Q BACKUPSET generates an ANR9999D error.
I searched the archives and did not see if this was a known problem. 04/05/01 09:33:27 ANR2017I Administrator x issued command: QUERY BACKUPSET 04/05/01 09:33:27 ANRD pkshmem.c(330): Invalid attempt to free memory; called from 10456d30 (AdmQueryBkSet). Version: Storage Management Server for AIX-RS/6000 - Version 3, Release 7, Level 2.0 Thanks, Phil Phil Bone Sr. Systems Consultant NT Platform Services Office: 706.596.5928 Fax: 706.596.5950 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NT Permissions and Restore
Try this: grant auth (someadmin) cl=node auth=acc node=(somenode) -Original Message- From: Mayo, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 8:22 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: NT Permissions and Restore I am trying to figure out if there is any way to allow a non-administrator account to restore files from ADSM to an NT server. I am the network administrator and have previously handled this. Our Operations group is going to take this over, and I have added them to the Backup Operators group in NT. However, from the literature and from a test, it appears that this is insufficient to restore from ADSM, although it works with a local NT backup. For security and confidentiality reasons, I am not looking to make them Administrators of all these machines. Is there a workaround, or is it absolutely required to either be an admin or have specific priveleges to restore a file in NT? Thanks, Bill Mayo Pitt County MIS
Re: Changing configuration to use 4 drives
Try MOUNTLIMIT=DRIVES -Original Message- From: Ken Chamberlain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 12:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Changing configuration to use 4 drives We've just upgraded our 2 3590 B drives to 3590 E drives and added 2 new E drives. The new drives are available according to "lsdev -C". The new drives have been defined to ADSM via "define drive" and set to "online=yes". We've upped the mountpoints parameter of the 3590 devclass to 4. But when we try to use all 4 drives simultaneously we get ANR8447E "No drives are currently available in library " and mounts fail after the first two mounts. Somewhere I've missed configuration to allow 4 drives to be used simultaneously. Any ideas? Ken Chamberlain University of Toronto Phone:(416) 978-1582 Fax: (416) 971-2085 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Really Dumb Mistake
I would hope that it would be as simple as changing the Management Class and elevating the new policy. The next expiration should clean it up. Phil -Original Message- From: Palmadesso Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2000 11:46 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Really Dumb Mistake We are using the ADSM connect agent with one of our exchange servers at a remote location. The level of the connect agent does not have the "autodelete" function to automatically remove older exchange objects. So what we need to do periodically is go into the exchange box and remove the last months backup objects manually. We've been doing this for 3 months but I was getting concerned when none of the tapes were being freed up by expiration and then reclaimed. It never concerned me too much because I knew the library had lots of space. Well after checking the management class for the exchange server I noticed that I had not set up some of the parameters correctly. Specifically "deleted objects" was set to 2 instead of the required 0. Of course this has the effect of keeping all objects because of the way exchange backups work. So now my dilemma is how do I get rid of what I don't want since its already been removed in the connect agent on the exchange box. Delete volume looks like my only option but it makes me a bit nervous because I'm not sure if it will cause any data continuity problems. Anybody have any advise for a dummy. ADSM Platform: AIX 4.1.5 ADSM 3.1.40 Exchange Server: NT4 sp5 Exchange 5.5 sp3 Thanks, Jack
Re: TDP for Microsoft Exchange
We run our Exchange backups as a "PRESCHEDULEDCOMMAND" Here is the line in the \baclient\dsm.opt file: * preschedulecmd "C:\PROGRA~1\IBM\ADSM\Agentexc\backup.cmd" * Here is the "backup.cmd" file: c: cd \progra~1\ibm\adsm\agentexc excdsmc /backup:is,full excdsmc /backup:dir,full excdsmc /backup:is,incr excdsmc /backup:dir,incr excdsmc /adsmautodelete:* /ifolder:20 You don't need to install a seperate "EXCHANGE SCHEDULER". You can use the existing NT client scheduler service (if you have one). Phil -Original Message- From: Anderson, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2000 9:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: TDP for Microsoft Exchange I have ADSM 3.1.2.20 for NT with client 3.06. I have installed TDP for exchange 1.1 I can ran a manual backup with no problem, but when I try to install the scheduler I keep getting an invalid option file. I have issued the following command to install the scheduler from the baclient directory: DSMCUTIL INST /NAME:'EXCHANGE SCHEDULER' /NODE:NODENAME //PASSWORD:PASSWORD /CLIENTDIR:"C:\WIN32APP\IBM\ADSM\BACLIENT /OPTFILE:"C:\WIN32APP\IBM\ADSM\MSEXC\DSM.OPT my questions I guess is one can this version of exchange agent run with the 3.06 client and second is there any incorrect syntax that I keep missing. Any help appreciated We will be going to TSM 4.1, but not till beginning of the year.
