Re: AW: [ADSM-L] monitoring software

2009-04-20 Thread Richard Sims

On Apr 20, 2009, at 1:06 AM, Mehdi Salehi wrote:


Thanks for your quick posts,
Anybody experienced ITM (IBM Tivoli Monitoring)?


For your planning, note that ITM will be incorporated into TSM 6.1:
http://www.mail-archive.com/adsm-l@vm.marist.edu/msg81149.html


Re: Export tape

2009-04-20 Thread Pretorius, Louw
Use the fromdate and todate parameters and be careful


Louw Pretorius   
Stellenbosch University 
Information Technology

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Erwin 
Zavala
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 22:19
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Export tape

but there are other volumes whose histroy I wan to keep

On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Shawn Drew < 
shawn.d...@americas.bnpparibas.com> wrote:

> Look at the DELETE VOLHIST type=export  command, but be careful!
>
> Regards,
> Shawn
> 
> Shawn Drew
>
>
>
>
> Internet
> erwin.zav...@gmail.com
>
> Sent by: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> 04/16/2009 02:17 PM
> Please respond to
> erwin.zav...@gmail.com
>
>
> To
> ADSM-L
> cc
>
> Subject
> [ADSM-L] Export tape
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I exported a node to tape.I do not need that export anymore.
> How do I make that tape scratch?
>
>
>
> This message and any attachments (the "message") is intended solely 
> for the addressees and is confidential. If you receive this message in 
> error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender. Any use not 
> in accord with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either 
> whole or partial, is prohibited except formal approval. The internet 
> can not guarantee the integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS (and its 
> subsidiaries) shall (will) not therefore be liable for the message if 
> modified. Please note that certain functions and services for BNP 
> Paribas may be performed by BNP Paribas RCC, Inc.
>


TSM Operational Reporting under Windows Server 2008

2009-04-20 Thread Neil Schofield
I'm in the process of migrating a bunch of TSM servers from Windows Server
2003 to Windows Server 2008 (x64) and thought I'd share one of the gotchas
I came across.

When attempting to refresh an operational report from the TSM management
console, the console went through the motions of apparently generating the
report, but never produced the output. It turned out the TSMREPT.EXE
process that should have been spawned wasn't being.

The solution was to change the compatibility setting for the file
TSMREPT.EXE in the console directory to enable "Run this program as an
administrator". Without this, attempting to run the utility from a command
prompt gave the error "A referral was returned from the server".
Interestingly, the TSMVER.EXE command gave the same error and required the
same change whereas the TSMDLST.EXE command worked fine.

Regards
Neil Schofield
Storage Technologies Manager
Yorkshire Water Services Ltd.

-
Find out about our efforts to create gardens in Yorkshire's primary
schools using a million green fingers by following this link:
http://greenfingers.yorkshirewater.com/

The information in this e-mail is confidential and may also be
legally privileged. The contents are intended for recipient only
and are subject to the legal notice available at
http://www.keldagroup.com/email.htm Yorkshire Water Services
Limited
Registered Office Western House Halifax Road Bradford BD6 2SZ
Registered in England and Wales No 2366682


Re: Fwd: [ADSM-L] Mixing LTO2 and LTO4 drives and media in the same library

2009-04-20 Thread David McClelland
List,

 

An addendum:

 

The client has now performed the change (it's been my first day back onsite
with them since working through the planning with them) and they report that
it all went swimmingly. From what I've seen there's now a happy co-existence
of LTO2 and LTO4 drives and LTO2 and LTO4 media within the same logical (IBM
3584) tape library - LTO2 media is getting mounted into LTO2 or LTO4 drives
for R/O activities, LTO2 media is getting mounted only into LTO2 drives for
R/W purposes, and LTO4 media is mounted only into LTO4 drives for R/W
operations. Simple operational procedures have been updated (e.g. an update
to their Q_SCRATCH script to returns how many scratch tapes there are of
each media type etc).

