernel memory: 196k freed Write protecting the kernel read-only data: 460k input: AT Translated Set 2 keyboard as /class/input/input0 USB Universal Host Controller Interface driver v3.0 ohci_hcd: 2005 April 22 USB 1.1 'Open' Host Controller (OHCI) Driver (PCI) ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LUB0] enabled at IRQ 23 GSI 16 sharing vector 0xE9 and IRQ 16 ACPI: PCI Interrupt :00:02.0[A] -> Link [LUB0] -> GSI 23 (level, low) -> IRQ 233 PCI: Setting latency timer of device :00:02.0 to 64 ohci_hcd :00:02.0: OHCI Host Controller ohci_hcd :00:02.0: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 1 ohci_hcd :00:02.0: irq 233, io mem 0xfe9bf000 usb usb1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice hub 1-0:1.0: USB hub found hub 1-0:1.0: 10 ports detected ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LUB2] enabled at IRQ 22 GSI 17 sharing vector 0x32 and IRQ 17 ACPI: PCI Interrupt :00:02.1[B] -> Link [LUB2] -> GSI 22 (level, low) -> IRQ 50 PCI: Setting latency timer of device :00:02.1 to 64 ehci_hcd :00:02.1: EHCI Host Controller ehci_hcd :00:02.1: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 2 ehci_hcd :00:02.1: debug port 1 PCI: cache line size of 64 is not supported by device :00:02.1 ehci_hcd :00:02.1: irq 50, io mem 0xfe9bec00 ehci_hcd :00:02.1: USB 2.0 started, EHCI 1.00, driver 10 Dec 2004 usb usb2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice hub 2-0:1.0: USB hub found hub 2-0:1.0: 10 ports detected md: raid1 personality registered for level 1 SCSI subsystem initialized libata version 2.00 loaded. sata_nv :00:05.0: version 2.0 ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LSA0] enabled at IRQ 21 GSI 18 sharing vector 0x3A and IRQ 18 ACPI: PCI Interrupt :00:05.0[A] -> Link [LSA0] -> GSI 21 (level, low) -> IRQ 58 PCI: Setting latency timer of device :00:05.0 to 64 ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xC480 ctl 0xC402 bmdma 0xBC00 irq 58 ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xC080 ctl 0xC002 bmdma 0xBC08 i
Re: [CentOS] ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0xB887
Seems to be related to the sata ports that you dont have drives connected to :- ata3: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xB880 ctl 0xB802 bmdma 0xB080 irq 66 ata4: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xB480 ctl 0xB402 bmdma 0xB088 irq 66 scsi2 : sata_nv ata3: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300) ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0xB887 scsi3 : sata_nv ata4: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300) ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0xB487 If it was the ports that you have drives on then I would be more worried ... Regards Lance -- uklinux.net - The ISP of choice for the discerning Linux user. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] DTLS for Centos?
I see DTLS being part of OpenSSL 0.9.8: http://crypto.stanford.edu/~nagendra/projects/dtls/dtls.html Which is the version of OpenSSL in Centos 5. But a yum [search|list] dtls comes up empty. Is it 'in there'? Robert Moskowitz wrote: Is DTLS available for Centos? Either Centos 4 or 5. DTLS is TLS over UDP. Highly valued to protect SIP traffic. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] DTLS for Centos?
On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 08:09 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > I see DTLS being part of OpenSSL 0.9.8: > http://crypto.stanford.edu/~nagendra/projects/dtls/dtls.html > > Which is the version of OpenSSL in Centos 5. > > But a yum [search|list] dtls comes up empty. > > Is it 'in there'? [EMAIL PROTECTED] bmcclure]# yum whatprovides dtls Loading "protectbase" plugin Loading "installonlyn" plugin Loading "fastestmirror" plugin Setting up repositories base 100% |=| 1.1 kB 00:00 updates 100% |=| 951 B 00:00 addons100% |=| 951 B 00:00 extras100% |=| 1.1 kB 00:00 Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile Reading repository metadata in from local files 0 packages excluded due to repository protections Importing additional filelist information filelists.xml.gz 100% |=| 3.0 MB 00:32 base : ## 3047/3047 Added 3047 new packages, deleted 0 old in 15.57 seconds filelists.xml.gz 100% |=| 1.2 MB 00:07 updates : ## 552/552 Added 552 new packages, deleted 0 old in 7.60 seconds filelists.xml.gz 100% |=| 150 B 00:00 Added 0 new packages, deleted 0 old in 0.01 seconds filelists.xml.gz 100% |=| 56 kB 00:00 extras: ## 128/128 Added 128 new packages, deleted 0 old in 0.61 seconds openssl-devel.x86_64 0.9.8b-8.3.el5 base Matched from: > Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > Is DTLS available for Centos? Either Centos 4 or 5. > > > > DTLS is TLS over UDP. Highly valued to protect SIP traffic. > > > > > > ___ > > CentOS mailing list > > CentOS@centos.org > > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos CentOS 5.0, Linux 2.6.18-8.1.6.el5 x86_64 07:19:51 up 14:06, 2 users, load average: 0.17, 0.17, 0.08 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0xB887
Lance Davis wrote: > > Seems to be related to the sata ports that you dont have drives > connected to :- > > ata3: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xB880 ctl 0xB802 bmdma 0xB080 irq 66 > ata4: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xB480 ctl 0xB402 bmdma 0xB088 irq 66 > scsi2 : sata_nv > ata3: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300) > ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0xB887 > scsi3 : sata_nv > ata4: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300) > ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0xB487 > > If it was the ports that you have drives on then I would be more worried > ... Ah, I see ;-) thanks for pointing that out Lance! -- Andrew Hearn ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] DTLS for Centos?
B.J. McClure wrote: On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 08:09 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I see DTLS being part of OpenSSL 0.9.8: http://crypto.stanford.edu/~nagendra/projects/dtls/dtls.html Which is the version of OpenSSL in Centos 5. But a yum [search|list] dtls comes up empty. Is it 'in there'? [EMAIL PROTECTED] bmcclure]# yum whatprovides dtls OH, that is the command.. yum whatprovides dtls openssl-devel.i386 0.9.8b-8.3.el5 base Matched from: /usr/include/openssl/dtls1.h thanks. Trixbox 2.4 (beta avail early sept) will be built on Centos 5... Loading "protectbase" plugin Loading "installonlyn" plugin Loading "fastestmirror" plugin Setting up repositories base 100% |=| 1.1 kB 00:00 updates 100% |=| 951 B 00:00 addons100% |=| 951 B 00:00 extras100% |=| 1.1 kB 00:00 Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile Reading repository metadata in from local files 0 packages excluded due to repository protections Importing additional filelist information filelists.xml.gz 100% |=| 3.0 MB 00:32 base : ## 3047/3047 Added 3047 new packages, deleted 0 old in 15.57 seconds filelists.xml.gz 100% |=| 1.2 MB 00:07 updates : ## 552/552 Added 552 new packages, deleted 0 old in 7.60 seconds filelists.xml.gz 100% |=| 150 B 00:00 Added 0 new packages, deleted 0 old in 0.01 seconds filelists.xml.gz 100% |=| 56 kB 00:00 extras: ## 128/128 Added 128 new packages, deleted 0 old in 0.61 seconds openssl-devel.x86_64 0.9.8b-8.3.el5 base Matched from: Robert Moskowitz wrote: Is DTLS available for Centos? Either Centos 4 or 5. DTLS is TLS over UDP. Highly valued to protect SIP traffic. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos CentOS 5.0, Linux 2.6.18-8.1.6.el5 x86_64 07:19:51 up 14:06, 2 users, load average: 0.17, 0.17, 0.08 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Sparc
Debian 4 supports sparc well, has done so for a long time...biggest problem is having to netboot the installer, since most sparc boxes won't get past the initial loader stages booting the kernel, it's some known SILO issue thats been going on for a while. Most distro's seems to falter after an initial release on sparc...and quickly drop the platform. On 7/7/07, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: By chance, has there been any progress on a 5.0 version for an Ultra Sparc? -- Best regards, Chris Registerd Linux user number 448639 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Adam Breaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Sparc
