[EMAIL PROTECTED] Differences between different Apaches in file requests

Hi! This is my first time posting in a mailing list -and I hope not to do something wrong... If I do something wrong, please tell me-. I have just upgraded my Apache 1.3 to Apache 2.0 (In Windows XP) and I have found an estrange problem. With Apache 1.3, if I try to get a file called /í.JPG I cou

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Differences between different Apaches in file requests

isconfiguration, but I don't know how could I fix it... 2008/9/23 André Warnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > #V[Á]lentín wrote: > Hola Válentin. > > I can't tell you what the solution is, but from the example you provide, it > looks as if Apache is accepting URLs encoded as

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Differences between different Apaches in file requests

Err... I really don't understand the sentence "Nothing like mod_security *in the picture*?"... but, well, I have nothing called mod_security in my httpd.conf, so I suppose that the answer is no. 2008/9/23 Eric Covener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 9:35

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Differences between different Apaches in file requests

So I got it ;-) I have nothing called mod_security in my httpd.conf, and I don't find anything related to filesystem encoding or something like that... :S 2008/9/23 Eric Covener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 9:50 AM, #V[Á]lentín <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Differences between different Apaches in file requests

ders like "Accept-Charset", > "Accept-Language", and "Content-Type". > Also about how the browser really sends the request URLs "on the wire". > > Now of course, another possibility is a bug in the particular Apache > version you are running. It

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Differences between different Apaches in file requests

I have just installed an Apache 2.2.9 and it has exactly the same behavior... 2008/9/24 #V[Á]lentín <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > "Accept-Charset", "Accept-Language", and "Content-Type" are the same in all > cases. Moreover, I think that is no related to the en

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Differences between different Apaches in file requests

So... maybe there is no solution? :( Fuck. Well... one more reason to migrate to Linux definitely :S . 2008/9/24 Eric Covener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 3:42 PM, André Warnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I created a file called "valentín.jpg" in my document root and tried to

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Differences between different Apaches in file requests

-server). 2008/9/24 Eric Covener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 4:40 PM, #V[Á]lentín <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So... maybe there is no solution? > > If it's only a few URLs, you might be able to use mod_rewrite to map > from the singlebyte

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Differences between different Apaches in file requests

I still think that there is an Apache 2.x + Windows related problem... because, as I said before, with Apache 1.3 + Windows I had no problems: With Apache 1.3, if I try to get a file called /í.JPG I could do it asking > for /%ED.JPG to the server, and this works perfectly. > and *the file is exac

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Differences between different Apaches in file requests

for a very long time, and I am also not an native English-speaker. I can't > imagine that I have not encountered the same issue before, so I can only > imagine that this logic is relatively new in Apache under Windows. > > André > > > André Warnier wrote: > >> #V[