[9fans] compiling 9vx on yosemite
is anyone able to compile 9vx on yosemite? i think the most up to date version is the one in David's repo (bitbucket.org/0intro/vx32). i'm getting this on mac os 10.10.3: /System/Library/Frameworks/QuickTime.framework/Headers/Movies.h:8727:1: note: 'BeginFullScreen' has been explicitly marked deprecated here BeginFullScreen( ^ 9vx/osx/screen.c:547:2: error: use of undeclared identifier 'OSXCursor' OSXCursor oc; ^ 9vx/osx/screen.c:552:3: error: use of undeclared identifier 'oc' oc.data[i] = ((ushort*)c->set)[i]; ^ 9vx/osx/screen.c:553:3: error: use of undeclared identifier 'oc' oc.mask[i] = oc.data[i] | ((ushort*)c->clr)[i]; ^ 9vx/osx/screen.c:553:16: error: use of undeclared identifier 'oc' oc.mask[i] = oc.data[i] | ((ushort*)c->clr)[i]; ^ 9vx/osx/screen.c:555:2: error: use of undeclared identifier 'oc' oc.hotSpot.h = - c->offset.x; ^ 9vx/osx/screen.c:556:2: error: use of undeclared identifier 'oc' oc.hotSpot.v = - c->offset.y; ^ 9vx/osx/screen.c:557:2: warning: implicit declaration of function 'SetCursor' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] SetCursor(&oc); ^ 9vx/osx/screen.c:557:13: error: use of undeclared identifier 'oc' SetCursor(&oc); ^ 52 warnings and 7 errors generated. make: *** [9vx/osx/screen.o] Error 1
Re: [9fans] compiling 9vx on yosemite
I have not been able to compile vx32 since 10.7 I think. -- Aram Hăvărneanu
Re: [9fans] compiling 9vx on yosemite
https://bitbucket.org/rsc/plan9port/issue/81/devdraw-does-not-build-on-os-x-lion-latest may be relevant 2015-05-21 9:57 GMT-07:00 Aram Hăvărneanu : > I have not been able to compile vx32 since 10.7 I think. > > -- > Aram Hăvărneanu >
Re: [9fans] compiling 9vx on yosemite
i have a vague recollection of a discussion about making 9vx use devdraw (plan9port). has anyone looked into that? On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:26 AM Devon H. O'Dell wrote: > > https://bitbucket.org/rsc/plan9port/issue/81/devdraw-does-not-build-on-os-x-lion-latest > may be relevant > > 2015-05-21 9:57 GMT-07:00 Aram Hăvărneanu : > > I have not been able to compile vx32 since 10.7 I think. > > > > -- > > Aram Hăvărneanu > > > >
Re: [9fans] compiling 9vx on yosemite
Speaking of plan9port, does anyone know which one is the official version on github now? Swtch.com has only partially moved to the cloud, but there are a lot of forks that aren’t really forks put direct uploads from some version tree. My old bitbucket version still works, but the last git clone http://code.swtch.com/plan9port doesn’t resolve anymore. -jas > On May 21, 2015, at 12:53 PM, Skip Tavakkolian > wrote: > > i have a vague recollection of a discussion about making 9vx use devdraw > (plan9port). has anyone looked into that? > > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:26 AM Devon H. O'Dell > wrote: > https://bitbucket.org/rsc/plan9port/issue/81/devdraw-does-not-build-on-os-x-lion-latest > may be relevant > > 2015-05-21 9:57 GMT-07:00 Aram Hăvărneanu : > > I have not been able to compile vx32 since 10.7 I think. > > > > -- > > Aram Hăvărneanu > > >
Re: [9fans] compiling 9vx on yosemite
the official version is https://github.com/9fans/plan9port and the old https://code.google.com/p/plan9port still works and is relatively recent (2014) On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 11:14 AM Jeff Sickel wrote: > Speaking of plan9port, does anyone know which one is the official version > on github now? > Swtch.com has only partially moved to the cloud, but there are a lot of > forks that aren’t > really forks put direct uploads from some version tree. My old bitbucket > version still > works, but the last git clone http://code.swtch.com/plan9port doesn’t > resolve anymore. > > -jas > > > > On May 21, 2015, at 12:53 PM, Skip Tavakkolian < > skip.tavakkol...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > i have a vague recollection of a discussion about making 9vx use devdraw > (plan9port). has anyone looked into that? > > > > > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:26 AM Devon H. O'Dell > wrote: > > > https://bitbucket.org/rsc/plan9port/issue/81/devdraw-does-not-build-on-os-x-lion-latest > > may be relevant > > > > 2015-05-21 9:57 GMT-07:00 Aram Hăvărneanu : > > > I have not been able to compile vx32 since 10.7 I think. > > > > > > -- > > > Aram Hăvărneanu > > > > > > > >
Re: [9fans] compiling 9vx on yosemite
