SPF record with include:

[Julie Xu]

Hi

I be asked to add:
include:otheremailsrv.otherdomain
 so the TXT records will be looked like:
TXT "v=spf1 mx  
include:otheremailsrv.otherdomain  ~all"

Question, from my limited research, I have not found any example to put http 
part into TXT records, and a little bit worried.

Could any one advice me if I can put http in spf record like above?

If so, is my statement right?

Any comments will be appreciated

Thanks in advance

julie
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

RE: SPF record with include:

[Julie Xu]

Hi Steven, Jason, Ged and Bind expert

Thanks for the reply. It is great help.

However, I need ask more.

For this include clause to be added in, I have also need to add DKIM records. 

we do not use it currently, which means the mx part do not use, but include 
part will use it.

Could I get advice on if the DKIM records will impact the email service which 
related to mx related environment?

Thousands thanks for advice

Julie

-Original Message-
From: Steven Carr [mailto:sjc...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, 18 June 2013 4:11 PM
To: Julie Xu
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: SPF record with include:

Remove the part... "<http://otheremailsrv.otherdomain>", whatever mailer agent 
you use has screwed with the information that you were sent, it is not 
required. So your finished TXT record will be...

TXT "v=spf1 mx include:otheremailsrv.otherdomain ~all"

Steve


On 18 June 2013 06:56, Julie Xu  wrote:
> Hi
>
>
>
> I be asked to add:
>
> include:otheremailsrv.otherdomain<http://otheremailsrv.otherdomain>
>
>  so the TXT records will be looked like:
>
> TXT "v=spf1 mx
> include:otheremailsrv.otherdomain<http://otheremailsrv.otherdomain>  ~all"
>
>
>
> Question, from my limited research, I have not found any example to 
> put http part into TXT records, and a little bit worried.
>
>
>
> Could any one advice me if I can put http in spf record like above?
>
>
>
> If so, is my statement right?
>
>
>
> Any comments will be appreciated
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance
>
>
>
> julie
>
>
> ___
> Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to 
> unsubscribe from this list
>
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users@lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

named can not find the zone file

[Julie Xu]

Hi

I am urgently setting a test dns server on centos.

Basically, copy named.conf and zone file over. And add  copy existed domain 
zone to new zone and change zone name called jxtest.edu.

And I have get error:

zone existeddomain.edu/IN: loaded serial 2012102459
zone jxtest.edu/IN: loading master file data/jxtest.edu: file not found
internal/jxtest.edu/IN: file not found

I have checked the file is existed, on required directory:
# pwd
/var/named
# ls -l data/jxtest.edu
-rw-r--r-- 1 named named 80263 Jul  3 13:25 data/jxtest.edu
#
# grep directory /etc/named.conf
directory "/var/named";
#

Could anyone give me some tip, how to fix this two error?

Any comments will be appreciated

Thanks in advance


Julie Xu

.

___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

question regards to dynamic dns update

[Julie Xu]

Hi

Could I ask a question? I have a subnet, which all the equipment has static ip 
address recorded to machine. For the purpose of getting these subnet 
controlled, I would like to use dynamic dns update.

After I read some bind  information, it looks like most configure example is 
use dhcp/ddns together.

Please advice, if I can make a subdomain and make this subnet will contact the 
dns server to get a dns name dynamicly. I would like it:
- every machine in this subnet will get a dns name automatically
- the dns name is same as the host name
- the dns name will automatically be removed after the ip offline or 
the hostname changed.

If these action can be achive, please advice how can I configure it?

Any comments will be appreciated

Thanks in advance


Julie

___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: question regards to dynamic dns update

[Julie Xu]

Thanks for the reply. But, my subnet do not use dhcp. Can they still get 
dynamic DNS?

Julie 

> On 11 Nov 2015, at 9:01 pm, Reindl Harald  wrote:
> 
> 
>> Am 11.11.2015 um 10:55 schrieb Julie Xu:
>> Could I ask a question? I have a subnet, which all the equipment has static 
>> ip address recorded to machine. For the purpose of getting these subnet 
>> controlled, I would like to use dynamic dns update.
>> 
>> After I read some bind  information, it looks like most configure example is 
>> use dhcp/ddns together.
>> 
>> Please advice, if I can make a subdomain and make this subnet will contact 
>> the dns server to get a dns name dynamicly. I would like it:
>>- every machine in this subnet will get a dns name automatically
>>- the dns name is same as the host name
>>- the dns name will automatically be removed after the ip offline or the 
>> hostname changed.
>> 
>> If these action can be achive, please advice how can I configure it?
>> 
>> Any comments will be appreciated
> 
> http://www.semicomplete.com/articles/dynamic-dns-with-dhcp/
> 
> "the dns name will automatically be removed after the ip offline" makes no 
> sense, named and dhcpd can't know when a machine goes offline
> 
> ___
> Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
> from this list
> 
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users@lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

RE: dns search list

[Julie Xu]

Hi


As I understand that dns search option 119 is not work with MS client.

But, I do need make a dns search list to ask MS client search a dns list. Could 
anyone advice me except group policy, do I have anyway to achive this point by 
change something in bind?

Any comments will be appreciated

Thanks in advance


Julie

___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Question abut reserv zone

[Julie Xu]

Hi,

I have a zone, we say abc.edu.au<http://abc.edu.au>, all private address 
10.0.0.0/8 is in this zone. So, I have a revers zoon 10.in-addr-arpa existed. I 
am the master.

Now, there is a new zone required - ddd.abc.edu.au<http://ddd.abc.edu.au> 
reverse should 100.10.in-addr-arpa; we are secondary of this zone.

However, currently, there is some ip address in zone 
abc.edu.au<http://abc.edu.au> there which is  the range, they are still 
required.

For example we want host.ddd.abc.edu.au<http://host.ddd.abc.edu.au>, and 
app.abc.edu.au<http://app.abc.edu.au> both existed.
The host.ddd.abs.edu.au<http://host.ddd.abs.edu.au> – 
10.100.10.20 – transferred from master dns for the domain ( both 
forward/reversed zones)
The app.abc.edu.au<http://app.abc.edu.au> – 10.100.10.20  
original in 10.0.0.0/8 zone file which we are the master.

Both are A record.

What will happen if I create second reverse zoon for 100.10.in-addr-arp? Is my 
current app.abc.edu.au<http://app.abc.edu.au> will lose? If it is true, do I 
have anyway to work around?

Any comments will be appreciated

Thanks in advance


Julie Xu

___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

dhcp failover is not working as expecte

[Julie Xu]

Hi,

I have dhcpd running on two servers. Share the load 50%.

I expect if one of the servers has issue, another one will automatically take 
over for all 100% clients.

But, the fact is not. When one of them down, or frozen, half of users had lose 
network without ip address.

My configuration is:
failover peer "primary_secondary" {
primary;
address 111.111.111.111;
peer address 222.222.222.222;
port 8068;
peer port 8068;
max-response-delay 60;
max-unacked-updates 10;
mclt 300;
split 128;
load balance max seconds 3;
   auto-partner-down 0;
max-lease-misbalance 15;
max-lease-ownership 10;
min-balance 60;
max-balance 3600;
}

Could I get some explanation on why it is happed? And how to avoid it?

Any comments will be appreciated

Thanks in advance

Julie


___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users