bug#75506: Broken links in Guile Reference Manual
Hello and thanks for this amazing work! It's clearly not that important, but there are some broken links in the Guile Reference Manual (e.g, here 6.18.6 https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/R6RS-Version-References.html) towards the R6RS library form, pointing there: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/r6rs_html/Library-form.html#Library-form which gives a 404. Anyway, thanks again for Guile! Lizzie
bug#49404: Cross module inlining causes unbound make-struct/no-tail ref
Rob Browning writes: > This commit casuses lokke's compilation to fail: > > commit fd5cb457fb3a450b4b14eb89c8dbd764ba8df52e > Date: Mon Apr 5 20:58:03 2021 +0200 > > Implement cross-module inlining > > * module/language/tree-il/optimize.scm (make-optimizer): Pass > cross-module-inlining? to peval. > * module/language/tree-il/peval.scm (peval): Add cross-module-inlining? > kwarg. Try to inline public module-ref. > > The failure looks like this (after applying the patch mentioned in > https://debbugs.gnu.org/49305 so we can get past the #nil issue): [...] > ice-9/boot-9.scm:1685:16: In procedure raise-exception: > Unbound variable: make-struct/no-tail I suspect this has been fixedq and I can no longer reproduce it -- though I'm not certain lokke didn't also change in some relevant way. In any case, I'll close it for now and we can re-open it if necessary. I also suspect this may have been related: commit d01ab7bf5cb97264b48bec96469360f1901d1a35 Author: Andy Wingo Date: Mon Jan 17 21:07:22 2022 +0100 Fix inlinable-exports bug for pure modules * module/language/tree-il/inlinable-exports.scm (compute-decoder): Fix bug in which inlinable exports in a pure module would have a missing make-struct/no-tail binding. Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
bug#49305: Regression regarding #nil in syntax expansions in 3.0.7
Rob Browning writes: > In 3.0.7, this: > > (define-syntax foo > (syntax-rules () > ((_ x) (eq? #nil x > > (foo #t) > > began crashing like this: > > ice-9/psyntax.scm:2795:12: In procedure syntax-violation: > Syntax error: > unknown location: unexpected syntax in form () I believe this has been fixed. Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
bug#39586: pfds 0.3 hamt-fold crashes with guile-2.0 and guile-3.0
Rob Browning writes: > (hamts/hamt-fold (lambda (k v result) result) For the record, the full invocation should have been: (hamts/hamt-fold (lambda (k v result) result) #t x) In any case, it looks like this has been fixed in main (not sure when). Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
bug#32384: Bug#892232: guile-2.2: FTBFS on alpha: test-conversion fails
Ludovic Courtès writes: > I’m afraid there’s not much we can do. Unless someone with access to > an Alpha machine can debug the issue, I’d close it as “wontfix”. > > WDYT? I don't have access to a porterbox in Debian anymore either, and the port is no longer officially supported: https://www.debian.org/ports/alpha/ (Though it is still active on the buildds: https://buildd.debian.org/guile-3.0.) In any case, I'd be fine closing it +wontfix. Could always re-open it if were to become a priority again somehow. Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
bug#21181: SRFI-64: Possible bug in test-group
Andy Wingo writes: > On Mon 03 Aug 2015 06:29, Rob Browning writes: >> I'm not that familiar with srfi-64, but it looks like the problem (if >> it's not expected) is that test-group doesn't handle the case where it's >> creating the first group, i.e. no prior test-begin. > Mark, do you have any thoughts on this one? This appears to be fixed in at least main, presumably by the recent srfi-64 work. Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
bug#21424: guile-2.0: SIGALRM signal handler does not get called when guile blocks on I/O
Rob Browning writes: > This appears to still be the case with at least Debian's 2.0.11+1-10 > package, and setting the handler to something that doesn't perform IO > has the same effect (i.e. no alarm until you hit return): > > (sigaction SIGALRM (lambda (x) (exit 1))) Just checked -- still true with 3.0.9. Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
