TS7650G virtual tapes

2010-02-25 Thread Mehdi Salehi
Hi,
Which tape drive model will be added to an AIX system when you attach it to
a TS7650G?

Thanks


Re: TSM Fastback For Mail Exchange

2010-02-25 Thread Sabar Martin Hasiholan Panggabean
Hi Yudi,

It's good to here you. Yes, TSM Fastback can run on VMGuest Machine as well as 
on Physical Machine. Please refer to TSM Fast Back documentation on IBM Tivoli 
website for hardware and software requirements. You can download it there. Or 
just let me know if like me to send me to your e-mail.

Best Regards,

Martin Panggabean


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Yudi 
Darmadi
Sent: 23 Februari 2010 10:30
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] TSM Fastback For Mail Exchange

Dear all,

I'm planning to install TSM Fastback for Customer Mail  Exchange Backup. And
i want to know, can TSM Fast back Server Installed on VMware ? or Does TSM
fastback server can installed on the same machine with TSM Server? And how
about the requirements  (like the storage disk size, or hardware
requirements) to perform this backup? Thanks for your help.


Regards,


Yudi Darmadi


__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 4888 (20100222) __

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com


__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 4893 (20100224) __

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com



__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 4893 (20100224) __

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com



New to TSM V6.1

2010-02-25 Thread Sabar Martin Hasiholan Panggabean
Hi,



Just recently I've installed TSM V6.1. I just wonder, is there any document 
that tells me about differences or what change from TSM version 5.x.x to this 
new version.

Anyway, I have couple of questions on this new version (actually I've a lot) :



1.   Where is the "dsmadmc" utility command ? I can't find it ! Does IBM 
remove it ? Or change the name ?

2.   How to extend the tsm DB and LOG if we need bigger size catalog ? or 
the new TSM DB doesn't work like it was ?





Best Regards,



Martin P


Re: New to TSM V6.1

2010-02-25 Thread Bos, Karel
Hi,

Useful information can be found @
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/tsminfo/v6/index.jsp

Regards/Met vriendelijke groet,

Karel

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Sabar Martin Hasiholan Panggabean
Sent: donderdag 25 februari 2010 10:09
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: New to TSM V6.1

Hi,



Just recently I've installed TSM V6.1. I just wonder, is there any
document that tells me about differences or what change from TSM version
5.x.x to this new version.

Anyway, I have couple of questions on this new version (actually I've a
lot) :



1.   Where is the "dsmadmc" utility command ? I can't find it ! Does
IBM remove it ? Or change the name ?

2.   How to extend the tsm DB and LOG if we need bigger size catalog
? or the new TSM DB doesn't work like it was ?





Best Regards,



Martin P

ÿþDit bericht is vertrouwelijk en kan 
geheime informatie bevatten enkel

bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien 
dit bericht niet voor u is bestemd,

verzoeken wij u dit onmiddellijk aan 
ons te melden en het bericht te

vernietigen.

Aangezien de integriteit van het 
bericht niet veilig gesteld is middels

verzending via internet, kan Atos 
Origin niet aansprakelijk worden 
gehouden

voor de inhoud daarvan.

Hoewel wij ons inspannen een virusvrij 
netwerk te hanteren, geven

wij geen enkele garantie dat dit 
bericht virusvrij is, noch aanvaarden 
wij

enige aansprakelijkheid voor de 
mogelijke aanwezigheid van een virus in 
dit

bericht.

 

Op al onze rechtsverhoudingen, 
aanbiedingen en overeenkomsten 
waaronder

Atos Origin goederen en/of diensten 
levert zijn met uitsluiting van alle

andere voorwaarden de 
Leveringsvoorwaarden van Atos Origin 
van toepassing.

Deze worden u op aanvraag direct 
kosteloos toegezonden.

 

This e-mail and the documents attached 
are confidential and intended solely

for the addressee; it may also be 
privileged. If you receive this e-mail

in error, please notify the sender 
immediately and destroy it.

As its integrity cannot be secured on 
the Internet, the Atos Origin group

liability cannot be triggered for the 
message content. Although the

sender endeavours to maintain a 
computer virus-free network, the sender

does not warrant that this transmission 
is virus-free and will not be

liable for any damages resulting from 
any virus transmitted.

 

On all offers and agreements under 
which Atos Origin supplies goods and/or

services of whatever nature, the Terms 
of Delivery from Atos Origin

exclusively apply. 

The Terms of Delivery shall be promptly 
submitted to you on your request.

 

Atos Origin Nederland B.V. / Utrecht

KvK Utrecht 30132762

Reclamation macro or script

2010-02-25 Thread Robert Ouzen Ouzen
Hi to all

 

Did anyone already wrote a macro or script to calculate how much data is 
expired after running "expire inv" and want to share it.

