Re: [ath5k-users] revisiting an old problem
Had success last night, got connected at the place where I have access to a fairly weak signal. I used iwconfig with an explicit essid, which required a bit of being devious as the essid name is "shutup!" getting that ! in there requires some trickery with Linux. Could not connect to the other essid at that location, but that might be because of extremely weak signal, -88dbm. ___ ath5k-users mailing list ath5k-users@lists.ath5k.org https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-users
Re: [ath5k-users] revisiting an old problem
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Jim Haynes wrote: > Had success last night, got connected at the place where I have > access to a fairly weak signal. I used iwconfig with an explicit > essid, which required a bit of being devious as the essid name is > "shutup!" getting that ! in there requires some trickery with > Linux. Could not connect to the other essid at that location, > but that might be because of extremely weak signal, -88dbm. I think worst signal you can use to connect is practically 83-84 and you will have speed troubles and packet loss. At least this is what I heard from my ISP. And I see some packet loss although my signal is 81-82 (on a high distance wireless connection). ___ ath5k-users mailing list ath5k-users@lists.ath5k.org https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-users
Re: [ath5k-users] revisiting an old problem
2010/3/18 A > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Jim Haynes > wrote: > > Had success last night, got connected at the place where I have > > access to a fairly weak signal. I used iwconfig with an explicit > > essid, which required a bit of being devious as the essid name is > > "shutup!" getting that ! in there requires some trickery with > > Linux. Could not connect to the other essid at that location, > > but that might be because of extremely weak signal, -88dbm. > > I think worst signal you can use to connect is practically 83-84 and > you will have speed troubles and packet loss. At least this is what I > heard from my ISP. And I see some packet loss although my signal is > 81-82 (on a high distance wireless connection). > Does any of these take me closer to solve my problem? Or the thread changed? ___ ath5k-users mailing list ath5k-users@lists.ath5k.org https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-users
Re: [ath5k-users] revisiting an old problem
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Franczen Attila wrote: > Does any of these take me closer to solve my problem? Or the thread > changed? Perhaps Jim hijacked your thread but really did you read the first reply to your question? ___ ath5k-users mailing list ath5k-users@lists.ath5k.org https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-users
