bug#75041: [PATCH] doc/srfi-64: Fix typos and add examples.

2025-01-24 Thread lloda


Applied in f109baebc005952a58726ee80b56bc5ef291af92. 

Thanks







bug#74841: [PATCH v2] srfi-19: Fix ~V converter in date->string.

2025-01-24 Thread Tomas Volf
The ~V is supposed to print ISO week number, not a week number.  This
commit fixes that.

* module/srfi/srfi-19.scm (date-week-number-iso): New procedure taken
from the reference implementation.
(directives)<#\V>: Use it.
* test-suite/tests/srfi-19.test ("date->string ~V"): Add tests taken
from the reference test suite.
* doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi (SRFI-19 Date to string): Mention ISO-8601
in description for ~V.
---
 doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi |  4 +--
 module/srfi/srfi-19.scm   | 24 +-
 test-suite/tests/srfi-19.test | 60 +--
 3 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi b/doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi
index f072e6c3f..0b663902e 100644
--- a/doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi
+++ b/doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi
@@ -2864,8 +2864,8 @@ with locale decimal point, eg.@: @samp{5.2}
 @item @nicode{~T} @tab time, 24 hour clock, @samp{~H:~M:~S}
 @item @nicode{~U} @tab week of year, Sunday first day of week,
 @samp{00} to @samp{52}
-@item @nicode{~V} @tab week of year, Monday first day of week,
-@samp{01} to @samp{53}
+@item @nicode{~V} @tab ISO 8601 week number of the year,
+Monday first day of week, @samp{01} to @samp{53}
 @item @nicode{~w} @tab day of week, 0 for Sunday, @samp{0} to @samp{6}
 @item @nicode{~W} @tab week of year, Monday first day of week,
 @samp{00} to @samp{52}
diff --git a/module/srfi/srfi-19.scm b/module/srfi/srfi-19.scm
index d809ac1ec..7ab0ad6dd 100644
--- a/module/srfi/srfi-19.scm
+++ b/module/srfi/srfi-19.scm
@@ -753,6 +753,28 @@
  (days-before-first-week  date day-of-week-starting-week))
   7))
 
+;;; Taken from the reference implementation.  Modified to fit Guile's
+;;; code style.
+(define (date-week-number-iso date)
+  "Return a ISO-8601 week number for the @var{date}."
+  ;; The week with the year's first Thursday is week 01.
+  (let* ((first-day-of-the-week (week-day 1 1 (date-year date)))
+ (offset (if (> first-day-of-the-week 4) 0 1))
+ ;; -2: decrement one day to compensate 1-origin of date-year-day,
+ ;; and decrement one more day for Sunday belongs to the previous week.
+ (w (+ (floor-quotient (+ (date-year-day date) first-day-of-the-week 
-2)
+   7)
+   offset)))
+(cond ((zero? w)
+   ;; date belongs to the last week of the previous year
+   (date-week-number-iso (make-date 0 0 0 0 31 12
+(- (date-year date) 1) 0)))
+  ((and (= w 53)
+(<= (week-day 1 1 (+ (date-year date) 1)) 4))
+   ;; date belongs to the first week of the next year
+   1)
+  (else w
+
 (define (current-date . tz-offset)
   (let ((time (current-time time-utc)))
 (time-utc->date
@@ -1043,7 +1065,7 @@
(display (padding (date-week-number date 0)
  #\0 2) port
(cons #\V (lambda (date pad-with port)
-   (display (padding (date-week-number date 1)
+   (display (padding (date-week-number-iso date)
  #\0 2) port)))
(cons #\w (lambda (date pad-with port)
(display (date-week-day date) port)))
diff --git a/test-suite/tests/srfi-19.test b/test-suite/tests/srfi-19.test
index 55eb82320..3cacff669 100644
--- a/test-suite/tests/srfi-19.test
+++ b/test-suite/tests/srfi-19.test
@@ -26,7 +26,8 @@
   #:use-module (test-suite lib)
   #:use-module (srfi srfi-1)
   #:use-module (srfi srfi-19)
-  #:use-module (ice-9 format))
+  #:use-module (ice-9 format)
+  #:use-module (ice-9 match))
 
