[Bug gprofng/29987] bfd/archive.c:1447: undefined reference to `filename_ncmp'
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29987 Jan-Benedict Glaw changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jbg...@lug-owl.de -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/29987] bfd/archive.c:1447: undefined reference to `filename_ncmp'
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29987 --- Comment #5 from Jan-Benedict Glaw --- I do regular builds (own build strategy and a hacked build-many-glibcs.py to allow for HEAD versions) and the later started to fail since this commit: /bin/bash ../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=link g++ -Wall -pthread -Wno-switch -g -O2 -o gp-archive gp-archive.o ArchiveExp.o libgprofng.la -L../../zlib -lz libtool: link: g++ -Wall -pthread -Wno-switch -g -O2 -o gp-archive gp-archive.o ArchiveExp.o ./.libs/libgprofng.a /var/lib/laminar/run/glibcbot-x86_64-linux-gnu/5/build/compilers/x86_64-linux-gnu/binutils/opcodes/.libs/libopcodes.a -lpthread -ldl -L/var/lib/laminar/run/glibcbot-x86_64-linux-gnu/5/build/compilers/x86_64-linux-gnu/binutils/zlib -lz -pthread /usr/bin/ld: /var/lib/laminar/run/glibcbot-x86_64-linux-gnu/5/build/compilers/x86_64-linux-gnu/binutils/opcodes/.libs/libopcodes.a(i386-dis.o): warning: relocation against `_sch_istable' in read-only section `.text' /usr/bin/ld: ./.libs/libgprofng.a(Elf.o): in function `Elf::elf_init()': /var/lib/laminar/run/glibcbot-x86_64-linux-gnu/5/src/binutils/gprofng/src/Elf.cc:142: undefined reference to `bfd_init' /usr/bin/ld: ./.libs/libgprofng.a(Elf.o): in function `Elf::~Elf()': /var/lib/laminar/run/glibcbot-x86_64-linux-gnu/5/src/binutils/gprofng/src/Elf.cc:274: undefined reference to `bfd_close' /usr/bin/ld: ./.libs/libgprofng.a(Elf.o): in function `Elf::Elf(char*)': /var/lib/laminar/run/glibcbot-x86_64-linux-gnu/5/src/binutils/gprofng/src/Elf.cc:159: undefined reference to `bfd_openr' /usr/bin/ld: /var/lib/laminar/run/glibcbot-x86_64-linux-gnu/5/src/binutils/gprofng/src/Elf.cc:165: undefined reference to `bfd_check_format' /usr/bin/ld: /var/lib/laminar/run/glibcbot-x86_64-linux-gnu/5/src/binutils/gprofng/src/Elf.cc:175: undefined reference to `bfd_close' /usr/bin/ld: /var/lib/laminar/run/glibcbot-x86_64-linux-gnu/5/src/binutils/gprofng/src/Elf.cc:167: undefined reference to `bfd_close' /usr/bin/ld: ./.libs/libgprofng.a(Function.o): in function `Function::set_name(char*)': /var/lib/laminar/run/glibcbot-x86_64-linux-gnu/5/src/binutils/gprofng/src/Function.cc:218: undefined reference to `cplus_demangle' /usr/bin/ld: ./.libs/libgprofng.a(CompCom.o): in function `CompComment::get_demangle_name(char*)': /var/lib/laminar/run/glibcbot-x86_64-linux-gnu/5/src/binutils/gprofng/src/CompCom.cc:109: undefined reference to `cplus_demangle' /usr/bin/ld: /var/lib/laminar/run/glibcbot-x86_64-linux-gnu/5/src/binutils/gprofng/src/CompCom.cc:109: undefined reference to `cplus_demangle' /usr/bin/ld: /var/lib/laminar/run/glibcbot-x86_64-linux-gnu/5/src/binutils/gprofng/src/CompCom.cc:109: undefined reference to `cplus_demangle' /usr/bin/ld: /var/lib/laminar/run/glibcbot-x86_64-linux-gnu/5/src/binutils/gprofng/src/CompCom.cc:109: undefined reference to `cplus_demangle' /usr/bin/ld: ./.libs/libgprofng.a(dbe_collctrl.o): in function `Coll_Ctrl::find_sig(char const*)': /var/lib/laminar/run/glibcbot-x86_64-linux-gnu/5/src/binutils/gprofng/src/collctrl.cc:2345: undefined reference