Re: Bare Metal Restore for NT
Here is the Redbook Nick is referring to: Client Disaster Recovery - Bare Metal - SG24-4880-00.pdf Phil -Original Message- From: Nicholas Cassimatis/Raleigh/IBM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2000 9:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bare Metal Restore for NT You can't overwrite an active registry. Two options: 1. Step 1 should be to install NT and TSM to non-standard directories. That way you can restore the registry. 2. Restore the c:\adsm.sys directory tree, then boot with an NTFS aware diskette, and copy the directory files back to c:\winnt\system32\config. I'd advise reading the redbook on NT Bare Metal Restores (I can't find the number, but you can search for it on the www.redbooks.ibm.com website), as there's more to restoring an entire NT system than meets the eye. Nick Cassimatis [EMAIL PROTECTED] "I'm one cookie away from happy." - Snoopy (Charles Schulz)
Re: Dropping pending tapes to scratch
A change in the reuse delay setting will not effect tapes that are already in pending state. If you need the tapes back immediately, you could delete the volume. Phil -Original Message- From: Kathleen M Hallahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 18, 2000 1:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Dropping pending tapes to scratch When a storage pool contains tapes in pending status, and the pool is subsequently updated to "reusedelay=0 days," how long should it take before those tapes drop into scratch status? I expected them to change status immediately, and they aren't. Thanks! Kathleen
Re: Bare metal restore manual
The document number is: SG24-4880-00. I can email it to you directly if you would like. Phil -Original Message- From: Richard Sims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2001 11:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Bare metal restore manual >I've looked there, can't find it www.redbooks.ibm.com's search capability seems to be broken this morning. I'm sending them email. Richard Sims, BU
Re: how to speed up NT restore?
John,
I am assuming here that the Q_TAPE_VOLS script shows tapes that include both
active and inactive versions. Do you have a version of the script that will
display a list of tapes that contain just the active versions?
Thanks,
Phil
Phil Bone
Sr. Systems Consultant
Network Services, Infrastructure Management
Office: 706.596.5928
Fax: 706.596.5950
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: John Naylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2001 8:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: how to speed up NT restore?
Peter,
Here is a script you can run to find out how many tapes your client has data
on.
You might not need to mount all of them as some will probably just contain
inactive data
/* -*/
/* Script written 23/06/99 by John Naylor */
/* Script Name: Q_TAPE_VOLS_TOT*/
/* Description:Display total tapes for node */
/* parameter $1 = node name
/* Example: run q_tape_vols havsd2 */
select node_name, count(distinct volume_name) -
as "Tape total" -
from volumeusage -
where node_name = upper('$1') -
group by node_name
If you want to know the individual tapes then the script below will do that
/* -*/
/* Script written 25/06/99 by John Naylor */
/* Script Name: Q_TAPE_VOLS*/
/* Description: Display the TAPES that */
/* relate to a specific node */
/* Parameter: node name and storage pool */
/* Example: run q_tape_vols havsd2 nwlcart */
select distinct volume_name,node_name from -
volumeusage where node_name = upper('$1') -
and stgpool_name = upper('$2')
If this is a test restore only, then I would bin it and think seriously
about
collocation for
your primary pools, or maybe regular backupsets.
