Installing the mouse gestures add on has resolved this for me.
--
[MASTER] right click (with button release) might activate random popup-menu-item
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187313
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 32457 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/32457
I see this in Lbreakout2 in Intrepid:
uname -a:
Linux jfo-laptop 2.6.27-7-generic #1 SMP Tue Nov 4 19:33:20 UTC 2008 i686
GNU/Linux
LSPCI:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lspci
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation Mob
This behavior has also been seen in Lenovo R61e laptops. This includes
significantly reduced FPS in testing 550 FPS in Intrepid, 1000 FPS in
Hardy. Benchmarking with glxgear.
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation Mobile PM965/GM965/GL960 Memory
Controller Hub (rev 0c)
00:02.0 VGA compatible con
This has happened to me as well numerous times throughout testing with
the RC.
My hardware is a Dell 620 Latitude. I can provide more specifics if
needed.
--
right click menu often opens "page bookmarked" dialog instead of the regular
right click menu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291889
You
Unfortunately it seems this bug is still an issue. Can you confirm this
issue exists with the most recent Jaunty Jackalope 9.04 release -
http://www.ubuntu.com/news/ubuntu-9.04-desktop . Please let us know
your results. Thanks.
-Jeremy
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomp
If you could also test the latest upstream kernel available that would
be great. It will allow additional upstream developers to examine this
issue. Refer to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds . Once
you've tested the upstream kernel, please remove the 'needs-upstream-
testing' tag. T
This bug report is being closed because we received no response to the
previous inquiry for information. Please reopen if this is still an
issue in the current Ubuntu release, Jaunty Jackalope 9.04 -
http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/download. If the issue remains in
Jaunty, please test the latest u
Unfortunately it seems this bug is still an issue. Can you confirm this
issue exists with the most recent Jaunty Jackalope 9.04 release -
http://www.ubuntu.com/news/ubuntu-9.04-desktop .
Also, can you please try installing the linux-backports-modules-jaunty
package. The linux-backports-modules-j
Unfortunately it seems this bug is still an issue. Can you confirm this
issue exists with the most recent Jaunty Jackalope 9.04 release -
http://www.ubuntu.com/news/ubuntu-9.04-desktop . Please let us know
your results. Thanks.
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Incomplete
This bug report is being closed because we received no response to the
previous inquiry for information. Please reopen if this is still an
issue in the current Ubuntu release, Jaunty Jackalope 9.04 -
http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/download. If the issue remains in
Jaunty, please test the latest u
This bug report is being closed because we received no response to the
previous inquiry for information. Please reopen if this is still an
issue in the current Ubuntu release, Jaunty Jackalope 9.04 -
http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/download. If the issue remains in
Jaunty, please test the latest u
Unfortunately it seems this bug is still an issue. Can you confirm this
issue exists with the most recent Jaunty Jackalope 9.04 release -
http://www.ubuntu.com/news/ubuntu-9.04-desktop . Please let us know
your results. Thanks.
-JFo
--
sound problem on ubuntu gutsy gibbon
https://bugs.launchp
Hi Martin,
Have you had the opportunity to test this on Jaunty to verify if it is
still an issue? Please let us know the results of your test. Thanks.
-JFo
--
gutsy amd64 oops at startup on core 2 duo 965p-gs3
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/135200
You received this bug notification becaus
This bug report is being closed because we received no response to the
previous inquiry for information. Please reopen if this is still an
issue in the current Ubuntu release, Jaunty Jackalope 9.04 -
http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/download. If the issue remains in
Jaunty, please test the latest u
This bug report is being closed because we received no response to the
previous inquiry for information. Please reopen if this is still an
issue in the current Ubuntu release, Jaunty Jackalope 9.04 -
http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/download. If the issue remains in
Jaunty, please test the latest u
This bug report is being closed because we received no response to the
previous inquiry for information. Please reopen if this is still an
issue in the current Ubuntu release, Jaunty Jackalope 9.04 -
http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/download. If the issue remains in
Jaunty, please test the latest u
Unfortunately it seems this bug is still an issue. Can you confirm this
issue exists with the most recent Jaunty Jackalope 9.04 release -
http://www.ubuntu.com/news/ubuntu-9.04-desktop . Please let us know
your results. Thanks.
