Re: Old friends and re-introduction

[Loon, EJ van - SPLXO]

Hi Geoff!
Welcome back! I hope you will find a suitable TSM job soon! 
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Geoff 
Gill
Sent: woensdag 14 december 2011 15:51
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Old friends and re-introduction

Hello,
This isn't a TSM question just more of a reintroduction. A year ago I was let 
go from saic when my wife was transferred to Dallas. Although we all know it's 
possible to manage the system remotely, and knowing they have offices in Plano, 
I expected to work from here, especially since the DR site is here, but that 
wasn't to be so I've been out of TSM work since then.
I recently rejoined the list to keep in touch and somewhat up to date,   While 
I've had a few calls unfortunately all have unded up in me being "over 
qualified" as they say. I would have preferred an offer and given an 
opportunity to make the decision to accept no matter what the work or pay but 
none have worked out that way unfortunately.
While driving Zamboni's for 15 years helped me land work in Allen, it isn't 
quite the same, nonetheless it helps pay bills.
Hope you guys are all well, I see many of the same names, Richard, Andrew, Bill 
and others so I'm glad to see the community is hanging together.

Geoff Gill

Sent from Yahoo! Mail on Android



For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. 
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Re: Old friends and re-introduction

[Swartz, Jerome]

All of the best mate!

Makes me think how fortunate I am to have a job. Sure something will come your 
way!

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Loon, 
EJ van - SPLXO
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 12:25 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Old friends and re-introduction

Hi Geoff!
Welcome back! I hope you will find a suitable TSM job soon! 
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Geoff 
Gill
Sent: woensdag 14 december 2011 15:51
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Old friends and re-introduction

Hello,
This isn't a TSM question just more of a reintroduction. A year ago I was let 
go from saic when my wife was transferred to Dallas. Although we all know it's 
possible to manage the system remotely, and knowing they have offices in Plano, 
I expected to work from here, especially since the DR site is here, but that 
wasn't to be so I've been out of TSM work since then.
I recently rejoined the list to keep in touch and somewhat up to date,   While 
I've had a few calls unfortunately all have unded up in me being "over 
qualified" as they say. I would have preferred an offer and given an 
opportunity to make the decision to accept no matter what the work or pay but 
none have worked out that way unfortunately.
While driving Zamboni's for 15 years helped me land work in Allen, it isn't 
quite the same, nonetheless it helps pay bills.
Hope you guys are all well, I see many of the same names, Richard, Andrew, Bill 
and others so I'm glad to see the community is hanging together.

Geoff Gill

Sent from Yahoo! Mail on Android



For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. 
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286




**
COMPUTACENTER PLC is registered in England and Wales with the registered number 
03110569.  Its registered office is at Hatfield Business Park, Hatfield Avenue, 
Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL10 9TW
COMPUTACENTER (UK) Limited is registered in England and Wales with the 
registered number 01584718.  Its registered office is at Hatfield Business 
Park, Hatfield Avenue, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL10 9TW
COMPUTACENTER (Mid-Market) Limited is registered in England and Wales with the 
registered number 3434654. Its registered office is at Hatfield Business Park, 
Hatfield Avenue, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL10 9TW
COMPUTACENTER (FMS) Limited is registered in England and Wales with the 
registered number 3798091. Its registered office is at Hatfield Business Park, 
Hatfield Avenue, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL10 9TW

The contents of this email are intended for the named addressee only.
It contains information which may be confidential and which may also be 
privileged.
Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive mail for the 
addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else.
If you receive it in error please notify us immediately and then destroy it.
Computacenter information is available from: http://www.computacenter.com
**

Re: 3494 library questions

[Richard Sims]

On Dec 14, 2011, at 10:54 AM, Ehresman,David E. wrote:

> Its been a long time since I've worked with 3494's.  But I don't think you 
> even have to partition them.  You just have to use different category codes 
> for the different systems.
> 
> An old dog, 
> David

Quite so.  The 3494 has historically benefitted from having an embedded library 
manager, unlike "SCSI" libraries, and can do a lot without the need for a TSM 
Library Manager and that added complexity.

   Richard Sims

Re: 3494 library questions

[Lee, Gary D.]

Tsm2 server is onsite.
Connectivity to 1120 drives is fibre channel


This strange config grew because I have just finished converting all our 
netbackup environment to tsm.  This offsite library, lib2, is the old netbackup 
library, and server tsm2 is an old netbackup server.

Yep, odd setup, I just inherrited it.  
I would eventually like to replace lib1 with a virtual tape, but until then, 
this is what it is.
 


Gary Lee
Senior System Programmer
Ball State University
phone: 765-285-1310

 
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Steven 
Langdale
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 5:10 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] 3494 library questions

Lee

OK, so TSM2 and lib2 are both offsite? You're implying that but it's not
100% clear.

I'm not particularly familliar with TS1120's are these SCSI or FC attach?

What connectivity is available between the 2 sites?

Thanks

Steven

On 14 December 2011 17:59, Lee, Gary D.  wrote:

> To clarify.
>
> Two tsm servers tsm1 and tsm2.
> Two librarys lib1 and lib2
>
> Tsm1 is  connected to lib1 directly.
> Tsm2 is connected to lib2.
>
> Lib2 is actually in our offsite location, and I would like to create a
> connection from tsm1 to lib2 and get our current offsite data moved into
> it. Then, I can copy storage pool directly to lib2 and illiminate carrying
> tapes to a static offsite storage location.
>
> Both libraries are 3494s containing ts1120 drives.
>
> No library sharing is being used at the present time, but has not been
> ruled out.
>
> Hopefully that has clarified things a bit.
>
> Questions are
>
> 1. If I define both 3494s to one machine, how to define them both to tsm?
>  By serial number?
>
> 2. If I can't define both to a single server, will library sharing with
> tsm work?
>
> Some sample definitions would be helpful.
>
>
>
>
> Gary Lee
> Senior System Programmer
> Ball State University
> phone: 765-285-1310
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
> Daniel Sparrman
> Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 10:07 AM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] 3494 library questions
>
> Hi Steven
>
> A TSM library manager isnt mandatory in a 3494 library environment. If the
> libraries are partitioned, he can just connect his two hosts to each
> library and assign access through the 3494 CU.
>
> Which is simplest is just a matter of how the existing environment looks.
> If the libraries are already partitioned for the two hosts, no TSM library
> manager is needed, just make an entry for each library in the ibmatl.conf
> and assign access in the 3494 CU.
>
> if the libraries are not partitioned, and there is limited 3494 competence
> on-site, perhaps TSM library sharing is the way to go. It all depends on
> Gary's requirements (like, can we share volumes between the two TSM
> servers, or do they need to be divided).
>
> Best Regards
>
> Daniel Sparrman
>
>
> Daniel Sparrman
> Exist i Stockholm AB
> Växel: 08-754 98 00
> Fax: 08-754 97 30
> daniel.sparr...@exist.se
> http://www.existgruppen.se
> Posthusgatan 1 761 30 NORRTÄLJE
>
> -"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  skrev: -
> Till: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Från: Steven Langdale
> Sänt av: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
> Datum: 12/14/2011 15:39
> Ärende: Re: [ADSM-L] 3494 library questions
>
> Gary
>
> A library manager is mandatory to coordinate library access.  Than can be a
> standalone instance or the existing instance that has exclusive access (the
> latter being the easier option with an environment of this size)
>
> Thanks
>
> Steven
>
> On 14 December 2011 14:22, Lee, Gary D.  wrote:
>
> > I have two 3494 libraries at different locations.
> > I would like to have both defined to both of my tsm servers.
> >
> > Is it possible to define two libraries in the ibmatl.conf file, and if
> so,
> > how to define them to tsm?
> >
> > If not, am I correct that the other option is to share the libraries as
> > necessary defining appropriate tsm servers as library managers?
> >
> > Thanks for the assistance.
> >
> >
> >
> > Gary Lee
> > Senior System Programmer
> > Ball State University
> > phone: 765-285-1310
> >
> >
>

3494 questions.

[Lee, Gary D.]

Thanks dave and tom.  I knew I was forgeting something, define path was it.
Well, off to play.


Gary Lee
Senior System Programmer
Ball State University
phone: 765-285-1310

 

Re: disabe/enable a sched via command line

[Rick Adamson]

Be aware that altering a client schedule will remove all historical
events from the DB.

Meaning when you perform an update to a client schedule and query the
past status for a particular client you will get the infamous "no match
found".


