Hello:
Combing through the xorg.0.log file was an important part of being able to set
up two Nvidia
cards (FX580+FX370) to drive three monitors (Dell P1914S + 2x SyncMaster 940N)
in
Xinerama mode.
Lots of searching and countless logouts/logins/boots eventually got me the
working xorg.conf I
Hello:
On 20 Oct 2017 at 10:48, Aaron Plattner wrote:
> I'm pretty sure these messages are printed in response to configuration
> commands issued by the desktop session itself.
The (II) means that they're 'informational'.
Not (**) from the config file, (--) probed or (==), a default setting from
Hello:
I have been looking at the logs and found this:
1.
'warnings' log
[code]
Oct 21 12:43:35 groucho gdm-binary[2719]:
WARNING: gdm_slave_xioerror_handler: Fatal X error - Restarting :0
Oct 21 12:43:36 groucho xinetd[2499]: Exiting...
[/code]
Looking around I found a post about it on the web
Hello:
I have been looking at the logs and found this:
1.
'warnings' log
[code]
Oct 21 12:43:35 groucho gdm-binary[2719]:
WARNING: gdm_slave_xioerror_handler: Fatal X error - Restarting :0
Oct 21 12:43:36 groucho xinetd[2499]: Exiting...
[/code]
Looking around I found a post about it on the web
Hello:
I have not been able to find a solution to my problem, so I decided
to try doing away with GDM to use XDM instead.
As a result, the problems described in my original post have gone
away.
Now my Xorg.0.log file starts at [ 56.750], ending at [ 61.292]
instead of starting at [ 58.839] an
Hello:
Running XDM instead of GDM has made things better in my setup (see other
thread).
But there are a couple of entries that I would like to know more about.
eg:
[code]
[ 59.921] (WW) xf86OpenConsole: setpgid failed: Operation not permitted
[ 59.921] (WW) xf86OpenConsole: setsid failed: Op
Hello:
On 8 Jan 2018 at 11:55, François Patte wrote:
> I try to install a multihead config with 2 video cards and 3 monitors,
> using xinerama in order to have a unique screen.
I'll see if I can help you with this.
I am running PCLinuxOS:
4.12.10-pclos1 #1 SMP Wed Aug 30 08:17:56 CDT 2017 x86_6
Hello:
At present I am running a two card - three monitor arrangement which has the
following layout:
| Monitor 0 | Monitor 1 | Monitor 3 |
This is the hardware video used:
# Cards and bus addresses output from lspci
# 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation G84GL
Hello:
I have this message in my Xorg.O.log:
[code]
[34.298] (WW) Unresolved symbol: fbGetGCPrivateKey
[/code]
I'm running Devuan ASCII with two NVidia caards for three monitors and using
proprietary
drivers.
I have searched all over the web and have found a great deal on posts/instances
Hello:
> What version of the X server are you using?
I use the latest versions available in the Devuan ASCII repositories.
[code]
groucho@devuan:~$ inxi -G
Graphics: Card-1: NVIDIA G84GL [Quadro FX 370]
Card-2: NVIDIA G96GL [Quadro FX 580]
Display Server: X.Org 1.19.2 driver: nvidia Resolution: 3
Hello:
---
I am posting this question here at X.org because it is related to an
X-application.
Please advise if it has to go elsewhere.
---
I have recently set up an interesting, simple/lightweight system mail
notification for my
Devuan Beowulf installation ...
~$ uname -a
Linux devuan 5.10.0-
Hello:
Admin: not sure this is the right place to ask about this, if not plase advise.
To my question:
The box I have had for the last nine years is a Sun Microsystems Ultra 24
workstation
(Q9550+8Gb RAM) now running Devuan Daedalus and a pair of matching Nvidia Quadro
FX580/G96CGL cards feedin
Hello:
On 13 Jun 2025 at 15:34, J Leslie Turriff wrote:
> ... makes a good case for compositor standardization ...
A case for standardi ... what?!
In an ecosystem that (in decades) has not been able to come up with
standardised init package, where there are currently four (4!) in
use, with one
Hello:
On 13 Jun 2025 at 15:34, J Leslie Turriff wrote:
> ... makes a good case for compositor standardization ...
A case for standardi ... what?!
In an ecosystem that (in decades) has not been able to come up with
standardised init package, where there are currently four (4!) in
use, with one
Hello:
On 9 Jun 2025 at 19:49, Robert Heller wrote:
> ... are some of "us" who have no use for "modern" desktop environments.
> .. prefer "old fashioned" desktop environments.
> ... will continue to use Xorg (X11).
> ... *I* don't need a spiffy GUI subsystem ...
> ... that actually works the wa
15 matches
Mail list logo