--
LVM not bootable with 2.6.22 kernel after Gusty upgrade
https:/
This bug report is being closed because we received no response to the
previous inquiry for information. Please reopen if this is still an
issue in the current Ubuntu release, Jaunty Jackalope 9.04 -
http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/download. If the issue remains in
Jaunty, please test the latest u
This bug report is being closed because we received no response to the
previous inquiry for information. Please reopen if this is still an
issue in the current Ubuntu release, Jaunty Jackalope 9.04 -
http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/download. If the issue remains in
Jaunty, please test the latest u
Unfortunately it seems this bug is still an issue. Can you confirm this
issue exists with the most recent Jaunty Jackalope 9.04 release -
http://www.ubuntu.com/news/ubuntu-9.04-desktop . If the issue remains
in Jaunty, Please run the following command from a Terminal
(Applications->Accessories->T
Unfortunately it seems this bug is still an issue. Can you confirm this
issue exists with the most recent Jaunty Jackalope 9.04 release -
http://www.ubuntu.com/news/ubuntu-9.04-desktop . If the issue remains
in Jaunty, Please run the following command from a Terminal
(Applications->Accessories->T
Unfortunately it seems this bug is still an issue. Can you confirm this
issue exists with the most recent Jaunty Jackalope 9.04 release -
http://www.ubuntu.com/news/ubuntu-9.04-desktop . If the issue remains
in Jaunty, Please run the following command from a Terminal
(Applications->Accessories->T
Unfortunately it seems this bug is still an issue. Can you confirm this
issue exists with the most recent Jaunty Jackalope 9.04 release -
http://www.ubuntu.com/news/ubuntu-9.04-desktop . If the issue remains
in Jaunty, Please run the following command from a Terminal
(Applications->Accessories->T
Unfortunately it seems this bug is still an issue. Can you confirm this
issue exists with the most recent Jaunty Jackalope 9.04 release -
http://www.ubuntu.com/news/ubuntu-9.04-desktop . If the issue remains
in Jaunty, Please run the following command from a Terminal
(Applications->Accessories->T
Unfortunately it seems this bug is still an issue. Can you confirm this
issue exists with the most recent Jaunty Jackalope 9.04 release -
http://www.ubuntu.com/news/ubuntu-9.04-desktop . If the issue remains
in Jaunty, Please run the following command from a Terminal
(Applications->Accessories->T
Unfortunately it seems this bug is still an issue. Can you confirm this
issue exists with the most recent Jaunty Jackalope 9.04 release -
http://www.ubuntu.com/news/ubuntu-9.04-desktop . If the issue remains
in Jaunty, Please run the following command from a Terminal
(Applications->Accessories->T
Unfortunately it seems this bug is still an issue. Can you confirm this
issue exists with the most recent Jaunty Jackalope 9.04 release -
http://www.ubuntu.com/news/ubuntu-9.04-desktop . If the issue remains
in Jaunty, Please run the following command from a Terminal
(Applications->Accessories->T
Unfortunately it seems this bug is still an issue. Can you confirm this
issue exists with the most recent Jaunty Jackalope 9.04 release -
http://www.ubuntu.com/news/ubuntu-9.04-desktop . If the issue remains
in Jaunty, Please run the following command from a Terminal
(Applications->Accessories->T
Unfortunately it seems this bug is still an issue. Can you confirm this
issue exists with the most recent Jaunty Jackalope 9.04 release -
http://www.ubuntu.com/news/ubuntu-9.04-desktop . If the issue remains
in Jaunty, Please run the following command from a Terminal
(Applications->Accessories->T
Unfortunately it seems this bug is still an issue. Can you confirm this
issue exists with the most recent Jaunty Jackalope 9.04 release -
http://www.ubuntu.com/news/ubuntu-9.04-desktop . If the issue remains
in Jaunty, Please run the following command from a Terminal
(Applications->Accessories->T
Unfortunately it seems this bug is still an issue. Can you confirm this
issue exists with the most recent Jaunty Jackalope 9.04 release -
http://www.ubuntu.com/news/ubuntu-9.04-desktop . If the issue remains
in Jaunty, Please run the following command from a Terminal
(Applications->Accessories->T
Unfortunately it seems this bug is still an issue. Can you confirm this
issue exists with the most recent Jaunty Jackalope 9.04 release -
http://www.ubuntu.com/news/ubuntu-9.04-desktop .
