Re: TSM Client & TSM TDP for Database Pricing
Two options I can see: 1) Ask you IBM rep for sub-capacity licensing for TDP for DB 2) You can use: -> oracle to dump DB some where and after that to backup this dump with backup archive client ( I -> MS SQL -> crate maintenance plan to backup DB on disk and again backup this dump to TSM with backup-archive client I personally will not recommend opt. 2) because there are some disadvantages and would require additional storage space.. HTH Chavdar On 2/19/2014 22:31, Lamb, Charles P. wrote: Hi. We are switching from IBM servers (x3650-Mx) to CISCO Blades (UCS B200-M3) in our VMware environment. We are receiving pricing from our IBM VAR for the CISCO blades that very high. CISCO blades have twice as many cores than the IBM servers. Boss is very upset about the issue. Does anyone have alternative to TSM clients and TSM TDP for Database which would interface with TSM servers and be less costly?? Your thoughts??
Re: TSM 7.1 Silent install
Raised a PMR Februar 2nd. and after a little back and forth with IBM
support I got silent install working for the 7.1 BA client today. There is
a document APAR which will fix the info center entry some time in the
future.
IBM has evidently just copied the info center entry from the 6.4 version to
7.1 without giving it any thought if it was correct or not. I think we
should expect more.
Solution:
The 7.1 client now uses the 2012 version instead of the 2010 version for
the vcredist thing. The paths after unpacking are:
x86:
TSMCLI_WIN\tsmcli\x64\client\Disk1\ISSetupPrerequisites\{270b0954-35ca-4324-bbc6-ba5db9072dae}
x64:
TSMCLI_WIN\tsmcli\x64\client\Disk1\ISSetupPrerequisites\{7f66a156-bc3b-479d-9703-65db354235cd
Hans Chr.
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Hans Christian Riksheim
wrote:
> I can not get silent install to work. with the 7.1 BA client for Windows.
>
> When I look into the information center for 7.1, the procedure is exactly
> the same as for version 6 although the paths after unpacking the 7.1 client
> is vastly different from unpacking version 6.
>
> Is the procedure in the information center correct or is it just copied
> and pasted from previous versions?
>
>
>
> http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/tsminfo/v7r1/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.ibm.itsm.client.doc%2Fc_inst_winsilent.html
>
> msiexec /i
> "Z:\tsm_images\TSM_BA_Client\IBM Tivoli Storage Manager Client.msi"
> RebootYesNo="No" REBOOT="Suppress" ALLUSERS=1
> INSTALLDIR="d:\program files\tivoli\tsm"
> ADDLOCAL="BackupArchiveGUI,BackupArchiveWeb,Api64Runtime,
> AdministrativeCmd"
> TRANSFORMS=1033.mst /qn /l*v "c:\log.txt"
>
>
>
>
SnapDiff backups not reporting last backup dates correctly
TSM Server 6.2.5.0 on AIX TSM client 6.3.1.0 on Windows 2008-R2 We are using 2 proxy servers to perform SnapDiff backups of our NetApp filers. I can see in the logs that the backups are completing successfully, but when I query the filespaces on TSM, many of the "end backup" dates are in the distant past. Is this a known issue, or am I missing something? Snippit from last night's backup log: Successful incremental backup of '\\\vol_$' Total number of objects inspected:0 Total number of objects backed up: 137 Total number of objects updated: 0 Total number of objects rebound: 0 Total number of objects deleted: 0 Total number of objects expired: 3 Total number of objects failed: 0 Total number of subfile objects: 0 Total number of bytes inspected: 1.36 GB Total number of bytes transferred: 1.36 GB Data transfer time: 25.96 sec Network data transfer rate:55,080.09 KB/sec Aggregate data transfer rate: 26,116.98 KB/sec Objects compressed by:0% Total data reduction ratio:0.00% Subfile objects reduced by: 0% Elapsed processing time: 00:00:54 Results of Q FI: Node Name: Filespace Name: \\\vol_$ Hexadecimal Filespace Name: fff FSID: 19 Platform: WinNT Filespace Type: NTFS Is Filespace Unicode?: Yes Capacity (MB): 233,472.0 Pct Util: 79.5 Last Backup Start Date/Time: 08/30/2012 08:53:52 Days Since Last Backup Started: 539 Last Backup Completion Date/Time: 08/30/2012 08:53:54 Days Since Last Backup Completed: 539 Last Full NAS Image Backup Completion Date/Time: Days Since Last Full NAS Image Backup Completed: Steve Schaub System Engineer II, Backup/Recovery Blue Cross Blue Shield of Tennessee - Please see the following link for the BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee E-mail disclaimer: http://www.bcbst.com/email_disclaimer.shtm
Re: TSM Client & TSM TDP for Database Pricing