On 7/9/07, Adam Breaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 7/7/07, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > By chance, has there been any progress on a 5.0 version for an Ultra > Sparc? Debian 4 supports sparc well, has done so for a long time...biggest problem is having to netboot the installer, since most sparc boxes won't get past the initial loader stages booting the kernel, it's some known SILO issue thats been going on for a while. Most distro's seems to falter after an initial release on sparc...and quickly drop the platform. aurora sparc linux seems to be still actively developed. I used it a few years ago and it wasn't bad at all. Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0xB887
ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0xB007 ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0xA887 I once had similar error messages, coming from a onboard Promise controler. I contacted Alan Cox - who is a kernel developper - about that and his answer was the following: « ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0xE407 ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0xE607 ATA: abnormal status 0x8 on port 0xE086E31C Probably fine - the code right now is excessively verbose about things it thinks odd. » ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Sparc
Akemi Yagi wrote: On 7/9/07, Adam Breaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 7/7/07, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > By chance, has there been any progress on a 5.0 version for an Ultra > Sparc? Debian 4 supports sparc well, has done so for a long time...biggest problem is having to netboot the installer, since most sparc boxes won't get past the initial loader stages booting the kernel, it's some known SILO issue thats been going on for a while. Most distro's seems to falter after an initial release on sparc...and quickly drop the platform. aurora sparc linux seems to be still actively developed. I used it a few years ago and it wasn't bad at all. Every time I feel like I have the time/energy to install Linux on an old Sparc box, I consider how much energy they use and how (relative to a modern PC) slow they now seem. Pretty amazing when you consider that the E450 that you'd now use to hold down paper once cost more than a luxury car. :) Best, ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Cannot Start CLVMD on second node of cluster
Hi, I'm trying to configure Red Hat GFS but have problems starting CLVMD on the second node of a 3-nodes cluster. I can start ccsd, cman, and fenced successfully, and clvmd on any other nodes first time. - CenOS 4.4 Kernel: 2.6.9-42.0.3.ELsmp [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# cman_tool nodes Node Votes Exp Sts Name 113 M server3 213 M server4 313 M server2 - First Node (able to start clvmd successfully) [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# cman_tool services Service Name GID LID State Code Fence Domain:"default" 1 2 run - [1 2 3] DLM Lock Space: "clvmd" 2 3 update U-4,1,3 [1 3] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# cat /proc/cluster/dlm_debug clvmd move flags 0,1,0 ids 0,3,0 clvmd move use event 3 clvmd recover event 3 (first) clvmd add nodes clvmd total nodes 1 clvmd rebuild resource directory clvmd rebuilt 0 resources clvmd recover event 3 done clvmd move flags 0,0,1 ids 0,3,3 clvmd process held requests clvmd processed 0 requests clvmd recover event 3 finished clvmd move flags 1,0,0 ids 3,3,3 clvmd move flags 0,1,0 ids 3,4,3 clvmd move use event 4 clvmd recover event 4 clvmd add node 3 -- Second Node (forever waiting) [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# cman_tool services Service Name GID LID State Code Fence Domain:"default" 1 2 run - [1 2 3] DLM Lock Space: "clvmd" 2 3 join S-6,20,2 [1 3] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# cat /proc/cluster/dlm_debug clvmd move flags 0,1,0 ids 0,2,0 clvmd move use event 2 clvmd recover event 2 (first) clvmd add nodes -- Any ideas why? Thanks in advance, Bernard Chew IT Operations Engineer ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: kernels with cifs backport (Was: where is smbmount on centOS 5)
On 7/8/07, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here is the updated info.
Steve French (samba team) made available a newer cifs version (1.48)
backported to old kernels:
http://lists.samba.org/archive/linux-cifs-client/2007-April/001898.html
Using this cifs code Jeff Layton (RH) has built some test kernels
after making appropriate adjustment for RHEL:
http://people.redhat.com/jlayton/
FYI.
A list of cifs bugs fixed in the above version (going from 1.45 to 1.48):
+Verison 1.48
+
+Fix mtime bouncing around from local idea of last write times to remote time.
+Fix hang (in i_size_read) when simultaneous size update of same remote file
+on smp system corrupts sequence number. Do not reread unnecessarily
partial page
+(which we are about to overwrite anyway) when writing out file opened rw.
+When DOS attribute of file on non-Unix server's file changes on the server side
+from read-only back to read-write, reflect this change in default file mode
+(we had been leaving a file's mode read-only until the inode were reloaded).
