[Bug binutils/4781] binutils 2.17.50.0.7 and later eats up memory when calling gnujava wizards in OpenOffice
--- Additional Comments From andyradke at web dot de 2007-07-21 13:54 --- hm. too much commits that i could test out each one of them. i checked again and used this time Sun's Java and don't have any problems. So can this also be a bug in GNUjava from gcc-gcj that is introduced when using binutils from 2.17.50.0.7 or higher? with GNUjava i could reproduce it also outside OpenOffice.org when using the gnujava Firefox browser plugin on any website. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4781 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/4781] binutils 2.17.50.0.7 and later eats up memory when calling gnujava wizards in OpenOffice
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-07-21 14:04 --- (In reply to comment #9) > hm. too much commits that i could test out each one of them. > There are about 200 commits between 2006-10-20 and 2006-11-27. It takes about 8 tries to find which commit causes this regression with binary search. I don't think it is too much. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4781 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/4781] binutils 2.17.50.0.7 and later eats up memory when calling gnujava wizards in OpenOffice
--- Additional Comments From andyradke at web dot de 2007-07-21 14:14 --- i know the way you want to show me. is there an easy way to just download/checkout let's say the first 100 commited patches? (compile time isn't an issue, system is really fast but has slow internet connection) -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4781 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/4781] binutils 2.17.50.0.7 and later eats up memory when calling gnujava wizards in OpenOffice
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-07-21 14:25 --- (In reply to comment #11) > i know the way you want to show me. is there an easy way to just > download/checkout let's say the first 100 commited patches? (compile time > isn't > an issue, system is really fast but has slow internet connection) From http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2006-10/ it looks like "October 31, 2006 22:59 UTC" hasthe first 100 patches from 2006-10-20 to 2006-11-27. I can do # cvs -z 3 -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/src co -D "October 31, 2006 22:59 UTC" binutils to check it out. You can use the same command with a different time for "-D" to update your tree to a different time, like # cvs -z 3 -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/src co -D "November 27, 2006 22:05 UTC" binutils will update your tree to "November 27, 2006 22:05 UTC". Since you don't need to check out the whole tree after the first check out, incremental check out isn't very slow. Also you can rsync CVS repository: http://sources.redhat.com/sourceware/rsync.html so that you check it out locally. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4781 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/4781] binutils 2.17.50.0.7 and later eats up memory when calling gnujava wizards in OpenOffice
--- Additional Comments From andyradke at web dot de 2007-07-21 16:30 --- ok, i could track down the issue due to the commits from 22th Nov. 2006. cvs co from 21st worked well and from 22nd has the memory issues. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4781 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/4781] binutils 2.17.50.0.7 and later eats up memory when calling gnujava wizards in OpenOffice
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-07-21 16:55 --- (In reply to comment #13) > ok, i could track down the issue due to the commits from 22th Nov. 2006. > > cvs co from 21st worked well and from 22nd has the memory issues. Please use http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2006-11/ to find the exact time for each change made on Nov. 22, 2006 and locate the exact change which causes this regression. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4781 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/4781] binutils 2.17.50.0.7 and later eats up memory when calling gnujava wizards in OpenOffice
--- Additional Comments From andyradke at web dot de 2007-07-21 20:39 --- ok, i got it located. it's this commit: http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2006-11/msg00100.html -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4781 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/4781] binutils 2.17.50.0.7 and later eats up memory when calling gnujava wizards in OpenOffice
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-07-21 23:01 --- Jakub, your EH change causes this regression. It looks like EH fails to terminate. -- What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at redhat dot com Status|WAITING |NEW http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4781 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