Also, Can you please try installing the linux-backports-modules-jaunty
package. The linux-backports-modules-j
Unfortunately it seems this bug is still an issue. Can you confirm this
issue exists with the most recent Jaunty Jackalope 9.04 release -
http://www.ubuntu.com/news/ubuntu-9.04-desktop . If the issue remains
in Jaunty, Please run the following command from a Terminal
(Applications->Accessories->T
Unfortunately it seems this bug is still an issue. Can you confirm this
issue exists with the most recent Jaunty Jackalope 9.04 release -
http://www.ubuntu.com/news/ubuntu-9.04-desktop . If the issue remains
in Jaunty, Please run the following command from a Terminal
(Applications->Accessories->T
Unfortunately it seems this bug is still an issue. Can you confirm this
issue exists with the most recent Jaunty Jackalope 9.04 release -
http://www.ubuntu.com/news/ubuntu-9.04-desktop . If the issue remains
in Jaunty, Please run the following command from a Terminal
(Applications->Accessories->T
Unfortunately it seems this bug is still an issue. Can you confirm this
issue exists with the most recent Jaunty Jackalope 9.04 release -
http://www.ubuntu.com/news/ubuntu-9.04-desktop . If the issue remains
in Jaunty, Please run the following command from a Terminal
(Applications->Accessories->T
Unfortunately it seems this bug is still an issue. Can you confirm this
issue exists with the most recent Jaunty Jackalope 9.04 release -
http://www.ubuntu.com/news/ubuntu-9.04-desktop . If the issue remains
in Jaunty, Please run the following command from a Terminal
(Applications->Accessories->T
Unfortunately it seems this bug is still an issue. Can you confirm this
issue exists with the most recent Jaunty Jackalope 9.04 release -
http://www.ubuntu.com/news/ubuntu-9.04-desktop . If the issue remains
in Jaunty, Please run the following command from a Terminal
(Applications->Accessories->T
Unfortunately it seems this bug is still an issue. Can you confirm this
issue exists with the most recent Jaunty Jackalope 9.04 release -
http://www.ubuntu.com/news/ubuntu-9.04-desktop . If the issue remains
in Jaunty, Please run the following command from a Terminal
(Applications->Accessories->T
** Tags added: needs-upstream-testing
--
Intel PRO/Wireless 4965 AGN deactivates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216634
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://
** Summary changed:
- 195980.117021 - cut here -
+ WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.32/kernel/power/suspend_test.c:53
suspend_test_finish+0x88/0x90()
--
WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.32/kernel/power/suspend_test.c:53
suspend_test_finish+0x88/0x90()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
** Tags added: suspend-test-finish
--
WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.32/kernel/power/suspend_test.c:53
suspend_test_finish+0x88/0x90()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/554505
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubunt
This bug report was marked as Triaged a while ago but has not had any
updated comments for quite some time. Please let us know if this issue
remains in the current Ubuntu release,
http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/download . If the issue remains, click
on the current status under the Status column
Hi davidfirth1,
The warning reported here typically indicates that it took longer for
your system to resume from suspend than expected. I believe there is a
5 sec barrier which your system likely exceeded. Based on your dmesg
output I see PM: resume devices took 8.104 seconds. A patch to preven
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 464552 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/464552
Hi Jeff,
The warning reported here typically indicates that it took longer for
your system to resume from suspend than expected. I believe there is a
5 sec barrier which your system likely exceeded. Typical
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 464552 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/464552
** Tags added: suspend-test-finish
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 464552
suspend_test_finish warning triggers too easily, increase timeout to match
mainline times
--
WARNING: at /build/b
Hi Christoph,
The warning reported here typically indicates that it took longer for
your system to resume from suspend than expected. I believe there is a
5 sec barrier which your system likely exceeded. Based on your dmesg
output I see PM: resume devices took 10.712 seconds. I'm setting this
t
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 464552 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/464552
Hi siknasa9,
The warning reported here typically indicates that it took longer for
your system to resume from suspend than expected. I believe there is a
5 sec barrier which your system likely exceeded. Typ
Hi elgabi-launchpad,
The warning reported here typically indicates that it took longer for
your system to resume from suspend than expected. I believe there is a
5 sec barrier which your system likely exceeded. Based on your dmesg
output I see PM: resume devices took 11.170 seconds. I'm setting
Hi Srikanth,
The warning reported here typically indicates that it took longer for
your system to resume from suspend than expected. I believe there is a
5 sec barrier which your system likely exceeded. Based on your dmesg
output I see PM: resume devices took 12.560 seconds. I'm setting this
to
Hi Laryllan,
The warning reported here typically indicates that it took longer for
your system to resume from suspend than expected. I believe there is a
5 sec barrier which your system likely exceeded. Based on your dmesg
output I see PM: resume devices took 10.170 seconds. I'm setting this
to
Hi jarek,
The warning reported here typically indicates that it took longer for
your system to resume from suspend than expected. I believe there is a
5 sec barrier which your system likely exceeded. Based on your dmesg
output I see PM: resume devices took 13.750 seconds. I'm setting this
to tr
Hi Thomas,
The warning reported here typically indicates that it took longer for
your system to resume from suspend than expected. I believe there is a
5 sec barrier which your system likely exceeded. Based on your dmesg
output I see PM: resume devices took 62.096 seconds. I'm setting this
to t
Hi SpooZ,
The warning reported here typically indicates that it took longer for
your system to resume from suspend than expected. I believe there is a
5 sec barrier which your system likely exceeded. Based on your dmesg
output I see PM: resume devices took 10.560 seconds. I'm setting this
to tr
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.32/kernel/power/suspend_test.c:53