+Allow setting of attribute back to ATTR_NORMAL (removing readonly dos attribute
+when archive dos attribute not set and we are changing mode back to writeable
+on server which does not support the Unix Extensions).
+
+Version 1.47
+
+Fix oops in list_del during mount caused by unaligned string.
+Fix file corruption which could occur on some large file
+copies caused by writepages page i/o completion bug.
+Seek to SEEK_END forces check for update of file size for non-cached
+files.
+
+Version 1.46
+
+Support deep tree mounts. Better support OS/2, Win9x (DOS) time stamps.
+Allow null user to be specified on mount ("username="). Do not return
+EINVAL on readdir when filldir fails due to overwritten blocksize
+(fixes FC problem). Return error in rename 2nd attempt retry (ie report
+if rename by handle also fails, after rename by path fails, we were
+not reporting whether the retry worked or not). Fix NTLMv2 to
+work to Windows servers (mount with option "sec=ntlmv2").
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] yum download with erros pertaining libpurple
On Sun, 2007-07-08 at 18:35 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote: > Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > > Has anyone else had problems with a recent yum download with > > libpurple on an X64 machine? > > whats an X64 machine ? > > > Error: Missing Dependency: libmeanwhile.so.1 is needed by package > > libpurple > > libmeanwhile is provided in the repo.. > > - KB > Thank you for your help!!! Sorry about X64 what I really should have written is that the OS is CentOS-5.0-x86_64-bin-DVD. My thought is that there may be a repository problem in that I have not tried to install anything out of the ordinary other than software related to the repositories I listed. If I try to do a yum install libmeanwhile I get a "Nothing to do" response from yum. but locate does not find any references to libmeanwhile. If I try to do a yum -y install I get : Error: Missing Dependency: libmeanwhile.so.1 is needed by package libpurple This causes me to think that their may be a dependency problem in the repositories for x86_64 operating systems. Does this sound reasonable or are their other things I might need to do on my end? Greg ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] yum download with erros pertaining libpurple
Gregory P. Ennis wrote: If I try to do a yum install libmeanwhile I get a "Nothing to do" response from yum. but locate does not find any references to libmeanwhile. ... If I try to do a yum -y install I get : Error: Missing Dependency: libmeanwhile.so.1 is needed by package libpurple ... This causes me to think that their may be a dependency problem in the repositories for x86_64 operating systems. yes, this is mostly the fallout from bad packaging at redhat's end. what you need to do is perhaps a 'yum clean all; yum --obsoletes update' that should find pidgin and its dep chain. - KB -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] yum download with erros pertaining libpurple
On 7/9/07, Gregory P. Ennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If I try to do a yum -y install I get : Error: Missing Dependency: libmeanwhile.so.1 is needed by package libpurple If you look, you're pulling meanwhile from the rpmforge repo, and the other stuff from the base/updates repos for centos. This causes me to think that their may be a dependency problem in the repositories for x86_64 operating systems. Nope. Mostly you're pulling different versions from different repositories. Does this sound reasonable or are their other things I might need to do on my end? you might try excluding the package from one of the repositories. -- During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act. George Orwell ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] yum download with erros pertaining libpurple
--- "Gregory P. Ennis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 2007-07-08 at 18:35 +0100, Karanbir Singh > wrote: > > Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > > > Has anyone else had problems with a recent yum > download with > > > libpurple on an X64 machine? > > > > whats an X64 machine ? > > > > > Error: Missing Dependency: libmeanwhile.so.1 is > needed by package > > > libpurple > > > > libmeanwhile is provided in the repo.. > > > > - KB > > > > Thank you for your help!!! > > Sorry about X64 what I really should have written is > that the OS is > CentOS-5.0-x86_64-bin-DVD. My thought is that there > may be a repository > problem in that I have not tried to install anything > out of the ordinary > other than software related to the repositories I > listed. > > If I try to do a yum install libmeanwhile I get a > "Nothing to do" > response from yum. but locate does not find any > references to > libmeanwhile. > > If I try to do a yum -y install I get : > Error: Missing Dependency: libmeanwhile.so.1 is > needed by package > libpurple > > This causes me to think that their may be a > dependency problem in the > repositories for x86_64 operating systems. > > Does this sound reasonable or are their other things > I might need to do > on my end? > > Greg > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > i just did this for S&G's and this is what i came up with: meanwhile.x86_64 0.5.0-1.el4.kb kbs-CentOS-Extra Matched from: /usr/lib64/libmeanwhile.so.0 /usr/lib64/libmeanwhile.so.0.0.0 libmeanwhile.so.0()(64bit) but did not see any .1 libs? so i do not think you are losing your mind yet :-) Steven Get your Art Supplies @ www.littleartstore.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Loss of Prompt & Cursor