 

I already have a script giving me the reclaim pct of each volumes but need to 
figure the global  percent of data that can be reclaim.

 

Thanks in Advance

 

Robert 


ANR9999D error mounting tape

2010-02-25 Thread Mario Behring
Hi list,


I am getting the following error on a TSM Server 5.5.3.0 running on a Windows 
box when trying to use the Library.the error message below happened during 
a BACKUP DB executionwhile attempting to mount the tape specified in the 
VOL parameter:

02/24/2010 16:07:38  ANR8468I LTO volume PV0001L3 dismounted from drive LTO1
  (mt4.0.0.4) in library LTOLIB1. (SESSION: 93, PROCESS:
  50)
02/24/2010 16:07:38  ANRD_0521343731 (pvrntp.c:1271) Thread<34>: Could 
not
  determine media type, rc = 1 (SESSION: 93, PROCESS: 
50)
02/24/2010 16:07:38  ANRD Thread<34> issued message  from: (SESSION:
  93, PROCESS: 50)
02/24/2010 16:07:38  ANRD Thread<34>  10660EC2 Unknown  (SESSION: 93,
  PROCESS: 50)
02/24/2010 16:07:38  ANRD Thread<34>  054EE9C0 Unknown  (SESSION: 93,
  PROCESS: 50)
02/24/2010 16:07:38  ANRD Thread<34>  FF9DD746 Unknown  (SESSION: 93,
  PROCESS: 50)
02/24/2010 16:07:38  ANRD Thread<34>  840FC085 Unknown  (SESSION: 93,
  PROCESS: 50)


There is more of this message, since I´ve issued the SET CONTEXTMESSAGING to 
ON.the library is a LTO ULTRIUM3C...

Any help is appreciated.

Mario





Re: ANR9999D error mounting tape

2010-02-25 Thread Bos, Karel
Hi,

ANR8468I LTO volume PV0001L3 dismounted from drive LTO1 

Loading an LTO3 tape in a LTO1 drive won't work. Otherway around is in 
read-only activities supported.


Kind Regards/Met vriendelijke groet,

Karel


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Mario 
Behring
Sent: donderdag 25 februari 2010 12:11
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: ANRD error mounting tape

Hi list,


I am getting the following error on a TSM Server 5.5.3.0 running on a Windows 
box when trying to use the Library.the error message below happened during 
a BACKUP DB executionwhile attempting to mount the tape specified in the 
VOL parameter:

02/24/2010 16:07:38  ANR8468I LTO volume PV0001L3 dismounted from drive LTO1
  (mt4.0.0.4) in library LTOLIB1. (SESSION: 93, PROCESS:
  50)
02/24/2010 16:07:38  ANRD_0521343731 (pvrntp.c:1271) Thread<34>: Could 
not
  determine media type, rc = 1 (SESSION: 93, PROCESS: 
50)
02/24/2010 16:07:38  ANRD Thread<34> issued message  from: (SESSION:
  93, PROCESS: 50)
02/24/2010 16:07:38  ANRD Thread<34>  10660EC2 Unknown  (SESSION: 93,
  PROCESS: 50)
02/24/2010 16:07:38  ANRD Thread<34>  054EE9C0 Unknown  (SESSION: 93,
  PROCESS: 50)
02/24/2010 16:07:38  ANRD Thread<34>  FF9DD746 Unknown  (SESSION: 93,
  PROCESS: 50)
02/24/2010 16:07:38  ANRD Thread<34>  840FC085 Unknown  (SESSION: 93,
  PROCESS: 50)


There is more of this message, since I´ve issued the SET CONTEXTMESSAGING to 
ON.the library is a LTO ULTRIUM3C...

Any help is appreciated.

Mario




ÿþDit bericht is vertrouwelijk en kan 
geheime informatie bevatten enkel

bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien 
dit bericht niet voor u is bestemd,

verzoeken wij u dit onmiddellijk aan 
ons te melden en het bericht te

vernietigen.

Aangezien de integriteit van het 
bericht niet veilig gesteld is middels

verzending via internet, kan Atos 
Origin niet aansprakelijk worden 
gehouden

voor de inhoud daarvan.

Hoewel wij ons inspannen een virusvrij 
netwerk te hanteren, geven

wij geen enkele garantie dat dit 
bericht virusvrij is, noch aanvaarden 
wij

enige aansprakelijkheid voor de 
mogelijke aanwezigheid van een virus in 
dit

bericht.

 

Op al onze rechtsverhoudingen, 
aanbiedingen en overeenkomsten 
waaronder

Atos Origin goederen en/of diensten 
levert zijn met uitsluiting van alle

andere voorwaarden de 
Leveringsvoorwaarden van Atos Origin 
van toepassing.

