Website and Call for Papers for TSM Symposium 2009
Please find updated CFP information about the TSM Symposium 2009 being hosted by University of Cologne in September 2009 and taking place at Grandhotel Petersberg at http://tsm2009.uni-koeln.de/ The CFP area in that webpage may give you some idea what to talk about and other hints for your contribution. The registration subpage is now available for enrollment. Have a nice weekend (with many good ideas for talks/papers), Claus -- Claus Kalle, Universitaet zu Koeln, RRZK i i Leiter Abteilung Systeme I I E-Mail: ka...@uni-koeln.deM M Fon: 0221 478 5580 /I\ Fax: 0221 478 86845 MiMiMiM Snail-Mail: Robert-Koch-Str. 10, 50931 Koeln MIMiMiM
RES: Storagepoool utilization 0.0%
Hallo Eric, Are you using migration based on the HIGHMIG/LOWMIG values or by means of the MIGRATE STGPOOL command? If I remember correctly, the second option worked for me in this case. Groeten uit Brazilië ___ Paul Gondim van Dongen IBM Certified Advanced Deployment Professional Tivoli Storage Management Solutions 2006, 2007 & 2008 IBM Certified Deployment Professional - ITWS 8.2 IBM Certified Storage Administrator - ITSM V5.4 IBM Certified Solution Advisor - Tivoli Storage 2008 SNIA Certified Professional ITIL Foundation Certified ___ VANguard Value Added Network guardian +55-81-34198094 http://www.vanguard-it.com.br De: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [ads...@vm.marist.edu] em Nome de Loon, EJ van - SPLXM [eric-van.l...@klm.com] Enviado: sexta-feira, 3 de abril de 2009 8:59 Para: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Assunto: Storagepoool utilization 0.0% Hi *SM-ers! I'm trying to empty a primary storagepool to a new one by using migration. The problem is that migration isn't kicking in. This is probably caused by the percentage utilized value for this storagepool. A Q STGPOOL shows a Pct. Util 0.0, so TSM thinks there is nothing to migrate. This storagepool is using a vritual tape library, so I already tried updating the deviceclass and entering some value in the Est. Capacity field, but that doesn't help either. What am I missing here? Thank you VERY much for your help in advance!!! Kindest regards, Eric van Loon KLM Royal Dutch Airlines ** For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 33014286 **
Re: Storagepoool utilization 0.0%
Hello There is definitely data in it then? Can you delete the volumes one at a time with discard set to no and see what's left? Steven "Loon, EJ van - SPLXM" Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 03/04/2009 13:01 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc Subject [ADSM-L] Storagepoool utilization 0.0% Caterpillar: Confidential Green Retain Until: 03/05/2009 Hi *SM-ers! I'm trying to empty a primary storagepool to a new one by using migration. The problem is that migration isn't kicking in. This is probably caused by the percentage utilized value for this storagepool. A Q STGPOOL shows a Pct. Util 0.0, so TSM thinks there is nothing to migrate. This storagepool is using a vritual tape library, so I already tried updating the deviceclass and entering some value in the Est. Capacity field, but that doesn't help either. What am I missing here? Thank you VERY much for your help in advance!!! Kindest regards, Eric van Loon KLM Royal Dutch Airlines ** For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 33014286 **
Re: Storagepoool utilization 0.0%
Hi, Eric - You may have some problem files, or perhaps even volumes. See what volumes remain in that storage pool, and perform a Move Data on them, to try to fully deplete the storage pool. You could also try running Query Content on the final volumes with DAmaged=Yes to see if there are any such files. Richard Sims
Storagepoool utilization 0.0%
Hi *SM-ers! I'm trying to empty a primary storagepool to a new one by using migration. The problem is that migration isn't kicking in. This is probably caused by the percentage utilized value for this storagepool. A Q STGPOOL shows a Pct. Util 0.0, so TSM thinks there is nothing to migrate. This storagepool is using a vritual tape library, so I already tried updating the deviceclass and entering some value in the Est. Capacity field, but that doesn't help either. What am I missing here? Thank you VERY much for your help in advance!!! Kindest regards, Eric van Loon KLM Royal Dutch Airlines ** For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 33014286 **
Re: Storagepoool utilization 0.0%
