Re: SV: Client 6.2.1.0 on Suse 11
Do, Those two packages install with the Client/Included with the Client? or are they installed separately? Regards On 10/4/2010 9:33 AM, Christian Svensson wrote: Hi Robert, I have been installing TSM 6.2.x.x on a couple of Linux systems with no problem. Does two packages you talking about are required for TSM encryption and also enable the SSL encryption option for TSM 6.2 in Linux. Best Regards Christian Svensson Cell: +46-70-325 1577 E-mail: christian.svens...@cristie.se Skype: cristie.christian.svensson Supported Platform for CPU2TSM:: http://www.cristie.se/cpu2tsm-supported-platforms Från: Robert Ouzen [rou...@univ.haifa.ac.il] Skickat: den 4 oktober 2010 15:10 Till: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Ämne: Client 6.2.1.0 on Suse 11 I want to test Tsm client version 6.2.1.0 on a client SLES 11sp1 64 bit , to make Tsm client working correctly I had to install too this two files: gskcrypt64-8.0.13.3.linux.x86_64.rpm gskssl64-8.0.13.3.linux.x86_64.rpm Did anyone know about any impact on the O.S after installing these two files? T.I.A Regards Robert Ouzen
Re: No drives are currently available in library
What does the output of `Q PATH` look like? Is there anything in the activity log (`Q ACT`), around the time that you first encountered the problem, that indicates why they've gone from working to not working? /DMc -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of David Lopes Sent: 04 October 2010 10:36 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] No drives are currently available in library Hi all, I have a problem in my TSM, I can't run a backup or a audit because give a error that drive are not available. For what I check they are available. Thanks for all the help you can give me. Error: tsm: TSMSRV>AUDIT LIBR ts3200 ANS8003I Process number 13 started. actl 04-10-10 10:28:46 ANR0984I Process 13 for AUDIT LIBRARY started in the BACKGROUND at 10:28:46. (PROCESS: 13) 04-10-10 10:28:46 ANR8457I AUDIT LIBRARY: Operation for library TS3200 started as process 13. (PROCESS: 13) 04-10-10 10:28:46 ANR8447E No drives are currently available in library TS3200. (PROCESS: 13) 04-10-10 10:28:46 ANR0985I Process 13 for AUDIT LIBRARY running in the BACKGROUND completed with completion state FAILURE at 10:28:46. (PROCESS: 13) Information from tsm: tsm: TSMSRV>q drive Library Name Drive Name Device Type On-Line --- --- TS3200 DRIVE_0 LTO Yes TS3200 DRIVE_1 LTO Yes tsm: TSMSRV>q mount ANR2034E QUERY MOUNT: No match found using this criteria. tsm: TSMSRV>q proc ANR0944E QUERY PROCESS: No active processes found. ANS8001I Return code 11. Information from SO (AIX): $ lsdev -Cc tape rmt0 Available 0I-09-02 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt1 Available 0M-09-02 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) smc0 Available 0I-09-02 IBM 3573 Tape Medium Changer (FCP) Best Regards, David No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 9.0.856 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3165 - Release Date: 10/03/10 07:34:00
Re: Looking for SAN/tape experts assistance
Thanks for the info and examples.
However, I am at a loss to understand why I need this, now. Especially
when 2-identical (well, I guess something is different ;--) servers are
acting differently. I have never had to do this with *ANY* other of my
now 7-servers. Unless hardware changed, a reboot would not change the
order of the tape drives.
Zoltan Forray
TSM Software & Hardware Administrator
Virginia Commonwealth University
UCC/Office of Technology Services
zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807
Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will
never use email to request that you reply with your password, social
security number or confidential personal information. For more details
visit http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html
From:
"Sergio O. Fuentes"
To:
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date:
09/27/2010 01:43 PM
Subject:
Re: [ADSM-L] Looking for SAN/tape experts assistance
Sent by:
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
I'm doing this work right now for a big project here. My first endeavor
into Linux.
The lin_tape drivers for 6.2 will require a .rules file in
/etc/udev/rules.d (or wherever your udev stuff lives) mainly because of
the instance owner/group requirements to run 6.2 dsmserv processes. Unless
you can alter your default udev rules for EVERYTHING, then you'll need the
.rule file to assign ownership and mode parameters for the tape devices.