suspend_test_finish+0x89/0x90()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/556886
You received this bug noti
Hi nannu,
The warning reported here typically indicates that it took longer for
your system to resume from suspend than expected. I believe there is a
5 sec barrier which your system likely exceeded. Based on your dmesg
output I see PM: resume devices took 33.584 seconds. I'm setting this
to tr
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 464552 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/464552
Hi Florin,
The warning reported here typically indicates that it took longer for
your system to resume from suspend than expected. I believe there is a
5 sec barrier which your system likely exceeded. Typic
Hi Kevin,
The warning reported here typically indicates that it took longer for
your system to resume from suspend than expected. I believe there is a
5 sec barrier which your system likely exceeded. Based on your dmesg
output I see PM: resume devices took 12.240 seconds. I'm setting this
to tr
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.32/kernel/power/suspend_test.c:53
suspend_test_finish+0x88/0x90()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/554505
You received this bug noti
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.32/kernel/power/suspend_test.c:53
suspend_test_finish 0x89/0x90()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/554344
You received this bug noti
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.32/kernel/power/suspend_test.c:53
suspend_test_finish+0x88/0x90()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/554243
You received this bug noti
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 464552 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/464552
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 464552
suspend_test_finish warning triggers too easily, increase timeout to match
mainline times
--
WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.32/kernel/power/susp
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
Touchpad unresponsive after suspend
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/519517
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscrib
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 464552 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/464552
Hi Luca,
The warning reported here typically indicates that it took longer for
your system to resume from suspend than expected. I believe there is a
5 sec barrier which your system likely exceeded. Typical
Hi Marita,
The warning reported here typically indicates that it took longer for
your system to resume from suspend than expected. I believe there is a
5 sec barrier which your system likely exceeded. Based on your dmesg
output I see PM: resume devices took 12.670 seconds. I'm setting this
to t
Hi fenixete,
The warning reported here typically indicates that it took longer for
your system to resume from suspend than expected. I believe there is a
5 sec barrier which your system likely exceeded. Based on your dmesg
output I see PM: resume devices took 12.610 seconds. I'm setting this
to
Hi G.,
The warning reported here typically indicates that it took longer for
your system to resume from suspend than expected. I believe there is a
5 sec barrier which your system likely exceeded. Based on your dmesg
output I see PM: resume devices took 11.668 seconds. I'm setting this
to traig
Hi ArcticTern,
The warning reported here typically indicates that it took longer for
your system to resume from suspend than expected. I believe there is a
5 sec barrier which your system likely exceeded. Based on your dmesg
output I see PM: resume devices took 11.640 seconds. I'm setting this
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 464552 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/464552
Hi Michael,
The warning reported here typically indicates that it took longer for
your system to resume from suspend than expected. I believe there is a
5 sec barrier which your system likely exceeded. Typi
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 464552 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/464552
Hi Michael,
The warning reported here typically indicates that it took longer for
your system to resume from suspend than expected. I believe there is a
5 sec barrier which your system likely exceeded. Typi
Hi Jeff,
The warning reported here typically indicates that it took longer for
your system to resume from suspend than expected. I believe there is a
5 sec barrier which your system likely exceeded. Based on your dmesg
output I see PM: resume devices took 11.156 seconds. I'm setting this
to tra
Hi AndyP79,
The warning reported here typically indicates that it took longer for
your system to resume from suspend than expected. I believe there is a
5 sec barrier which your system likely exceeded. Based on your dmesg
output I see PM: resume devices took 10.840 seconds. I'm setting this
to
Hi Rowan,
The warning reported here typically indicates that it took longer for
your system to resume from suspend than expected. I believe there is a
5 sec barrier which your system likely exceeded. Based on your dmesg
output I see PM: resume devices took 16.604 seconds. I'm setting this
to tr
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 464552 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/464552
Hi .salo,
The warning reported here typically indicates that it took longer for
your system to resume from suspend than expected. I believe there is a
5 sec barrier which your system likely exceeded. Typica
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 464552 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/464552
Hi tony,
The warning reported here typically indicates that it took longer for
your system to resume from suspend than expected. I believe there is a
5 sec barrier which your system likely exceeded. Typical
Hi Alan,
The warning reported here typically indicates that it took longer for
your system to resume from suspend than expected. I believe there is a
5 sec barrier which your system likely exceeded. Based on your dmesg
output I see PM: resume devices took 12.500 seconds. I'm setting this
to tra
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 464552 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/464552
Hi keredson,
The warning reported here typically indicates that it took longer for
your system to resume from suspend than expected. I believe there is a
5 sec barrier which your system likely exceeded. Bas
Hi Michal Pěnka,
I can tell you that we are aware of this issue, however, the kernel is
currently frozen for release. This particular bug is on my list for review and
will likely make it into the first SRU update of Lucid.