Deze worden u op aanvraag direct 
kosteloos toegezonden.

 

This e-mail and the documents attached 
are confidential and intended solely

for the addressee; it may also be 
privileged. If you receive this e-mail

in error, please notify the sender 
immediately and destroy it.

As its integrity cannot be secured on 
the Internet, the Atos Origin group

liability cannot be triggered for the 
message content. Although the

sender endeavours to maintain a 
computer virus-free network, the sender

does not warrant that this transmission 
is virus-free and will not be

liable for any damages resulting from 
any virus transmitted.

 

On all offers and agreements under 
which Atos Origin supplies goods and/or

services of what

Re: New to TSM V6.1

2010-02-25 Thread Richard Sims

The front of the server manuals carries a summary of what's new in
each release.  Additionally, IBM maintains a tradition of creating a
redbook for each new release, with an exposition on new features: look
at http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg247718.html.  And you can
search for specific details in IBM Technotes about TSM 6.1, as well as
review past customer postings on issues in the ADSM-L archives.

Note that the search function remains defective in the ill-conceived
generalized Support pages which arbitrarily replaced the once-great
TSM Support Page which IBM took away from customers.  (I had to press
the Web development department to acknowledge that the search function
was badly engineered, where Defect 1247 has been open since February
9th on resolving the problems therein.)

   Richard Sims


Re: ANR9999D error mounting tape

2010-02-25 Thread Mario Behring
Karel,

The drive name is LTO1not the type.check the output of the query drive 
command below please:

Library Name: LTOLIB1
  Drive Name: LTO1
 Device Type: LTO
 On-Line: Yes
Read Formats: 
ULTRIUM3C,ULTRIUM3,ULTRIUM2C,ULTRIUM2,ULTRIUMC,ULTRIUM
   Write Formats: 
ULTRIUM3C,ULTRIUM3,ULTRIUM2C,ULTRIUM2
 Element: 256
 Drive State: EMPTY
 Volume Name:
Allocated to:
 WWN:
   Serial Number: 1210382024
  Last Update by (administrator): ADMIN
   Last Update Date/Time: 11/29/2009 13:44:31
Cleaning Frequency (Gigabytes/ASNEEDED/NONE): NONE


Any ideas?

Mario





From: "Bos, Karel" 
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Sent: Thu, February 25, 2010 8:31:41 AM
Subject: Re: ANRD error mounting tape

Hi,

ANR8468I LTO volume PV0001L3 dismounted from drive LTO1 

Loading an LTO3 tape in a LTO1 drive won't work. Otherway around is in 
read-only activities supported.


Kind Regards/Met vriendelijke groet,

Karel


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Mario 
Behring
Sent: donderdag 25 februari 2010 12:11
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: ANRD error mounting tape

Hi list,


I am getting the following error on a TSM Server 5.5.3.0 running on a Windows 
box when trying to use the Library.the error message below happened during 
a BACKUP DB executionwhile attempting to mount the tape specified in the 
VOL parameter:

02/24/2010 16:07:38  ANR8468I LTO volume PV0001L3 dismounted from drive LTO1
  (mt4.0.0.4) in library LTOLIB1. (SESSION: 93, PROCESS:
  50)
02/24/2010 16:07:38  ANRD_0521343731 (pvrntp.c:1271) Thread<34>: Could 
not
  determine media type, rc = 1 (SESSION: 93, PROCESS: 
50)
02/24/2010 16:07:38  ANRD Thread<34> issued message  from: (SESSION:
  93, PROCESS: 50)
02/24/2010 16:07:38  ANRD Thread<34>  10660EC2 Unknown  (SESSION: 93,
  PROCESS: 50)
02/24/2010 16:07:38  ANRD Thread<34>  054EE9C0 Unknown  (SESSION: 93,
  PROCESS: 50)
02/24/2010 16:07:38  ANRD Thread<34>  FF9DD746 Unknown  (SESSION: 93,
  PROCESS: 50)
02/24/2010 16:07:38  ANRD Thread<34>  840FC085 Unknown  (SESSION: 93,
  PROCESS: 50)


There is more of this message, since I´ve issued the SET CONTEXTMESSAGING to 
ON.the library is a LTO ULTRIUM3C...

Any help is appreciated.

Mario


 

Re: ANR9999D error mounting tape

2010-02-25 Thread Richard Sims

We don't have the context on whether this has been working for you and
then stopped working, or whether you are trying something new, or
whether this is a problem with other types of operations on tape in
that library, or may be isolated to specific cartridges in that library.