Have you looked at MOVE NODEDATA? -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Loon, EJ van - SPLXM Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 7:59 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] Storagepoool utilization 0.0% Hi *SM-ers! I'm trying to empty a primary storagepool to a new one by using migration. The problem is that migration isn't kicking in. This is probably caused by the percentage utilized value for this storagepool. A Q STGPOOL shows a Pct. Util 0.0, so TSM thinks there is nothing to migrate. This storagepool is using a vritual tape library, so I already tried updating the deviceclass and entering some value in the Est. Capacity field, but that doesn't help either. What am I missing here? Thank you VERY much for your help in advance!!! Kindest regards, Eric van Loon KLM Royal Dutch Airlines ** For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 33014286 ** IMPORTANT: E-mail sent through the Internet is not secure and timely delivery of Internet mail is not guaranteed. Legg Mason therefore, recommends that you do not send any action-oriented or time-sensitive information to us via electronic mail, or any confidential or sensitive information including: social security numbers, account numbers, or personal identification numbers. This message is intended for the addressee only and may contain privileged or confidential information. Unless you are the intended recipient, you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone any information contained in this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify the author by replying to this message and then kindly delete the message. Thank you.
RES: Microsoft Cluster Server - Bare Metal Recovery
Hi Wellington, I used a procedure much like yours on several machines as per a customer's request. The only difference is that I used the ASR facility, meaning that during the Windows install, the system drive and system state get restored, and the result of the install is already "the server you had backed up". Stangely, this procedure went fine for all non-cluster machines (14) I tested, but the last pair, a SQL Server cluster, would start issuing messages like "Could not join cluster. Will retry" every time one of the machines was booted, although everything worked fine. The customer said they would try to fix this issue later, and in the meantime the procedure was approved by them as a "last resource". Regards, ___ Paul Gondim van Dongen IBM Certified Advanced Deployment Professional Tivoli Storage Management Solutions 2006, 2007 & 2008 IBM Certified Deployment Professional - ITWS 8.2 IBM Certified Storage Administrator - ITSM V5.4 IBM Certified Solution Advisor - Tivoli Storage 2008 SNIA Certified Professional ITIL Foundation Certified ___ VANguard Value Added Network guardian +55-81-34198094 http://www.vanguard-it.com.br De: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [ads...@vm.marist.edu] em Nome de Wellington KMK [wellington.kirubhaka...@wipro.com] Enviado: sexta-feira, 3 de abril de 2009 1:06 Para: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Assunto: Microsoft Cluster Server - Bare Metal Recovery Hi, I need to plan BMR for two Microsoft Cluster Servers(Failover Cluster). Is the below steps are enough or something need to add up for cluster services.. Backup Plan i) Backup all local drives ii) Backup shared drives iii) System State Backup Restoration Plan i) Install the OS & network drivers ii) Install the TSM Client iii) Restore the data (local drives & shared drives) iv) Apply Systemstate backup v) Restart the Server. Please correct me if I miss anything... TSM Server Details Version 5.5 OS AIX 5.3 Regards, Wellington K Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary. The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. www.wipro.com
ITM 6.1 new Reporting and real-time Monitoring Feature - 2 Day Workshop
Dear ADSM / TSM community. As you know, TSM 6.1 is available since 27th of March. One of the three new main features (besides De-Dup, and DB/2 database) is the complete new "Reporting and real-time Monitoring" feature. This new feature is based on ITM 6.2 (IBM Tivoli Monitoring) and the TCR (Tivoli Common Reporting), which in turn is based on the open source reporting tool "BIRT" (Business Intelligence Reporting Tools). I've already written a class covering TCR & ITM 6.2.1 (see class SMCR2DAT in www.ibm.at) And now I'm developing an own 2-day "ITM 6.1 Reporting and real-time Monitoring" workshop for the needs of an TSM Administrator --> will be held 3rd to 4th of June in Vienna / Austria. If you are interested or need any additional information pls let me know (to my knowledge, there is no official comparable class "in the pipeline"). Thanks and rgds mikel from sunny Vienna /Austria Michael Malitz Tivoli Certified Instructor (TSM and ITM) / BIRT & Tivoli Common (TCR) Reporting & TSM 6.1 Upgrade Consulting Tel.: +43 (0) 664 1415275 e-mail: michael.mal...@mm-it.at
Re: ITM 6.1 new Reporting and real-time Monitoring Feature - 2 Day Workshop