 

They may well be keeping some LTO2 drives and media in this configuration
for a while longer for generation of their offsite volumes – as long as the
capacity figures and support for this make sense, it means they’re not
having to shell out on a whole load more LTO4 media up front (which ‘aint
cheap) before they need to.

 

Thanks again to the list for your help in reassuring me that this should
(and does) indeed work well. I’ll report back in case I hear of anything
else on this.

 

David Mc

London, UK

 

From: David McClelland [mailto:david.mcclell...@networkc.co.uk] 
Sent: 23 March 2009 18:06
To: 'Bill Smoldt'; 'ADSM: Dist Stor Manager'
Subject: RE: [ADSM-L] Fwd: [ADSM-L] Mixing LTO2 and LTO4 drives and media in
the same library

 

Hi Bill,

 

Many thanks for feeding back with this. 

 

(Why do things like this always come through and scare me like that right at
the end of my day in the office just when I’m getting set to head home...!)

 

The APAR suggests 5.5.2.0 and 5.4.4.1 and above are currently affected by
this issue (and perhaps as a result of the IC54738 fix from my reading of
it) – it’s Windows TSM 5.4.3.2 onsite here now (migrating to AIX TSM
5.5.1.1), so I think they’ll just about dodge underneath this issue I
reckon. 

 

The mixed LTO2/4 media/drives is a config they’ll be running for (to the
current plan) about 5 weeks before the wholesale migration to LTO4 drives
and read only LTO2 media.

 

Many thanks,

 

David Mc

London, UK

 

From: Bill Smoldt [mailto:smo...@storserver.com] 
Sent: 23 March 2009 17:19
To: david.mcclell...@networkc.co.uk; ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Fwd: [ADSM-L] Mixing LTO2 and LTO4 drives and media in
the same library

 

David,

While I understand that this works in specific circumstances, we’ve had
significant problems with your specific combination.  The problem we
observed will occur with a current release of TSM server and any two-level
gap in LTO generations and the right circumstances.  You may want to wait on
implementation until you are running a TSM version which contains the fix
described in APAR IC59691.  Unless you can live with that feature.

HYPERLINK
"http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1IC59691"http://www-01.ibm
.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1IC59691

-- 
Bill Smoldt
VP Research & Development
STORServer, Inc.
719-266-8777 x7103

   _  

From: David McClelland 
Reply-To: 
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 05:39:28 -0600
To: 
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Fwd: [ADSM-L] Mixing LTO2 and LTO4 drives and media in
the same library

(War and Peace again - sorry):

Thanks for all of your responses both on and off list. I've put some feelers
out elsewhere on this too (many thanks if you're reading) and have had some
interesting and contradictory responses!

In summary, there do seem to be some folks out there running with exactly
the proposed config below (i.e. LTO2 and LTO4 drives and media in the same
logical/physical library, LTO2 used purely for offsite media generation)
and, provided parameters such as MOUNTLIMIT are set carefully (as well as
separate devclasses and stgpools of course), it is a happy configuration
without undesired LTO2 > LTO4 cross pollination.

The 'Implementing IBM Tape in Unix Systems' Redbook is an excellent read and
talks about this configuration in one of its examples (going against my
reading of the TSM Admin Guide):

"As of Tivoli Storage Manager V5.3.5, LTO4 drives are supported, and any
combination of LTO 2, 3, and 4 drives and media can be used in one library
[...] Although LTO4 drives can read the LTO2 media (but cannot write to it),
care should be taken to avoid attempted writing. Set the MOUNTLIMIT option
for the LTO2 devclass to less than the sum of LTO2 and 3 drives (see the
previous tip), thereby preventing the LTO2 media from being loaded in the
LTO4 drives. The LTO2 media will still be available for normal use by the
LTO2 [and 3] drives.

"['Previous tip' - relates to different scenario but the point is still
valid] Setting the MOUNTLIMIT parameter: For read or write tape mounts,
Tivoli Storage Manager will select LTO3 drives for LTO3 media first. If no
LTO3 devices are available, an available LTO4 drive will be selected for the
LTO3 media. To prevent the case where all LTO