If this is all VMWare, and the UCS blades have twice as many processors, shouldn't you only need half as many of them? Core count would be the same? -steve -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Lamb, Charles P. Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 3:32 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] TSM Client & TSM TDP for Database Pricing Hi. We are switching from IBM servers (x3650-Mx) to CISCO Blades (UCS B200-M3) in our VMware environment. We are receiving pricing from our IBM VAR for the CISCO blades that very high. CISCO blades have twice as many cores than the IBM servers. Boss is very upset about the issue. Does anyone have alternative to TSM clients and TSM TDP for Database which would interface with TSM servers and be less costly?? Your thoughts?? - Please see the following link for the BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee E-mail disclaimer: http://www.bcbst.com/email_disclaimer.shtm
Re: Pointing FlashCopyManager.exe at a custom options file
Unless your DBA leaves the gui open and one of your scheduled backups kicks off, using the incorrect settings in the opt file. Steve Schaub -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Remco Post Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 2:14 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Pointing FlashCopyManager.exe at a custom options file Hi Neil, we've opted to do the 'copy and overwrite' option files in a script that subsequently starts the GUI. The scripts are placed in the start menu and well, the exchange/sql admins see the difference, but the ease of use is such that there is very little to complain about. Op 19 feb. 2014, om 16:58 heeft Neil Schofield het volgende geschreven: > I've got something of a revolt on my hands from our SQL DBAs when it > comes to the new Flash Copy Manager interface for TDP for SQL. > Fundamentally, their objections arise from an inability to specify the > name of a custom options file when launching the console. > > Previously, when managing multiple SQL Server instances in a Failover > Cluster the DBAs would have numerous shortcuts to TDPSQL.EXE with each > using the /TSMOPTFILE switch (along with /SQLSERVER ) to specify a > different options file on a shared disk. Unfortunately > FLASHCOPYMANAGER.EXE doesn't seem to allow the options file to be > specified in this way. > > IBM offer some advice to work around this limitation but this seems to > boil down to reverting to using the now deprecated TDPSQL.EXE or a > rather kludgy series of scripts to overwrite the default copy of the > options file with a custom version prior to launching the console: > http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21597023 > > Neither of these is especially attractive and I wondered if anyone > else had a better way of coping with this scenario? The technote above > makes reference to reviewing this capability for future releases but > given this is now a year old and we've seen v7.1 arrive in the mean > time, I'm guessing they don't see it as a priority. > > Regards > Neil Schofield > Infrastructure Architect, Hardware Engineering Yorkshire Water > > > > > Spotted a leak? > If you spot a leak please report it immediately. Call us on 0800 57 > 3553 or go to http://www.yorkshirewater.com/leaks > > Get a free water saving pack > Don't forget to request your free water and energy saving pack, it > could save you money on your utility bills and help you conserve > water. http://www.yorkshirewater.com/savewater > > The information in this e-mail, and any files transmitted with it, is > confidential and may also be legally privileged. The contents are intended > solely for the addressee only and are subject to the legal notice available > at http://www.keldagroup.com/email.htm. This email does not constitute a > binding offer, acceptance, amendment, waiver or other agreement, or create > any obligation whatsoever, unless such intention is clearly stated in the > body of the email. If you are not the intended recipient, please return the > message by replying to it and then delete the message from your computer. Any > disclosure, copying, distribution or action taken in reliance on its contents > is prohibited and may be unlawful. > > Yorkshire Water Services Limited > Registered Office Western House, Halifax Road, Bradford, BD6 2SZ > Registered in England and Wales No 2366682 -- Met vriendelijke groeten/Kind Regards, Remco Post r.p...@plcs.nl +31 6 248 21 622 - Please see the following link for the BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee E-mail disclaimer: http://www.bcbst.com/email_disclaimer.shtm