I looked on the IBM site. Is there an english version of your class somewhere to be found? ** Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will never use email to request that you reply with your password, social security number or confidential personal information. For more details visit http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html From: Michael Malitz To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Date: 04/03/2009 09:23 AM Subject: [ADSM-L] ITM 6.1 new Reporting and real-time Monitoring Feature - 2 Day Workshop Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Dear ADSM / TSM community. As you know, TSM 6.1 is available since 27th of March. One of the three new main features (besides De-Dup, and DB/2 database) is the complete new "Reporting and real-time Monitoring" feature. This new feature is based on ITM 6.2 (IBM Tivoli Monitoring) and the TCR (Tivoli Common Reporting), which in turn is based on the open source reporting tool "BIRT" (Business Intelligence Reporting Tools). I've already written a class covering TCR & ITM 6.2.1 (see class SMCR2DAT in www.ibm.at) And now I'm developing an own 2-day "ITM 6.1 Reporting and real-time Monitoring" workshop for the needs of an TSM Administrator --> will be held 3rd to 4th of June in Vienna / Austria. If you are interested or need any additional information pls let me know (to my knowledge, there is no official comparable class "in the pipeline"). Thanks and rgds mikel from sunny Vienna /Austria Michael Malitz Tivoli Certified Instructor (TSM and ITM) / BIRT & Tivoli Common (TCR) Reporting & TSM 6.1 Upgrade Consulting Tel.: +43 (0) 664 1415275 e-mail: michael.mal...@mm-it.at
Re: ITM 6.1 new Reporting and real-time Monitoring Feature - 2 Day Workshop
David, there is no other official class available covering this topic. But as with my other TCR 1.2 / ITM 6.2.1 class /workshop, the new TSM 6.1 new Reporting and real-time Monitoring workshop materials (guide and exercises) will be in English and if we have a non-german speaking participant, I'll teach also in English - no problem. If there exist enough interest, I can also teach in another country of course. But for the time being the 3rd/4th of June is planned for the first event. Rgds mikel Michael Malitz Tivoli Certified Instructor / BIRT & Tivoli Common (TCR) Reporting / TSM 6.1 Upgrades Tel.: +43 (0) 664 1415275 e-mail: michael.mal...@mm-it.at -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of David W Daniels/AC/VCU Sent: Freitag, 3. April 2009 15:35 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: ITM 6.1 new Reporting and real-time Monitoring Feature - 2 Day Workshop I looked on the IBM site. Is there an english version of your class somewhere to be found? ** Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will never use email to request that you reply with your password, social security number or confidential personal information. For more details visit http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html From: Michael Malitz To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Date: 04/03/2009 09:23 AM Subject: [ADSM-L] ITM 6.1 new Reporting and real-time Monitoring Feature - 2 Day Workshop Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Dear ADSM / TSM community. As you know, TSM 6.1 is available since 27th of March. One of the three new main features (besides De-Dup, and DB/2 database) is the complete new "Reporting and real-time Monitoring" feature. This new feature is based on ITM 6.2 (IBM Tivoli Monitoring) and the TCR (Tivoli Common Reporting), which in turn is based on the open source reporting tool "BIRT" (Business Intelligence Reporting Tools). I've already written a class covering TCR & ITM 6.2.1 (see class SMCR2DAT in www.ibm.at) And now I'm developing an own 2-day "ITM 6.1 Reporting and real-time Monitoring" workshop for the needs of an TSM Administrator --> will be held 3rd to 4th of June in Vienna / Austria. If you are interested or need any additional information pls let me know (to my knowledge, there is no official comparable class "in the pipeline"). Thanks and rgds mikel from sunny Vienna /Austria Michael Malitz Tivoli Certified Instructor (TSM and ITM) / BIRT & Tivoli Common (TCR) Reporting & TSM 6.1 Upgrade Consulting Tel.: +43 (0) 664 1415275 e-mail: michael.mal...@mm-it.at
Re: TSM 6.1 : Database replication Feature