When I log into a virtual console as ordinary user, I initially have a prompt & cursor. After I print 24 lines or more, the last visible (24th) line will be data instead of the prompt & cursor. The up arrow no longer gives the previous commands. A clear command will restore the prompt & cursor. This bug first appeared after I installed CentOS5. I do not believe it is a CentOS5 bug however because when I boot Ubuntu from a LivePC CDROM, the same thing happens. Any comments/suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks in advance - Bob T. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] yum download with erros pertaining libpurple
On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 12:37 -0400, Jim Perrin wrote: > On 7/9/07, Gregory P. Ennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > If I try to do a yum -y install I get : > > Error: Missing Dependency: libmeanwhile.so.1 is needed by package > > libpurple > > If you look, you're pulling meanwhile from the rpmforge repo, and the > other stuff from the base/updates repos for centos. > > > This causes me to think that their may be a dependency problem in the > > repositories for x86_64 operating systems. > > Nope. Mostly you're pulling different versions from different repositories. > > > Does this sound reasonable or are their other things I might need to do > > on my end? > > you might try excluding the package from one of the repositories. > Thanks for your help... and thanks to Karanbir Singh as well. After I did a "yum clean all" I followed it with a yum --obsoletes update and continued to receive the same error of not finding libmeanwhile. I removed the rpmforge depo and performed another yum clean all followed by yum -y update and everything downloaded without error. Have others had difficulty with rpmforge? Is there a way within yum to keep it active, but to give it a priority as secondary to the normal CentOS repositories? Thanks again for your help Greg ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] yum download with erros pertaining libpurple
Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 12:37 -0400, Jim Perrin wrote: >> On 7/9/07, Gregory P. Ennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> If I try to do a yum -y install I get : >>> Error: Missing Dependency: libmeanwhile.so.1 is needed by package >>> libpurple >> If you look, you're pulling meanwhile from the rpmforge repo, and the >> other stuff from the base/updates repos for centos. >> >>> This causes me to think that their may be a dependency problem in the >>> repositories for x86_64 operating systems. >> Nope. Mostly you're pulling different versions from different repositories. >> >>> Does this sound reasonable or are their other things I might need to do >>> on my end? >> you might try excluding the package from one of the repositories. >> > > Thanks for your help... and thanks to Karanbir Singh as well. > > After I did a "yum clean all" I followed it with a yum --obsoletes > update and continued to receive the same error of not finding > libmeanwhile. > > I removed the rpmforge depo and performed another yum clean all followed > by yum -y update and everything downloaded without error. > > Have others had difficulty with rpmforge? Is there a way within yum to > keep it active, but to give it a priority as secondary to the normal > CentOS repositories? Are you using the yum-fastestmirror and yum-priorities plugins (I highly recommend both)? http://wiki.centos.org/PackageManagement/Yum signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] yum download with erros pertaining libpurple
On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 12:20 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > Are you using the yum-fastestmirror and yum-priorities plugins (I highly > recommend both)? > > I removed RPMforge and these are what is left. Loading "skip-broken" plugin Loading "changelog" plugin Loading "priorities" plugin Loading "allowdowngrade" plugin Loading "fastestmirror" plugin Loading "downloadonly" plugin Loading "installonlyn" plugin Loading "tsflags" plugin Loading "protectbase" plugin Loading "fedorakmod" plugin Loading "kernel-module" plugin Does the priorities plugin give the CentOS repositories priority over RPMforge? Greg ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] yum download with erros pertaining libpurple
Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 12:20 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> Are you using the yum-fastestmirror and yum-priorities plugins (I highly >> recommend both)? >> >> > > I removed RPMforge and these are what is left. > > Loading "skip-broken" plugin > Loading "changelog" plugin > Loading "priorities" plugin > Loading "allowdowngrade" plugin > Loading "fastestmirror" plugin > Loading "downloadonly" plugin > Loading "installonlyn" plugin > Loading "tsflags" plugin > Loading "protectbase" plugin > Loading "fedorakmod" plugin > Loading "kernel-module" plugin > > Does the priorities plugin give the CentOS repositories priority over > RPMforge? Yes it does (when configured) See: http://wiki.centos.org/PackageManagement/Yum/Priorities (You probably don't need all those plugins ... and you do nt want both protectbase and priorities installed at the same time) signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Firefox and CPU spikes?