I'd start by checking the device class assigned to your TSM db
backups, and assure that the drive type is consistent with the "L3"
tape at issue.  You can take a look at Technote 1303094 to see if that
pertains.  We don't know your library type, but possibly it is
configured such that it's operating in a 6-char volser mode rather
than 8, so the L3 is not being conveyed to TSM for media type to be
known.

   Richard Sims


Re: ANR9999D error mounting tape

2010-02-25 Thread Mario Behring
Hi Richard,

There is only one device class configured on this TSM Server

 Device Class Name: LTOCLASS1
Device Access Strategy: Sequential
Storage Pool Count: 4
   Device Type: LTO
Format: ULTRIUM3C
 Est/Max Capacity (MB):
   Mount Limit: DRIVES
  Mount Wait (min): 60
 Mount Retention (min): 60
  Label Prefix: ADSM
  Drive Letter:
   Library: LTOLIB1
 Directory:
   Server Name:
  Retry Period:
Retry Interval:
  Twosided:
Shared:
High-level Address:
  Minimum Capacity:
  WORM: No
  Drive Encryption: Allow
   Scaled Capacity:
Last Update by (administrator): ADMIN
 Last Update Date/Time: 01/06/2009 08:52:42



The Technote you mentionedI guess it doesn´t help me as it is about a 
Virtual Library.this is a IBM TS3100 Library...the Management Console shows 
the following information:

LIBRARY IBM 3573-TL
DRIVE LTO ULT3580-TD3


Also...about this volser mode...how do I check if it is 6 or 8...and how do I 
change it, if needed?

Thanks

Mario







From: Richard Sims 
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Sent: Thu, February 25, 2010 9:32:29 AM
Subject: Re: ANRD error mounting tape

We don't have the context on whether this has been working for you and
then stopped working, or whether you are trying something new, or
whether this is a problem with other types of operations on tape in
that library, or may be isolated to specific cartridges in that library.

I'd start by checking the device class assigned to your TSM db
backups, and assure that the drive type is consistent with the "L3"
tape at issue.  You can take a look at Technote 1303094 to see if that
pertains.  We don't know your library type, but possibly it is
configured such that it's operating in a 6-char volser mode rather
than 8, so the L3 is not being conveyed to TSM for media type to be
known.

   Richard Sims






Re: ANR9999D error mounting tape

2010-02-25 Thread Richard Sims

Some libraries allow setting for 6- vs. 8-char volser handling: I
don't believe that the TS3100 does.

Two other things that come to mind to check are:

- That the appropriate type of device driver is being used with the
library, and that it's level is sufficient for the generation of tape
currently being employed in the library.  A wrong type of driver would
certainly result in functionality problems; and one that is too old
would not recognize modern drive parameters and cartridge designations.

- That the barcode scanner is operating properly for conveying label
media type to the host through the device driver.  Check out the
library status from its interface, to assure that all components are
operating properly.

Beyond that, you may have to confer with TSM Support to uncover the
issue, particularly given the generic ANR interception.

Richard Sims


Re: DP for SQL Server backup file size

2010-02-25 Thread Loon, EJ van - SPLXM
Hi Del!
Is a parameter like the DP for SQL's parameter /STRIPes=n also available
for the DP for Exchange client?
I checked the manual, but could not find one...
Thank you very much for your reply!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines


> Hi Eric,
>
> Have you considered using the "/STRIPes=n" option?
> It allows you to break up the single stream of bytes
> into "n" stripes on different parallel sessions.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Del
**
For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain
confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee
only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part
of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or
distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or
attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately
by return e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries
and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or
incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor
responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal
Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with
registered number 33014286 
**


Re: DP for SQL Server backup file size

2010-02-25 Thread Del Hoobler
Hi Eric,

Microsoft had original intentions to add striping into
Exchange legacy-style backups, but opted against it,
most likely to focus their efforts on VSS backups.

DP/Exchange has nothing built in to break apart the
storage group list and create multiple streams.
The only way to do this is to create and launch
separate commands, specifying the individual storage groups.

I have heard of a few customers that have written
Perl scripts that query the storage groups and then build
the commands dynamically in order to do this
multiple-instance/parallelism automatically.