Mine, so far, looks like this:
#cat /etc/udev/rules.d/98-lin_tape.rules
KERNEL=="IBMchanger*", SYSFS{primary_path}=="Primary",
SYSFS{serial_num}=="078150090402", OWNER="tsminst1", MODE="0600",
SYMLINK="lin_tape/IBMchanger137B"
KERNEL=="IBMchanger*", SYSFS{primary_path}=="Alternate",
SYSFS{serial_num}=="078150090402", OWNER="tsminst1", MODE="0600",
SYMLINK="lin_tape/IBMchanger138A"
KERNEL=="IBMtape*[0-9]",SYSFS{ww_port_name}=="0x5005076300549127",
OWNER="tsminst1", MODE="0600", SYMLINK="lin_tape/IBMtape137"
KERNEL=="IBMtape*[0-9]",SYSFS{ww_port_name}=="0x5005076300549128",
OWNER="tsminst1", MODE="0600", SYMLINK="lin_tape/IBMtape138"
KERNEL=="IBMtape*[0-9]",SYSFS{ww_port_name}=="0x5005076300549129",
OWNER="tsminst1", MODE="0600", SYMLINK="lin_tape/IBMtape139"
KERNEL=="IBMtape*n", OWNER="tsminst1", MODE="0600"
There are a lot of gotchas with this method that I'm running into. I'm
not sure if they are kernel bugs or driver issues but not much of this is
documented anywhere. Bullet-list (so far):
-If you have alternate pathing or data path failover, lin_taped needs
be installed and running. Problem is getting persistent binding to work
with this. There's a race condition where once modprobe lin_tape is run,
the udev files are created with the rules. But the SYSFS{primary_path}
key isn't defined correctly until lin_taped is run, BUT lin_taped can't
run until lin_tape is loaded. So by the time lin_taped is executed and
running, the lin_tape rules have already been processed for udev.
oMy workaround will be to create an init script that will run
lin_taped and then udevtrigger. Seems to work, but udevtrigger once
crashed the system.
-Sometimes when lin_tape is loaded, the mode is incorrect for devices.
The fix is again "udevtrigger".
-KERNEL=="IBMtape*" doesn't work for renaming, because sometimes a
symlink to IBMtape1n is used instead of IBMtape1. Which is why I have the
character class "IBMtape*[0-9]"
Here's the output for ls /dev/ commands for when I believe things are
configured correctly. Caveat: I haven't even tested reading/writing to
these devices yet, let alone defining the devices to TSM.
#ls -l /dev/IBMtape*
crw-r--r-- 1 root root 250, 3071 Sep 27 11:43 /dev/IBMtape
crw--- 1 tsminst1 root 250,0 Sep 27 11:43 /dev/IBMtape0
crw--- 1 tsminst1 root 250, 1024 Sep 27 11:43 /dev/IBMtape0n
crw--- 1 tsminst1 root 250,1 Sep 27 11:43 /dev/IBMtape1
crw--- 1 tsminst1 root 250, 1025 Sep 27 11:43 /dev/IBMtape1n
crw--- 1 tsminst1 root 250,2 Sep 27 11:43 /dev/IBMtape2
crw--- 1 tsminst1 root 250, 1026 Sep 27 11:43 /dev/IBMtape2n
#ls -l /dev/lin_tape
total 0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 Sep 27 11:43 IBMchanger137B -> ../IBMchanger0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 Sep 27 11:43 IBMchanger138A -> ../IBMchanger1
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Sep 27 11:43 IBMtape137 -> ../IBMtape2
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Sep 27 11:43 IBMtape138 -> ../IBMtape0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Sep 27 11:43 IBMtape139 -> ../IBMtape1
HTH,
Sergio
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 2:53 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Looking for SAN/tape experts assistance
I have mentioned in previous posts that we are putting up 2-new RH Linux
based TSM server . These are the first of my existing 5-Linux servers to
use EMC SAN storage.
