bug#23120: cp with --dereference (-L) and --link (-l) or --symbolic-link (-s)

2016-03-26 Thread Petr Skočík
Hi,

I'm on a system with cp 8.21, and when I do `cp -Ll` or `cp -Ls` on a
symlink, it hardlinks (-Ll) or symlinks (-Ls) the symlink instead of the
target of the symlink.

It behaves the same on single files and trees (with `-r`).

I think the logical thing to do would be for to `cp` to symlink or
hardlink the symlink target in these cases.

What do you think?

Best regards,
Petr.

(
My particular use case is that I'd like to turn a part of an augmented
tree of symlinks (created with `cp -s` + additional file creation on top
of that) into a tree of hardlinks to the sources.
)






bug#23121: Wrong translation in stty

2016-03-26 Thread Roland Illig
Hello,

in coreutils-8.25, src/stty.c, line 955, the string "" is selected for
translation. This is wrong, since the empty string has a special
meaning: it outputs general information about the translation. You can
see it by running "stty --help", which outputs "Last-Translator", among
other information.

This string should therefore be left untranslated.

Greetings,
Roland





bug#23121: Wrong translation in stty

2016-03-26 Thread Pádraig Brady

forcemerge 22758 22686 23121

stop

On 26/03/16 11:38, Roland Illig wrote:

Hello,

in coreutils-8.25, src/stty.c, line 955, the string "" is selected for
translation. This is wrong, since the empty string has a special
meaning: it outputs general information about the translation. You can
see it by running "stty --help", which outputs "Last-Translator", among
other information.

This string should therefore be left untranslated.


Already fixed.

thanks,
Pádraig






bug#23120: cp with --dereference (-L) and --link (-l) or --symbolic-link (-s)

2016-03-26 Thread Pádraig Brady

unarchive 15173
stop

On 26/03/16 10:36, Petr Skočík wrote:

Hi,

I'm on a system with cp 8.21, and when I do `cp -Ll` or `cp -Ls` on a
symlink, it hardlinks (-Ll) or symlinks (-Ls) the symlink instead of the
target of the symlink.

It behaves the same on single files and trees (with `-r`).

I think the logical thing to do would be for to `cp` to symlink or
hardlink the symlink target in these cases.

What do you think?

Best regards,
Petr.

(
My particular use case is that I'd like to turn a part of an augmented
tree of symlinks (created with `cp -s` + additional file creation on top
of that) into a tree of hardlinks to the sources.
)


The -Ll hardlink case was fixed in 8.22 with a bit of
an epic discussion in http://bugs.gnu.org/15173

The -Ls symlink case currently just symlinks the source symlink.
To link the target you'd have to do similar processing to that
done in `ln -r` and `realpath ...`.  I've not thought about it
enough to know if it was a good idea to add to cp.
There may be enough options for symlink handling to keep
those options in separate tools like discussed in the
--relative option description in the ln manual:
http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/ln

cheers,
Pádraig.