Thanks,

Del



"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 02/25/2010
09:11:30 AM:

> [image removed]
>
> Re: DP for SQL Server backup file size
>
> Loon, EJ van - SPLXM
>
> to:
>
> ADSM-L
>
> 02/25/2010 09:13 AM
>
> Sent by:
>
> "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 
>
> Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
>
> Hi Del!
> Is a parameter like the DP for SQL's parameter /STRIPes=n also available
> for the DP for Exchange client?
> I checked the manual, but could not find one...
> Thank you very much for your reply!
> Kind regards,
> Eric van Loon
> KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
>
>
> > Hi Eric,
> >
> > Have you considered using the "/STRIPes=n" option?
> > It allows you to break up the single stream of bytes
> > into "n" stripes on different parallel sessions.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Del


Re: DP for SQL Server backup file size

2010-02-25 Thread Loon, EJ van - SPLXM
Hi Del!
Thank you very much for you reply! As clear as always! 
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Del Hoobler
Sent: donderdag 25 februari 2010 16:10
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: DP for SQL Server backup file size

Hi Eric,

Microsoft had original intentions to add striping into
Exchange legacy-style backups, but opted against it,
most likely to focus their efforts on VSS backups.

DP/Exchange has nothing built in to break apart the
storage group list and create multiple streams.
The only way to do this is to create and launch
separate commands, specifying the individual storage groups.

I have heard of a few customers that have written
Perl scripts that query the storage groups and then build
the commands dynamically in order to do this
multiple-instance/parallelism automatically.

Thanks,

Del



"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 02/25/2010
09:11:30 AM:

> [image removed]
>
> Re: DP for SQL Server backup file size
>
> Loon, EJ van - SPLXM
>
> to:
>
> ADSM-L
>
> 02/25/2010 09:13 AM
>
> Sent by:
>
> "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 
>
> Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
>
> Hi Del!
> Is a parameter like the DP for SQL's parameter /STRIPes=n also
available
> for the DP for Exchange client?
> I checked the manual, but could not find one...
> Thank you very much for your reply!
> Kind regards,
> Eric van Loon
> KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
>
>
> > Hi Eric,
> >
> > Have you considered using the "/STRIPes=n" option?
> > It allows you to break up the single stream of bytes
> > into "n" stripes on different parallel sessions.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Del
**
For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain
confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee
only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part
of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or
distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or
attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately
by return e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries
and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or
incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor
responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal
Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with
registered number 33014286 
**


Re: AIX mountpoints

2010-02-25 Thread David Longo
No.  By default NFS filesystems are NOT backed up.

You must explicitly list them for them to be backed up.

David Longo 

>>> Larry Clark  2/25/2010 1:52 PM >>>
general question: do AIX sites normally add explicit entries in the
inclexcl.list file to exclude NFS mountpoints?



#
This message is for the named person's use only.  It may 
contain private, proprietary, or legally privileged information.  
No privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.  If you 
receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and 
all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it, 
and notify the sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, 
disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you 
are not the intended recipient.  Health First reserves the right to 
monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.  Any views 
or opinions expressed in this message are solely those of the 
individual sender, except (1) where the message states such views 
or opinions are on behalf of a particular entity;  and (2) the sender 
is authorized by the entity to give such views or opinions.
#


Question on Expiration

2010-02-25 Thread Jones, Eric J
Good Afternoon.
I was wondering if there was a way to generate a report or see it in the server 
logs how many files had expired each day for a particular server by day for a 
week then 2 weeks, etc.  We run expiration each day at 4:00 and the logs show 
the total expiration but not by machine.  The logs are kept for 45 days on the 
server.
We are running
TSM 5.4.1 on AIX 5.3 .
Clients are running Version 5.4 and this particular machine is Windows 2003
I'd like to see a breakout for a particular machine.

Thanks


AIX mountpoints

2010-02-25 Thread Larry Clark

general question: do AIX sites normally add explicit entries in the
inclexcl.list file to exclude NFS mountpoints?


Re: Question on Expiration

2010-02-25 Thread Lee, Gary D.
Query the actlog table for message ane4970i

That is number of objects expired. 


Gary Lee
Senior System Programmer
Ball State University
phone: 765-285-1310

 
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Jones, 
Eric J
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 2:55 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Question on Expiration

Good Afternoon.
I was wondering if there was a way to generate a report or see it in the server 
logs how many files had expired each day for a particular server by day for a 
week then 2 weeks, etc.  We run expiration each day at 4:00 and the logs show 
the total expiration but not by machine.  The logs are kept for 45 days on the 
server.
We are running
TSM 5.4.1 on AIX 5.3 .
Clients are running Version 5.4 and this particular machine is Windows 2003
I'd like to see a breakout for a particular machine.

Thanks


Re: Question on Expiration

2010-02-25 Thread Evans, Bill
query actl begind=-1 se="objects expired"

should get you the data in rough format, perhaps one of the sql guru's
has a select they can share.

Thanks,
  --Bill


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Jones, Eric J
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 11:55 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Question on Expiration

Good Afternoon.
I was wondering if there was a way to generate a report or see it in the
server logs how many files had expired each day for a particular server
by day for a week then 2 weeks, etc.  We run expiration each day at 4:00
and the logs show the total expiration but not by machine.  The logs are
kept for 45 days on the server.
We are running
TSM 5.4.1 on AIX 5.3 .
Clients are running Version 5.4 and this particular machine is Windows
2003 I'd like to see a breakout for a particular machine.