With every new adventure, we get new problems. This on
Re: SV: SV: Client 6.2.1.0 on Suse 11
Thanks Christian! Best Regards On 10/4/2010 9:53 AM, Christian Svensson wrote: Does two are 2 extra RPMs you need to install. But included in the TSM TAR file that you download from IBM. Best Regards Christian Svensson Cell: +46-70-325 1577 E-mail: christian.svens...@cristie.se Skype: cristie.christian.svensson Supported Platform for CPU2TSM:: http://www.cristie.se/cpu2tsm-supported-platforms Från: Timothy Hughes [timothy.hug...@oit.state.nj.us] Skickat: den 4 oktober 2010 15:44 Till: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Ämne: Re: SV: Client 6.2.1.0 on Suse 11 Do, Those two packages install with the Client/Included with the Client? or are they installed separately? Regards On 10/4/2010 9:33 AM, Christian Svensson wrote: Hi Robert, I have been installing TSM 6.2.x.x on a couple of Linux systems with no problem. Does two packages you talking about are required for TSM encryption and also enable the SSL encryption option for TSM 6.2 in Linux. Best Regards Christian Svensson Cell: +46-70-325 1577 E-mail: christian.svens...@cristie.se Skype: cristie.christian.svensson Supported Platform for CPU2TSM:: http://www.cristie.se/cpu2tsm-supported-platforms Från: Robert Ouzen [rou...@univ.haifa.ac.il] Skickat: den 4 oktober 2010 15:10 Till: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Ämne: Client 6.2.1.0 on Suse 11 I want to test Tsm client version 6.2.1.0 on a client SLES 11sp1 64 bit , to make Tsm client working correctly I had to install too this two files: gskcrypt64-8.0.13.3.linux.x86_64.rpm gskssl64-8.0.13.3.linux.x86_64.rpm Did anyone know about any impact on the O.S after installing these two files? T.I.A Regards Robert Ouzen
Re: Client 6.2.1.0 on Suse 11
Since they are now a requirement, you don't have a choice. Lots of my Linux (RedHat) nodes have upgraded to this client level and I do not have any reports of problems. Zoltan Forray TSM Software & Hardware Administrator Virginia Commonwealth University UCC/Office of Technology Services zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807 Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will never use email to request that you reply with your password, social security number or confidential personal information. For more details visit http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html From: Robert Ouzen To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Date: 10/04/2010 09:10 AM Subject: [ADSM-L] Client 6.2.1.0 on Suse 11 Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" I want to test Tsm client version 6.2.1.0 on a client SLES 11sp1 64 bit , to make Tsm client working correctly I had to install too this two files: gskcrypt64-8.0.13.3.linux.x86_64.rpm gskssl64-8.0.13.3.linux.x86_64.rpm Did anyone know about any impact on the O.S after installing these two files? T.I.A Regards Robert Ouzen
Client 6.2.1.0 on Suse 11
I want to test Tsm client version 6.2.1.0 on a client SLES 11sp1 64 bit , to make Tsm client working correctly I had to install too this two files: gskcrypt64-8.0.13.3.linux.x86_64.rpm gskssl64-8.0.13.3.linux.x86_64.rpm Did anyone know about any impact on the O.S after installing these two files? T.I.A Regards Robert Ouzen
Antwort: [ADSM-L] No drives are currently available in library
Hi David,, it seems, the paths to the drives are offline. Please, run "q path" and set paths online, if necessary. regards Ulli - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ullrich Mänz System-Integration FRITZ & MACZIOL Software und Computervertrieb GmbH Ludwig Str. 180D, 63067 Offenbach, Germany Mobil: +49 170 7678434 Fax: +49 69 38013500 10 Web: http://www.fum.de Amtsgericht Ulm, Handelsregister-Nummer: HRB 1936 Geschäftsführer: Heribert Fritz, Oliver Schallhorn, Frank Haines Inhaber: Imtech N.V., Gouda, Niederlande Referenzen finden Sie auf unserer Website, Rubrik 'News'. Von:David Lopes An: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Datum: 04.10.2010 11:37 Betreff:[ADSM-L] No drives are currently available in library Gesendet von: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Hi all, I have a problem in my TSM, I can't run a backup or a audit because give a error that drive are not available. For what I check they are available. Thanks for all the help you can give me. Error: tsm: TSMSRV>AUDIT LIBR ts3200 ANS8003I Process number 13 started. actl 04-10-10 10:28:46 ANR0984I Process 13 for AUDIT LIBRARY