Is it just me, or does anyone else experience their CPU utilization spiking to 100% for about 5 to 10 seconds when Firefox is about to download a file, via http or ftp? Then, after the file starts to download, the CPU usage drops back down to normal. I've got Firefox 2.0.0.4 running on CentOS 4.4 32-bit. Thanks. Scott ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Firefox and CPU spikes?
Scott Ehrlich wrote: > Is it just me, or does anyone else experience their CPU utilization > spiking to 100% for about 5 to 10 seconds when Firefox is about to > download a file, via http or ftp? Then, after the file starts to > download, the CPU usage drops back down to normal. > > I've got Firefox 2.0.0.4 running on CentOS 4.4 32-bit. > > Thanks. > > Scott > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Hi Scott, I experience the same behavior in FF on Windows and Linux. In fact, the same was with FF 1.5/Win if I recall. I'm running 1.5 on my CentOS 5 box now with no issues, but the same 'first load' or 'download' CPU spike. Hope this helps. Regards, ~Ray ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] Loss of Prompt & Cursor
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Thompson > Sent: Tuesday, 10 July 2007 5:06 a.m. > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: [CentOS] Loss of Prompt & Cursor > > When I log into a virtual console as ordinary user, I > initially have a > prompt & cursor. After I > print 24 lines or more, the last visible (24th) line will be data > instead of the prompt & cursor. The up arrow no longer gives the > previous commands. A clear command will restore the prompt & cursor. > > This bug first appeared after I installed CentOS5. I do not > believe it > is a CentOS5 bug however because when I boot Ubuntu from a > LivePC CDROM, > the same thing happens. > > Any comments/suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks in > advance - Bob T. Use the "size/position" controls of your monitor to shrink and reposition the displayed image (or your monitor may have an auto-adjust feature which can be invoked). My guess is that the 25th line is being displayed, with prompt and cursor etc, but is off the bottom of visible screen area. Craig Miskell === Attention: The information contained in this message and/or attachments from AgResearch Limited is intended only for the persons or entities to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipients is prohibited by AgResearch Limited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately. === ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Sparc
On Monday 09 July 2007 15:57:32 Chris Mauritz wrote: > Akemi Yagi wrote: > > On 7/9/07, Adam Breaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On 7/7/07, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > By chance, has there been any progress on a 5.0 version for an Ultra > >> > Sparc? > >> > >> Debian 4 supports sparc well, has done so for a long time...biggest > >> problem is having to netboot the installer, since most sparc boxes > >> won't get past the initial loader stages booting the kernel, it's some > >> known SILO issue thats been going on for a while. Most distro's seems > >> to falter after an initial release on sparc...and quickly drop the > >> platform. > > > > aurora sparc linux seems to be still actively developed. I used it a > > few years ago and it wasn't bad at all. > > Every time I feel like I have the time/energy to install Linux on an old > Sparc box, I consider how much energy they use and how (relative to a > modern PC) slow they now seem. Pretty amazing when you consider that > the E450 that you'd now use to hold down paper once cost more than a > luxury car. :) > > Best, > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Sorry to hijack this thread. I have got some old Sparc station 5's any one know of an o/s that I can install on them. I would like to learn all about clustering -- Guy Fawkes, the only man to enter the house's of Parliament with honest intentions, (he was going to blow them up!) Registered Linux user number 414240 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] yum download with erros pertaining libpurple
On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 12:44 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 12:20 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > > >> Are you using the yum-fastestmirror and yum-priorities plugins (I highly > >> recommend both)? > >> > >> > > > > I removed RPMforge and these are what is left. > > > > Loading "skip-broken" plugin > > Loading "changelog" plugin > > Loading "priorities" plugin > > Loading "allowdowngrade" plugin > > Loading "fastestmirror" plugin > > Loading "downloadonly" plugin > > Loading "installonlyn" plugin > > Loading "tsflags" plugin > > Loading "protectbase" plugin > > Loading "fedorakmod" plugin > > Loading "kernel-module" plugin > > > > Does the priorities plugin give the CentOS repositories priority over > > RPMforge? > > Yes it does (when configured) > > See: > > http://wiki.centos.org/PackageManagement/Yum/Priorities > > (You probably don't need all those plugins ... and you do nt want both > protectbase and priorities installed at the same time) > > Thank you for the link... very informative!! Is the reason not to have both protectbase and priority installed at the same time related to the obvious that they do similar things? Greg ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] question on kernel compile