Re: TSM Client & TSM TDP for Database Pricing
Steve... No, the CISCO blade memory can be just so large to be effective. VMware memory usage sizes the server/blade. I asked your question many months ago and was told by the consultant that this concept would not work to have an good performing CISCO blade in the VMware environment. So, the core count went up!! -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Schaub, Steve Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 8:05 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM Client & TSM TDP for Database Pricing If this is all VMWare, and the UCS blades have twice as many processors, shouldn't you only need half as many of them? Core count would be the same? -steve -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Lamb, Charles P. Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 3:32 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] TSM Client & TSM TDP for Database Pricing Hi. We are switching from IBM servers (x3650-Mx) to CISCO Blades (UCS B200-M3) in our VMware environment. We are receiving pricing from our IBM VAR for the CISCO blades that very high. CISCO blades have twice as many cores than the IBM servers. Boss is very upset about the issue. Does anyone have alternative to TSM clients and TSM TDP for Database which would interface with TSM servers and be less costly?? Your thoughts?? - Please see the following link for the BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee E-mail disclaimer: http://www.bcbst.com/email_disclaimer.shtm
[FYI] IBM information centers transition to IBM Knowledge Center
Today technical documentation for IBM hardware and software offerings is published in unconnected information centers. Content is moving to an integrated environment where you can access all IBM documentation from one site called IBM Knowledge Center (www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter). Sometime between early March to mid April (my apologies for not having a specific date available - this is the window of dates that I have today), the information centers will redirect to IBM Knowledge Center. If you want to use IBM Knowledge Center today, you can go to www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter. Not all content is indexed for search yet. All content will be indexed for search by time the information centers redirect to IBM Knowledge Center. The downloadable information centers that are available today are not going away. The URL for the downloadable information center is not affected by the IBM Knowledge Center. Also, I created pages on the TSM wiki for the 5.5 and 6.1 PDFs. Here are the links: TSM 5.5 PDFs - https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/wikis/home?lang=en#!/wiki/Tivoli%20Storage%20Manager/page/PDF%20versions%20of%20the%20IBM%20Tivoli%20Storage%20Manager%20Version%205.5.x%20documentation TSM 6.1 PDFs - https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/wikis/home?lang=en#!/wiki/Tivoli%20Storage%20Manager/page/PDF%20versions%20of%20the%20IBM%20Tivoli%20Storage%20Manager%20Version%206.1.x%20documentation There are a few ways to learn more about IBM Knowledge Center: Read an overview posted on the developerWorks site at https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/blogs/IBMElectronicSupport/entry/kc_beta_20140117?lnk=uctug_ibmesa_ibmcom_2014-01-17_kc_beta_20140117_mte View a YouTube video that I recorded at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R55_FZjk8XE Go directly to IBM Knowledge Center. Link to the TSM content: www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSGSG7/ If you want to provide feedback about IBM Knowledge Center, you can take the survey posted at https://www-304.ibm.com/software/support/trial/cst/forms/survey.wss?id=5323. If you want more videos posted, let me know. I want the transition from information centers to IBM Knowledge Center to be a smooth transition so I value the feedback that you provide. I'll respond as quickly as possible. Angela Angela Robertson IBM Software Group Durham, NC 27703 aprob...@us.ibm.com
Re: Pointing FlashCopyManager.exe at a custom options file