Thanks


Re: Question on Expiration

2010-02-25 Thread Jones, Eric J
Bill:
I can see a total on the TSM server for all the machines that have objects to 
expire but cannot see for a particular machine.  Is there any way to tell how 
many have expired on 1 machine since we are backing up dozens of machines.  I 
see each machine listed but it just shows what it's expiring, not the amount of 
space.

Thanks

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Evans, 
Bill
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 3:21 PM
To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Question on Expiration

query actl begind=-1 se="objects expired"

should get you the data in rough format, perhaps one of the sql guru's has a 
select they can share.

Thanks,
  --Bill


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Jones, 
Eric J
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 11:55 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Question on Expiration

Good Afternoon.
I was wondering if there was a way to generate a report or see it in the server 
logs how many files had expired each day for a particular server by day for a 
week then 2 weeks, etc.  We run expiration each day at 4:00 and the logs show 
the total expiration but not by machine.  The logs are kept for 45 days on the 
server.
We are running
TSM 5.4.1 on AIX 5.3 .
Clients are running Version 5.4 and this particular machine is Windows
2003 I'd like to see a breakout for a particular machine.

Thanks


Exchange2003 restore help

2010-02-25 Thread Bill Boyer
Environment is Exchange2003 server. TSM versions 5.5 on everything.

Client had an Exchange server over a year ago called EXCHANGE01 with a
couple storage groups. They did backups on this and retained them forever.
They have since created a new, larger EXCHANGE04 server with 4 differently
named storage groups, migrated the users over and then "retired" the
EXCHANGE01 server. Now they have a need to restore mailboxes from the old
EXCHANGE01 storage groups to another server in the domain EXCHANGE09.

The original storage group names DO NOT exist in the new Exchange
environement, so there's no way I can direct the restore to the Recovery
Storage Group. How can I restore this old data and be able to appease the
lawyers?? This is for legal discovery.

TIA,
Bill Boyer


Re: FW: [ADSM-L] Question on Expiration

2010-02-25 Thread Remco Post
expiration only deals in objects, reclamation deals in objects and bytes. I 
don't believe there is any way for you to find out. I fail to see why this is 
operationally important.

On 25 feb 2010, at 23:07, Huebschman, George J. wrote:

> Eric,
>   That only shows and object count, not bytes.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
> Huebschman, George J.
> Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 5:05 PM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Question on Expiration
> 
> Eric,
> Try this:
> 
> select nodename, substr (message, 1,9) as MESSAGE, cast(substr (message,
> 44,10)as char (20)) as ObjExpired from actlog where msgno=4970 and
> date(date_time)>date(current_timestamp)-1 day
> 
> IMPORTANT:  E-mail sent through the Internet is not secure. Legg Mason 
> therefore recommends that you do not send any confidential or sensitive 
> information to us via electronic mail, including social security numbers, 
> account numbers, or personal identification numbers. Delivery, and or timely 
> delivery of Internet mail is not guaranteed. Legg Mason therefore recommends 
> that you do not send time sensitive 
> or action-oriented messages to us via electronic mail.
> 
> This message is intended for the addressee only and may contain privileged or 
> confidential information. Unless you are the intended recipient, you may not 
> use, copy or disclose to anyone any information contained in this message. If 
> you have received this message in error, please notify the author by replying 
> to this message and then kindly delete the message. Thank you.

-- 
Met vriendelijke groeten/Kind Regards,

Remco Post
r.p...@plcs.nl
+31 6 248 21 622


Re: Exchange2003 restore help

2010-02-25 Thread Remco Post
On 25 feb 2010, at 22:52, Bill Boyer wrote:

> Environment is Exchange2003 server. TSM versions 5.5 on everything.
> 
> Client had an Exchange server over a year ago called EXCHANGE01 with a
> couple storage groups. They did backups on this and retained them forever.
> They have since created a new, larger EXCHANGE04 server with 4 differently
> named storage groups, migrated the users over and then "retired" the
> EXCHANGE01 server. Now they have a need to restore mailboxes from the old
> EXCHANGE01 storage groups to another server in the domain EXCHANGE09.
> 
> The original storage group names DO NOT exist in the new Exchange
> environement, so there's no way I can direct the restore to the Recovery
> Storage Group. How can I restore this old data and be able to appease the
> lawyers?? This is for legal discovery.
> 

1- _backups_ are not for legal compliance

having said that, build a vm, install windows and exchange, restore, extract 
the desired info, then destroy.

