[hudson] Hudson speaks Japanese

2009-09-03 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi,

I was looking at some recent test failures in the Jackrabbit-trunk job
in Hudson, and noticed that the test status messages were in Japanese.
See:

http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Jackrabbit-trunk/org.apache.jackrabbit$jackrabbit-core/818/testReport/org.apache.jackrabbit.test.api.query/SQLJoinTest/

The status column says "リグレッション", which means "Regression".

I wonder when our Hudson instance started speaking Japanese! :-)

BR,

Jukka Zitting


Fwd: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: HttpComponents - HttpComponents Client -

2009-09-03 Thread sebb
The cause for the HC build failures is as follows:

The plugin 'com.atlassian.maven.plugins:maven-clover2-plugin' does not
exist or no valid version could be found

However, as far as I can tell, that used to work - anyone have any
clues as to what is wrong here?

-- Forwarded message --
From: contin...@vmbuild.apache.org 
Date: 3 Sep 2009 21:27
Subject: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: HttpComponents - HttpComponents Client -
To: comm...@hc.apache.org


Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=210355&projectId=353

 Build statistics:
  State: Failed
  Previous State: Failed
  Started at: Thu 3 Sep 2009 13:26:33 -0700
  Finished at: Thu 3 Sep 2009 13:26:49 -0700
  Total time: 15s
  Build Trigger: Schedule
  Build Number: 129
  Exit code: 1
  Building machine hostname: vmbuild.apache.org
  Operating system : Linux(unknown)
  Java Home version :
  java version "1.5.0_12"
  Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_12-b04)
  Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.5.0_12-b04, mixed mode, sharing)

  Builder version :
  Maven version: 2.0.9
  Java version: 1.5.0_12
  OS name: "linux" version: "2.6.24-23-server" arch: "i386"
Family: "unix"

 
 SCM Changes:
 
 Changed: no author @ no date
 Comment: no comment
 Files changed:
  RELEASE_NOTES.txt ( no revision )
  httpclient/src/test/java/org/apache/http/impl/client/TestContentCodings.java
( no revision )
  
httpclient/src/main/java/org/apache/http/impl/client/ContentEncodingProcessor.java
( no revision )
  
httpclient/src/main/java/org/apache/http/impl/client/DeflateDecompressingEntity.java
( no revision )
  
httpclient/src/main/java/org/apache/http/impl/client/GzipDecompressingEntity.java
( no revision )

 
 Dependencies Changes:
 
 No dependencies changed


 
 Build Definition:
 
 POM filename: pom.xml
 Goals: clean install
 Arguments: --batch-mode
 Build Fresh: false
 Always Build: false
 Default Build Definition: true
 Schedule: DEFAULT_SCHEDULE
 Profile Name: Java 5
 Description:

 
 Test Summary:
 
 Tests: 0
 Failures: 0
 Errors: 0
 Total time: 0.0


Re: Move builds off of Hudson master

2009-09-03 Thread Nigel Daley
New yahoo.net Hudson slaves are now hooked up and related Hadoop  
builds have been moved to these slaves.  This frees up vesta for any  
other builds.  I'll follow up with another email on moving builds to  
vesta and off the master.


Cheers,
Nige

On Jul 17, 2009, at 12:17 PM, Nigel Daley wrote:

FWIW, I'm still working on getting the yahoo.net machines properly  
imaged.  Hoping to have them when I get back from vacation week of  
July 27.


Nige

On Jul 17, 2009, at 9:15 AM, Justin Mason wrote:


On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 18:36, Nigel Daley wrote:

Folks,

I'd really like to move builds off the Hudson master.  Here's a  
proposal:


1) We move the Hadoop related builds (Common, HDFS, Mapreduce, Pig,
ZooKeeper, Hive, HBase, Chukwa, Avro) off to some other machines  
(see 4

below)

2) That would free up minerva and vesta as Ubuntu build slaves for  
all the

other projects (which should be more than enough capacity).

3) We get permission to use the current lucene.zones slave as a  
Solaris
build slave for those projects that really want a Solaris build  
(how many is

that I wonder?)

4) We add a bunch more Ubuntu slaves to hudson.zones out of a pool  
of
publicly IP'd yahoo.net machines my employer has for Hadoop  
related builds.


So -- what's the situation with this proposal?

I'm all in favour.  I've been monitoring Hudson closely for the  
past 2

weeks, and it's clear that it's over-capacity. Even with the limiting
band-aids I've been putting in place to control overlong builds,  
right
now, the build queue has 8 pending builds waiting for a free  
executor,

and that's been pretty much the normal situation.  It needs more
machines.

Paul, are you still -1?

--j.



Cheers,
Nige


On Jun 30, 2009, at 6:17 AM, Justin Mason wrote:


On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 13:46, sebb wrote:


On 30/06/2009, Jukka Zitting  wrote:


Hi,

Another Tuscany-2x build [1] was stuck with lots of OOM errors  
and
other failures in the console log. I killed the build as it was  
taking
already almost 7 hours, which is much more than the 40 minutes  
used by

the last successful build.

[1] http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Tuscany-2x/116/


It looked to me as though the build was stalled, i.e. Hudson was  
not
able to detect/recover from the situation. Is this a known  
problem?


Is there any way to give the builds a bit more memory?

It looks like Tuscany has not built successfully for a long  
while, so

this is likely to keep happening.

It's a pity that the console output does not have time-stamps,  
or it

would be a lot easier to tell that nothing was happening.


It could be the entire machine was under memory pressure, given  
those

OOM errors.  I wonder if that caused the Hudson master to get
confused.

--j.







--
--j.