Del Sincere apologies for this - I should have seen your post from last week on the subject but it didn't turn up in my searches. I'll look forward to the iFix that provides the solution. Regards Neil Neil Schofield Infrastructure Architect, Hardware Engineering Yorkshire Water Spotted a leak? If you spot a leak please report it immediately. Call us on 0800 57 3553 or go to http://www.yorkshirewater.com/leaks Get a free water saving pack Don't forget to request your free water and energy saving pack, it could save you money on your utility bills and help you conserve water. http://www.yorkshirewater.com/savewater The information in this e-mail, and any files transmitted with it, is confidential and may also be legally privileged. The contents are intended solely for the addressee only and are subject to the legal notice available at http://www.keldagroup.com/email.htm. This email does not constitute a binding offer, acceptance, amendment, waiver or other agreement, or create any obligation whatsoever, unless such intention is clearly stated in the body of the email. If you are not the intended recipient, please return the message by replying to it and then delete the message from your computer. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or action taken in reliance on its contents is prohibited and may be unlawful. Yorkshire Water Services Limited Registered Office Western House, Halifax Road, Bradford, BD6 2SZ Registered in England and Wales No 2366682
Re: Pointing FlashCopyManager.exe at a custom options file
Op 20 feb. 2014, om 15:07 heeft Schaub, Steve het volgende geschreven: > Unless your DBA leaves the gui open and one of your scheduled backups kicks > off, using the incorrect settings in the opt file. specify a specific opt file in the scheduled script and gone are those worries. > Steve Schaub > > -Original Message- > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of > Remco Post > Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 2:14 PM > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Pointing FlashCopyManager.exe at a custom options file > > Hi Neil, > > we've opted to do the 'copy and overwrite' option files in a script that > subsequently starts the GUI. The scripts are placed in the start menu and > well, the exchange/sql admins see the difference, but the ease of use is such > that there is very little to complain about. > > Op 19 feb. 2014, om 16:58 heeft Neil Schofield > het volgende geschreven: > >> I've got something of a revolt on my hands from our SQL DBAs when it >> comes to the new Flash Copy Manager interface for TDP for SQL. >> Fundamentally, their objections arise from an inability to specify the >> name of a custom options file when launching the console. >> >> Previously, when managing multiple SQL Server instances in a Failover >> Cluster the DBAs would have numerous shortcuts to TDPSQL.EXE with each >> using the /TSMOPTFILE switch (along with /SQLSERVER ) to specify a >> different options file on a shared disk. Unfortunately >> FLASHCOPYMANAGER.EXE doesn't seem to allow the options file to be >> specified in this way. >> >> IBM offer some advice to work around this limitation but this seems to >> boil down to reverting to using the now deprecated TDPSQL.EXE or a >> rather kludgy series of scripts to overwrite the default copy of the >> options file with a custom version prior to launching the console: >> http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21597023 >> >> Neither of these is especially attractive and I wondered if anyone >> else had a better way of coping with this scenario? The technote above >> makes reference to reviewing this capability for future releases but >> given this is now a year old and we've seen v7.1 arrive in the mean >> time, I'm guessing they don't see it as a priority. >> >> Regards >> Neil Schofield >> Infrastructure Architect, Hardware Engineering Yorkshire Water >> >> >> >> >> Spotted a leak? >> If you spot a leak please report it immediately. Call us on 0800 57 >> 3553 or go to http://www.yorkshirewater.com/leaks >> >> Get a free water saving pack >> Don't forget to request your free water and energy saving pack, it >> could save you money on your utility bills and help you conserve >> water. http://www.yorkshirewater.com/savewater >> >> The information in this e-mail, and any files transmitted with it, is >> confidential and may also be legally privileged. The contents are intended >> solely for the addressee only and are subject to the legal notice available >> at http://www.keldagroup.com/email.htm. This email does not constitute a >> binding offer, acceptance, amendment, waiver or other agreement, or create >> any obligation whatsoever, unless such intention is clearly stated in the >> body of the email. If you are not the intended recipient, please return the >> message by replying to it and then delete the message from your computer. >> Any disclosure, copying, distribution or action taken in reliance on its >> contents is prohibited and may be unlawful. >> >> Yorkshire Water Services Limited >> Registered Office Western House, Halifax Road, Bradford, BD6 2SZ >> Registered in England and Wales No 2366682 > > -- > > Met vriendelijke groeten/Kind Regards, > > Remco Post > r.p...