~Rick Adamson
Jacksonville, FL.

 
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Tyree, David
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 1:05 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] disabe/enable a sched via command line

I'm trying to figure out to enable and disable client
schedules from the command line. I've looked over the online help and
elsewhere but no luck.

If the command was for an admin sched I would do "update
sched something type=admin active=yes/no" . But I don't see a similar
command for client schedules.
thanks
David Tyree
Interface Analyst
South Georgia Medical Center
229.333.1155

Re: Old friends and re-introduction

[Kelly J. Lipp]

Geoff,

Drop me a private email.  Good to see your name up here in lights!

Kelly J. Lipp
Elbert Colorado
719-531-5574

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Swartz, Jerome
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 3:36 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Old friends and re-introduction

All of the best mate!

Makes me think how fortunate I am to have a job. Sure something will come
your way!

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Loon, EJ van - SPLXO
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 12:25 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Old friends and re-introduction

Hi Geoff!
Welcome back! I hope you will find a suitable TSM job soon! 
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Geoff Gill
Sent: woensdag 14 december 2011 15:51
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Old friends and re-introduction

Hello,
This isn't a TSM question just more of a reintroduction. A year ago I was
let go from saic when my wife was transferred to Dallas. Although we all
know it's possible to manage the system remotely, and knowing they have
offices in Plano, I expected to work from here, especially since the DR site
is here, but that wasn't to be so I've been out of TSM work since then.
I recently rejoined the list to keep in touch and somewhat up to date,  
While I've had a few calls unfortunately all have unded up in me being "over
qualified" as they say. I would have preferred an offer and given an
opportunity to make the decision to accept no matter what the work or pay
but none have worked out that way unfortunately.
While driving Zamboni's for 15 years helped me land work in Allen, it isn't
quite the same, nonetheless it helps pay bills.
Hope you guys are all well, I see many of the same names, Richard, Andrew,
Bill and others so I'm glad to see the community is hanging together.

Geoff Gill

Sent from Yahoo! Mail on Android



For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential
and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may
be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to
this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If
you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately
by return e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission
of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered
number 33014286




**
COMPUTACENTER PLC is registered in England and Wales with the registered
number 03110569.  Its registered office is at Hatfield Business Park,
Hatfield Avenue, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL10 9TW COMPUTACENTER (UK) Limited
is registered in England and Wales with the registered number 01584718.  Its
registered office is at Hatfield Business Park, Hatfield Avenue, Hatfield,
Hertfordshire AL10 9TW COMPUTACENTER (Mid-Market) Limited is registered in
England and Wales with the registered number 3434654. Its registered office
is at Hatfield Business Park, Hatfield Avenue, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL10
9TW COMPUTACENTER (FMS) Limited is registered in England and Wales with the
registered number 3798091. Its registered office is at Hatfield Business
Park, Hatfield Avenue, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL10 9TW

The contents of this email are intended for the named addressee only.
It contains information which may be confidential and which may also be
privileged.
Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive mail for the
addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else.
If you receive it in error please notify us immediately and then destroy it.
Computacenter information is available from: http://www.computacenter.com
**

Policy Option Sets relation to Domains

[Vandeventer, Harold [BS]]

I created a new Domain Name on a TSM6.2.3 server, no problem.

I then assumed (that's bad) that deleting Option Sets within that domain would 
be isolated to that domain.

However, the Option sets were removed from the "server", not just that domain.

Is that normal?

I see that Mgmt Classes are unique to the Domain and would think that Option 
sets would also be unique to the Domain.

I've recreated them, but curious if this is normal or a bug in 6.2.3?


Harold Vandeventer
Systems Programmer
State of Kansas - Department of Administration - Office of Information 
Technology Services
harold.vandeven...@da.ks.gov
(785) 296-0631

Re: Policy Option Sets relation to Domains

[Richard Sims]

The "Parts of a Policy" in the Admin Guide manual illustrates what elements 
constitute a Policy Domain, which is involved in the governance of data.  The 
mechanical elements of data handling and the housing of client options are 
external to that, as they are not specifically related to enterprise policies.

   Richard Sims

Re: Policy Option Sets relation to Domains

[Erwann SIMON]

Hi Harold,

Client Options Sets are server-wide and not related to Policy Domains. It has 
always been like that. It's'not a bug.

