Re: can @ be CNAME?
--- On Tue, 23/11/10, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas > Subject: Re: can @ be CNAME? > To: bind-users@lists.isc.org > Received: Tuesday, 23 November, 2010, 3:58 PM > On 23.11.10 15:50, Tech W. wrote: > > can I set @ to a cname type? like: > > > > @ IN CNAME www.example.com. > > Certainly not. for a domain you have you need SOA and NS > records, and CNAME > is incompatible with both of them. > But why @ can have an A RR? @ IN A 12.34.56.78 This seems OK for us. ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Re: can @ be CNAME?
On 23/11/2010 08:07, Tech W. wrote: > --- On Tue, 23/11/10, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >> From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas >>> can I set @ to a cname type? like: >>> >>> @ IN CNAME www.example.com. >> >> Certainly not. for a domain you have you need SOA and NS >> records, and CNAME >> is incompatible with both of them. >> > > But why @ can have an A RR? > > @ IN A 12.34.56.78 > > This seems OK for us. CNAME records are special. You can't have any other records for a label where you have a CNAME record (well, with the exception of RRSIG records if you're using DNSSEC). This is covered in great detail in any introductory text on DNS. The principle reason to want to have a CNAME record at the apex of a zone is to make http://example.com/ be a synonym for http://www.example.com/. The way to deal with that is to turn it round and make www.example.com be the CNAME record, and have the A record at example.com. Or just have A or records at both example.com and www.example.com Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matt...@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Re: can @ be CNAME?
Thanks a lot Matthew. > > CNAME records are special. You can't have any other > records for a label > where you have a CNAME record (well, with the exception of > RRSIG records > if you're using DNSSEC). This is covered in great > detail in any > introductory text on DNS. > > The principle reason to want to have a CNAME record at the > apex of a > zone is to make http://example.com/ be a synonym for > http://www.example.com/. The way to deal with > that is to turn it round > and make www.example.com be the CNAME record, and have the > A record at > example.com. Or just have A or records at both > example.com and > www.example.com > ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Split Delegation IP Reverse
Hi, Hello! My scenario is as follows: I have the following network 192.168.0.0/24 which manages my primary DNS server for this zone reversals and if any updates on the reverse of an IP upgrade to a second DNS server is a slave. Well my question is: Suppose I have a third server that will manage DNS but only part of the reverse IP block that my two DNS servers given, say that this third server must manage the reverse DNS for the network 192.168.0.230/28 only. How could you do this? Escuchar Leer fonéticamente Ing. Wilbert J. Rojas O. |Equipos y Sistemas, S.A. Administrador de Sistemas. Colegio Centro América 60 mts al norte. | Managua, Nicaragua wro...@ideay.net.ni | Tel.:+505 2277-4000 Ext.115|Fax: +505 2277-4411 ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Re: Split Delegation IP Reverse
You could CNAME the records to another PTR domain maintained by the third server. 230.0.168.192.in-addr.arpa is an alias for 230.0-28.0.168.192.in-addr.arpa 230.0-28.0.168.192.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer host.domainname On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Wilbert J. Rojas O. wrote: > Hi, > > Hello! > > My scenario is as follows: > > I have the following network 192.168.0.0/24 which manages my primary DNS > server for this zone reversals and if any updates on the reverse of an IP > upgrade to a second DNS server is a slave. > > Well my question is: > > Suppose I have a third server that will manage DNS but only part of the > reverse IP block that my two DNS servers given, say that this third server > must manage the reverse DNS for the network 192.168.0.230/28 only. > > How could you do this? > Escuchar > Leer fonéticamente > > Ing. Wilbert J. Rojas O. |Equipos y Sistemas, S.A. > Administrador de Sistemas. > Colegio Centro América 60 mts al norte. | Managua, Nicaragua > wro...@ideay.net.ni | Tel.:+505 2277-4000 Ext.115|Fax: +505 2277-4411 > > ___ > bind-users mailing list > bind-users@lists.isc.org > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users > ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Re: Split Delegation IP Reverse
Jonathan Thanks for responding, but I don't understand your idea. Ing. Wilbert J. Rojas O. |Equipos y Sistemas, S.A. Administrador de Sistemas. Colegio Centro América 60 mts al norte. | Managua, Nicaragua wro...@ideay.net.ni | Tel.:+505 2277-4000 Ext.115|Fax: +505 2277-4411 El 23/11/2010 04:01 p.m., Jonathan Petersson escribió: You could CNAME the records to another PTR domain maintained by the third server. 230.0.168.192.in-addr.arpa is an alias for 230.0-28.0.168.192.in-addr.arpa 230.0-28.0.168.192.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer host.domainname On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Wilbert J. Rojas O. wrote: Hi, Hello! My scenario is as follows: I have the following network 192.168.0.0/24 which manages my primary DNS server for this zone reversals and if any updates on the reverse of an IP upgrade to a second DNS server is a slave. Well my question is: Suppose I have a third server that will manage DNS but only part of the reverse IP block that my two DNS servers given, say that this third server must manage the reverse DNS for the network 192.168.0.230/28 only. How could you do this? Escuchar Leer fonéticamente Ing. Wilbert J. Rojas O. |Equipos y Sistemas, S.A. Administrador de Sistemas. Colegio Centro América 60 mts al norte. | Managua, Nicaragua wro...@ideay.net.ni | Tel.:+505 2277-4000 Ext.115|Fax: +505 2277-4411 ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Re: Split Delegation IP Reverse
It makes the thread hard to follow! > Why not? > > Please don't top post. > > On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Wilbert J. Rojas O. > > wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> Hello! > >> > >> My scenario is as follows: > >> > >> I have the following network 192.168.0.0/24 which manages my primary DNS > >> server for this zone reversals and if any updates on the reverse of an IP > >> upgrade to a second DNS server is a slave. > >> > >> Well my question is: > >> > >> Suppose I have a third server that will manage DNS but only part of the > >> reverse IP block that my two DNS servers given, say that this third server > >> must manage the reverse DNS for the network 192.168.0.230/28 only. > >> > >> How could you do this? > >> Escuchar > >> Leer fonéticamente > >> > >> Ing. Wilbert J. Rojas O. |Equipos y Sistemas, S.A. > >> Administrador de Sistemas. > >> Colegio Centro América 60 mts al norte. | Managua, Nicaragua > >> wro...@ideay.net.ni | Tel.:+505 2277-4000 Ext.115|Fax: +505 2277-4411 > >> > >> ___ > >> bind-users mailing list > >> bind-users@lists.isc.org > >> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users > >> > El 23/11/2010 04:01 p.m., Jonathan Petersson escribió: > > > You could CNAME the records to another PTR domain maintained by the > > third server. > > > > 230.0.168.192.in-addr.arpa is an alias for 230.0-28.0.168.192.in-addr.arpa > > 230.0-28.0.168.192.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer host.domainname > > > Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:18:17 -0600 > From: "Wilbert J. Rojas O." > Sender: bind-users-bounces+oberman=es@lists.isc.org > > Jonathan Thanks for responding, but I don't understand your idea. > > > Ing. Wilbert J. Rojas O. |Equipos y Sistemas, S.A. > Administrador de Sistemas. > Colegio Centro América 60 mts al norte. | Managua, Nicaragua > wro...@ideay.net.ni | Tel.:+505 2277-4000 Ext.115|Fax: +505 2277-4411 > > See RFC2317, "Classless IN-ADDR.ARPA delegation". http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1035.txt -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: ober...@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751 ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Re: Split Delegation IP Reverse
In article , "Wilbert J. Rojas O." wrote: > Jonathan Thanks for responding, but I don't understand your idea. See RFC 2317 for the mechanism to delegate subnets of a /24. -- Barry Margolin, bar...@alum.mit.edu Arlington, MA *** PLEASE don't copy me on replies, I'll read them in the group *** ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Re: Split Delegation IP Reverse
On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 14:34 -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote: > It makes the thread hard to follow! what rot, its no worse than bottom posters, nor those who forget how to trim replies to what's relevant, once you become responsible for this list server, then you can choose, until then, please desist with self appointment net-copping. > > Why not? > > > Please don't top post. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Re: error (broken trust chain) resolving
Casey Deccio deccio.net> writes: > > I still don't have the answer to this. Fair enough. I was just looking for clarification on your previous statements. > Perhaps a BIND developer may > have better insight into the log messages and what may be going on. Yeah, I was hoping to have caught the attention of a BIND developer here with all of this by now. Perhaps they just don't hang out here. Maybe I will try to find out where to ask questions that they might see. Thanx! b. ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Re: error (broken trust chain) resolving
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > Yeah, I was hoping to have caught the attention of a BIND developer > here with all of this by now. Perhaps they just don't hang out here. > Maybe I will try to find out where to ask questions that they might > see. I was reading it all along, but could never reproduce. I thought it was a temporary issue. I see your new bug report. Someone will follow up soon. ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