started in the BACKGROUND at 10:28:46. (PROCESS: 13) 04-10-10 10:28:46 ANR8457I AUDIT LIBRARY: Operation for library TS3200 started as process 13. (PROCESS: 13) 04-10-10 10:28:46 ANR8447E No drives are currently available in library TS3200. (PROCESS: 13) 04-10-10 10:28:46 ANR0985I Process 13 for AUDIT LIBRARY running in the BACKGROUND completed with completion state FAILURE at 10:28:46. (PROCESS: 13) Information from tsm: tsm: TSMSRV>q drive Library Name Drive Name Device Type On-Line --- --- TS3200 DRIVE_0 LTO Yes TS3200 DRIVE_1 LTO Yes tsm: TSMSRV>q mount ANR2034E QUERY MOUNT: No match found using this criteria. tsm: TSMSRV>q proc ANR0944E QUERY PROCESS: No active processes found. ANS8001I Return code 11. Information from SO (AIX): $ lsdev -Cc tape rmt0 Available 0I-09-02 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt1 Available 0M-09-02 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) smc0 Available 0I-09-02 IBM 3573 Tape Medium Changer (FCP) Best Regards, David
SV: Client 6.2.1.0 on Suse 11
Hi Robert, I have been installing TSM 6.2.x.x on a couple of Linux systems with no problem. Does two packages you talking about are required for TSM encryption and also enable the SSL encryption option for TSM 6.2 in Linux. Best Regards Christian Svensson Cell: +46-70-325 1577 E-mail: christian.svens...@cristie.se Skype: cristie.christian.svensson Supported Platform for CPU2TSM:: http://www.cristie.se/cpu2tsm-supported-platforms Från: Robert Ouzen [rou...@univ.haifa.ac.il] Skickat: den 4 oktober 2010 15:10 Till: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Ämne: Client 6.2.1.0 on Suse 11 I want to test Tsm client version 6.2.1.0 on a client SLES 11sp1 64 bit , to make Tsm client working correctly I had to install too this two files: gskcrypt64-8.0.13.3.linux.x86_64.rpm gskssl64-8.0.13.3.linux.x86_64.rpm Did anyone know about any impact on the O.S after installing these two files? T.I.A Regards Robert Ouzen
SV: SV: Client 6.2.1.0 on Suse 11
Does two are 2 extra RPMs you need to install. But included in the TSM TAR file that you download from IBM. Best Regards Christian Svensson Cell: +46-70-325 1577 E-mail: christian.svens...@cristie.se Skype: cristie.christian.svensson Supported Platform for CPU2TSM:: http://www.cristie.se/cpu2tsm-supported-platforms Från: Timothy Hughes [timothy.hug...@oit.state.nj.us] Skickat: den 4 oktober 2010 15:44 Till: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Ämne: Re: SV: Client 6.2.1.0 on Suse 11 Do, Those two packages install with the Client/Included with the Client? or are they installed separately? Regards On 10/4/2010 9:33 AM, Christian Svensson wrote: > Hi Robert, > I have been installing TSM 6.2.x.x on a couple of Linux systems with no > problem. > Does two packages you talking about are required for TSM encryption and also > enable the SSL encryption option for TSM 6.2 in Linux. > > Best Regards > Christian Svensson > > Cell: +46-70-325 1577 > E-mail: christian.svens...@cristie.se > Skype: cristie.christian.svensson > Supported Platform for CPU2TSM:: > http://www.cristie.se/cpu2tsm-supported-platforms > > > Från: Robert Ouzen [rou...@univ.haifa.ac.il] > Skickat: den 4 oktober 2010 15:10 > Till: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Ämne: Client 6.2.1.0 on Suse 11 > > I want to test Tsm client version 6.2.1.0 on a client SLES 11sp1 64 bit , to > make Tsm client working correctly I had to install too this two files: > > gskcrypt64-8.0.13.3.linux.x86_64.rpm > gskssl64-8.0.13.3.linux.x86_64.rpm > > Did anyone know about any impact on the O.S after installing these two files? > > T.I.A Regards > > Robert Ouzen
backleveling: v5.5.4.0 -> v5.5.2.1 ??
A couple weeks ago we upgraded our TSM library manager instances (two of them) from v5.5.2.1 to v5.5.4. Since then we have been getting SCSI RESERVATION problems (3592 in 3584, san attached with multiple tsm instances and storage agents). It's to the place we have to stop/start the library managers at least once per day to keep things working. IBM support so far hasn't been very helpfull. So, I'm wondering if we can backout this upgrade. It's been far too long to do a db restore back to the old version. Is it possible to downgrade/backout v5.5.4 down to v5.5.2.1 by installing the old binaries? I guess it depends upon what db changes were made during the upgrade. Rick - The information contained in this message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately, and delete the original message.