to `strtosigno' /usr/bin/ld: /var/lib/laminar/run/glibcbot-x86_64-linux-gnu/5/build/compilers/x86_64-linux-gnu/binutils/opcodes/.libs/libopcodes.a(i386-dis.o): in function `i386_dis_printf': /var/lib/laminar/run/glibcbot-x86_64-linux-gnu/5/src/binutils/opcodes/i386-dis.c:9615: undefined reference to `_sch_istable' /usr/bin/ld: /var/lib/laminar/run/glibcbot-x86_64-linux-gnu/5/build/compilers/x86_64-linux-gnu/binutils/opcodes/.libs/libopcodes.a(i386-dis.o): in function `putop': /var/lib/laminar/run/glibcbot-x86_64-linux-gnu/5/src/binutils/opcodes/i386-dis.c:10645: undefined reference to `_sch_istable' /usr/bin/ld: /var/lib/laminar/run/glibcbot-x86_64-linux-gnu/5/src/binutils/opcodes/i386-dis.c:10778: undefined reference to `_sch_istable' /usr/bin/ld: /var/lib/laminar/run/glibcbot-x86_64-linux-gnu/5/build/compilers/x86_64-linux-gnu/binutils/opcodes/.libs/libopcodes.a(disassemble.o): in function `remove_whitespace_and_extra_commas': /var/lib/laminar/run/glibcbot-x86_64-linux-gnu/5/src/binutils/opcodes/disassemble.c:821: undefined reference to `_sch_istable' /usr/bin/ld: /var/lib/laminar/run/glibcbot-x86_64-linux-gnu/5/src/binutils/opcodes/disassemble.c:829: undefined reference to `_sch_istable' /usr/bin/ld: /var/lib/laminar/run/glibcbot-x86_64-linux-gnu/5/build/compilers/x86_64-linux-gnu/binutils/opcodes/.libs/libopcodes.a(disassemble.o): in function `opcodes_assert': /var/lib/laminar/run/glibcbot-x86_64-linux-gnu/5/src/binutils/opcodes/disassemble.c:876: undefined reference to `_bfd_error_handler' /usr/bin/ld: /var/lib/laminar/run/glibcbot-x86_64-linux-gnu/5/src/binutils/opcodes/disassemble.c:877: undefined reference to `_bfd_error_handler' /usr/bin/ld: warning: creating DT_TEXTREL in a PIE collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status make[6]: *** [Makefile:724: gp-archive] Error 1 make[6]: Leaving directory '/var/lib/laminar/run/glibcbot-x86_64-linux-gnu/5/build/compilers/x86_64-linux-gnu/binutils/gprofng/sr
[Bug gprofng/29987] bfd/archive.c:1447: undefined reference to `filename_ncmp'
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29987 --- Comment #6 from Jan-Benedict Glaw --- Just ftr: The build-many-glibcs.py script does the equivalent of: /var/cache/git/binutils-gdb/configure '--prefix=/tmp/b/i' \ '--build=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu' \ '--host=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu' \ '--target=x86_64-glibc-linux-gnu' \ '--with-sysroot=/tmp/b/i/sysroot' \ --disable-gdb \ --disable-gdbserver \ --disable-libdecnumber \ --disable-readline \ --disable-sim make (Pathes shortened here, but that's a working example.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/29987] bfd/archive.c:1447: undefined reference to `filename_ncmp'
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29987 --- Comment #7 from Jan-Benedict Glaw --- Build is currently restored by reverting the initial patch. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/30197] New: gas: Error: bad value (sr71k) for default CPU