Peter Koblauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 01/05/2001 12:57:32 PM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: John Naylor/HAV/SSE)
Subject: how to speed up NT restore?
Hello,
I have been restoring an NT client for about 8 hours now, a bare-metal
restore.
The server is an RS/6000 at ADSM 3.10.
The problem is that it until now only some MBs have been restored and
the client
will need many GBs before it is done ... Looks like this could take
days.
The activity log and 'q session' shows that the restore session is doing
numerous
( DLT) tape mounts, and even when no mounts are outstanding very little
data is
transferred from the server to the client. Looks like the data for this
client might be spread
over hundreds of tapes. The storage pool for this client is not
collocated.
Is there a way to speed up the restore?
Would it make sense to do an "export node" to tapes followed by an
"import node" in order to force
the data to fewer tapes or would I then just be spending time in the
"export" instead?
Is there something else I can do?
--
any help would be appreciated!
thanks,
Peter Koblauch
**
The information in this E-Mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It may not represent the views of Scottish and Southern
Energy plc.
It is intended solely for the addressees. Access to this E-Mail by
anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient,
any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted
to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any unauthorised recipient should advise the sender immediately of
the error in transmission.
Scottish Hydro-Electric and Southern Electric are trading names of
Scottish and Southern Energy Group.
**
Re: how to speed up NT restore? (Export Node)
The export node command finished with this output:
tsm: ADSM>export node A25705 filed=alla pre=yes
ANR0616I EXPORT NODE: Preview processing completed successfully.
ANR0626I EXPORT NODE: Copied 1 node definitions.
ANR0627I EXPORT NODE: Copied 2 file space 939 archive files, 294620 backup
files, and 0 space managed files.
ANR0630I EXPORT NODE: Copied 25376272 kilobytes of data.
ANR0611I EXPORT NODE started by E10058 as process 70 has ended.
ANR0986I Process 70 for EXPORT NODE running in the BACKGROUND processed
295562
items for a total of 25,985,303,029 bytes with a completion state of SUCCESS
at
10:20:28.
How does help me know how many tape mounts would be required to perform a
full restore of this node??
Thanks,
Phil
-Original Message-
From: John Naylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2001 10:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: how to speed up NT restore?
Phil,
No I have not needed to look at that because all my clients are in
collocated
pools and
the large ones are on 9840 cartridges, so the number of tapes per client is
limited.
However I believe you can achieve this via :-
export node ?? filedata=allactive preview=yes
John
Phil Bone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 01/05/2001 02:48:34 PM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: John Naylor/HAV/SSE)
Subject: Re: how to speed up NT restore?
John,
I am assuming here that the Q_TAPE_VOLS script shows tapes that include both
active and inactive versions. Do you have a version of the script that will
display a list of tapes that contain just the active versions?
Thanks,
Phil
Phil Bone
Sr. Systems Consultant
Network Services, Infrastructure Management
Office: 706.596.5928
Fax: 706.596.5950
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: John Naylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2001 8:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: how to speed up NT restore?
Peter,
Here is a script you can run to find out how many tapes your client has data
on.
You might not need to mount all of them as some will probably just contain
inactive data
/* -*/
/* Script written 23/06/99 by John Naylor */
/* Script Name: Q_TAPE_VOLS_TOT*/
/* Description:Display total tapes for node */
/* parameter $1 = node name
/* Example: run q_tape_vols havsd2 */
select node_name, count(distinct volume_name) -
as "Tape total" -
from volumeusage -
where node_name = upper('$1') -
group by node_name
If you want to know the individual tapes then the script below will do that
/* -*/
/* Script written 25/06/99 by John Naylor */
/* Script Name: Q_TAPE_VOLS*/
/* Description: Display the TAPES that */
/* relate to a specific node */
/* Parameter: node name and storage pool */
/* Example: run q_tape_vols havsd2 nwlcart */
select distinct volume_name,node_name from -
volumeusage where node_name = upper('$1') -
and stgpool_name = upper('$2')
If this is a test restore only, then I would bin it and think seriously
about
collocation for
your primary pools, or maybe regular backupsets.