No drives are currently available in library
Hi all, I have a problem in my TSM, I can't run a backup or a audit because give a error that drive are not available. For what I check they are available. Thanks for all the help you can give me. Error: tsm: TSMSRV>AUDIT LIBR ts3200 ANS8003I Process number 13 started. actl 04-10-10 10:28:46 ANR0984I Process 13 for AUDIT LIBRARY started in the BACKGROUND at 10:28:46. (PROCESS: 13) 04-10-10 10:28:46 ANR8457I AUDIT LIBRARY: Operation for library TS3200 started as process 13. (PROCESS: 13) 04-10-10 10:28:46 ANR8447E No drives are currently available in library TS3200. (PROCESS: 13) 04-10-10 10:28:46 ANR0985I Process 13 for AUDIT LIBRARY running in the BACKGROUND completed with completion state FAILURE at 10:28:46. (PROCESS: 13) Information from tsm: tsm: TSMSRV>q drive Library Name Drive Name Device Type On-Line --- --- TS3200 DRIVE_0 LTO Yes TS3200 DRIVE_1 LTO Yes tsm: TSMSRV>q mount ANR2034E QUERY MOUNT: No match found using this criteria. tsm: TSMSRV>q proc ANR0944E QUERY PROCESS: No active processes found. ANS8001I Return code 11. Information from SO (AIX): $ lsdev -Cc tape rmt0 Available 0I-09-02 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt1 Available 0M-09-02 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) smc0 Available 0I-09-02 IBM 3573 Tape Medium Changer (FCP) Best Regards, David
Re: SV: Client 6.2.1.0 on Suse 11
They are included in the package but installed separately , as I said the client worked only after I install them. Regards rOBERT -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Timothy Hughes Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 3:44 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] SV: Client 6.2.1.0 on Suse 11 Do, Those two packages install with the Client/Included with the Client? or are they installed separately? Regards On 10/4/2010 9:33 AM, Christian Svensson wrote: > Hi Robert, > I have been installing TSM 6.2.x.x on a couple of Linux systems with no > problem. > Does two packages you talking about are required for TSM encryption and also > enable the SSL encryption option for TSM 6.2 in Linux. > > Best Regards > Christian Svensson > > Cell: +46-70-325 1577 > E-mail: christian.svens...@cristie.se > Skype: cristie.christian.svensson > Supported Platform for CPU2TSM:: > http://www.cristie.se/cpu2tsm-supported-platforms > > > Från: Robert Ouzen [rou...@univ.haifa.ac.il] > Skickat: den 4 oktober 2010 15:10 > Till: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Ämne: Client 6.2.1.0 on Suse 11 > > I want to test Tsm client version 6.2.1.0 on a client SLES 11sp1 64 bit , to > make Tsm client working correctly I had to install too this two files: > > gskcrypt64-8.0.13.3.linux.x86_64.rpm > gskssl64-8.0.13.3.linux.x86_64.rpm > > Did anyone know about any impact on the O.S after installing these two files? > > T.I.A Regards > > Robert Ouzen
Re: SV: Client 6.2.1.0 on Suse 11
Thanks Rob, I guess it's sorta like the AIX client when they started with having to install >>> gsksa.rte and gskta.rte someone did tell me the packages will likely get more requirements as time goes on. Regards! On 10/4/2010 10:52 AM, Robert Ouzen wrote: They are included in the package but installed separately , as I said the client worked only after I install them. Regards rOBERT -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Timothy Hughes Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 3:44 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] SV: Client 6.2.1.0 on Suse 11 Do, Those two packages install with the Client/Included with the Client? or are they installed separately? Regards On 10/4/2010 9:33 AM, Christian Svensson wrote: Hi Robert, I have been installing TSM 6.2.x.x on a couple of Linux systems with no problem. Does two packages you talking about are required for TSM encryption and also enable the SSL encryption option for TSM 6.2 in Linux. Best Regards Christian Svensson Cell: +46-70-325 1577 E-mail: christian.svens...@cristie.se Skype: cristie.christian.svensson Supported Platform for CPU2TSM:: http://www.cristie.se/cpu2tsm-supported-platforms Från: Robert Ouzen [rou...@univ.haifa.ac.il] Skickat: den 4 oktober 2010 15:10 Till: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Ämne: Client 6.2.1.0 on Suse 11 I want to test Tsm client version 6.2.1.0 on a client SLES 11sp1 64 bit , to make Tsm client working correctly I had to install too this two files: gskcrypt64-8.0.13.3.linux.x86_64.rpm gskssl64-8.0.13.3.linux.x86_64.rpm Did anyone know about any impact on the O.S after installing these two files? T.I.A Regards Robert Ouzen
"Feature" or "bug"?