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30197 Bug ID: 30197 Summary: gas: Error: bad value (sr71k) for default CPU Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: jbg...@lug-owl.de Target Milestone: --- Hi! While mass-building toolchains, I came across --target=mipsisa64sr71k-elf. Binutils/gas built and are in $PATH for a GCC build, which fails (full log at http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/laminar/jobs/gcc-mipsisa64sr71k-elf/36) while building Modula-2 stuff: [all 2023-03-05 08:13:26] echo "GM2_FOR_TARGET /var/lib/laminar/run/gcc-mipsisa64sr71k-elf/36/toolchain-build/./gcc/gm2 -B/var/lib/laminar/run/gcc-mipsisa64sr71k-elf/36/toolchain-build/./gcc/ " [all 2023-03-05 08:13:26] GM2_FOR_TARGET /var/lib/laminar/run/gcc-mipsisa64sr71k-elf/36/toolchain-build/./gcc/gm2 -B/var/lib/laminar/run/gcc-mipsisa64sr71k-elf/36/toolchain-build/./gcc/ [all 2023-03-05 08:13:26] echo "GCC_FOR_TARGET /var/lib/laminar/run/gcc-mipsisa64sr71k-elf/36/toolchain-build/./gcc/xgcc -B/var/lib/laminar/run/gcc-mipsisa64sr71k-elf/36/toolchain-build/./gcc/ " [all 2023-03-05 08:13:26] GCC_FOR_TARGET /var/lib/laminar/run/gcc-mipsisa64sr71k-elf/36/toolchain-build/./gcc/xgcc -B/var/lib/laminar/run/gcc-mipsisa64sr71k-elf/36/toolchain-build/./gcc/ [all 2023-03-05 08:13:26] /bin/bash ../../gcc/gcc/m2/tools-src/makeSystem -fpim \ [all 2023-03-05 08:13:26] ../../gcc/gcc/m2/gm2-libs/SYSTEM.def \ [all 2023-03-05 08:13:26] ../../gcc/gcc/m2/gm2-libs/SYSTEM.mod \ [all 2023-03-05 08:13:26] -I../../gcc/gcc/m2/gm2-libs \ [all 2023-03-05 08:13:26] "/var/lib/laminar/run/gcc-mipsisa64sr71k-elf/36/toolchain-build/./gcc/gm2 -B/var/lib/laminar/run/gcc-mipsisa64sr71k-elf/36/toolchain-build/./gcc/ " /var/lib/laminar/run/gcc-mipsisa64sr71k-elf/36/toolchain-build/gcc/m2/gm2-libs/SYSTEM.def [all 2023-03-05 08:13:27] Assembler messages: [all 2023-03-05 08:13:27] Error: bad value (sr71k) for default CPU [all 2023-03-05 08:13:27] Internal error in mips_after_parse_args at config/tc-mips.c:15291. [all 2023-03-05 08:13:27] Please report this bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/30197] gas: Error: bad value (sr71k) for default CPU
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30197 Jan-Benedict Glaw changed: What|Removed |Added Target||mipsisa64sr71k-elf Version|unspecified |2.41 (HEAD) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30568] --dependency-file includes temporary LTO files
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30568 Jan-Benedict Glaw changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jbg...@lug-owl.de --- Comment #5 from Jan-Benedict Glaw --- While this patch works for most targets, it breaks for --target=alpha-dec-vms and --target=alpha64-dec-vms (the latter is a bit of an odd one, but listed in config-list.mk nonetheless). See eg. http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/laminar/jobs/binutils-alpha-dec-vms/39 : [all 2023-07-05 16:20:23] /var/lib/laminar/run/binutils-alpha-dec-vms/39/local-toolchain-install/bin/gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I../bfd -I./../bfd -I./../include -I./../zlib -g -O2 -DLOCALEDIR="\"/tmp/binutils-alpha-dec-vms/share/locale\"" -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wshadow -Wstack-usage=262144 -Werror -DELF_LIST_OPTIONS=false -DELF_SHLIB_LIST_OPTIONS=false -DELF_PLT_UNWIND_LIST_OPTIONS=false -g -O2 -MT ldfile.