Peter Koblauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 01/05/2001 12:57:32 PM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: John Naylor/HAV/SSE)
Subject: how to speed up NT restore?
Hello,
I have been restoring an NT client for about 8 hours now, a bare-metal
restore.
The server is an RS/6000 at ADSM 3.10.
The problem is that it until now only some MBs have been restored and
the client
will need many GBs before it is done ... Looks like this could take
days.
The activity log and 'q session' shows that the restore session is doing
numerous
( DLT) tape mounts, and even when no mounts are outstanding very little
data is
transferred from the server to the client. Looks like the data for this
client might be spread
over hundreds of tapes. The storage pool for this client is not
collocated.
Is there a way to speed up the restore?
Would it make sense to do an "export node" to tapes followed by an
"import node" in order to force
the data to fewer tapes or would I then just be spending time in the
"export" instead?
Is there something else I can do?
--
any help would be appreciated!
thanks,
Peter Koblauch
**
The information in this E-Mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It may not represent the views of Scottish and Southern
Energy plc.
It is intended solely for the addressees. Access to this E-Mail by
anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient,
any disclos
Re: Creating a Client Backup Set???
It sounds like it would be a two step process: 1) output the Backup Set to a file then 2) burn the file to a CD. It may require defining a storage pool (DEF STG pool_name DISK ...), then creating one volume in that pool (DEF VOL pool_name volume_name ...), and creating the backup set to that volume (DEF BACKUPSET node_name bckup_set_name DEV=device_class_name VOL=volume_name). You may also need to define a new device class (DEF DEV device_class_name DEVT=FILE MAXCAP=???M DIR=directory_name). Phil Bone Sr. Systems Consultant NT Platform Services Office: 706.596.5928 Fax: 706.596.5950 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Marc Levitan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 12:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Creating a Client Backup Set??? Hi all- I have been asked to create a client backup set for the purpose of restoring a client in the event that the TSM Server is not available via the network. I am supposed to burn the backup set to cd. This way I can walk up to the client, put in the cd, and restore locally from the cd. Here is my question: Where is the default output of the backup set? Where does it go -- to tape? Is there a way to create the backup set onto the hard disk rather than tape? How does the Device Class fit into this? I am trying to figure out how I am supposed to transfer the backup set to cd-rom. One more issue: the cd Burner is NOT local to the tsm server, it is accross the network. Tsm server is 3.7.4 on AIX RS/6000. StorageTek 9840 Storage Management Server for AIX-RS/6000 - Version 3, Release 7, Level 4.0 Any ifo would be appreciated! Thanks, Storage Management Server for AIX-RS/6000 - Version 3, Release 7, Level 4.0 Marc Levitan Senior LAN Engineer PFPC Global Fund Services
Re: hard cut-off time
You can do a "cancel session all" and if the clients are out of the backup start window, they won't try to restart. Phil Bone Sr. Systems Consultant Network Services, Infrastructure Management Office: 706.596.5928 Fax: 706.596.5950 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Phillip Guan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2000 3:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: hard cut-off time Hi all, We have an environment where we'd like to implement a hard cut-off time for backups to our TSM server. There are some boxes that start and stop a database or do other pre and post commands that can't afford to still be doing backups when a certain point in the morning comes up. In fact we don't really want any backups going outside of a certain window. If they're still going, we'd prefer they just fail and cancel their sessions and run their post commands. Is there an easy way to implement this in TSM? To cut off any backup sessions and put the server in a disable sessions mode or something along those lines? or do i have to script that via KSH/Perl and do queries and parse out the info and so forth to get the same effect? Thanks, Phillip Guan
Re: backup several NT domains with out trust