When you define (or delete) a Client Options Set, there is no référence to a 
Policy Domain.


--Message d'origine--
De: Vandeventer, Harold [BS]
Expéditeur : ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Répondre à: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
Objet: [ADSM-L] Policy Option Sets relation to Domains
Envoyé: 15 déc. 2011 19:50

I created a new Domain Name on a TSM6.2.3 server, no problem.

I then assumed (that's bad) that deleting Option Sets within that domain would 
be isolated to that domain.

However, the Option sets were removed from the "server", not just that domain.

Is that normal?

I see that Mgmt Classes are unique to the Domain and would think that Option 
sets would also be unique to the Domain.

I've recreated them, but curious if this is normal or a bug in 6.2.3?


Harold Vandeventer
Systems Programmer
State of Kansas - Department of Administration - Office of Information 
Technology Services
harold.vandeven...@da.ks.gov
(785) 296-0631


--
Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي
Erwann SIMON

Re: Policy Option Sets relation to Domains

[Remco Post]

did you specify a domainname when creating the optionset? I bet you didn't.


On 15 dec. 2011, at 19:50, Vandeventer, Harold [BS] wrote:

> I created a new Domain Name on a TSM6.2.3 server, no problem.
> 
> I then assumed (that's bad) that deleting Option Sets within that domain 
> would be isolated to that domain.
> 
> However, the Option sets were removed from the "server", not just that domain.
> 
> Is that normal?
> 
> I see that Mgmt Classes are unique to the Domain and would think that Option 
> sets would also be unique to the Domain.
> 
> I've recreated them, but curious if this is normal or a bug in 6.2.3?
> 
> 
> Harold Vandeventer
> Systems Programmer
> State of Kansas - Department of Administration - Office of Information 
> Technology Services
> harold.vandeven...@da.ks.gov
> (785) 296-0631

-- 
Met vriendelijke groeten/Kind Regards,

Remco Post
r.p...@plcs.nl
+31 6 248 21 622

Deleting option sets

[Lee, Gary D.]

Option sets are not domain specific.

Gary Lee
Senior System Programmer
Ball State University
phone: 765-285-1310

 

Re: Deleting option sets

[Vandeventer, Harold [BS]]

Thanks to everyone for the quick replies.

I'd never worked in a new domain setting. Did the stupid and didn't read the 
manual first.

Fortunately, on this server, all the nodes were using one option set that is 
common across all our TSMs; thus easy to recreate.




Harold Vandeventer
Systems Programmer
State of Kansas - Department of Administration - Office of Information 
Technology Services
harold.vandeven...@da.ks.gov
(785) 296-0631


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Lee, 
Gary D.
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 1:35 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Deleting option sets

Option sets are not domain specific.

Gary Lee
Senior System Programmer
Ball State University
phone: 765-285-1310

 

Re: Deleting option sets

[Colwell, William F.]

Harold,

After recreating the optionset, remember to update the nodes to use it.
When you deleted it, the server implicitly updated the nodes to not use any
optionset.

Bill Colwell
Draper lab

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of 
Vandeventer, Harold [BS]
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 4:26 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Deleting option sets

Thanks to everyone for the quick replies.

I'd never worked in a new domain setting. Did the stupid and didn't read the 
manual first.

Fortunately, on this server, all the nodes were using one option set that is 
common across all our TSMs; thus easy to recreate.




Harold Vandeventer
Systems Programmer
State of Kansas - Department of Administration - Office of Information 
Technology Services
harold.vandeven...@da.ks.gov
(785) 296-0631


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Lee, 
Gary D.
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 1:35 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Deleting option sets

Option sets are not domain specific.

Gary Lee
Senior System Programmer
Ball State University
phone: 765-285-1310

 

Re: 3494 library questions

[Steven Langdale]

Right I get it.

I assume you are wanting to do this so you can offsite your data
electronically rather than manually?

I know this is going a bit OT, but what are your options as far as moving
TSM2 offsite to where the library is?  does it have many/any clients that
need it where it is?

Also, what experience do you have with TSM server to serve stuff i.e. using
a remote library manager AND what experience with 3494 libs?