@plcs.nl > +31 6 248 21 622 > - > Please see the following link for the BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee > E-mail disclaimer: http://www.bcbst.com/email_disclaimer.shtm -- Met vriendelijke groeten/Kind Regards, Remco Post r.p...@plcs.nl +31 6 248 21 622
Re: Pointing FlashCopyManager.exe at a custom options file
No apology needed Neil! These questions are easy to answer! :-) Del "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 02/20/2014 11:51:38 AM: > From: Neil Schofield > To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu, > Date: 02/20/2014 11:57 AM > Subject: Re: Pointing FlashCopyManager.exe at a custom options file > Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" > > Del > > Sincere apologies for this - I should have seen your post from last week > on the subject but it didn't turn up in my searches. > > I'll look forward to the iFix that provides the solution. > > Regards > Neil >
Re: exchange 2007 and TSM for mail 6.4
Hi Del, thanks for your efforts. Our exchange team managed to recover the DB (without telling me the details of what they did)… Op 20 feb. 2014, om 02:43 heeft Del Hoobler het volgende geschreven: > Hi Remco, > > As long as you told DP/Exchange to run recovery on the > last INCREMENTAL restore (there is an option), > it should have run the recovery. > > The service team should be able to assist if you can't > get it working. > > > Thank you, > > Del > > > > "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 02/19/2014 > 07:10:09 PM: > >> From: Remco Post >> To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu, >> Date: 02/19/2014 07:10 PM >> Subject: Re: exchange 2007 and TSM for mail 6.4 >> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" >> >> Op 19 feb. 2014, om 20:50 heeft Del Hoobler het >> volgende geschreven: >> >>> Hi Remco, >>> >>> It's difficult to see what might be going on here. >>> My first suggestion is to open a PMR to get the ball rolling on that. >> >> Hi Del, >> >> thanks. I’ve opened the PMR and will ask my colleagues in the mail >> team to focus on letting support help them. >> >>> >>> While that is progressing, you could try to use the RESTOREFILES > command: >>> >> >> that does seem useful, also the q tdp to see what’s going on. >> >>> >>> http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/tsminfo/v6r4/topic/ >> com.ibm.itsm.mail.exc.doc/dpe_ref_cmd_restorefiles.html >>> >>> to get the database file and all of the transaction logs into >>> the directory of choice. Then, make sure there are no gaps >>> in the sequence of log files. >>> At that point, your Exchange admins probably know how >>> to create a recovery database and point to the >>> restored files to get the database recovered and mounted. >> >> as far as I can tell the TDP does restore the DB and all logfiles… >> it seems to be just a matter of letting exchange know that >> everything is there. Unfortunately I don’t know enough about >> exchange and my exchange colleagues don’t know enough about the TDP >> in the new version… In any case, that’s why I opened the PMR, to >> allow support to assist us in the recovery... >> >>> You shouldn't need to do this normally, but I was giving >>> you something to try while the PD was being done for the real restore. >>> >>> I hope this helps. >>> >>> Thank you, >>> >>> Del >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 02/19/2014 >>> 02:24:29 PM: >>> From: Remco Post To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu, Date: 02/19/2014 02:27 PM Subject: exchange 2007 and TSM for mail 6.4 Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Hi all, we’ve recently upgraded our TSM for Mail from 6.1 to 6.4 on our exchange 2007 servers. To facilitate long-term retention of the monthly backup we take an extra full backup of the exchange DB once a month using a different > node >>> name. With the old client this was not an issue in case of recovery. We’d just first restore (into a recovery database) the full from the ‘month’ node, then subsequent incremental back-ups using the ‘daily’ node and replay the lot. Now, the first restore using the new client version is causing us major headaches, no matter what we do, Exchange will not replay the logs and the recovery database is impossible to mount. For some reason it’s looking for log files with names starting with R while all we have are log files with names starting with E. Our exchange specialists have tried everything in their book as well as everything google can come up with, but so far no success. Anyone has any hints? Everything is appreciated. (yes, the monthly full backups will become copy backups soon). -- Met vriendelijke groeten/Kind Regards, Remco Post r.p...