As Ricardo mentioned, the patch is not trivial and will need to be a
Hi balak,
If you could also please test the latest upstream kernel available that would
be great. It will allow additional upstream developers to examine the issue.
Refer to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds . Once you've tested the
upstream kernel, please remove the 'needs-upstre
** Tags added: kj-triage
--
ATK0110 ACPI not working
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/75507
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinf
Hi Guillaume,
If you could also please test the latest upstream kernel available that would
be great. It will allow additional upstream developers to examine the issue.
Refer to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds . Once you've tested the
upstream kernel, please remove the 'needs-up
** Tags added: kj-triage
--
continuously requesting b43legacy/ucode2.fw
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/250833
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu
** Tags added: kernel-sound
** Tags added: kj-triage
--
Headphone and Speakers are switched on Amilo Xi1526
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/71737
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@l
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
No Sound on Toshiba Laptop Model Satellite L30
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/155939
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bu
Ptitphysik,
Please open a new bug for your issue.
Thanks!
~JFo
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
Headphone and Speakers are switched on Amilo Xi1526
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/71737
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
ATK0110 ACPI not working
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/75507
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https
** Tags added: needs-kernel-logs
--
Wireless mouse stops working after a few minutes of operation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/304475
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubunt
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 197762
file transfers on USB flash key (pendrive) or USB HDD are slowing down with
time
--
copying files to an usb pandrive is slow and slows down in time (Lucid Lynx)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541937
You received this bug notification because
Ted,
I couldn't agree more. I'm not sure I fall into what you would call
"someone official in Ubuntu", but I am the Kernel Bug Triager. My stance on
these is to have reporters, with any deviation from the reported bug they think
is affecting them, file a new bug while subscribing to the bug
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 197762
file transfers on USB flash key (pendrive) or USB HDD are slowing down with
time
--
since Ubuntu karmic Filetransfer to some USB Drives got realy slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/500069
You received this bug notification because you are a
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 197762
file transfers on USB flash key (pendrive) or USB HDD are slowing down with
time
--
Ubuntu 9.10 USB Transfer extremely slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/493706
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whi
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 197762
file transfers on USB flash key (pendrive) or USB HDD are slowing down with
time
--
Extremely slow USB transfer in Ubuntu 9.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/479931
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 197762
file transfers on USB flash key (pendrive) or USB HDD are slowing down with
time
--
Pendrive copy is very slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/490112
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscri
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 197762
file transfers on USB flash key (pendrive) or USB HDD are slowing down with
time
--
USB transfer is very slow on Ubuntu 9.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/477843
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, wh
Hi alifdalya,
This bug was reported a while ago and there hasn't been any activity in it
recently. We were wondering if this is still an issue? Can you try with the
latest development release of Ubuntu? ISO CD images are available from
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/ .
If it remai
Hi Yann,
Please be sure to confirm this issue exists with the latest development release
of Ubuntu. ISO CD images are available from
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/ . If the issue remains, please run the
following command from a Terminal (Applications->Accessories->Terminal). It
will au
** Tags added: kernel-suspend
** Tags added: kj-triage
--
[ASUSTeK Computer Inc. F5VL] suspend/resume failure
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/35
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bug
Hi caspar_wrede,
This bug was reported a while ago and there hasn't been any activity in it
recently. We were wondering if this is still an issue? Can you try with the
latest development release of Ubuntu? ISO CD images are available from
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/ .
If it re
Hi Mss,
This bug was reported a while ago and there hasn't been any activity in it
recently. We were wondering if this is still an issue? Can you try with the
latest development release of Ubuntu? ISO CD images are available from
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/ .
If it remains an
** Tags added: kj-triage
--
Network card RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ not detected
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429530
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ub
1 - 100 of 22194 matches
Mail list logo