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/ldfile.Tpo -c -o ldfile.o \ [all 2023-07-05 16:20:23] -DSCRIPTDIR='"/tmp/binutils-alpha-dec-vms/alpha-dec-vms/lib"' -DBINDIR='"/tmp/binutils-alpha-dec-vms/bin"' -DTOOLBINDIR='"/tmp/binutils-alpha-dec-vms/alpha-dec-vms/bin"' \ [all 2023-07-05 16:20:23] ./ldfile.c [all 2023-07-05 16:20:24] ./ldfile.c: In function 'ldfile_try_open_bfd': [all 2023-07-05 16:20:24] ./ldfile.c:356:20: error: 'struct lang_input_statement_flags' has no member named 'lto_output' [all 2023-07-05 16:20:24] 356 | if (!entry->flags.lto_output) [all 2023-07-05 16:20:24] |^ [all 2023-07-05 16:20:24] make[3]: *** [Makefile:2311: ldfile.o] Error 1 [all 2023-07-05 16:20:24] make[3]: Leaving directory '/var/lib/laminar/run/binutils-alpha-dec-vms/39/binutils-gdb/ld' [all 2023-07-05 16:20:24] make[2]: *** [Makefile:1881: all-recursive] Error 1 [all 2023-07-05 16:20:24] make[2]: Leaving directory '/var/lib/laminar/run/binutils-alpha-dec-vms/39/binutils-gdb/ld' [all 2023-07-05 16:20:24] make[1]: *** [Makefile:1077: all] Error 2 [all 2023-07-05 16:20:24] make[1]: Leaving directory '/var/lib/laminar/run/binutils-alpha-dec-vms/39/binutils-gdb/ld' [all 2023-07-05 16:20:24] make: *** [Makefile:8162: all-ld] Error 2 So this needs a `#if BFD_SUPPORTS_PLUGINS` (cf. ldlang.h) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30568] --dependency-file includes temporary LTO files
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30568 --- Comment #6 from Jan-Benedict Glaw --- Slowly showing up on other builds as well: i686-pc-msdosdjgpp (http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/laminar/jobs/binutils-i686-pc-msdosdjgpp/38) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30568] --dependency-file includes temporary LTO files
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30568 --- Comment #8 from Jan-Benedict Glaw --- That fixes the intermediate build issue, thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/28910] GNU-ld: ARM: Issues when trying to set target output architecture
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28910 Jan-Benedict Glaw changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jbg...@lug-owl.de --- Comment #18 from Jan-Benedict Glaw --- This patch somehow has side effects: Since this commit, using a cross compiler to build the Linux parisc or some sh kernels fails: http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/laminar/jobs/linux-parisc-generic-32bit_defconfig/36 + log_execute 'mk all' ionice --class Idle make V=1 CROSS32_COMPILE=hppa-linux- ARCH=parisc CROSS_COMPILE=hppa-linux- INSTALL_MOD_PATH=/var/lib/laminar/run/linux-parisc-generic-32bit_defconfig/36/linux-parisc-generic-32bit_defconfig INSTALL_DTBS_PATH=/var/lib/laminar/run/linux-parisc-generic-32bit_defconfig/36/linux-parisc-generic-32bit_defconfig all [...] [mk all 2023-11-10 19:49:33] # OBJCOPY arch/parisc/boot/compressed/vmlinux.bin [mk all 2023-11-10 19:49:33] hppa-linux-objcopy -R .comment -R .note -S vmlinux arch/parisc/boot/compressed/vmlinux.bin [mk all 2023-11-10 19:49:33] # GZIP arch/parisc/boot/compressed/vmlinux.bin.gz [mk all 2023-11-10 19:49:33] cat arch/parisc/boot/compressed/vmlinux.bin | gzip -n -f -9 > arch/parisc/boot/compressed/vmlinux.bin.gz [mk all 2023-11-10 19:49:34] # LD arch/parisc/boot/compressed/piggy.o [mk all 2023-11-10 19:49:34] hppa-linux-ld -z noexecstack --no-warn-rwx-segments -r --format binary --oformat elf32-hppa-linux -T arch/parisc/boot/compressed/vmlinux.scr arch/parisc/boot/compressed/vmlinux.bin.gz -o arch/parisc/boot/compressed/piggy.o [mk all 2023-11-10 19:49:34] hppa-linux-ld: Error: unable to disambiguate: --format (did you mean ---format ?) [mk all 2023-11-10 19:49:34] make[3]: *** [arch/parisc/boot/compressed/Makefile:75: arch/parisc/boot/compressed/piggy.o] Error 1 [mk all 2023-11-10 19:49:34] make[2]: *** [arch/parisc/boot/Makefile:17: arch/parisc/boot/compressed/vmlinux] Error 2 [mk all 2023-11-10 19:49:34] make[1]: *** [arch/parisc/Makefile:161: bzImage] Error 2 [mk all 2023-11-10 19:49:34] make: *** [Makefile:234: __sub-make] Error 2 http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/laminar/jobs/linux-sh-microdev_defconfig/37 + log_execute 'mk all' ionice --class Idle make V=1 ARCH=sh CROSS_COMPILE=sh-linux- INSTALL_MOD_PATH=/var/lib/laminar/run/linux-sh-microdev_defconfig/37/linux-sh-microdev_defconfig INSTALL_DTBS_PATH=/var/lib/laminar/run/linux-sh-microdev_defconfig/37/linux-sh-microdev_defconfig all [...] [mk all 2023-11-11 04:19:44] # OBJCOPY arch/sh/boot/compressed/vmlinux.bin [mk all 2023-11-11 04:19:44] sh-linux-objcopy -O binary -R .note -R .note.gnu.build-id -R .comment -R .stab -R .stabstr -S -R .empty_zero_page vmlinux arch/sh/boot/compressed/vmlinux.bin [mk all 2023-11-11 04:19:44] # GZIParch/sh/boot/compressed/vmlinux.bin.gz [mk all 2023-11-11 04:19:44] cat arch/sh/boot/compressed/vmlinux.bin | gzip -n -f -9 > arch/sh/boot/compressed/vmlinux.bin.gz [mk all 2023-11-11 04:19:45] # LD arch/sh/boot/compressed/piggy.o [mk all 2023-11-11 04:19:45] sh-linux-ld -EL -z noexecstack --no-warn-rwx-segments -r --format binary --oformat elf32-sh-linux -T arch/sh/boot/compressed/vmlinux.scr arch/sh/boot/compressed/vmlinux.bin.gz -o arch/sh/boot/compressed/piggy.o [mk all 2023-11-11 04:19:45] sh-linux-ld: Error: unable to disambiguate: --format (did you mean ---format ?) [mk all 2023-11-11 04:19:45] make[3]: *** [arch/sh/boot/compressed/Makefile:59: arch/sh/boot/compressed/piggy.o] Error 1 [mk all 2023-11-11 04:19:45] make[2]: *** [arch/sh/boot/Makefile:40: arch/sh/boot/compressed/vmlinux] Error 2 [mk all 2023-11-11 04:19:45] make[1]: *** [arch/sh/Makefile:170: zImage] Error 2 [mk all 2023-11-11 04:19:45] make: *** [Makefile:234: __sub-make] Error 2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/28910] GNU-ld: ARM: Issues when trying to set target output architecture
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28910 --- Comment #21 from Jan-Benedict Glaw --- Got two "green": http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/laminar/jobs/linux-parisc-generic-32bit_defconfig/57 http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/laminar/jobs/linux-sh-microdev_defconfig/38 I have not yet tested whether or not other builds are affected negatively, will queue a complete set of Builds followed by a round of Linux kernel builds. But the first impression is positive. Thanks a lot! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/28910] GNU-ld: ARM: Issues when trying to set target output architecture
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28910 --- Comment #26 from Jan-Benedict Glaw --- All mass compilations of Binutils worked as expected. Linux kernel builds are running, but no other regressions (and parisc and sh are fixed.) Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/31617] New: VAX: Check immediates to match expected operand type