Thanks

Steven

On 15 December 2011 12:41, Lee, Gary D.  wrote:

> Tsm2 server is onsite.
> Connectivity to 1120 drives is fibre channel
>
>
> This strange config grew because I have just finished converting all our
> netbackup environment to tsm.  This offsite library, lib2, is the old
> netbackup library, and server tsm2 is an old netbackup server.
>
> Yep, odd setup, I just inherrited it.
> I would eventually like to replace lib1 with a virtual tape, but until
> then, this is what it is.
>
>
>
> Gary Lee
> Senior System Programmer
> Ball State University
> phone: 765-285-1310
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
> Steven Langdale
> Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 5:10 PM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] 3494 library questions
>
> Lee
>
> OK, so TSM2 and lib2 are both offsite? You're implying that but it's not
> 100% clear.
>
> I'm not particularly familliar with TS1120's are these SCSI or FC attach?
>
> What connectivity is available between the 2 sites?
>
> Thanks
>
> Steven
>
> On 14 December 2011 17:59, Lee, Gary D.  wrote:
>
> > To clarify.
> >
> > Two tsm servers tsm1 and tsm2.
> > Two librarys lib1 and lib2
> >
> > Tsm1 is  connected to lib1 directly.
> > Tsm2 is connected to lib2.
> >
> > Lib2 is actually in our offsite location, and I would like to create a
> > connection from tsm1 to lib2 and get our current offsite data moved into
> > it. Then, I can copy storage pool directly to lib2 and illiminate
> carrying
> > tapes to a static offsite storage location.
> >
> > Both libraries are 3494s containing ts1120 drives.
> >
> > No library sharing is being used at the present time, but has not been
> > ruled out.
> >
> > Hopefully that has clarified things a bit.
> >
> > Questions are
> >
> > 1. If I define both 3494s to one machine, how to define them both to tsm?
> >  By serial number?
> >
> > 2. If I can't define both to a single server, will library sharing with
> > tsm work?
> >
> > Some sample definitions would be helpful.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Gary Lee
> > Senior System Programmer
> > Ball State University
> > phone: 765-285-1310
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
> > Daniel Sparrman
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 10:07 AM
> > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> > Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] 3494 library questions
> >
> > Hi Steven
> >
> > A TSM library manager isnt mandatory in a 3494 library environment. If
> the
> > libraries are partitioned, he can just connect his two hosts to each
> > library and assign access through the 3494 CU.
> >
> > Which is simplest is just a matter of how the existing environment looks.
> > If the libraries are already partitioned for the two hosts, no TSM
> library
> > manager is needed, just make an entry for each library in the ibmatl.conf
> > and assign access in the 3494 CU.
> >
> > if the libraries are not partitioned, and there is limited 3494
> competence
> > on-site, perhaps TSM library sharing is the way to go. It all depends on
> > Gary's requirements (like, can we share volumes between the two TSM
> > servers, or do they need to be divided).
> >
> > Best Regards
> >
> > Daniel Sparrman
> >
> >
> > Daniel Sparrman
> > Exist i Stockholm AB
> > Växel: 08-754 98 00
> > Fax: 08-754 97 30
> > daniel.sparr...@exist.se
> > http://www.existgruppen.se
> > Posthusgatan 1 761 30 NORRTÄLJE
> >
> > -"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  skrev: -
> > Till: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> > Från: Steven Langdale
> > Sänt av: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
> > Datum: 12/14/2011 15:39
> > Ärende: Re: [ADSM-L] 3494 library questions
> >
> > Gary
> >
> > A library manager is mandatory to coordinate library access.  Than can
> be a
> > standalone instance or the existing instance that has exclusive access
> (the
> > latter being the easier option with an environment of this size)
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Steven
> >
> > On 14 December 2011 14:22, Lee, Gary D.  wrote:
> >
> > > I have two 3494 libraries at different locations.
> > > I would like to have both defined to both of my tsm servers.
> > >
> > > Is it possible to define two libraries in the ibmatl.conf file, and if
> > so,
> > > how to define them to tsm?
> > >
> > > If not, am I correct that the other option is to share the libraries as
> > > necessary defining appropriate tsm servers as library managers?
> > >
> > > Thanks for the assistance.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Gary Lee
> > > Senior System Programmer
> > > Ball State University
> > > phone: 765-