[Bacula-users] Offsite vol management

2006-11-13 Thread Eric Rousse
Hi guys,

We are currently running Bacula for our backups. It works perfectly. I 
was just wondering if there's anything available for Offsite volume 
management ?
So far, I haven't seen anything, but if someone has an idea, that would 
be great.

Currently, I store tape locally and in the tape changer. But we also 
bring our tapes offsite, just in case anything happen to our server room.

But is there a way to track that information related to the tape volume.

Thanks,

-- 
Eric Rousse
514-655-1001

Telmatik inc.
204 Montarville, suite 250
Boucherville, QC, Canada
J4B 6S2

www.telmatik.com



-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] Offsite vol management

2006-11-13 Thread Eric Rousse
Hi Alan,

Well, either on site or offsite, it's not in a data safe. Yeah, I know 
we need to invest in a good data safe, its on my too-do list...
But even with a data safe that can handle 1100C, it makes you a bit 
unsecure... :P

thanks for your answer, I'll try to keep a manual list of the offsite tapes.


Alan Brown a écrit :
> On Mon, 13 Nov 2006, Eric Rousse wrote:
>
>> Currently, I store tape locally
>
> In a data safe?
>
>> and in the tape changer. But we also bring our tapes offsite, just in 
>> case anything happen to our server room.
>
> Is the offsite storage in a data safe?
>
>> But is there a way to track that information related to the tape volume.
>
> Not at the moment.
>
> If you use a suitably rated data safe, the need to take tapes offsite 
> is reduced as they can handle several hours direct fire exposure @ 
> 1100C along with a 7 metre drop (simulates floors burning out in a 
> multistory building)
>
>
>
> AB
>


-- 
Eric Rousse
514-655-1001

Telmatik inc.
204 Montarville, suite 250
Boucherville, QC, Canada
J4B 6S2

www.telmatik.com



-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


[Bacula-users] TCP 2 Hours timeout

2007-09-18 Thread Eric Rousse
Hi,

For some reason, on a specific machine(Windows 2000 Server), I always 
seems to get a 2 hours timeout. Since there's so much data it's kind of 
normal.
But I don't get that behavior on other machines. Also, my backup server 
is running under CentOS 4.5. And I just upgraded to bacula 2.2.1.

Here's the output of the job:

"18-Sep 01:34 alize-dir: TMBD02.2007-09-17_23.05.04 Fatal error: Network 
error with FD during Backup: ERR=Connection reset by peer
18-Sep 01:34 alize-dir: TMBD02.2007-09-17_23.05.04 Fatal error: No Job 
status returned from FD.
18-Sep 01:34 alize-dir: TMBD02.2007-09-17_23.05.04 Error: Bacula 
alize-dir 2.2.1 (30Aug07): 18-Sep-2007 01:34:29
  Build OS:   i686-pc-linux-gnu redhat
  JobId:  2692
  Job:TMBD02.2007-09-17_23.05.04
  Backup Level:   Full (upgraded from Incremental)
  Client: "tmbd02-fd" 2.0.3 (06Mar07) 
Linux,Cross-compile,Win32
  FileSet:"tmbd02 file set" 2007-08-23 23:05:05
  Pool:   "Daily" (From Run pool override)
  Storage:"TLS-4210" (From Job resource)
  Scheduled time: 17-Sep-2007 23:05:03
  Start time: 17-Sep-2007 23:34:32
  End time:   18-Sep-2007 01:34:29
  Elapsed time:   1 hour 59 mins 57 secs
  Priority:   5
  FD Files Written:   0
  SD Files Written:   4,291
  FD Bytes Written:   0 (0 B)
  SD Bytes Written:   21,789,009,405 (21.78 GB)
  Rate:   0.0 KB/s
  Software Compression:   None
  VSS:no
  Encryption: no
  Volume name(s): 14
  Volume Session Id:  13
  Volume Session Time:1190035021
  Last Volume Bytes:  22,876,922,880 (22.87 GB)
  Non-fatal FD errors:0
  SD Errors:  0
  FD termination status:  Error
  SD termination status:  OK
  Termination:*** Backup Error ***
"

The start and end time is exactly 2 hours.

I tried the heartbeat interval = 600, in my bacula-dir.conf file, for 
that specific client. And still no good.
Same problem. But other machines, in the same subnet, running linux 
though, I can transfer a lot of data. Okay, I don't think I have some 
huge files.
TMBD02, has some big database files, well, not that huge. But still 
about 1 gig each. I tested the transfer between the backup machine and 
the client, and it's working fine for smaller files though.

Anyone has a clue about that ?

Thanks,

-- 
Eric Rousse
System Administrator


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] TCP 2 Hours timeout

2007-09-18 Thread Eric Rousse

A, that seems to have did the trick.
Still took like 2 hours or so, but it didn't timeout before the end.

Thanks!

Jose E. Molina a écrit :

Eric Rousse wrote:

  
I tried the heartbeat interval = 600, in my bacula-dir.conf file, for 
that specific client. And still no good.



Did you also set the Heartbeat interval in the client configuration?

Cheers,
  


--
Eric Rousse
System Administrator



-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users