buillding error xorg-server 21.1.4

2024-10-30 Thread Fungal-net
I get the following error trying to build version 21.1.4 same build dependencies used for 21.1.3 (4/13/24) but different versions gcc 14.2.1+r134 glibc 2.40+r16 binutils 2.43+r4 libtool 2.5.3 arch linux like system without systemd ../xorg-server/os/access.c: In function ‘siHostnameAddrMatch’:

Re: Xrandr and external monitor

2025-01-03 Thread Fungal-net
On Friday, January 3rd, 2025 at 12:49 AM, H wrote: > Forgot to attach the file but doing it now. I have a shortcut function in my zsh which looks for (EE) in Xorg.log The first thing I would do after seeing this log is to install the xorg xf86 packages for fbdev and vesa then attempt to run aga

Re: Xrandr and external monitor

2025-01-01 Thread Fungal-net
> I just discovered running xrandr --listmonitors that, while the internal > laptop monitor is labeled eDP-1, xrandr identifies the external monitor as > using DP-1 although it uses the laptop HDMI-connector. Further, while mate > hardware display monitor also identifies it as using DP-1 - pos

Re: looking for help on multimonitor setup

2025-03-12 Thread Fungal-net
> have you run xrandr to see what modes the external screen is offering - which > is claims is native etc.? > - Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -- > Carsten Haitzler - ras...@rasterman.com This is pretty much the answer I would have given as well, if xrandr doe

Re: Question about the future of Xorg

2025-06-24 Thread Fungal-net
Michel Dänzer wrote: > On 2025-06-11 03:53, Felipe Contreras wrote: > > It does seem Enrico Weigelt was the only one, so why wouldn't I > > contribute to XLibre instead? 1 developer is infinitely more percent > > than 0. > Enrico clearly demonstrated in the xserver project he lacks the tec

Re: list banning

2025-06-09 Thread Fungal-net
I am sorry to say that this would have been better not answered than answered the way it did. This is as if some bully comes up at work and spills hot chocolate on your pants, you run to the men's room to clean it off, he follows and steals your pants. Then you get fired for running around the

Re: Question about the future of Xorg

2025-06-22 Thread Fungal-net
Robert Funnell wrote: > I would guess that you've just thrown away whatever chance you had of > getting cooperation from the developers. (Is 'citizen journalist' a way > of saying 'unaccredited journalist'?) Unless you have been in a freezer since the mid-80s someone with a blog or website publis

Re: Question about the future of Xorg

2025-06-11 Thread Fungal-net
I don't know whether it is relevant or not and whether it helps anyone understand the practical aspects of it all. If you start a wayland session, wlroots, wm, .. inside an X environment, and run xrandr/arandr in it through Xwayland it shows as the monitors available being X11 (that's how Xrandr

Re: Question about the future of Xorg

2025-06-10 Thread Fungal-net
On Tuesday, 250610, Olivier Galibert wrote: > The problems are the reasons why Wayland is inferior, e.g. the integration of > the window manager into the server (making customization so much more > difficult) and In the past while discussing functionality with core devs of a wl wm their ref

Re: X11 vs Wayland: what does the timeline look like?

2025-07-07 Thread Fungal-net
> At this time it looks like I cannot switch to Wayland -- several things > about Wayland just don't work (for me). > > I know of at least three things where Wayland simply fails: > > I use KiCAD and KiCAD just does not work with Wayland: > https://www.kicad.org/blog/2025/06/KiCad-and-Wayland-Sup

Re: evince crashes the X server

2025-07-10 Thread Fungal-net
On Thursday, July 10th, 2025 at 5:17 AM, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote: > On 10/7/25 14:57, Vladimir Dergachev wrote: > > > [163563.414] (EE) Backtrace: > > > [163563.416] (EE) unw_get_proc_name failed: no unwind info found [-10] > > > [163563.416] (EE) 0: /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/intel_drv.so (?+

Re: Question about the future of Xorg

2025-07-05 Thread Fungal-net
> On Fri, 4 Jul 2025, Felipe Contreras wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 1:23 AM Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net wrote: > > > On 2025-06-11 03:53, Felipe Contreras wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 1:11 AM Carsten Haitzler > > > > ras...@rasterman.com wrote: > > No, I'm not. Asking a questio

Re: [ANNOUNCE] igt-gpu-tools 2.1

2025-06-28 Thread Fungal-net
Kamil Konieczny wrote: > A new igt-gpu-tools release is available with the following changes: > > Release 2.01 (2025-06-27) > - Should this read 2.1 instead v2.1 is in the source v2.01 is not