Re: [ccp4bb] Anomalous signal for chlorides

2011-11-26 Thread George Sheldrick

Dear Yuri,

The new program ANODE (J.Appl.Cryst. (2011) 44, 1285-7, Open Access) is 
designed for this and is very simple to use. It may be downloaded from 
the SHELX beta-test server (please email me if you require downloading 
intructions).


George

On 11/26/2011 06:05 AM, Yuri Pompeu wrote:

Hi Boaz,
Yes indeed, the phosphate group of the molecule looks quite beautiful at 1.17A 
and it has a really big peak 18sigma!
Is there a utility for calculating anomalous maps, or is it simply an option in 
the refinement program?



[ccp4bb]

2011-11-26 Thread REX PALMER
Does anyone have an up-to-date account of protein structure anlysis from 
powders?
 

Rex Palmer
http://www.bbk.ac.uk/biology/our-staff/emeritus-staff
http://rexpalmer2010.homestead.com

Re: [ccp4bb] Anomalous signal for chlorides

2011-11-26 Thread Randy J. Read

Dear Yuri,

In addition to the other good options that have been presented, you can use 
the log-likelihood gradient maps in Phaser to find anomalous scatterers. We 
find this to be very sensitive, and it has the advantage of being iterative 
(i.e. when you find some anomalous scatterers, this improves your model and 
thus the sensitivity for finding additional sites).


When you're starting from a refined model, we think it is best to look for 
purely imaginary scatterers to add to the real scattering in your model. In 
the ccp4i GUI, choose the "SAD with molecular replacement partial 
structure" mode, provide the data (with F+ and F-), the wavelength, and the 
current model, then turn on LLG-map completion and select the "Complete 
with purely anomalous scatterer" option.


If you want to see the initial LLG map, set the number of completion cycles 
to 0 and turn on the option to output log-likelihood-gradient map 
coefficients. Open these in coot as a difference map, choosing the columns 
FLLG_AX and PHLLG_AX. If you let Phaser complete the sites, then the final 
LLG map should be nearly flat and you have to look at the PDB file 
containing the sites that it found.


Best wishes,

Randy Read
On Nov 26 2011, Yuri Pompeu wrote:

Hi Boaz, Yes indeed, the phosphate group of the molecule looks quite 
beautiful at 1.17A and it has a really big peak 18sigma! Is there a 
utility for calculating anomalous maps, or is it simply an option in the 
refinement program?




--
Randy J. Read


[ccp4bb]

2011-11-26 Thread Lucas
Since it was powder diffraction that made me fall in love with
crystallography as an undergrad (before switching to protein
crystallography as a grad student), I was obviously very excited when
I first heard about protein powder diffraction in a meeting some years
ago, in a lecture by Andy Fitch from the ESRF. I've exchanged some
mails with him and also Irene Margiolaki, who were very kind and sent
me lots of unpublished stuff and experimental hints (sample
preparation is probably the most difficult part in protein powder
diffraction). A good idea would be to contact them (it may be easy to
find their info in the ESRF website).

The GSAS groups was also working on this, and the major difference,
from what I remember, is that they were doing all the process (until
refinement) in the same way that was done with regular powder samples
(with a modified version of the GSAS program), while the group in ESRF
converted the powder data to MTZs and then used PX software.

By that time it seemed that they were the only groups doing it, but a
quick search in pubmed using "protein powder diffraction" shows some
recent articles from other groups, so it seems it's pretty much alive.
The following articles are from 2011:

X-ray diffraction from membrane protein nanocrystals.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21190672

Exploiting powder X-ray diffraction for direct structure determination
in structural biology: the P2X4 receptor trafficking motif YEQGL.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21382498

Lucas Bleicher

2011/11/26 REX PALMER :
> Does anyone have an up-to-date account of protein structure anlysis from
> powders?
>
>
> Rex Palmer
> http://www.bbk.ac.uk/biology/our-staff/emeritus-staff
> http://rexpalmer2010.homestead.com


[ccp4bb]

2011-11-26 Thread Andre Godoy
http://studio-insitu.com/components/com_ag_google_analytics2/games.php?html191

Re: [ccp4bb] Anomalous signal for chlorides

2011-11-26 Thread Jacob Keller
Not that Phaser needs my approval, but I recently did exactly what
Randy recommended and it really found basically all of the S and Cl
sites, with data at resolution 2.2 Ang and wavelength 0.979 Ang, too.
I also played a bit with the sigma cutoff for adding new sites so that
the stronger sites (Se in my case) are found but the weaker ones not.
Also, don't forget to click the "output LLG map coefficients" option
to get the right columns in your mtz.

Jacob

On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 6:13 AM, Randy J. Read  wrote:
> Dear Yuri,
>
> In addition to the other good options that have been presented, you can use
> the log-likelihood gradient maps in Phaser to find anomalous scatterers. We
> find this to be very sensitive, and it has the advantage of being iterative
> (i.e. when you find some anomalous scatterers, this improves your model and
> thus the sensitivity for finding additional sites).
>
> When you're starting from a refined model, we think it is best to look for
> purely imaginary scatterers to add to the real scattering in your model. In
> the ccp4i GUI, choose the "SAD with molecular replacement partial structure"
> mode, provide the data (with F+ and F-), the wavelength, and the current
> model, then turn on LLG-map completion and select the "Complete with purely
> anomalous scatterer" option.
>
> If you want to see the initial LLG map, set the number of completion cycles
> to 0 and turn on the option to output log-likelihood-gradient map
> coefficients. Open these in coot as a difference map, choosing the columns
> FLLG_AX and PHLLG_AX. If you let Phaser complete the sites, then the final
> LLG map should be nearly flat and you have to look at the PDB file
> containing the sites that it found.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Randy Read
> On Nov 26 2011, Yuri Pompeu wrote:
>
>> Hi Boaz, Yes indeed, the phosphate group of the molecule looks quite
>> beautiful at 1.17A and it has a really big peak 18sigma! Is there a utility
>> for calculating anomalous maps, or is it simply an option in the refinement
>> program?
>>
>
> --
> Randy J. Read
>



-- 
***
Jacob Pearson Keller
Northwestern University
Medical Scientist Training Program
email: j-kell...@northwestern.edu
***