cts: gnome-shell (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu Noble)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Robert Malz (rmalz)
** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu Noble)
Status:
Verified on Jammy in AWS workspaces.
Test plan:
1. Upgrade from 1.72.4-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 to
1.72.4-0ubuntu0.22.04.3~really.is.1.72.2.0ubuntu2
2. Monitor system for couple of days
Done in 3 VMs, no issues detected. I'll keep VMs running for couple of
days doing random GUI operations and update this
Tested package on jammy VMs for around week, no gjs crashes detected.
** Tags removed: verification-needed-jammy
** Tags added: verification-done-jammy
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2
roviding incorrect
credentials, which might
confuse users.
* Attaching tcpdump pcaps with SMB operations from 5.15 Kernel with and
without patch.
** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Medium
Assignee: Robert Malz (rmalz)
Status: New
** Affects: linux (Ubuntu Focal)
Im
Attaching tcpdump output with patch
** Attachment added: "base_5_15_104_with_patch_filtered.pcap"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2061986/+attachment/5766753/+files/base_5_15_104_with_patch_filtered.pcap
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Attaching tcpdump output without patch
** Attachment added: "base_5_15_104_filtered.pcap"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2061986/+attachment/5766752/+files/base_5_15_104_filtered.pcap
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which i
Progress
** Changed in: irqbalance (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Robert Malz (rmalz)
** Also affects: irqbalance (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Medium
Assignee: Robert Malz (rmalz)
Status: In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
irqbalance 1.9.3-2ubuntu4 verified on 6.8.0-11-generic
Issue no longer reproduces.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054872
Title:
Cannot change IRQ 70 affinity: Input/output error
To
Hi Roxana,
Mantic verification is still not finished.
I did some touch tests without stress traffic.
I'm trying to get my hands on E810 device to finish testing, I'll update ticket
once it's done.
Wishful ETA EOW 09.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
LP update:
Mantic update:
Due to lack of reproduction environment I have been performing following
regression test:
1. Setup:
nic: 2port E810-C
both interfaces set up in bonding
kernel: 6.5.0-25-generic
2. Test cases:
0) verified that code from the change is used during driver in
** Tags removed: verification-needed-mantic-linux
** Tags added: verification-done-mantic-linux
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2036239
Title:
Intel E810-XXV - NETDEV WATCHDOG: (ice):
** Patch added: "noble.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/2077011/+attachment/5810010/+files/noble.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077011
Tit
** Patch removed: "noble.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/2077011/+attachment/5810010/+files/noble.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077011
T
Adding debdiff for noble
** Patch added: "noble debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/netplan/+bug/2076319/+attachment/5810012/+files/noble.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076
Adding debdiff for jammy based on 0.106.1-7ubuntu0.22.04.4
** Patch added: "debdiff based on 0.106.1-7ubuntu0.22.04.4"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/netplan/+bug/2076319/+attachment/5810013/+files/jammy_04_to_05.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bu
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu Jammy)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Robert Malz (rmalz)
** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu Noble)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Robert Malz (rm
Verified issue on both linux/5.4.0-186.206 and linux/5.15.0-111.121.
Following steps from description I was not able to reproduce issue nor I did
not hit any new problems.
Marking as verified.
** Tags removed: verification-needed-focal-linux verification-needed-jammy-linux
** Tags added: verifica
Sorry for lack of update,
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/TestPlans/gjs was not executed.
For a test I wrote a script to spam random windows
let win = new Gtk.Window({
title: "Hello, GJS",
default_width: 200,
default_height: 100,
});
and left it over a week checking if any crashes h
Public bug reported:
[ Impact ]
* In Kernels with commit ec9aedb2aa1a (6.7) CPUs can be enumerated in the order
which violates ACPI specification that states:
"OSPM should initialize processors in the order that they appear in the
MADT"
* The problematic commit parses all LAPIC ent
modified apic.dsl
** Attachment added: "modified_apic.dsl"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2097455/+attachment/5855117/+files/modified_apic.dsl
** Summary changed:
- Fix LAPIC/x2APIC parsing order
+ Incorrect LAPIC/x2APIC parsing order
--
You received this bug notifica
attaching apic.dsl files
** Attachment added: "clean_apic.dsl"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2097455/+attachment/5855116/+files/clean_apic.dsl
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
Tested CPU ordering on both 6.11.0-21-generic 6.8.0-56-generic with modified
ACPI tables.
Everything looks correct:
Linux rmalz 6.11.0-19-generic #19~24.04.1-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Mon Feb 17
11:51:52 UTC 2 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
NUMA node(s): 2
NUMA node0 CP
Public bug reported:
[Impact]
Devices that rely on hwdb metadata for proper naming or configuration may not
function as expected during initramfs boot.
The issue is that systemd currently does not include the hwdb database in the
initramfs, despite the fact that udev rules
triggered during early
23 matches
Mail list logo