I "think" I followed the directions on kernel compile (actually I downloaded 2.6.21.5). did the make oldconfig, did make menuconfig, did my compile and everything is working fine in that regard. My question now is how do I take that kernel configuration and use it for another machine that also needs the 2.6.21.5 kernel. Basically I am trying to save the step of going back into menuconfig and reselecting what I wanted. Thanks, Jerry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Sparc
John Bowden wrote: Sorry to hijack this thread. I have got some old Sparc station 5's any one know of an o/s that I can install on them. I would like to learn all about clustering SS5 or Sun Ultra 5 ? the SS5 is way WAY old (discontinued in 1996), 70Mhz and used oddball memory, 8 x 8MB (64MB total) or 8 x 32MB (256MB total maximum), and used SBus peripherals, you'd be better off with pentium-II systems. clusters generally need multiple network adapters at the very least. The Ultra 5 is somewhat newer, with a 270-400MHz ultrasparc IIi and support for up to 512MB ram,, but was penalized (heavily!) by using a programmed IO IDE channel controller (no DMA). It also requires nonstandard RAM (EDO DRAM with ECC in a 168 pin jedec form factor), very hard to find. anyways, I think you'd have better luck trying to bring up a test cluster using old x86 PCs. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: hardware for a test cluster setup
John R Pierce wrote: Sorry to hijack this thread. I have got some old Sparc station 5's any one know of an o/s that I can install on them. I would like to learn all about clustering anyways, I think you'd have better luck trying to bring up a test cluster using old x86 PCs. or just a bunch of VM's on your laptop :) - KB -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Sparc
On 7/7/07, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: By chance, has there been any progress on a 5.0 version for an Ultra Sparc? At this point, I do not know of any effort towards a Sparc version. The problems in getting usable documentation and determined developers. I would probably look at Debian for your best support chances... they hopefully have enough interested developers towards that platform. I dealt with Sparc a while back... and while it is a beauty in someways.. the various models and chipsets are more propietary than an iPhone. -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- CSIRT/Linux System Administrator How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice" ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Sparc
On Monday 09 July 2007 22:41:04 John R Pierce wrote: > John Bowden wrote: > > Sorry to hijack this thread. I have got some old Sparc station 5's any > > one know of an o/s that I can install on them. I would like to learn all > > about clustering > > SS5 or Sun Ultra 5 ? > > the SS5 is way WAY old (discontinued in 1996), 70Mhz and used oddball > memory, 8 x 8MB (64MB total) or 8 x 32MB (256MB total maximum), and used > SBus peripherals, you'd be better off with pentium-II systems. > clusters generally need multiple network adapters at the very least. Yes exactly what I have, with massive 520Mb hard drives ;-) The architecture is completely new to me > > The Ultra 5 is somewhat newer, with a 270-400MHz ultrasparc IIi and > support for up to 512MB ram,, but was penalized (heavily!) by using a > programmed IO IDE channel controller (no DMA). It also requires > nonstandard RAM (EDO DRAM with ECC in a 168 pin jedec form factor), very > hard to find. > > > anyways, I think you'd have better luck trying to bring up a test > cluster using old x86 PCs. > > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos I think I will get rid of them as I have some old 333mhz boards. thanks for the reply. I will hand back the thread now -- Guy Fawkes, the only man to enter the house's of Parliament with honest intentions, (he was going to blow them up!) Registered Linux user number 414240 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: hardware for a test cluster setup
