CHANGES file for new releases [was: Re: BIND 9.7.3b1 is now available]
I am sure some people like the new Release Notes section in these announcements (or the RELEASE-NOTES-* files at ftp.isc.bind), but can we have some easier way of getting hold of the CHANGES file for a new release than downloading the whole thing and picking it out? -- Chris Thompson Email: c...@cam.ac.uk ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Does anyone know where to find the ISC signing keys for source packages?
I'm getting a new version of Bind to build etc. The download pages come with references to signatures (asc, and others). But I can't find any reference to current PGP or other signing keys; does anyone know where to find them on the www.isc.org web site or where to obtain them otherwise? (I've tried to run searches on their site for signature or source signing, only getting information back about signing DNS records. Also, I haven't found any mention in the FAQ. Thanks in advance. Oisin McGuinness SMBC Capital Markets, Inc. 277 Park Avenue NY NY 10172 ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Re: Does anyone know where to find the ISC signing keys for source packages?
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Oisin McGuinness wrote: > I'm getting a new version of Bind to build etc. > > The download pages come with references to signatures (asc, and others). > > But I can't find any reference to current PGP or other signing keys; does > anyone know where to find > them on the www.isc.org web site or where to obtain them otherwise? > http://www.isc.org/about/openpgp Casey ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Re: ignoring incorrect nameservers in authority section
On Dec 22, 2010, at 4:55 AM, Sunil Shetye wrote:
> Is there any option to add workarounds for specific domains /
> nameservers like the ones listed above?
Possibly. You can try setting up conditional forwarding for the problem domain,
setting the authoritative name servers as the 'forwarders' list. This may not
work, since the authoritative servers may not respond well to recursive
queries, but it's worth a shot. For example:
zone "e-nxt.com." {
type forward;
forwarders {
202.71.131.12;
202.71.131.13;
};
};
Regards,
Chris Buxton
BlueCat Networks
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Re: CHANGES file for new releases [was: Re: BIND 9.7.3b1 is now available]
I've extracted the CHANGES files for BIND 9.6.3b1, BIND 9.7.3b1 and BIND 9.8.0a1 and put them in relevant directories on ftp.isc.org. Mark In message , Chris Thom pson writes: > I am sure some people like the new Release Notes section in these > announcements (or the RELEASE-NOTES-* files at ftp.isc.bind), but > can we have some easier way of getting hold of the CHANGES file for > a new release than downloading the whole thing and picking it out? > > -- > Chris Thompson > Email: c...@cam.ac.uk > ___ > bind-users mailing list > bind-users@lists.isc.org > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Re: ignoring incorrect nameservers in authority section
Quoting from Chris Buxton's mail on Thu, Dec 23, 2010:
> > Is there any option to add workarounds for specific domains /
> > nameservers like the ones listed above?
>
> Possibly. You can try setting up conditional forwarding for the problem
> domain, setting the authoritative name servers as the 'forwarders' list. This
> may not work, since the authoritative servers may not respond well to
> recursive queries, but it's worth a shot. For example:
>
> zone "e-nxt.com." {
> type forward;
> forwarders {
> 202.71.131.12;
> 202.71.131.13;
> };
> };
That did work. However, this means that I would have to watch the
zone to see
- if the IP addresses of their nameservers change
- if their nameservers change
Here, I can see that the nameserver is giving the right replies to all
queries except the NS queries. My guess is that they must have
transferred the zone from one nameserver to another
(ns[56].zenexpress.com. to ns[12].webpresenceworld.com. for
e-nxt.com) and updated the domain registration, but did not bother to
change the NS record on the new nameservers.
I was hoping that either bind should catch such cases automatically or
allow some workaround which need not be monitored later.
--
Sunil Shetye.
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