 ;; Make sure we use the default locale.
 (when (defined? 'setlocale)
@@ -412,7 +413,62 @@ incomplete numerical tower implementation.)"
   (with-test-prefix "date-week-number"
 (pass-if (= 0 (date-week-number (make-date 0 0 0 0 1 1 1984 0) 0)))
 (pass-if (= 0 (date-week-number (make-date 0 0 0 0 7 1 1984 0) 0)))
-(pass-if (= 1 (date-week-number (make-date 0 0 0 0 8 1 1984 0) 0)
+(pass-if (= 1 (date-week-number (make-date 0 0 0 0 8 1 1984 0) 0
+
+  (let ((convert (match-lambda
+   ((y m d)
+(date->string (make-date 0 0 0 0 d m y 0)
+  "~V")
+;; The test cases are taken from the test suite for the reference
+;; implementation.
+(with-test-prefix "date->string ~V"
+  (pass-if-equal "Thursday, week 53" "53"
+(convert '(2020 12 31)))
+  (pass-if-equal "Friday, week 53 (previous year)" "53"
+(convert '(2021 1 1)))
+  (pass-if-equal "Sunday, week 53 (previous year)" "53"
+(convert '(2021 1 3)))
+  (pass-if-equal "Monday, week 1" "01"
+(convert '(2021 1 4)))
+
+  (pass-if-equal "Sunday, week 52" "52"
+(convert '(2019 12 29)))
+  (pass-if-equal "Monday, week 1 (next year)" "01"
+(convert '(2019 12 30)))
+  (pass-if-equal "Tuesday, week 1 (ne

bug#74841: [PATCH] srfi-19: Fix ~V converter in date->string.

2025-01-24 Thread Tomas Volf
Ludovic Courtès  writes:

> Hi,
>
> Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> skribis:
>
>> The ~V is supposed to print ISO week number, not a week number.  This
>> commit fixes that.
>>
>> * module/srfi/srfi-19.scm (date-week-number-iso): New procedure taken
>> from the reference implementation.
>> (directives)<#\V>: Use it.
>> * test-suite/tests/srfi-19.test ("date->string ~V"): Add tests taken
>> from the reference test suite.
>
> The manual just reads this:
>
>  ~U week of year, Sunday first day of week, ‘00’ to
> ‘52’
>  ~V week of year, Monday first day of week, ‘01’ to
> ‘53’
>
> Should it be fixed or clarified?

Definitely, updated to reference the ISO-8601.

>
>> +(define (date-week-number-iso date)
>
> Please add a docstring.

Done.

>
>> +  (let ((convert (λ (lst)
>> +   (date->string
>> +(make-date 0 0 0 0
>> +   (caddr lst) (cadr lst) (car lst)
>
> Please use ‘match-lambda’.

Yeah that is much nicer.

>
>> +(with-test-prefix "date->string ~V"
>> +  (pass-if-equal "Thursday, week 53" "53"
>
> If these are from the SRFI-19 spec, could you add a comment to say so?

Good point, done.

>
> Thanks,
> Ludo’.

--
There are only two hard things in Computer Science:
cache invalidation, naming things and off-by-one errors.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


bug#75041: closed (Re: [PATCH] doc/srfi-64: Fix typos and add examples.)

2025-01-24 Thread Maxim Cournoyer
Hello,

[...]

> From: lloda 
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc/srfi-64: Fix typos and add examples.
> To: 75041-d...@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 19:29:17 +0100 (6 hours, 47 minutes, 1 second ago)
>
>
> Applied in f109baebc005952a58726ee80b56bc5ef291af92. 

Excellent, thank you!

-- 
Maxim





bug#75078: Guile 3.0.10 fails to build for i686 cygwin

2025-01-24 Thread Rob Browning
Jeremy Drake via "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension
Language"  writes:

> I don't know if I'll go with that or just wait for 3.0.11 though.

In case it's useful, here's what I ended up doing for Debian for now, to
get 3.0.10 back into unstable:

  
https://salsa.debian.org/rlb/deb-guile/-/tree/ee0cb057e1d5108a0eb144bd57a025149c0b5695/debian/patches

More specifically with respect to 32-bit, the patches merged here
(perhaps easier to see in gitk or git log --graph):

  
https://salsa.debian.org/rlb/deb-guile/-/commit/7564af161f3bb61578d767ff54a13398907c1e22

Hope this helps
-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4