Re: Permission issue ¿?

2023-06-22 Thread Daniel A. Rodriguez via bind-users
Just changed the dirt, sorry for the noise

El 22 de junio de 2023 1:25:57 p. m. GMT-03:00, "Ondřej Surý"  
escribió:
>Which would not be a problem. But we can’t help the OP without the config 
>(named-checkconf -px)
>
>--
>Ondřej Surý — ISC (He/Him)
>
>My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do not feel 
>obligated to reply outside your normal working hours.
>
>> On 22. 6. 2023, at 17:53, Marco  wrote:
>> 
>> Am 22.06.2023 um 11:47:50 Uhr schrieb Daniel Armando Rodriguez via
>> bind-users:
>> 
>>> drwxr-sr-x   4 root bind 4,0K jun 22 11:17 .
>> 
>> That means that the group bind is not allowed to write into that
>> directory.
>> --
>> Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from 
>> this list
>> 
>> ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. 
>> Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.
>> 
>> 
>> bind-users mailing list
>> bind-users@lists.isc.org
>> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
>-- 
>Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from 
>this list
>
>ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. 
>Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.
>
>
>bind-users mailing list
>bind-users@lists.isc.org
>https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
-- 
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from 
this list

ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. 
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.


bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


DNSSEC doubt

2023-06-22 Thread Daniel A. Rodriguez via bind-users
I wonder if it's mandatory make a manual deployment prior to an automated setup.-- 
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from 
this list

ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. 
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.


bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: DNSSEC doubt

2023-06-22 Thread Daniel A. Rodriguez via bind-users
Thanks, I was reading but wasn't able to decode that.


Best regards


El 22 de junio de 2023 4:27:21 p. m. GMT-03:00, "Ondřej Surý"  
escribió:
>It’s not. TL;DR use dnssec-policy.
>
>The more elaborate version of the TL;DR can be found in the DNSSEC Guide here: 
>https://bind9.readthedocs.io/en/v9.18.16/dnssec-guide.html
>
>--
>Ondřej Surý — ISC (He/Him)
>
>My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do not feel 
>obligated to reply outside your normal working hours.
>
>> On 22. 6. 2023, at 20:43, Daniel A. Rodriguez via bind-users 
>>  wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> I wonder if it's mandatory make a manual deployment prior to an automated 
>> setup.
>> --
>> Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from 
>> this list
>> 
>> ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. 
>> Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.
>> 
>> 
>> bind-users mailing list
>> bind-users@lists.isc.org
>> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
-- 
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from 
this list

ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. 
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.


bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: Master file permission denied

2023-06-28 Thread Daniel A. Rodriguez via bind-users
Exactly the same

El 28 de junio de 2023 6:50:26 p. m. GMT-03:00, Mark Andrews  
escribió:
>The *exact* same error, word for word, or a different permission denied?
>
>> On 29 Jun 2023, at 06:35, Daniel Armando Rodriguez via bind-users 
>>  wrote:
>> 
>> However, as soon as I added this
>> 
>>   dnssec-policy "default";
>>   inline-signing yes;
>> 
>> Error came up again :-(
>> -- 
>> Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from 
>> this list
>> 
>> ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. 
>> Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.
>> 
>> 
>> bind-users mailing list
>> bind-users@lists.isc.org
>> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
>
>-- 
>Mark Andrews, ISC
>1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
>PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742  INTERNET: ma...@isc.org
>
-- 
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from 
this list

ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. 
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.


bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: Re: Multisite deployment issue

2021-08-08 Thread Daniel A. Rodriguez via bind-users
Finally could make it work using RPZ, just in case some would be interested. 
Mon Aug 02 18:25:12 GMT-03:00 2021 Nuno Simoes : Hi, 
Yes, so long as you are authoritative for the zone you can forward subdomains 
of that zone to any other DNS server you want. On Mon, Aug 2, 2021, 3:07 PM 
Daniel Armando Rodriguez via bind-users < bind-users@lists.isc.org> wrote: Was 
wondering If would be possible to setup a forwarding scheme just for some 
subdomains, I emphasize the fact that master is publicly accesible and current 
need is to locally resolv a bunch of subdomains of the same zone. I think image 
attached in previuos message is pretty explanatory, but currently my setup doen 
not work as (I) expected. > I attach a picture to best describe where I'm 
standed at. > > https://i.postimg.cc/x8PKnz53/ejemplo-com.png > > Currently 
disabled the SH setup to let just an authoritative DNS for > local resolution. 
Following the example, any request made from PC1 to > sys4/sys5/sys6 have no 
issues. However, if such host makes a request > to sys1/sys2/sys2 just get a 
time out response. > Any other query to outside, let's say google.com or 
whatever, works > just fine. El lun, 26 jul 2021 a las 13:29, Sten Carlsen ( 
s-carlsen.dk>>) escribió: >> >> Hi >> >> I am running just that setup. >> >> 
This may not scale well enough for your needs. >> >> I have one server with two 
views, one internal and one external. >> >> The external view is the hidden 
master for a number of public servers. >> All going through the relevant 
delegations. This is only >> authoritative. >> >> The internal view is selected 
by the client address and master files >> for the same domain but with my 
internal addresses. This is recursing >> and will answer from the master files 
for those domains and will >> recurse for any other query. >> >> This has 
served me well and e.g. I get the internal address for the >> mail server if I 
query from an internal address and I get the public >> address if I query from 
an external address. >> >> This setup means that mail clients will make a 
lookup of the same name >> always and if at home get the internal address and 
if outside get the >> public address. >> >> There is often a recommendation to 
use different domains, e.g. >> xxx.example.com for public addresses and 
xxx.internal.example.com for >> the same servers internal addresses. This is 
not very useful since >> e.g. a mail client would have to know about two 
different server names >> - with split horizon I can use the same name always. 
>> >> -- >> Best regards >> Sten Carlsen >> >> A pessimist is a person that can 
find a problem for every solution. >> >> >> On 26 Jul 2021, at 15.55, Daniel A. 
Rodriguez >> gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Hi there, >> >> Currently have a public 
DNS up & runnin' but, due to brand new >> location, there's a need to add local 
resolution. >> >> With that in mind, first idea was to deploy a split horizon 
setup. >> Sadly just local resolution works so far. Double check config but >> 
currently I'm stuck with this situation. >> >> Was wondering if having the same 
zone both public and private, but >> with different records, could be an issue. 
Master for the zone is >> public, of course, and the private one -as mentioned- 
has a different >> set of records just for lan hosts. Idea was to go out just 
when a >> query for a public subdomain is requested, but that desn't seem to >> 
work. >> >> Both forwarders option and recursion are enabled. >> >> Any hint 
will be much appreciated. ___ 
Daniel A. Rodriguez Informática, Conectividad y Sistemas Universidad Nacional 
del Alto Uruguay San Vicente - Misiones - Argentina www.unau.edu.ar 
___ Please visit 
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list 
ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. 
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-users 
mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org 
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. 
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.


bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users