Can't find node
Select node_name, tcp_name from nodes where tcp_name='xxx.domain.com' also tried Select node_name, tcp_name from nodes where tcp_name='xxx' No match found usin this criteria. I dont know why tsm still try to connect to this node, 1) On node xxx I removed all TSM files, I removed all entries from register, I removed also all TSM services. 2) TSM server was restarted, node xxx was restarted and still q actlog gives me 02/05/2014 10:27:26 ANR8212W Unable to resolve address for domain. 02/04/2014 10:27:57 ANR8214E Session open with xxx.domain.com failed due to connection refusal. (SESSION: 14) Any ideas? +-- |This was sent by r4mz...@gmail.com via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +--
ALL Tapes known to TSM
Hi, i got another problem, here is my q libvol which shows thats i have 19 tapes, but library says that i got 20... 939BCML5 is listed on library inventory but on q libvol no. Drive is empty, Any ideas? (http://postimg.org/image/bifvtp1yh/) undefined +-- |This was sent by r4mz...@gmail.com via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +--
ALL Tapes known to TSM
This volume is not shown in Q VOL, but like u asked I did CHECKIN LIBVOL SEARCH=YES After that, missing tape appeared in Q LIBVOL, its private (used by tsm, but last use is empty) weird ? How can I check is it assigned to any pool? Private means its being in use by tsm right? (http://postimg.org/image/vw7n7bu7n/) +-- |This was sent by r4mz...@gmail.com via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +--
ALL Tapes known to TSM
I've checked outputed q volhistory, there is no word about 938. +-- |This was sent by r4mz...@gmail.com via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +--
ALL Tapes known to TSM
I have set it to scratch, Now can I assign it to pool? +-- |This was sent by r4mz...@gmail.com via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +--
Copy stgpool best practises
Hi, I am planing upgrade of my TSM infrastructure. For now I have Server IBM x3650 M3 with 6x SATA RAID 1 (2 disk) (2 partition C,D) include TSM SERVER, Operation Server, on C, and DB + LOGS on D drive RAID 5 (4 disk) (1 partition) for primary stgpools (about 2,8TB) Got also Tape Library 3100 with next storage pools WIth I think is bad idea cuz there is no copypools I am thinking to do: Buy extra 10 SATA to x3650 and then RAID 1 (2 disk) Just WIN, TSM Server, + OC RAID 1 (2 disk) for DB RAID 1 (2 disk) for activelogs, archlogs (I heard from IBM en, that is best practise to split logs and db) RAID 5 (10 disk) or 2x RAID 5 (5 disk) as PRIMARY STORAGE = about 8-9TB and set Library as COPYSTG POOLS and put in other location (other room) But IMAO 8-9TB is way to low capcity, so i decided to make nextstorage pool on tape lib DO u think is good idea to make on tape lib nextstorage pool and copypool? I got 2x drive +-- |This was sent by r4mz...@gmail.com via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +--
Can't find node
I am gettin from q actlog ANR8214E Session open with xxx.domain.com failed due to connection refusal But the problem is that xxx.domain.com doesn't exists as registered node in TSM. How can I find this? +-- |This was sent by r4mz...@gmail.com via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +--
