[Bug ld/27659] BFD (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.36.1 internal error, aborting at ../../bfd/elfcode.h:224 in bfd_elf32_swap_symbol_out
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27659 --- Comment #22 from Gianfranco --- With binutils 2.42-4ubuntu1 looks like it is fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/27659] BFD (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.36.1 internal error, aborting at ../../bfd/elfcode.h:224 in bfd_elf32_swap_symbol_out
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27659 --- Comment #23 from Gianfranco --- With binutils 2.42-4ubuntu1 looks like it is fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/27659] BFD (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.36.1 internal error, aborting at ../../bfd/elfcode.h:224 in bfd_elf32_swap_symbol_out
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27659 Gianfranco changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #24 from Gianfranco --- closing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30685] bfd fails with lto on armhf and clang-16 (symbol from plugin): Number of symbols in input file has increased from 0 to 1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30685 Gianfranco changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #3 from Gianfranco --- binutils 2.42-4ubuntu1 looks working now. Closing -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30685] bfd fails with lto on armhf and clang-16 (symbol from plugin): Number of symbols in input file has increased from 0 to 1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30685 --- Comment #4 from Gianfranco --- binutils 2.42-4ubuntu1 looks working now. Closing -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/23935] [Regression] ld.bfd does not rescan fat LTO archives to resolve plugin-added references
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23935 --- Comment #12 from Sourceware Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=bb9a951fab7a30cc1209c6b8b1716c13456e8b1a commit bb9a951fab7a30cc1209c6b8b1716c13456e8b1a Author: H.J. Lu Date: Thu Dec 6 11:45:41 2018 -0800 Don't claim a fat IR object if no IR object should be claimed When the linker sees an input object containing nothing but IR during rescan, it should ignore it (LTO phase is over). But if the input object is a fat IR object, which has non-IR code as well, it should be used to resolve references as if it did not contain any IR at all. This patch adds lto_type to bfd and linker avoids claiming a fat IR object if no IR object should be claimed. bfd/ PR ld/23935 * archive.c (_bfd_compute_and_write_armap): Check bfd_get_lto_type instead of lto_slim_object. * elflink.c (elf_link_add_object_symbols): Likewise. * bfd.c (bfd_lto_object_type): New. (bfd): Remove lto_slim_object and add lto_type. (bfd_get_lto_type): New function. * elf.c (lto_section): Removed. (_bfd_elf_make_section_from_shdr): Don't set lto_slim_object. * format.c: (lto_section): New. (bfd_set_lto_type): New function. (bfd_check_format_matches): Call bfd_set_lto_type. * bfd-in2.h: Regenerated. binutils/ PR ld/23935 * nm.c (display_rel_file): Check bfd_get_lto_type instead of lto_slim_object. ld/ PR ld/23935 * ldmain.c (add_archive_element): Don't claim a fat IR object if no IR object should be claimed. * testsuite/ld-plugin/lto.exp (pr20103): Adjust fat IR test. Add PR ld/23935 test. * testsuite/ld-plugin/pr23935a.c: New file. * testsuite/ld-plugin/pr23935b.c: Likewise. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/23935] [Regression] ld.bfd does not rescan fat LTO archives to resolve plugin-added references
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23935 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW |RESOLVED Target Milestone|2.32|2.43 --- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu --- Fixed for 2.43. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/31561] New: AArch64 gas test case "SME extension (ZERO)" fails on s390x
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31561
Bug ID: 31561
Summary: AArch64 gas test case "SME extension (ZERO)" fails on
s390x
Product: binutils
Version: 2.43 (HEAD)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: jremus at linux dot ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
The AArch64 GNU Assembler test case "SME extension (ZERO)" fails in a GNU
Binutils build for target "aarch64-linux-gnu" on s390x as follows:
Target is aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
Host is s390x-ibm-linux-gnu
...
../as-new -march=armv8-a+sme -o tmpdir/sme-4.o
/home/jremus/binutils/gas/testsuite/gas/aarch64/sme-4.s
Executing on host: sh -c {../as-new -march=armv8-a+sme -o tmpdir/sme-4.o
/home/jremus/binutils/gas/testsuite/gas/aarch64/sme-4.s 2>&1} /dev/null
dump.tmp (timeout = 300)
spawn [open ...]
/home/jremus/binutils/build-gcc-aarch64/gas/testsuite/../../binutils/objdump
-dr tmpdir/sme-4.o > tmpdir/dump.out
Executing on host: sh -c
{/home/jremus/binutils/build-gcc-aarch64/gas/testsuite/../../binutils/objdump
-dr tmpdir/sme-4.o > tmpdir/dump.out 2>dump.tmp} /dev/null (timeout = 300)
spawn [open ...]
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^ 4: c00800ffzero{za}$"
line " 4: c00800ffzero{}"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^ 8: c00800ffzero{za}$"
line " 8: c00800ffzero{}"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^ c: c00800ffzero{za}$"
line " c: c00800ffzero{}"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^ 10: c00800ffzero{za}$"
line " 10: c00800ffzero{}"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^ 14: c00800ffzero{za}$"
line " 14: c00800ffzero{}"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^ 18: c0080001zero{za0\.d}$"
line " 18: c0080001zero{}"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^ 1c: c0080002zero{za1\.d}$"
line " 1c: c0080002zero{}"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^ 20: c0080004zero{za2\.d}$"
line " 20: c0080004zero{}"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^ 24: c0080008zero{za3\.d}$"
line " 24: c0080008zero{}"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^ 28: c0080010zero{za4\.d}$"
line " 28: c0080010zero{}"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^ 2c: c0080020zero{za5\.d}$"
line " 2c: c0080020zero{}"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^ 30: c0080040zero{za6\.d}$"
line " 30: c0080040zero{}"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^ 34: c0080080zero{za7\.d}$"
line " 34: c0080080zero{}"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^ 38: c0080001zero{za0\.d}$"
line " 38: c0080001zero{}"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^ 3c: c0080003zero{za0\.d, za1\.d}$"
line " 3c: c0080003zero{}"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^ 40: c0080007zero{za0\.d, za1\.d, za2\.d}$"
line " 40: c0080007zero{}"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^ 44: c008000fzero{za0\.d, za1\.d, za2\.d, za3\.d}$"
line " 44: c008000fzero{}"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^ 48: c008001fzero{za0\.s, za1\.d, za2\.d, za3\.d}$"
line " 48: c008001fzero{}"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^ 4c: c008003fzero{za0\.s, za1\.s, za2\.d, za3\.d}$"
line " 4c: c008003fzero{}"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^ 50: c008007fzero{za0\.h, za1\.s, za3\.d}$"
line " 50: c008007fzero{}"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^ 54: c00800ffzero{za}$"
line " 54: c00800ffzero{}"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^ 58: c0080080zero{za7\.d}$"
line " 58: c0080080zero{}"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^ 5c: c00800c0zero{za6\.d, za7\.d}$"
line " 5c: c00800c0zero{}"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^ 60: c00800e0zero{za5\.d, za6\.d, za7\.d}$"
line " 60: c00800e0zero{}"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^ 64: c00800f0zero{za4\.d, za5\.d, za6\.d, za7\.d}$"
line " 64: c00800f0zero{}"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^ 68: c00800f8zero{za3\.s, za4\.d, za5\.d, za6\.d}$"
line " 68: c00800f8zero{}"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^ 6c: c00800fczero{za2\.s, za3\.s, za4\.d, za5\.d}$"
line " 6c: c00800fczero{}"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^ 70: c00800fezero{za1\.h, za2\.s, za4\.d}$"
line " 70: c00800fezero{}"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^ 74: c00800ffzero{za}$"
line " 74: c00800ffzero
[Bug binutils/31543] windres announces non-PE targets as supported
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31543 Peter0x44 changed: What|Removed |Added CC||peter0x44 at disroot dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
