Re: additional empty zones

2011-02-12 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> 2011/2/12 Matus UHLAR - fantomas :
> > Is it possible to add additional zones as empty?

On 12.02.11 11:15, Terry. wrote:
> depends on what is "empty".

exactly the same what is used by disable-empty-zones option.
I'd like to have opposite option.
-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
There's a long-standing bug relating to the x86 architecture that
allows you to install Windows.   -- Matthew D. Fuller
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: multi-master with mysql backend

2011-02-12 Thread Doug Barton

On 02/11/2011 01:51 PM, fddi wrote:

I understand you, but the advantage of having mysql backend is that
if one of the two servers dies, the other keeps running with up to
date informations, and can also be updated wit new informations. When
the  other server comes up again it will automatically sync itself
using mysql replica mechanism. if I use file backend I have to
manually sync it, and how to keep tracks of modifications ?

for this I choose mysql backend


Two questions, how often do you anticipate one of the masters failing, 
and how much data are you talking about? Generally the number of times a 
server fails is going to be pretty small, if it's not, you've got bigger 
problems.


If you're not talking about a huge amount of data here (and from what 
you've described in previous posts, you're not) then you are fairly 
dramatically over-architecting your solution here. Personally I think 
David had a great idea in regards to using nsupdate to update both 
masters at the same time. If you really think that one of them is going 
to fail often enough to justify an automated solution than scripting 
something that utilizes rsync shouldn't be too hard.



hth,

Doug

--

Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go

Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/

___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: additional empty zones

2011-02-12 Thread Doug Barton

On 02/12/2011 02:04 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:

2011/2/12 Matus UHLAR - fantomas:

Is it possible to add additional zones as empty?


On 12.02.11 11:15, Terry. wrote:

depends on what is "empty".


exactly the same what is used by disable-empty-zones option.
I'd like to have opposite option.


It's not clear to me what you're trying to accomplish, so if I don't get 
it right you'll have to post another message trying to describe in more 
detail what you're trying to accomplish without referring to the 
*empty-zones option.


What it sounds like you're trying to do is to define additional zones in 
a manner similar to what the current internally defined empty zones do. 
There is no simple named.conf option for that, but there is no reason 
that you can't define your own zones to accomplish the same thing. You 
might want to take a look at what I've done for the default FreeBSD 
named.conf:


http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base/head/etc/namedb/named.conf?view=markup&pathrev=218350

And here is the zone file that they use:

$TTL 3h
@ SOA @ nobody.localhost. 42 1d 12h 1w 3h
; Serial, Refresh, Retry, Expire, Neg. cache TTL

@   NS  @

; Silence a BIND warning
@   A   127.0.0.1


Hope this helps,

Doug

--

Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go

Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/

___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: additional empty zones

2011-02-12 Thread Mark Andrews

In message <20110212220459.ga23...@fantomas.sk>, Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
> > 2011/2/12 Matus UHLAR - fantomas :
> > > Is it possible to add additional zones as empty?
> 
> On 12.02.11 11:15, Terry. wrote:
> > depends on what is "empty".
> 
> exactly the same what is used by disable-empty-zones option.
> I'd like to have opposite option.

zone "xxx" {
type master;
database "_builtin empty  ";
};

should do it.

> -- 
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
> Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
> Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
> There's a long-standing bug relating to the x86 architecture that
> allows you to install Windows.   -- Matthew D. Fuller
> ___
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users@lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users