2- find some application that will _archive_ your e-mail info for legal 
compliance purposes so you can comply next time

good luck

> TIA,
> Bill Boyer

-- 
Met vriendelijke groeten/Kind Regards,

Remco Post
r.p...@plcs.nl
+31 6 248 21 622


FW: [ADSM-L] Question on Expiration

2010-02-25 Thread Huebschman, George J.
Eric,
That only shows and object count, not bytes.

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Huebschman, George J.
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 5:05 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Question on Expiration

Eric,
Try this:

select nodename, substr (message, 1,9) as MESSAGE, cast(substr (message,
44,10)as char (20)) as ObjExpired from actlog where msgno=4970 and
date(date_time)>date(current_timestamp)-1 day

IMPORTANT:  E-mail sent through the Internet is not secure. Legg Mason 
therefore recommends that you do not send any confidential or sensitive 
information to us via electronic mail, including social security numbers, 
account numbers, or personal identification numbers. Delivery, and or timely 
delivery of Internet mail is not guaranteed. Legg Mason therefore recommends 
that you do not send time sensitive 
or action-oriented messages to us via electronic mail.

This message is intended for the addressee only and may contain privileged or 
confidential information. Unless you are the intended recipient, you may not 
use, copy or disclose to anyone any information contained in this message. If 
you have received this message in error, please notify the author by replying 
to this message and then kindly delete the message. Thank you.


Re: Question on Expiration

2010-02-25 Thread Huebschman, George J.
Eric,
Try this:

select nodename, substr (message, 1,9) as MESSAGE, cast(substr (message,
44,10)as char (20)) as ObjExpired from actlog where msgno=4970 and
date(date_time)>date(current_timestamp)-1 day

George Huebschman
Storage Support Team, Media Librarian
Legg Mason, LMTS
410 580-7911 (office)
410 522-8581 (mobile)

Please plant a tree before printing this e-mail, and remember, E-Mail is
forever
...but Diamonds are a girl's best friend.



-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Jones, Eric J
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 4:23 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Question on Expiration

Bill:
I can see a total on the TSM server for all the machines that have
objects to expire but cannot see for a particular machine.  Is there any
way to tell how many have expired on 1 machine since we are backing up
dozens of machines.  I see each machine listed but it just shows what
it's expiring, not the amount of space.

Thanks

IMPORTANT:  E-mail sent through the Internet is not secure. Legg Mason 
therefore recommends that you do not send any confidential or sensitive 
information to us via electronic mail, including social security numbers, 
account numbers, or personal identification numbers. Delivery, and or timely 
delivery of Internet mail is not guaranteed. Legg Mason therefore recommends 
that you do not send time sensitive 
or action-oriented messages to us via electronic mail.

This message is intended for the addressee only and may contain privileged or 
confidential information. Unless you are the intended recipient, you may not 
use, copy or disclose to anyone any information contained in this message. If 
you have received this message in error, please notify the author by replying 
to this message and then kindly delete the message. Thank you.


FW: [ADSM-L] FW: [ADSM-L] Question on Expiration

2010-02-25 Thread Huebschman, George J.
Eric,
I believe that Remco is correct.
The only way I see to do this is by doing a before/after query of
occupancy:
select * from occupancy where node_name='XYZCLIENT'

But as Remco says, what is the value of knowing the bytes?  They
space is on the TSM server; Q DB to find out how utilzed your DB is and
do it daily to find the rate of change.

Geo H.

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Remco Post
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 5:17 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] FW: [ADSM-L] Question on Expiration

expiration only deals in objects, reclamation deals in objects and
bytes. I don't believe there is any way for you to find out. I fail to
see why this is operationally important.

On 25 feb 2010, at 23:07, Huebschman, George J. wrote:

> Eric,
>   That only shows and object count, not bytes.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf
> Of Huebschman, George J.
> Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 5:05 PM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Question on Expiration
>
> Eric,
> Try this:
>
> select nodename, substr (message, 1,9) as MESSAGE, cast(substr
> (message, 44,10)as char (20)) as ObjExpired from actlog where
> msgno=4970 and
> date(date_time)>date(current_timestamp)-1 day
>
> IMPORTANT:  E-mail sent through the Internet is not secure. Legg Mason

> therefore recommends that you do not send any confidential or
sensitive information to us via electronic mail, including social
security numbers, account numbers, or personal identification numbers.
Delivery, and or timely delivery of Internet mail is not guaranteed.
Legg Mason therefore recommends that you do not send time sensitive or
action-oriented messages to us via electronic mail.
>
> This message is intended for the addressee only and may contain
privileged or confidential information. Unless you are the intended
recipient, you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone any information
contained in this message. If you have received this message in error,
please notify the author by replying to this message and then kindly
delete the message. Thank you.