TSM does not rely on an NT Domain structure to do it's thing...that is, unless you change the TSM services to run as something other than the default system account. Phil Bone Sr. Systems Consultant Network Services, Infrastructure Management Office: 706.596.5928 Fax: 706.596.5950 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ofer vaknin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2000 6:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: backup several NT domains with out trust Importance: High Hi all it may be a stupid Q but ... We have a Server Farm and want to install TSM on NT server and to backup all the servers in the Server Farm all of them are NT servers because they are customers servers all of them in different domains we do not want do to trust relation ship between them how can we backup all of them in one TSM server on NT
Re: Upgrade to Tivoli
If you are under maintenance, your CE can order it for you. We have our TSM 3.7 upgrade (it's called microcode) in house and will be installing it next month. Oh yeah, our NetStore box is a part number 3466-C00. It came loaded with 3.1.2.something... Phil Bone Sr. Systems Consultant Network Services, Infrastructure Management Office: 706.596.5928 Fax: 706.596.5950 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Anderson, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2000 10:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Upgrade to Tivoli I was wondering if anyone else is in the same boat I am. We are trying to upgrade our ADSM 3.1.2.20 to Tivoli. I was just informed however that because we have a Netstore a01, that we can not upgrade. My question is if anyone else has the same problem, what are you going to do? Mike Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Preferred server? ADSM on NT vs ADSM on AIX (3466 Comments)
Just a side comment on the 3466: The "no upgrade" dilemma seems to have come early for me. We have a 3466 with one drawer of 9GB SSA (JBOD). We were hoping to reconfigure the DASD to a RAID5 configuration. The story that I am getting is that a RAID5 set of 9GB drives is not a supported configuration. O.K., then we chunk the 9GB drives and put in a drawer of 18's which do support RAID5, right? Nope. The "configuration" (the software that IBM uses to quote you an upgrade) does not support removing the 9's. Well, the last resort is to add more 9's (not what we want to do). But no!! The 9's are no longer available!! ARGHHH Phil Bone Sr. Systems Consultant Network Services, Infrastructure Management Office: 706.596.5928 Fax: 706.596.5950 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Joe Faracchio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 07, 2000 7:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Preferred server? ADSM on NT vs ADSM on AIX Hal, Do look at the price comparison of a 3466 as a 'total solution' option. What I mean is , don't dismiss it as just another AIX box. It includes a license for 5000 clients (or at least it used to!) And may even be cheaper as a whole than buying all the parts yourself. The down side is that it will reach a point where IBM will say: "Go ahead and run it into the ground but we won't upgrade it anymore." and that point is usually (?) around 3 or so years ... ... joe.f. Joseph A Faracchio, Systems Programmer, UC Berkeley On Fri, 4 Aug 2000, Riddle, Hal wrote: > Any thoughts on which would be the preferred server and why. We presently > run ADSM 3.1 on an AIX SP node to back up AIX, NT, Novell, and Vax servers. > Have absolutely no problems with the present arrangement other than the > lease on the AIX stuff will run out in the next year. Management wants to > look at other options and since we have NT servers on site, their > suitablilty wa sraised. The NT's we presently use are the IBM Netfinity 5000 > w/h Xeon processors and a similiar box would be used for ADSM. >
3590-B11 Configuration Help Needed
I downloaded and installed the latest atape and atldd drivers on my 4.3.3.0 server. When I follow the steps outlined in the ADSM Admin Guide (pg 47 in the .PDF) to define an autochanger, I get back the message that: cfgadsmdd: can NOT configure a TAPE DRIVE as lb0 cfgadsmdd: the device is NOT supported. I was able to define the drive as a MANUAL lib and configure it in ADSM 3.1. What am I doing wrong? PS: I tried every setting on the ACF...did not seem to make any difference. Thanks. Phil Bone Sr. Systems Consultant Network Services, Infrastructure Management Office: 706.596.5928 Fax: 706.596.5950 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: I have a ( stupid) NetWare restore question