>> On Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:24:31 -0700, "Clark, Robert A" >> said: > If we put together a wiki or forum, and pull enough info together to > make something like this work, would we get a cease-n-desist letter > from IBM? > Does anyone on the list have a feel for how tolerant IBM is with > "Open Source" style projects when they interact this closely with > TSM? I'd say, edit articles on the official TSM wiki that IBM maintains (and which was recently announced). This should be the most intense test of that tolerance, and will establish wether the wiki is ours, even partially, or not. If you know you're going off the reservation, then you have the responsibility to let IBM know about that in whatever support interactions you develop. And you need to be prepared to accept "Go away, you're in an unsupported config" with a cheerful smile. It would be fun to see IBM legal send a C&D to IBM communications and IBM customer care. Like those coke commercials? "I want to sue us, for excessively good customer communcations. It's making the other divisions feel inadequate." - Allen S. Rout
Re: ITM 6.1 new Reporting and real-time Monitoring Feature - 2 Day Workshop
>> On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 15:51:15 +0200, Michael Malitz >> said: > David, there is no other official class available covering this > topic. > But as with my other TCR 1.2 / ITM 6.2.1 class /workshop, the new > TSM 6.1 new Reporting and real-time Monitoring workshop materials > (guide and exercises) will be in English and if we have a non-german > speaking participant, I'll teach also in English - no problem. I have excessively sensitive commercial-self-promotion antennae. Think of me as a canary in a coal mine. I don't think that Michael is being obnoxious in his presentation, but he's basically saying "I'm teaching a class I wrote". I think that we would not be happy with the way this list would evolve if we welcome self-promotion and advertising. There are lots and lots of teaching establishments which would love to be able to pour marketing on this topic into our inboxes. I think the only self consistent way to prevent this is to make any primarily marketing post from a non-Tivoli/IBM source unwelcome. I am not denigrating Michael's skill or experience: I expect he's probably good at writing and at teaching. I expect that links to his class schedule, salted within otherwise contributing messages, would be fruitful for him and for us. Having educators on this list listening to what we want, to what we want to learn, is good for _all_ of us. I don't want to chase them away. But I do, fervently, want to chase away the advertising. I watched USENET melt under spam, and I've watched other fora go the same way. I've said my piece. - Allen S. Rout
Re: TSM 6.1 : Database replication Feature
Howdy, Please look at the new TSM Wiki. The TSM development team recognizes that there are capabilities available with the V6.1 database that may be beneficial to the TSM server that are just not yet documented or tested. The following is a link to the specific section of the wiki that is intended to address or consider these types of issues: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/wikis/display/tivolistoragemanager/TSM +V6.1+Database+Capabilities+and+Considerations ( V6.1 FAQs->TSM V6.1 Database Capabilities and Considerations->...) This is a work in progress at this point (as you would expect of a wiki) but should help to get the discussions started or put forth a framework from which the development team would like to approach this. The main point is we'd like to approach this as a collaborative community effort. To the degree that new features or capabilities can be reviewed and "approved" for use in production environments, we'd like to use the wiki as the main clearinghouse for this. To comment on the cease and desist questions, the goal from the development team is to take a conservative and measured approach to functional enhancements or tuning/configuration changes to the database with the focus being on data integrity and server availability. If changes are being considered or made to the server database that changes the schema (DDL) or other operational characteristics then we're going to try to steer folks away from these. The main thing to consider about DDL changes or otherwise is that the TSM server application is built on that DDL and those database behaviors and the algorithms and such make specific assumptions or decisions based on these. Changes to the schema or database configuration parameters can have unforeseen consequences ranging from performance to more serious implications such as server down or data loss. Thanks in advance for the participation and discussion and for what will hopefully be a lot of good information and consideration in the wiki for this topic... Thanks, Colin - Colin Dawson col...@us.ibm.com From: "Allen S. Rout" To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Date: 04/03/2009 10:02 AM Subject:Re: [ADSM-L] TSM 6.1 : Database replication Feature >> On Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:24:31 -0700, "Clark, Robert A" said: > If we put together a wiki or forum, and pull enough info together to > make something like this work, would we get a cease-n-desist letter > from IBM? > Does anyone on the list have a feel for how tolerant IBM is with > "Open Source" style projects when they interact this closely with > TSM? I'd say, edit articles on the official TSM wiki that IBM maintains (and which was recently announced). This should be the most intense test of that tolerance, and will establish wether the wiki is ours, even partially, or not. If you know you're going off the reservation, then you have the responsibility to let IBM know about that in whatever support interactions you develop. And you need to be prepared to accept "Go away, you're in an unsupported config" with a cheerful smile. It would be fun to see IBM legal send a C&D to IBM communications and IBM customer care. Like those coke commercials? "I want to sue us, for excessively good customer communcations. It's making the other divisions feel inadequate." - Allen S. Rout
Re: TSM 6.1 : Database replication Feature
>> On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 11:24:31 -0700, Colin Dawson said: > If changes are being considered or made to the server database that > changes the schema (DDL) or other operational characteristics then > we're going to try to steer folks away from these. Oy. Or go pop popcorn to watch the explosion. The customizations I think are rational tend to be meta-schema: outside of it. For example, I've already done a bunch of tinkering with Federated DB configurations. I've been building a meta-DB which holds references to all the tables in my TSM server DBs. Then some sort of virtual tables which union the contents of, say, all the SESSION tables. Add a column to the virtual tables to denote the source server, and all of a sudden you can do cross-instance monitoring and math which was impossible before. - Allen S. Rout
Re: TSM 6.1 : Database replication Feature
Mmm Federated ... See now if you could have a Master / Federated DB you could really get that DE-Dupe in to the Enterprise as opposed to just de-dupes for smaller TSM env ... -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Allen S. Rout Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 2:17 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM 6.1 : Database replication Feature >> On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 11:24:31 -0700, Colin Dawson said: > If changes are being considered or made to the server database that > changes the schema (DDL) or other operational characteristics then > we're going to try to steer folks away from these. Oy. Or go pop popcorn to watch the explosion. The customizations I think are rational tend to be meta-schema: outside of it. For example, I've already done a bunch of tinkering with Federated DB configurations. I've been building a meta-DB which holds references to all the tables in my TSM server DBs. Then some sort of virtual tables which union the contents of, say, all the SESSION tables. Add a column to the virtual tables to denote the source server, and all of a sudden you can do cross-instance monitoring and math which was impossible before. - Allen S. Rout This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately.
Re: Backup files to empty tape
That´s right...but, how can I assure that this data will be readable somewhere else, without TSM? Mario From: Shawn Drew To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2009 3:47:40 PM Subject: Re: Backup files to empty tape I'm assuming you don't want to keep a copy onsite. "export node" or "generate backupset" will put files on the tape and keep them out of the typical storage pool heirarchy Regards, Shawn Shawn Drew Internet mariobehr...@yahoo.com Sent by: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU 04/01/2009 02:23 PM Please respond to ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU To ADSM-L cc Subject [ADSM-L] Backup files to empty tape Hi list, I have to backup some files from a TSM node to an empty tape and send this tape away (check out from the library). What is the best approach to perform this task? Thanks Mario This message and any attachments (the "message") is intended solely for the addressees and is confidential. If you receive this message in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender. Any use not in accord with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited except formal approval. The internet can not guarantee the integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not therefore be liable for the message if modified. Please note that certain functions and services for BNP Paribas may be performed by BNP Paribas RCC, Inc.
