Re: [9fans] plan9 on windows
On 09/06/15 16:52, Steve Simon wrote: > Its looking like I may be sintting in fronto of windows for a while > > Anyone suggest a version of sam, B, and 9term which works on win64? > > I don't think I need any of the other command line tools as I have them > already. Not that I know of -- but Unix ports might work under Cygwin. -- David Pick Network Security Manager, IT Services Queen Mary University of London Tel: +44 (0) 20 7882 7079 Mob: +44 (0) 7973 379 161 E-Mail: d.m.p...@qmul.ac.uk
Re: [9fans] Wireless on the Pi?
On 09/01/16 19:21, Anthony Sorace wrote: > Anyone got anything? USB dongle we can drive, or an ethernet bridge > folks have had good results with? WiFi with WPA2 is ideal, but the > only hard requirement for my use case is power: it needs to either > draw directly or be able to draw power via USB. Mikrotik RMmAP2n at http://routerboard.com/RBmAP2n Small physical size. Can be powered via USB, two Ethernet ports, WiFi client or base station with WPA/WPA2. Internal antenna. Quite cheap, -- David Pick Network Security Manager, IT Services Queen Mary University of London Tel: +44 (0) 20 7882 7079 Mob: +44 (0) 7973 379 161 E-Mail: d.m.p...@qmul.ac.uk
Re: [9fans] The Plan 9/"right" way to do Facebook
On 31/03/16 10:03, hiro wrote: > people would probably not talk with me if they had to 2-factor first. > they just ring and that's it. But that *is* two-factor: they're using something you have (the telephone number) and a biometric (your voice). -- David Pick Network Security Manager, IT Services Queen Mary University of London Tel: +44 (0) 20 7882 7079 Mob: +44 (0) 7973 379 161 E-Mail: d.m.p...@qmul.ac.uk Normal working days are Monday to Wednesday inclusive
Re: [9fans] Questions on the browser as a platform if plan 9 had gained marketshare
On 19/09/16 21:55, Chris McGee wrote: > > > Maybe 9P could be implemented in a SoC. It already has: the Raspberry Pi is built round a SoC... ...all that's needed is to boot from SoC ROM instead of the SD card. -- David Pick Network Security Manager, IT Services Queen Mary University of London Tel: +44 (0) 20 7882 7079 Mob: +44 (0) 7973 379 161 E-Mail: d.m.p...@qmul.ac.uk Normal working days are Monday to Wednesday inclusive Worried about Cyber Security? Check out the Cyber Security Information and Training described at http://connect.qmul.ac.uk/qmandyou/staff/items/2016/item177974.html
Re: [9fans] Pi3 with 2 nics
On 14/04/17 23:37, Adriano Verardo wrote: > I have a pi3 with normal and wifi eth interfaces under the same stack. > Wifi address is 10.12.12.15/16, the address of the other nic is > 10.11.12.15/16, > /net seems to be correct, the connection to the AP is up and running. > But: > > (1) ping wifi 10.12.12.15 doesn't work when the Rj45 is unplugged > (2) ping wifi 10.12.12.15 works when the Rj45 is plugged > (3) the arp tables on the net all have a correct 10.12.12.15 entry > (4) ip/ping -a to 10.11.x.x or 10.12.x.x always displays > 10.11.12.15 -> ... and doesn't work when the cable is unplugged. > (5) with/without cable, "snoopy /net/ether1" (wifi nic) shows > icmp packets when pinging. > > I'm quite confused. > Could anyone kindly tell me where is my mistake ? When this situation occurs on *any* OS I'd check the "defaut" route and/or the connectivity of the other end. You don't say what the connectivity of the other end is for the tests you've performed and it makes a difference to the ability of the pi3 to respond via the correct interface. -- David Pick Network Security Manager, IT Services Queen Mary University of London TB202, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS Tel: +44 (0) 20 7882 7079 Mob: +44 (0) 7973 379 161 E-Mail: d.m.p...@qmul.ac.uk Normal working days are Monday to Wednesday inclusive Worried about Cyber Security? Check out the Cyber Security Information and Training described at http://connect.qmul.ac.uk/qmandyou/staff/items/2016/item177974.html