On Monday 09 July 2007 22:47:05 Karanbir Singh wrote: > John R Pierce wrote: > >> Sorry to hijack this thread. I have got some old Sparc station 5's any > >> one know of an o/s that I can install on them. I would like to learn > >> all about clustering > > > > anyways, I think you'd have better luck trying to bring up a test > > cluster using old x86 PCs. > > or just a bunch of VM's on your laptop :) > > - KB Actually I never thought of taking this route. I have a tower with an AMD 3ghz ht cpu in it just trying to sort out the sound card chip on it at the moment. Thanks for the idea, I will hand back the thread now. -- Guy Fawkes, the only man to enter the house's of Parliament with honest intentions, (he was going to blow them up!) Registered Linux user number 414240 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] question on kernel compile
Jerry Geis wrote: > I "think" I followed the directions on kernel compile (actually I > downloaded 2.6.21.5). > did the make oldconfig, did make menuconfig, did my compile and > everything is working fine > in that regard. > > My question now is how do I take that kernel configuration and use it > for another machine > that also needs the 2.6.21.5 kernel. Basically I am trying to save the > step of going back into > menuconfig and reselecting what I wanted. > > Thanks, > > Jerry If you saved that config file somewhere, copy it into the kernel directory as .config and run "make oldconfig". Then you can run "make menuconfig" to validate that things are as you expect. If you did not save the .config file after you ran "make menuconfig" before, then you will have to do it again. Thanks, Johnny Hughes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Loss of Prompt & Cursor
Miskell, Craig wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Thompson Sent: Tuesday, 10 July 2007 5:06 a.m. To: CentOS mailing list Subject: [CentOS] Loss of Prompt & Cursor When I log into a virtual console as ordinary user, I initially have a prompt & cursor. After I print 24 lines or more, the last visible (24th) line will be data instead of the prompt & cursor. The up arrow no longer gives the previous commands. A clear command will restore the prompt & cursor. This bug first appeared after I installed CentOS5. I do not believe it is a CentOS5 bug however because when I boot Ubuntu from a LivePC CDROM, the same thing happens. Any comments/suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks in advance - Bob T. Use the "size/position" controls of your monitor to shrink and reposition the displayed image (or your monitor may have an auto-adjust feature which can be invoked). My guess is that the 25th line is being displayed, with prompt and cursor etc, but is off the bottom of visible screen area. Craig Miskell === Attention: The information contained in this message and/or attachments from AgResearch Limited is intended only for the persons or entities to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipients is prohibited by AgResearch Limited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately. === ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Craig: Thanks for suggestion. I have a Samsung SyncMaster 171v flat screen monitor. It does not have the "old fashion" controls, but does have an "auto adjust" which did the trick. Bob T. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] bind issue on centos 5 (SOLVED)
Hi everyone,
Finally, I got it solved.
The issue was my named.conf file. pls see below.
zone "example77.com " IN {
type master;
file "master/example77.com.zone";
};
The below error happened
Jul 5 15:50:32 gateway named[3548]: master/example77.com.zone:11:
example77.com\032: bad owner name (check-names)
in the above zone line, between example.com , double quotes should be
included. But trailing double quotes was with a ONE SPACE.
I rectified as follows.
zone "example77.com" IN {
type master;
file "master/example77.com.zone";
};
Thanks, EVERYONE.
On 7/7/07, Robert Spangler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu July 5 2007 06:29, Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] master]# cat example77.com.zone
> $TTL86400
> @ IN SOA gateway.example77.com. root.example77.com. (
> 2006101604 ; Serial
> 1800 ; Refresh
> 300; Retry
> 36 ; Expire
> 86400 ); Minimum
>
> NS gateway.example77.com.
>
> MX 10 gateway.example77.com.
> MX 20 mail.example77.com.
>
> A 192.168.0.3
>
> gateway A192.168.0.3
> mailA 192.168.0.2
>
>
> But, I still get the same error. pls see below.
>
> Jul 5 15:50:32 gateway named[3548]: master/example77.com.zone:11:
> example77.com\032: bad owner name (check-names)
This error is telling you that the error is in line 11.
The error as some have already told you is the space.
Sorry I didn't get back to you sooner.
--
Regards
Robert
Smile... it increases your face value!
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
--
Thank you
Indunil Jayasooriya
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
