Re: [9fans] Plan 9 Go (Was: GNU/Linux/Plan 9 disto)
Great! I just came to the list today looking for some content about Go in p9, I'll code many stuff in Go and was wondering if it was ported. Count me in for testing and would be much appreciated if you highlight what have been done to bring 386 Go over Plan 9. On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Lucio De Re wrote: > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 08:31:58PM +0200, Lucio De Re wrote: > > There are many inconsistencies I am vaguely aware of, feel free to remind > > me and make suggestion on how to improve them. > > One problem is the lack of execute permissions, you may have to fix these. > > Lucio. > > -- S.
Re: [9fans] my kingdom for a web browser :-P
Things are becoming very complex. Chromium even process C++ in the client-side, civilization is dying. On 9/16/11, tlaro...@polynum.com wrote: > On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 03:56:18PM +0100, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote: >> On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 13:11:00 +0300 >> Aram H?v?rneanu wrote: >> >> > And I don't believe in full linux environments >> > in lguest, in general, a kernel plus a single static binary, like a >> > browser would be enough. >> >> I don't think a browser can even be a static binary any more. I'm not >> going to try to recall exactly which bits won't statically linked; I >> suspect I'd get very depressed if I remembered. >> > > Last time I tried, I had to give up due to the dependencies of > dependencies of dependencies... of the X11 and above dynamically > shared libraries. > > If simplicity is the shortest path to the truth, I'm afraid I'm not > convinced some people are on the right track to the truth... > -- > Thierry Laronde > http://www.kergis.com/ > Key fingerprint = 0FF7 E906 FBAF FE95 FD89 250D 52B1 AE95 6006 F40C > > > -- S.
[9fans] Parallels 6/7 and Q(qemu for mac)
Someone had any lucky with these VMs? Parallels simply crash at Bell's p9, with 9atom it freezes displaying this message, "igbe: unusable PciCLS: 0, using 8 longs". Q installs it perfectly, but network doesn't work. Looks like I'll keep my dirty and old proliant a little longer. -- S.
Re: [9fans] who would have guessed.
I loved the justification. On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 2:06 AM, Bruce Ellis wrote: > "7th Edition Unix grep did not conform to POSIX" -- somewhere in gnudoc. > > -- > Don't meddle in the mouth -- MVS (0416935147, +1-513-3BRUCEE) > > -- Sent from the outer space