Doing some server/node cleanup, I noticed an interesting "anomaly" caused by a server-to-server export. I consider it a "bug". Curios on your opinions. This node was exported to a different server. The node contains Oracle filesystems named /u01, /u02, /u03 and /u04 I went to delete the target server copy and found not only the above file systems, but also /u05-/u08 I know that when doing server-to-server exports, if you don't say " mergefilespaces" and an duplicate filesystem exists, the import process automagically adds a "1", "2" and so forth to the name of the duplicate imported filesystems. I know this is what happened since I also found a " /1" (root) and "/boot1" (boot) filesystem on the target server. It was confusing to see the /u05-/u08 until I saw the object counts/sizes were identical for /u04 and /u08. IMHO, I look at this as a bug. I would have expected a /u011, /u021, /u031 and /u041 for the duplicates, not taking the last digit and incrementing it.
backleveling: v5.5.4.0 -> v5.5.2.1
Hi Richard, more of a theory than anything I have done myself, strongly depending on what you actually do with your Library manager. Supposing it serves solely as a libm, no NDMP, no storage agents native to the libm, no config manager on libm, library clients have not been upgraded: Why not come up from scratch: make a backup of the database, volhist, devconfig and store on disk somewhere just in case... New install, same servername, same password, define libm and client servers for S2S-communication now make sure no one mounts tapes (disable se, nomigrrecl, ...) define libraries, paths, drives (only one drive online) checkin tapes - all will be scratch or private no owner, choose according to your setup, I prefer private audit library from all library clients ownership will change, takes just a second or two, as only the TSM servers communicate check and activate Hope I didn´t forget any crucial steps, I would appreciate comments! Kind regards, Markus -- Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese E-Mail. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Mail oder von Teilen dieser Mail ist nicht gestattet. Wir haben alle verkehrsüblichen Maßnahmen unternommen, um das Risiko der Verbreitung virenbefallener Software oder E-Mails zu minimieren, dennoch raten wir Ihnen, Ihre eigenen Virenkontrollen auf alle Anhänge an dieser Nachricht durchzuführen. Wir schließen außer für den Fall von Vorsatz oder grober Fahrlässigkeit die Haftung für jeglichen Verlust oder Schäden durch virenbefallene Software oder E-Mails aus. Jede von der Bank versendete E-Mail ist sorgfältig erstellt worden, dennoch schließen wir die rechtliche Verbindlichkeit aus; sie kann nicht zu einer irgendwie gearteten Verpflichtung zu Lasten der Bank ausgelegt werden. __ This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorised copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail or of parts hereof is strictly forbidden. We have taken precautions to minimize the risk of transmitting software viruses but nevertheless advise you to carry out your own virus checks on any attachment of this message. We accept no liability for loss or damage caused by software viruses except in case of gross negligence or willful behaviour. Any e-mail messages from the Bank are sent in good faith, but shall not be binding or construed as constituting any kind of obligation on the part of the Bank.
AUTO: Ich bin nicht im Büro und kann deshalb Ihr Mail nicht sofort lesen. (Rückkehr am 17.10.2010)
Ich bin bis 17.10.2010 abwesend. In dringenden Fällen wenden Sie sich bitte an meine Kollegen der IT-Infrastruktur. Hinweis: Dies ist eine automatische Antwort auf Ihre Nachricht "backleveling: v5.5.4.0 -> v5.5.2.1" gesendet am 05.10.2010 08:23:43. Diese ist die einzige Benachrichtigung, die Sie empfangen werden, während diese Person abwesend ist. - Der Austausch von Nachrichten via e-mail dient ausschließlich Informationszwecken und ist nur für den Gebrauch des Empfängers bestimmt. Rechtsgeschäftliche Erklärungen dürfen über dieses Medium nicht ausgetauscht werden. Sollten Sie nicht der Adressat sein, verständigen Sie uns bitte unverzüglich per e-mail oder Telefon und vernichten Sie diese Nachricht. The exchange of e-mail messages is for purposes of information only and only intended for the recipient. This medium may not be used to exchange legal declarations. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact us immediately by e-mail or phone and delete this message from your system.
