[Bug ld/13287] g++ -Wl,--as-needed -flto doesn't work with the BFD linker, but with gold
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13287 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|amodra at gmail dot com | AssignedTo|unassigned at sourceware|amodra at gmail dot com |dot org | -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/13287] g++ -Wl,--as-needed -flto doesn't work with the BFD linker, but with gold
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13287 --- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-20 09:51:03 UTC --- CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by:amo...@sourceware.org2011-10-20 09:50:59 Modified files: ld : ChangeLog plugin.c plugin.h ldlang.c Log message: PR ld/13287 * plugin.c (plugin_should_reload): New function. * plugin.h (plugin_should_reload): Declare. * ldlang.c (open_input_bfds): Use above function. Patches: http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.2383&r2=1.2384 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/plugin.c.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.42&r2=1.43 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/plugin.h.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.9&r2=1.10 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/ldlang.c.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.378&r2=1.379 -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/13292] Binutils uses "struct stat" instead of "#include "
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13292 --- Comment #2 from Pau Garcia i Quiles 2011-10-20 10:06:32 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > (In reply to comment #0) > > Created attachment 5984 [details] > > Fix > > > > mingw-w64 recently implemented support for large files using > > _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64. > > > > Binutils uses "struct stat" instead of "#include ", which makes > > it > > fail to compile with mingw-w64 trunk. > > > > The attached patch fixes the issue. > > I think you shouldn't edit bfd/bfd-in2.h since it is auto generated. > The bfd-in.h is the file you want to patch, I guess. You are right. I'm attaching a new patch against bfd/bfd-in.h (which is essentially the same). > The patch doesn't seem to solve the problem for me. What is the problem you are experiencing now? What compiler are you trying? > Do you have the issue bfd/archive.c? Sorry, I don't understand :-? -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/13292] Binutils uses "struct stat" instead of "#include "
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13292 Pau Garcia i Quiles changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #5984|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #3 from Pau Garcia i Quiles 2011-10-20 10:07:43 UTC --- Created attachment 6020 --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6020 Fix (patch bfd-in.h) -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/13292] Binutils uses "struct stat" instead of "#include "
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13292 --- Comment #4 from Alen Skondro 2011-10-20 12:02:39 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > (In reply to comment #0) > > > Created attachment 5984 [details] > > > Fix > > > > > > mingw-w64 recently implemented support for large files using > > > _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64. > > > > > > Binutils uses "struct stat" instead of "#include ", which > > > makes it > > > fail to compile with mingw-w64 trunk. > > > > > > The attached patch fixes the issue. > > > > I think you shouldn't edit bfd/bfd-in2.h since it is auto generated. > > The bfd-in.h is the file you want to patch, I guess. > > You are right. I'm attaching a new patch against bfd/bfd-in.h (which is > essentially the same). > > > > The patch doesn't seem to solve the problem for me. > > What is the problem you are experiencing now? What compiler are you trying? I'm using gcc 4.7 (trunk). ../../../binutils/bfd/archive.c: In function 'bfd_ar_hdr_from_filesystem': ../../../binutils/bfd/archive.c:1841:7: error: passing argument 1 of 'time' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror] In file included from j:\cross-gcc\bin\../lib/gcc/i686-w64-mingw32/4.7.0/../../../../i686-w64-mingw32/include/sys/time.h:10:0, from ../../../binutils/bfd/sysdep.h:64, from ../../../binutils/bfd/archive.c:130: j:\cross-gcc\bin\../lib/gcc/i686-w64-mingw32/4.7.0/../../../../i686-w64-mingw32/include/time.h:241:29: note: expected 'time_t *' but argument is of type '__time64_t *' cc1.exe: all warnings being treated as errors > > > > Do you have the issue bfd/archive.c? > > Sorry, I don't understand :-? Sorry, I wanted to ask if you also experienced the compile error in bfd/archive.c or somewhere else? -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/13292] Binutils uses "struct stat" instead of "#include "
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13292 --- Comment #5 from Pau Garcia i Quiles 2011-10-20 12:29:30 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #2) > > (In reply to comment #1) > > > (In reply to comment #0) > > > > Created attachment 5984 [details] > > > > Fix > > > > > > > > mingw-w64 recently implemented support for large files using > > > > _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64. > > > > > > > > Binutils uses "struct stat" instead of "#include ", which > > > > makes it > > > > fail to compile with mingw-w64 trunk. > > > > > > > > The attached patch fixes the issue. > > > > > > I think you shouldn't edit bfd/bfd-in2.h since it is auto generated. > > > The bfd-in.h is the file you want to patch, I guess. > > > > You are right. I'm attaching a new patch against bfd/bfd-in.h (which is > > essentially the same). > > > > > > > The patch doesn't seem to solve the problem for me. > > > > What is the problem you are experiencing now? What compiler are you trying? > > I'm using gcc 4.7 (trunk). > > ../../../binutils/bfd/archive.c: In function 'bfd_ar_hdr_from_filesystem': > ../../../binutils/bfd/archive.c:1841:7: error: passing argument 1 of 'time' > from incompatible pointer type [-Werror] > In file included from > j:\cross-gcc\bin\../lib/gcc/i686-w64-mingw32/4.7.0/../../../../i686-w64-mingw32/include/sys/time.h:10:0, > from ../../../binutils/bfd/sysdep.h:64, > from ../../../binutils/bfd/archive.c:130: > j:\cross-gcc\bin\../lib/gcc/i686-w64-mingw32/4.7.0/../../../../i686-w64-mingw32/include/time.h:241:29: > note: expected 'time_t *' but argument is of type '__time64_t *' > cc1.exe: all warnings being treated as errors I see. I am compiling a cross binutils CVS with gcc 4.6.1 on Linux. No, I am not seeing that problem. > > > > > > > > Do you have the issue bfd/archive.c? > > > > Sorry, I don't understand :-? > > Sorry, I wanted to ask if you also experienced the compile error in > bfd/archive.c or somewhere else? No, I do not have that problem. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/13049] Generates R_ARM_NONE relocations for stub_* symbols when using -fdata-sections
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13049 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #6019|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #4 from Nick Clifton 2011-10-20 14:30:47 UTC --- Created attachment 6021 --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6021 Rename stub sections in ARM, PPC and HPPA -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/13049] Generates R_ARM_NONE relocations for stub_* symbols when using -fdata-sections
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13049 --- Comment #5 from Nick Clifton 2011-10-20 14:38:45 UTC --- Hi Christophe, OK, I have uploaded a revised patch which contains an expanded comment, and similar fixes for the elf64-ppc.c and elf32-hppa.c files. I have also removed the changes to the linker scripts, since these were not necessary. (It was a case of me being too paranoid). Are you happy with this version of the patch ? Cheers Nick -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/13295] Segfault and/or incorrect output in objdump when disassembling an ARM library
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13295 --- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton 2011-10-20 15:23:53 UTC --- Created attachment 6022 --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6022 Fix for 2.21 sources -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/13295] Segfault and/or incorrect output in objdump when disassembling an ARM library
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13295 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #4 from Nick Clifton 2011-10-20 15:24:46 UTC --- Hi Zoltan, I have uploaded a patch for the 2.21 sources which should fix this problem. Please let me know if you have any problems with it. Cheers Nick -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/13049] Generates R_ARM_NONE relocations for stub_* symbols when using -fdata-sections
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13049 --- Comment #6 from christophe.lyon at st dot com 2011-10-20 16:08:24 UTC --- Hi Nick, The comment is much clearer indeed, thanks. I have noticed a typo "defintion" near the end of the comment. However, I am wondering whether prefixing with "__" is secure enough: in my understanding, the C standard defines the "__" namespace as reserved for tools, but as such it could very well be used by some GCC or GLIBC magic, or by a end-user, couldn't it? What about using something like "_._" which could still be used in assembly, but much less likely? But I won't argue strongly on this point. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/13049] Generates R_ARM_NONE relocations for stub_* symbols when using -fdata-sections
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13049 --- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-20 16:27:16 UTC --- CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by:ni...@sourceware.org2011-10-20 16:27:04 Modified files: bfd: ChangeLog elf32-arm.c elf64-ppc.c elf32-hppa.c Log message: PR ld/13049 * elf32-arm.c (STUB_SUFFIX): Avoid collision with user namespace symbol names. * elf64-ppc.c (STUB_SUFFIX): Likewise. * elf32-hppa.c (STUB_SUFFIX): Likewise. Patches: http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/bfd/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.5496&r2=1.5497 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/bfd/elf32-arm.c.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.278&r2=1.279 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/bfd/elf64-ppc.c.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.367&r2=1.368 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/bfd/elf32-hppa.c.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.179&r2=1.180 -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/13049] Generates R_ARM_NONE relocations for stub_* symbols when using -fdata-sections
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13049 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #8 from Nick Clifton 2011-10-20 16:32:22 UTC --- Hi Christophe, Thanks for spelling typo catch. You are right of course. System type tools, including the compiler, can generate symbols with a double underscore prefix. But I think that in this context the stub suffix *is* a system type symbol, and so it is correct to use the __ prefix. Plus if they really want to a user could always generate a symbol with a _._ prefix, or any other combination that we might choose, so we cannot win So - I have gone ahead and checked the patch in. Cheers Nick -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/13302] IRELATIVE relocation should come last
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13302 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #6016|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2011-10-20 23:21:27 UTC --- Created attachment 6023 --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6023 A patch This patch can build glibc on ia32 and x86-64. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
