[Bug ld/14623] internal error, aborting at bfd/elf64-x86-64.c line 3611 in elf_x86_64_relocate_section while building firefox

2012-09-27 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14623



H.J. Lu  changed:



   What|Removed |Added



 Status|NEW |WAITING



--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu  2012-09-27 12:11:38 
UTC ---

I believe it this is the same as



http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/pipermail/pld-devel-en/2012-September/023091.html



and is fixed by



http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2012-09/msg00210.html



Please try the current binutils.



-- 

Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---

You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/14623] internal error, aborting at bfd/elf64-x86-64.c line 3611 in elf_x86_64_relocate_section while building firefox

2012-09-27 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14623



H.J. Lu  changed:



   What|Removed |Added



 CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com



-- 

Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---

You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/14623] internal error, aborting at bfd/elf64-x86-64.c line 3611 in elf_x86_64_relocate_section while building firefox

2012-09-27 Thread markus at trippelsdorf dot de


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14623



Markus Trippelsdorf  changed:



   What|Removed |Added



 Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

 Resolution||FIXED



--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf  
2012-09-27 14:09:28 UTC ---

(In reply to comment #1)

> I believe it this is the same as

> 

> http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/pipermail/pld-devel-en/2012-September/023091.html

> 

> and is fixed by

> 

> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2012-09/msg00210.html



Yes. It's fixed now. Thanks H.J..



-- 

Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---

You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug gas/14640] New: gas generates broken relocations for symbols with weak defs on microblaze

2012-09-27 Thread bugdal at aerifal dot cx


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14640



 Bug #: 14640

   Summary: gas generates broken relocations for symbols with weak

defs on microblaze

   Product: binutils

   Version: unspecified

Status: NEW

  Severity: normal

  Priority: P2

 Component: gas

AssignedTo: unassig...@sourceware.org

ReportedBy: bug...@aerifal.cx

Classification: Unclassified





See this thread for a description of the issue and a patch, which is in

Xilinx's fork of binutils but does not seem to have made it upstream:



http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.uclinux.microblaze/11155



Basically, the issue is that gas thinks it can generate a 16-bit relative jump

when there's a local definition of the function, even if that definition is

weak and might be overridden by a strong definition that's outside of the

16-bit jump range. I'm in the process of porting musl libc to microblaze, and

this issue is a show-stopper since we make heavy use of weak definitions.



-- 

Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---

You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils