Re: Is an IPv6-only glue/delegation record a problem in a world of IPv4?

[Mathew J. Newton]

On Mon, January 11, 2010 9:10 pm, Matthew Pounsett wrote:

> I suspect that, even though they threw an error, your registrar went ahead
> and passed on the same IPv4 address for both name servers to the registry.

I think this may have been the problem...

I went back in to the registrar's DNS control panel, cleaned everything
out and started afresh. In addition to the conventional 'delegate your
domain' control function I found that they also allow independent manual
tweaking of the glue - I think these two frontends may well have got out
of sync (my fault I'm sure for changing things too quickly) and ended up
in a bit of a mess.

The whole debacle has turned into something of a blessing in disguise
however -  I've discovered that the registrar provides a free secondary
service for domains purchased through them... and their nameserver is
dual-stacked too so all the better for my situation!

Thanks everyone for the assistance,

Mathew


___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: Best way to run Bind on public DNS servers??

[Jason Fesler]

On Jan 11, 2010, at 9:39 AM, Kaya Saman wrote:

> Hi, since I got no responses for this question could I rephrase it to 
> asking if Bind will do a zone transfer over public internet if the 
> servers have private IP addresses and are behind NAT with static port 
> definitions?

Tell bind to slave from the public IP that is forward to the private side.

___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users