https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=280959
--- Comment #8 from Zhenlei Huang ---
(In reply to Mark Johnston from comment #6)
> Wouldn't that cause freebsd-update to fail?
Yes, but at least user can still have access to the instance, and can
workaround it ( add swap later ).
--
Yo
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=280959
--- Comment #6 from Mark Johnston ---
(In reply to Zhenlei Huang from comment #5)
Wouldn't that cause freebsd-update to fail?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=280959
--- Comment #7 from Colin Percival ---
(In reply to Mark Johnston from comment #6)
No, freebsd-update uses bspatch opportunistically; if bspatch doesn't produce
the correct binary (or rather, one with the correct sha256 hash) then
freebsd-u
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209427
Alexander Vereeken changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Alexander88207@protonmail.c