--
Met vriendelijke groeten/Kind Regards,

Remco Post
r.p...@plcs.nl
+31 6 248 21 622

IMPORTANT:  E-mail sent through the Internet is not secure. Legg Mason 
therefore recommends that you do not send any confidential or sensitive 
information to us via electronic mail, including social security numbers, 
account numbers, or personal identification numbers. Delivery, and or timely 
delivery of Internet mail is not guaranteed. Legg Mason therefore recommends 
that you do not send time sensitive 
or action-oriented messages to us via electronic mail.

This message is intended for the addressee only and may contain privileged or 
confidential information. Unless you are the intended recipient, you may not 
use, copy or disclose to anyone any information contained in this message. If 
you have received this message in error, please notify the author by replying 
to this message and then kindly delete the message. Thank you.


Re: FW: [ADSM-L] Question on Expiration

2010-02-25 Thread Jones, Eric J
Thanks.
The number of objects that have expired is really what I'm looking for and it 
sounds like this will do it.  I don't necessarily need the number of bytes.

Thanks

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of 
Huebschman, George J.
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 5:30 PM
To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
Subject: [ADSM-L] FW: [ADSM-L] FW: [ADSM-L] Question on Expiration

Eric,
I believe that Remco is correct.
The only way I see to do this is by doing a before/after query of
occupancy:
select * from occupancy where node_name='XYZCLIENT'

But as Remco says, what is the value of knowing the bytes?  They space 
is on the TSM server; Q DB to find out how utilzed your DB is and do it daily 
to find the rate of change.

Geo H.

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Remco 
Post
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 5:17 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] FW: [ADSM-L] Question on Expiration

expiration only deals in objects, reclamation deals in objects and bytes. I 
don't believe there is any way for you to find out. I fail to see why this is 
operationally important.

On 25 feb 2010, at 23:07, Huebschman, George J. wrote:

> Eric,
>   That only shows and object count, not bytes.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf
> Of Huebschman, George J.
> Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 5:05 PM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Question on Expiration
>
> Eric,
> Try this:
>
> select nodename, substr (message, 1,9) as MESSAGE, cast(substr
> (message, 44,10)as char (20)) as ObjExpired from actlog where
> msgno=4970 and
> date(date_time)>date(current_timestamp)-1 day
>
> IMPORTANT:  E-mail sent through the Internet is not secure. Legg Mason

> therefore recommends that you do not send any confidential or
sensitive information to us via electronic mail, including social security 
numbers, account numbers, or personal identification numbers.
Delivery, and or timely delivery of Internet mail is not guaranteed.
Legg Mason therefore recommends that you do not send time sensitive or 
action-oriented messages to us via electronic mail.
>
> This message is intended for the addressee only and may contain
privileged or confidential information. Unless you are the intended recipient, 
you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone any information contained in this 
message. If you have received this message in error, please notify the author 
by replying to this message and then kindly delete the message. Thank you.

--
Met vriendelijke groeten/Kind Regards,

Remco Post
r.p...@plcs.nl
+31 6 248 21 622

IMPORTANT:  E-mail sent through the Internet is not secure. Legg Mason 
therefore recommends that you do not send any confidential or sensitive 
information to us via electronic mail, including social security numbers, 
account numbers, or personal identification numbers. Delivery, and or timely 
delivery of Internet mail is not guaranteed. Legg Mason therefore recommends 
that you do not send time sensitive or action-oriented messages to us via 
electronic mail.

This message is intended for the addressee only and may contain privileged or 
confidential information. Unless you are the intended recipient, you may not 
use, copy or disclose to anyone any information contained in this message. If 
you have received this message in error, please notify the author by replying 
to this message and then kindly delete the message. Thank you.


Re: Versions of TDP SQL and TSM BA running on one server

2010-02-25 Thread Alexander Födisch

short summary:

TDP 5.5.3 and BA 6.1.3 on Windows Server 2008 R2 x64 are working well - also 
the backup of SQL Express works.






Del Hoobler schrieb:

DP/SQL 5.5.3 Requirements are here:
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21403340

MS SQL Express is not officially supported.

Thanks,

Del



"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 02/17/2010 
08:06:50 AM:


[image removed] 


Versions of TDP SQL and TSM BA running on one server

Alexander Födisch 


to:

ADSM-L

02/17/2010 08:11 AM

Sent by:

"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 

Please respond to foedisch

Hi,

I would like to install TSM BA and TSM DP for SQL on the same server
(Windows Server 2008 R2 x64).
Which version of BA do I need when installing DP 5.5.3.0?

We have to backup MS SQL Express with TDB. Any experiences? Does it 

work?


Best,
Alex