https://github.com/9fans/plan9port On May 21, 2015 1:01:16 PM CDT, Jeff Sickel wrote: >Speaking of plan9port, does anyone know which one is the official >version on github now? >Swtch.com has only partially moved to the cloud, but there are a lot of >forks that aren’t >really forks put direct uploads from some version tree. My old >bitbucket version still >works, but the last git clone http://code.swtch.com/plan9port doesn’t >resolve anymore. > >-jas > > >> On May 21, 2015, at 12:53 PM, Skip Tavakkolian > wrote: >> >> i have a vague recollection of a discussion about making 9vx use >devdraw (plan9port). has anyone looked into that? >> >> >> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:26 AM Devon H. O'Dell > wrote: >> >https://bitbucket.org/rsc/plan9port/issue/81/devdraw-does-not-build-on-os-x-lion-latest >> may be relevant >> >> 2015-05-21 9:57 GMT-07:00 Aram Hăvărneanu : >> > I have not been able to compile vx32 since 10.7 I think. >> > >> > -- >> > Aram Hăvărneanu >> > >> -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Re: [9fans] compiling 9vx on yosemite
Just to let you know. The current vx32 repository moved from Mercurial to Git and is now hosted on GitHub. https://github.com/0intro/vx32 -- David du Colombier
[9fans] Plan 9 on SRX/VSX rides again
I’m happy to report we are back in the storage business based on Plan 9. We acquired the rights to the SRX/VSX and HBA initiator drivers and will be selling, supporting and advancing the technology. I had been working on a non-Plan 9 appliance platform to avoid any conflict with Coraid, but now that’s not a problem. I’ll be integrating the new stuff I’ve been working on over the past several months into the Coraid products. We’ll use The Brantley Coile Company to market the SRX and VSX as software, not hardware. We’ll release the specs for buying your own SRX hardware. The SRX and VSX code will also be open sourced. It feels nice to have the technology back where it originated from. Brantley b...@etherdrive.com
Re: [9fans] Plan 9 on SRX/VSX rides again
Great to hear Brantley! On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Brantley Coile wrote: > I’m happy to report we are back in the storage business based on Plan 9. > We acquired the rights to the SRX/VSX and HBA initiator drivers and will be > selling, supporting and advancing the technology. I had been working on a > non-Plan 9 appliance platform to avoid any conflict with Coraid, but now > that’s not a problem. I’ll be integrating the new stuff I’ve been working > on over the past several months into the Coraid products. We’ll use The > Brantley Coile Company to market the SRX and VSX as software, not > hardware. We’ll release the specs for buying your own SRX hardware. > > The SRX and VSX code will also be open sourced. > > It feels nice to have the technology back where it originated from. > > Brantley > b...@etherdrive.com >
Re: [9fans] Plan 9 on SRX/VSX rides again
Greate ! Well done Brantley! пятница, 22 мая 2015 г. пользователь Joseph Stewart написал: > Great to hear Brantley! > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Brantley Coile > wrote: > >> I’m happy to report we are back in the storage business based on Plan 9. >> We acquired the rights to the SRX/VSX and HBA initiator drivers and will be >> selling, supporting and advancing the technology. I had been working on a >> non-Plan 9 appliance platform to avoid any conflict with Coraid, but now >> that’s not a problem. I’ll be integrating the new stuff I’ve been working >> on over the past several months into the Coraid products. We’ll use The >> Brantley Coile Company to market the SRX and VSX as software, not >> hardware. We’ll release the specs for buying your own SRX hardware. >> >> The SRX and VSX code will also be open sourced. >> >> It feels nice to have the technology back where it originated from. >> >> Brantley >> b...@etherdrive.com >> > > -- Sent from Gmail Mobile
[9fans] plan9port on AIX
So, it's been a few years since I did any work on it, but I'm trying to update the AIX support a bit. I know there aren't lots of home AIX users, but it seems everywhere I've worked professionally has had gobs of AIX deployed. My primary goal is to have sam and acme running. I got lots of stuff building and working, including sam -d. However, there is an issue when trying to run it with the graphical interface, and the problem seems vaguely familiar, so I thought I'd throw it out here to see if anyone could help with a hint to point me in the right direction... When I run sam, the samterm window pops up and looks correct. However, if I right-click, the menu pops up, but is empty. Just a green rectangle with no text. At that point, samterm hangs and I have to kill the sam process. Alternatively, if I try to type in the sam command window, it will then hang. I suspect the issue is in devdraw, because acme exhibits similar behavior. Upon launch of acme, an initial empty white window pops up, and then nothing happens. However, unlike sam, the acme process can be stopped using ctrl-c. Sound familiar? If not, I'll keep poking at it. Thanks in advance! -Ben