@plcs.nl +31 6 248 21 622 >>> >> >> -- >> >> Met vriendelijke groeten/Kind Regards, >> >> Remco Post >> r.p...@plcs.nl >> +31 6 248 21 622 >> > -- Met vriendelijke groeten/Kind Regards, Remco Post r.p...@plcs.nl +31 6 248 21 622
Re: TSM Client & TSM TDP for Database Pricing
If you are using TSM/VE, look at the options in VE 7.1 for doing DB restores right out of TSM/VE snapshots, rather than using TDP for Databases. I haven't gotten the opportunity to test it myself, it's new, so I'm not sure where it is appropriate and where it isn't. Just bringing it up, in case that would eliminate the requirement for some of your TDP for DB setups. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Chavdar Cholev Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 4:55 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM Client & TSM TDP for Database Pricing Two options I can see: 1) Ask you IBM rep for sub-capacity licensing for TDP for DB 2) You can use: -> oracle to dump DB some where and after that to backup this dump with backup archive client ( I -> MS SQL -> crate maintenance plan to backup DB on disk and again backup this dump to TSM with backup-archive client I personally will not recommend opt. 2) because there are some disadvantages and would require additional storage space.. HTH Chavdar On 2/19/2014 22:31, Lamb, Charles P. wrote: > Hi. > > We are switching from IBM servers (x3650-Mx) to CISCO Blades (UCS B200-M3) in > our VMware environment. We are receiving pricing from our IBM VAR for the > CISCO blades that very high. CISCO blades have twice as many cores than the > IBM servers. Boss is very upset about the issue. > > Does anyone have alternative to TSM clients and TSM TDP for Database which > would interface with TSM servers and be less costly?? > > Your thoughts??
Re: [TSM 6.4] - TDP for Exchange and Exchange 2013
Hello Yann, If you are using Exchange Server 2013, we recommend that you upgrade to Data Protection for Exchange 7.1. It has additional capabilities, such as: - Multi-language support in mailbox restore browser GUI - Mailbox restore browser restore to Unicode PST files - Mailbox restore browser restore to PST files greater than 2GB - Improved responsiveness of mailbox restore browser GUI - Ability to directly opening EDB and LOG files in mailbox restore browser - Improved usability for instant restore - New method for collecting mailbox history for improved backup performance - New calendar widget for entering dates in MMC GUI Thank you, Del "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 02/19/2014 09:28:54 AM: > From: "Meunier, Yann" > To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu, > Date: 02/19/2014 12:12 PM > Subject: [TSM 6.4] - TDP for Exchange and Exchange 2013 > Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" > > Hi, > > Does anyone know exactly what features are not supported on the TDP > Client 6.4.1 for Exchange 2013. > > http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21654310 > > The following application levels are supported. > · Microsoft Exchange Server 2007 SP3, and later Service Pack > levels: Standard or Enterprise Editions > · Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 SP1, and "Update Rollup 2 > for Exchange Server 2010 (KB242517< http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2425179 > >) and later rollup and later Service Pack levels: Standard or > Enterprise Editions > · Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 SP3, and later Service Pack > levels: Standard or Enterprise Editions > · Microsoft Exchange Server 2013 CU1 and later CU and > Service Pack levels: Standard or Enterprise Editions > Note: This is toleration level support. Exploitation of new features > available with Microsoft Exchange Server 2013 is not available in > this fix pack release. > > And do you have a date for a full product support? > > Best Regards, > > Yann MEUNIER