Could it be that your client has MEMMORYEFFICIENTBACKUP=YES and the filenames have been truncated? Or that you are restoring all versions of each file? (Just some thoughts) Oh yeah, when you get tired of staring RCONSOLE, try a Lava Lamp Phil Bone Sr. Systems Consultant Network Services, Infrastructure Management Office: 706.596.5928 Fax: 706.596.5950 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Robinson, Cris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2000 9:41 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: I have a ( stupid) netware restore question Ok, I've done quite a few full Netware restores and I have noticed that when I restore an entire volume, (the volume is empty when I start), I get messages that state that the file already exists and it is skipping. Now I don't mean the files that are created when the volume and name space support are installed. I'm talking data files several directories down. We haven't noticed any problems with the restores but how can this happen? Anyone? Not worried, just perplexed as I stare at RCONSOLE. :- 0 CR __ Cris Robinson Backup & Recovery Engineering Information Technology Support Services Liberty Mutual Insurance Portsmouth, New Hampshire 603.431.8400.54837 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Base TMS client and SQL backup question
We are using the ADSM SQL Connect Agent (or TSM SQL Data Protection Agents) to do our backups. Our DBA's are scheduling and running the backups with SQL jobs that they have setup through the SQL Enterprise Manager. Then they can have the status of the backup jobs emailed to them through SQL Mail. As far as issuing "net" commands in pre/post, I would assume that at a minimum you would have to configure the ADSM/TSM "Central Scheduler Agent" and/or the "Client Acceptor" to run as an NT account with the required privilege to stop/start services. Just a guess... Phil Bone Sr. Systems Consultant Network Services, Infrastructure Management Office: 706.596.5928 Fax: 706.596.5950 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Gary Ison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2000 8:08 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Base TMS client and SQL backup question Hi Folks, Is anyone using the pre/post exits of the base client to stop/start the MSSQL server with the "net stop/start mssqlserver" commands? I have a client who is trying this and the schedule log stops recording when the pre command file is triggered. The client has also failed to back up since this method was implemented. If you are not using the net commands, how are you using the pre/post (or other methods) commands to stop the SQL server so the databases can be backed up? Any help or examples would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. Gary L. Ison Governor's Office for Technology 101 Cold Harbor Drive Frankfort, Ky. 40601 Phone: (502) 564-8724 Fax: (502) 564-6856 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Re: label libv - problem
>From personal experience, I can tell you that you don't need to specify LABELSOURCE for a 3494, (regardless of what the documentations says). label libvol 3494a search=yes checkin=scratch overwrite=yes volrange=00,99 Hope that helps. Phil Bone Sr. Systems Consultant Network Services, Infrastructure Management Office: 706.596.5928 Fax: 706.596.5950 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Peter Dümpert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2000 12:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: label libv - problem Hi *SMers, trying to fill a newly installed 3494 under TSM 3.7.3.0 I ran into the following problem: tsm: TSM>q libr Library Name LibraryDevice Private Scratch External Shared TypeCategory Category Manager -- -- -- 3494 349X /dev/lmcp0 300 301 No tsm: TSM>label libv 3494 devtype=3590 search=yes labelsource=barcode checkin=scratch volrange=00,09 ANR8494E LABEL LIBVOLUME: An option specified is not valid for 349X libraries. ANS8001I Return code 3. Checking with "help label libv" I can't find what I've done wrong with the above used "label libv" command. Any help would be very welcome. -- MfG / Ciao - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Peter Dümpert Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rechenzentrum der Technischen Universität Fax : ++49/531/391-5549 D 38092 BraunschweigTel : ++49/531/391-5535
RAID5 or JBOD: Which Performs Batter in the *SM Environment?
We are looking to upgrade our SSA storage on our H50. Our current configuration is 16 x 9GB drives. One the upgrade path is to 16 x 18GB RAID5. How will this help or hurt our *SM performance? Any suggestions on setting up the filesystems, i.e., a few large ones or several small ones? Thanks, Phil Phil Bone Sr. Systems Consultant Network Services, Infrastructure Management Office: 706.596.5928 Fax: 706.596.5950 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phil Bone Sr. Systems Consultant Network Services, Infrastructure Management Office: 706.596.5928 Fax: 706.596.5950 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We currently have an Phil Bone Sr. Systems Consultant Network Services, Infrastructure Management Office: 706.596.5928 Fax: 706.596.5950 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