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31617 Bug ID: 31617 Summary: VAX: Check immediates to match expected operand type Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: jbg...@lug-owl.de Target Milestone: --- In NetBSD's src/sys/arch/vax/vax/unimpl_emul.S, we had three bogus assembler statements: movq $0f0.0, TMPFRAC2 movd $0f0.0, TMPFRAC1 movd $0f0, (%r0) NOVQ is ment to work on a 64bit (integer) value, MOVD is ment to work on a D_Float type (64bit wide.) The supplied immediate value is of type F_Float and thus only 32bit wide. Compiling the actual unimpl_emul.S resulted in observable differences: The generated immediate was correctly rendered as 64bit wide, with the low 32bit containing the correctly parsed F_Float, but the upper 32bit contained random stale data. Thus, interpreted as D_Float, the value is no longer 0.0 . As we know the expected types for all instructions, we'd be able to reject such a situation where not even the size is correct. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/31617] VAX: Check immediates to match expected operand type
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31617 Jan-Benedict Glaw changed: What|Removed |Added Target||vax-netbsdelf, vax-linux -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/31617] VAX: Check immediates to match expected operand type
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31617 Jan-Benedict Glaw changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jbg...@lug-owl.de -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/32072] New: ./dlltool.c:870:27: error: initializer-string for array of 'char' is too long
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32072 Bug ID: 32072 Summary: ./dlltool.c:870:27: error: initializer-string for array of 'char' is too long Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: jbg...@lug-owl.de Target Milestone: --- Hi! While doing automated builds using a _very_ recent host GCC (gcc (basepoints/gcc-15-2866-g9d5c500c4fa, built at 1723293902) 15.0.0 20240810 (experimental)), I got issues with dlltool.c (for --target=i686-mingw32crt and -target=i686-cygwin): [all 2024-08-11 18:35:01] /var/lib/laminar/run/binutils-i686-cygwin/51/local-toolchain-install/bin/gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I../bfd -I./../bfd -I./../include -DLOCALEDIR="\"/tmp/binutils-i686-cygwin/share/locale\"" -Dbin_dummy_emulation=bin_vanilla_emulation -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wshadow -Wstack-usage=262144 -Werror -I./../zlib -g -O2 -MT dlltool.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/dlltool.Tpo -c -o dlltool.o -DDLLTOOL_I386 -DDLLTOOL_DEFAULT_I386 ./dlltool.c [all 2024-08-11 18:35:01] ./dlltool.c: In function 'prefix_encode': [all 2024-08-11 18:35:01] ./dlltool.c:870:27: error: initializer-string for array of 'char' is too long [-Werror=unterminated-string-initialization] [all 2024-08-11 18:35:01] 870 | static char alpha[26] = "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz"; [all 2024-08-11 18:35:01] | ^~~~ [all 2024-08-11 18:35:05] cc1: all warnings being treated as errors (See http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/laminar/jobs/binutils-i686-cygwin/51 or http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/laminar/jobs/binutils-i686-mingw32crt/51) Should be easy to fix but dropping the explicit array length and introduce a strlen() based lenght instead of sizeof. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/32072] ./dlltool.c:870:27: error: initializer-string for array of 'char' is too long
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32072 Jan-Benedict Glaw changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unspecified |2.44 (HEAD) Target||i686-mingw32crt, ||i686-cygwin CC||jbg...@lug-owl.de -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
